Necrotic PulpNCT03059290
Incidence of Post-Operative Pain After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment in Necrotic Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems (Protaper Nex t& Neolix File)
A study testing neolix file in people with Necrotic Pulp, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
this prospective in vivo randomized clinical is to evaluate the post operative pain (incidence ,degree and duration) with multiple full rotation file (protaper next ®) and single full rotation file (Neolix®) in treating maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar with chronic pulpitis .Together with our aim from… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Necrotic Pulp
- What is being tested?
- neolix file
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 1 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Medically free patients.
- Patient's age (20-65) years old.
- Upper \&lower anterior and premolar teeth diagnosed clinically as necrotic teeth.
- Positive patient's acceptance for participation in the study.
- Sex includes both male and female.
- Patients who can understand Numerical Rating Scale.
- Patients able to sign informed consent.
Who cannot join
- • Pregnancy or lactation.
- Medically compromised patients.
- Patient with multiple teeth that required treatment to eliminate the possibility of pain referral.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
this prospective in vivo randomized clinical is to evaluate the post operative pain (incidence ,degree and duration) with multiple full rotation file (protaper next ®) and single full rotation file (Neolix®) in treating maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar with chronic pulpitis .Together with our aim from this trial ; we are trying to provide an evidence for the dentists in order to provide the best quality service with the least expenses and thus gaining the patients' trust and saving time, money and effort.
Read the detailed description
Interventions:
Using neolix file (Ori kam SAS,France)
Control:
Using Protaper next files (Dentsply ,Maillefer , Switzerland)
Treatment in all cases will be completed in one session as follows:
- Full medical and dental history using a schematic dental chart will be obtained from all patients treated during this study. Each tooth will be evaluated for vitality (sensitivity) of pulp tissues using electric pulp tester (Kerr, Analytic Technology Crop, Redmond, WA).
- Patient will be anesthetized; teeth will be isolated with rubber dam.
- Make access and working length will be determined using an electronic apex locator (Root ZX, J.Morita USA, Irvine, CA.) then confirmed with intraoral periapical radiograph, to be 0.5-1 mm, shorter than radiographic apex.
- Cleaning and shaping will be done using crown down preparation technique with rotary files either
- neolix file , first file used is C1 file size 25 taper 12% as orifice opener and for coronal flaring for 2/3 of canal length the A1 file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani ,Japan ) is loose or pass easily in the canal , but in case of K-file size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large file size 40 taper 4% either of them to the full working length to the full working length with (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with speed 300-500 rpm and torque 1.5 N.cm or
- protaper next in sequences by using Prepare straight line access to canal orifice. The ProTaper SX file may be used. Explore the canal using small-sized hand files, determine working length, verify patency and confirm a smooth, reproducible glide path. Always irrigate and if necessary, expand the glide path using small-sized hand files or dedicated mechanical glide path files. Path Files P1 and P2 are recommended. In the presence of NaOCl, brush and follow the glide path, with the PROTAPER NEXT™ X1 (017/04) file, in one or more passes until the working length is reached. Use PROTAPER NEXT X2 (025/06), exactly as described for PROTAPER NEXT X1 file, until the working length is passively reached. Gauge the foramen with a size 025 hand file and, if this file binds at length, the canal is shaped and ready for disinfection. If the size 025 hand file is loose at length, then continue shaping with the PROTAPER NEXT X3 (30/07) and, when necessary, the PROTAPER NEXT X4 (040/06) or PROTAPER NEXT X5 (050/06), gauging after each instrument with the 030, 040 or 050 hand files, respectively. During canal shaping, irrigate, recapitulate with a small-sized hand file after each sequential PROTAPER NEXT instrument, then re-irrigate. in an endodontic motor according to the manufacturer instructions (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with torque 2.0 N.cm and speed 300 rpm.
- The rotary files will be introduced inside the canal using EDTA gel "MD-Chelcream, META BIOMED CO.,LTD, Korea".
- The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3 ml of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. After instrumentation of the canals, paper points will be used for drying.
- Obturation will be carried out using gutta percha cones (25/0.6 or 40/0.4) Or Protaper next cones according to instrument used and canal size with resin sealer (ADSEAL, META BIOMED CO., LTD,Korea).After obturation a cotton pellet will be placed in the pulp chamber and the access cavity will be closed with a temporary filling to avoid coronal leakage. ((MD-Temp, META BIOMED CO., LTD, Korea).
- The patient is given a Numerical Rating Scale and asked to rate his pain level at 6, 12, 24 \& 48 hours after obturation.
- Conditions
- Necrotic Pulp
- Being tested
- neolix file
- Keywords
- post operative pain, Post operative flare ups, Post endodontic pain, Post endodontic flare ups, Necrotic teeth, Non vital teeth, Neolix file, Single rotating file, Protaper next file, Multiple rotating file, Single visit
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Pulp Necrosis, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
neolix fileDevice
first file used is C1 file size 25 taper 12% as orifice opener and for coronal flaring for 2/3 of canal length the A1 file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani ,Japan ) is loose or pass easily in the canal , but in case of K-file size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large file size 40 taper 4% either of them to the full working length to the full working length with (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with speed 300-500 rpm and torque 1.5 N.cm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| protaper next file | Active comparator | the PROTAPER NEXT™ X1 (017/04) file, in one or more passes until the working length is reached. Use PROTAPER NEXT X2 (025/06), exactly as described for PROTAPER NEXT X1 file, until the working length is passively reached. Gauge the foramen with a size 025 hand file and, if this file binds at length, the canal is shaped and ready for disinfection. If the size 025 hand file is loose at length, then continue shaping with the PROTAPER NEXT X3 (30/07) and, when necessary, the PROTAPER NEXT X4 (040/06) or PROTAPER NEXT X5 (050/06), gauging after each instrument with the 030, 040 or 050 hand files, respectively. During canal shaping, irrigate, recapitulate with a small-sized hand file after each sequential PROTAPER NEXT instrument, then re-irrigate. in an endodontic motor according to the manufacturer instructions (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with torque 2.0 N.cm and speed 300 rpm. Receives: Device: neolix file |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Measured: 6 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Measured: 12 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Measured: 24 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Measured: 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Necrotic PulpStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, karim ahmed abdallah el nahas, Cairo University
- Investigators
- nehal nabil, assistant professor, Study chair, faculty of oral and dental medicine - cairo university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03059290
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEBC-CE-2017-01-15
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incidence of Post-Operative Pain After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment in Necrotic Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems (Protaper Nex t& Neolix File)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03059290
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEBC-CE-2017-01-15
- Conditions
- Necrotic Pulp
- Keywords
- post operative pain, Post operative flare ups, Post endodontic pain, Post endodontic flare ups, Necrotic teeth, Non vital teeth, Neolix file, Single rotating file
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
this prospective in vivo randomized clinical is to evaluate the post operative pain (incidence ,degree and duration) with multiple full rotation file (protaper next ®) and single full rotation file (Neolix®) in treating maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar with chronic pulpitis .Together with our aim from this trial ; we are trying to provide an evidence for the dentists in order to provide the best quality service with the least expenses and thus gaining the patients' trust and saving time, money and effort.
Detailed description
Interventions:
Using neolix file (Ori kam SAS,France)
Control:
Using Protaper next files (Dentsply ,Maillefer , Switzerland)
Treatment in all cases will be completed in one session as follows:
- Full medical and dental history using a schematic dental chart will be obtained from all patients treated during this study. Each tooth will be evaluated for vitality (sensitivity) of pulp tissues using electric pulp tester (Kerr, Analytic Technology Crop, Redmond, WA).
- Patient will be anesthetized; teeth will be isolated with rubber dam.
- Make access and working length will be determined using an electronic apex locator (Root ZX, J.Morita USA, Irvine, CA.) then confirmed with intraoral periapical radiograph, to be 0.5-1 mm, shorter than radiographic apex.
- Cleaning and shaping will be done using crown down preparation technique with rotary files either
- neolix file , first file used is C1 file size 25 taper 12% as orifice opener and for coronal flaring for 2/3 of canal length the A1 file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani ,Japan ) is loose or pass easily in the canal , but in case of K-file size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large file size 40 taper 4% either of them to the full working length to the full working length with (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with speed 300-500 rpm and torque 1.5 N.cm or
- protaper next in sequences by using Prepare straight line access to canal orifice. The ProTaper SX file may be used. Explore the canal using small-sized hand files, determine working length, verify patency and confirm a smooth, reproducible glide path. Always irrigate and if necessary, expand the glide path using small-sized hand files or dedicated mechanical glide path files. Path Files P1 and P2 are recommended. In the presence of NaOCl, brush and follow the glide path, with the PROTAPER NEXT™ X1 (017/04) file, in one or more passes until the working length is reached. Use PROTAPER NEXT X2 (025/06), exactly as described for PROTAPER NEXT X1 file, until the working length is passively reached. Gauge the foramen with a size 025 hand file and, if this file binds at length, the canal is shaped and ready for disinfection. If the size 025 hand file is loose at length, then continue shaping with the PROTAPER NEXT X3 (30/07) and, when necessary, the PROTAPER NEXT X4 (040/06) or PROTAPER NEXT X5 (050/06), gauging after each instrument with the 030, 040 or 050 hand files, respectively. During canal shaping, irrigate, recapitulate with a small-sized hand file after each sequential PROTAPER NEXT instrument, then re-irrigate. in an endodontic motor according to the manufacturer instructions (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with torque 2.0 N.cm and speed 300 rpm.
- The rotary files will be introduced inside the canal using EDTA gel "MD-Chelcream, META BIOMED CO.,LTD, Korea".
- The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3 ml of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. After instrumentation of the canals, paper points will be used for drying.
- Obturation will be carried out using gutta percha cones (25/0.6 or 40/0.4) Or Protaper next cones according to instrument used and canal size with resin sealer (ADSEAL, META BIOMED CO., LTD,Korea).After obturation a cotton pellet will be placed in the pulp chamber and the access cavity will be closed with a temporary filling to avoid coronal leakage. ((MD-Temp, META BIOMED CO., LTD, Korea).
- The patient is given a Numerical Rating Scale and asked to rate his pain level at 6, 12, 24 \& 48 hours after obturation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| protaper next file | Active comparator | Device: neolix filethe PROTAPER NEXT™ X1 (017/04) file, in one or more passes until the working length is reached. Use PROTAPER NEXT X2 (025/06), exactly as described for PROTAPER NEXT X1 file, until the working length is passively reached. Gauge the foramen with a size 025 hand file and, if this file binds at length, the canal is shaped and ready for disinfection. If the size 025 hand file is loose at length, then continue shaping with the PROTAPER NEXT X3 (30/07) and, when necessary, the PROTAPER NEXT X4 (040/06) or PROTAPER NEXT X5 (050/06), gauging after each instrument with the 030, 040 or 050 hand files, respectively. During canal shaping, irrigate, recapitulate with a small-sized hand file after each sequential PROTAPER NEXT instrument, then re-irrigate. in an endodontic motor according to the manufacturer instructions (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with torque 2.0 N.cm and speed 300 rpm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Medically free patients.
- Patient's age (20-65) years old.
- Upper \&lower anterior and premolar teeth diagnosed clinically as necrotic teeth.
- Positive patient's acceptance for participation in the study.
- Sex includes both male and female.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- • Pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| neolix filefirst file used is C1 file size 25 taper 12% as orifice opener and for coronal flaring for 2/3 of canal length the A1 file size 25 taper 8% in narrow or curved canals if size 10 K file (Mani ,Japan ) is loose or pass easily in the canal , but in case of K-file size 20 loose in the canal so we choose large file size 40 taper 4% either of them to the full working length to the full working length with (X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA.), with speed 300-500 rpm and torque 1.5 N.cm | Device | protaper next file |
Primary outcome
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Time frame: 6 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Time frame: 12 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Time frame: 24 hours
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation
Time frame: 48 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
Related trials for Necrotic Pulp
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruiting
PRP-Assisted Regenerative Endodontics Versus Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Mature Necrotic Teeth
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Continuous Rotation Versus Reciprocation Motion of MG3 Blue Rotary File on Postoperative Pain and Intracanal Bacterial Reduction of Teeth With Necrotic Pulps.
Necrotic Pulps With no Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Inflammatory Outcomes of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Mature Necrotic Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis.
Chronic Apical Periodontitis, Pulp Necrosis
Recruiting
Conventional and Nano-Metronidazole Irrigation With/Without Activation in Necrotic Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
nehal nabil, assistant professor study chair
faculty of oral and dental medicine - cairo university
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing neolix file in people with Necrotic Pulp, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact karim ahmed nahas, master degree candidate (+201006300519, karimnahas34@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the Incidence of postoperative pain in root canal treatment with necrotic tooth after obturation (time frame: 6 hours). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.