AzTrials
AzTrials

Sleep Apnea SyndromesNCT03061071

The POSAtive Study: Study for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea

A study testing NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) and Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) in people with Sleep Apnea Syndromes, run by NightBalance at 11 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
What is being tested?
NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) and Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
117 participants
Where
11 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Mar 2017to 12 Jul 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is between the ages of 20 and 80.
  • Diagnosis of POSA meeting all the following criteria per in-lab control PSG (performed within 3 months of screening):
  • Total AHI >15, or AHI >10 and <15 with ESS >10
  • Supine AHI at least twice the non-supine AHI
  • Non-supine AHI <10 (<5 in mild patients)
  • Supine time >40% and <60%
  • Subject understands the study protocol and is willing and able to comply with study requirements and sign informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Prior surgery to treat OSA (such as UPPP), or prior or current therapy or treatment for OSA, with the exception of PAP being used for split night PSG only.
  • A female of child-bearing potential that is pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
  • Any unstable or severe medical condition of any organ system including congestive heart failure, COPD, renal failure, neuromuscular disease, or at the discretion of the site Principal Investigator (PI).
  • Taking medication that may affect sleep, sleepiness, or alertness including hypnotics, sedatives, alerting agents, stimulants, opiates, sedating antidepressants, and anticonvulsants.
  • Oxygen use.
  • The presence of any other sleep disorder (central sleep apnea (CSA >5), periodic limb movement disorder (PLMAI >15), clinical diagnosis of insomnia or narcolepsy).
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (>21 drinks/week).
  • The use of any illegal drug(s).
  • Night or rotating shift work.
  • Severe claustrophobia.
  • Shoulder, neck, or back complaints that restrict sleeping position.
  • Subject requires use of more than 2 pillows under the head while sleeping or sleeps in a bed/chair with raised upper body position.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

United States11 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Sleep Disorders Center of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35213

  • St. Luke's Sleep Medicine and Research Center

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017

  • Center for Sleep and Wake Disorders

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • SleepMed of South Carolina

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29201

  • Med One Sleep

    Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304

  • Sleep Disorders at Magnolia Park

    Gainesville, Florida, 32606

  • Sleep Med Inc., AZ

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Kentucky Research Group

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40218

  • Clayton Sleep Institute

    Maplewood, Missouri, 63143

  • Pearl Clinical Research

    Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of the NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) Compared to Automatic Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA)

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA).

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of POSA.

The Primary Objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of treatment with the SPT as compared to APAP.

Being tested
NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT), Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)
Keywords
Positional Sleep Apnea, Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea, POSA, OSA, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep Apnea
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT)Device

    Subject to sleep with the SPT for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.

  • Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)Device

    Subject to sleep with the APAP for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.

Study groups in NCT03061071
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Randomized to SPT First: APAP SecondExperimentalRandomized to order of treatment (SPT first or APAP first) for a total of 6 weeks home use with each treatment.
Receives: Device: NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT); Device: Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)
Randomized to APAP First: SPT SecondExperimentalRandomized to order of treatment (APAP first or SPT first) for a total of 6 weeks home use with each treatment.
Receives: Device: NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT); Device: Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adherence (minutes of device use per night)

    Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (calculated by number of minutes of objective device use per night)

    Measured: 6 week

  2. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI, events/hr)

    Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (measured by events/hr during in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

    SPT vs. APAP

    Measured: 6 week

  2. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)

    SPT vs. APAP

    Measured: 6 week

  3. SF-36

    SPT vs. APAP

    Measured: 6 week

  4. Patient Satisfaction (Comfort, Satisfaction) assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    SPT vs. APAP

    Measured: 6 week

  5. Oxygen Desaturation Index (3%)

    SPT vs. APAP

    Measured: 6 week

  6. Total Sleep Time (minutes)

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  7. Sleep Onset Latency (minutes)

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  8. Sleep Efficiency (%)

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  9. Arousal Index

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  10. Sleep Stages (%)

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  11. Sleep Position (%)

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

    Measured: 6 week

  12. Mean Disease Alleviation (MDA) (%)

    SPT vs. APAP (MDA (%) is calculated by the product of the objective adherence (from SPT and APAP download), adjusted for total sleep time (X-axis), combined with therapeutic efficacy (AHI from the respective treatment night, Y-axis), divided by 100.)

    Measured: 6 weeks

  13. Adverse Events

    SPT vs. APAP, frequency, seriousness, severity and device relationship will be summarized.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2017
  2. Study start1 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion12 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion12 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
6 week crossover study, randomized to order of treatment
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
117 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03061071
Sponsor's protocol ID
US-2017-001
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
13 Feb 2017
Last updated
21 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Berry RB, Uhles ML, Abaluck BK, Winslow DH, Schweitzer PK, Gaskins RA Jr, Doekel RC Jr, Emsellem HA. NightBalance Sleep Position Treatment Device Versus Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 15;15(7):947-956. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7868.

    PubMed 31383231

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) and Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) in people with Sleep Apnea Syndromes, run by NightBalance at 11 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adherence (minutes of device use per night) (time frame: 6 week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03061071, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in