Bladder CancerNCT03065725
Early Versus Late FDG-PET/CT in Bladder Cancer
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen at 2 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to examine if late FDG-PET/CT images after intravenous FDG injection has a higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting local lymph node metastases in patients with muscle invasive BC than FDG-PET/CT images 60 minutes after FDG injection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- late FDG
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 179 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2017to 1 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with bladder cancer scheduled for cystectomy
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with BC who are candidates for cystectomy and undergo cystectomy with lymph node dissection or have a needle biopsy of at least one FDG-PET/CT local lymph node suspected for malignancy following the FDG-PET/CT due to their BC.
Who cannot join
- Patients who have received chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in the timespan between the FDG-PET/CT and the needle biopsy or the lymph node dissection.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Denmark2 sites
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200
Hospital of West Jutland
Holstebro, Danmark, 7500
About this study
Official title: Is Late FDG-PET/CT Imaging Better Than Early FDG-PET/CT Imaging to Distinguish Between Malign and Inflammatory Changes in Lymph Nodes in Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Scheduled for Radical Cystectomy?
The aim of this study is to examine if late FDG-PET/CT images after intravenous FDG injection has a higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting local lymph node metastases in patients with muscle invasive BC than FDG-PET/CT images 60 minutes after FDG injection. The latter procedure has been used routinely until now.
Read the detailed description
Background: Approximately 900 patients are diagnosed with invasive bladder cancer (BC) in Denmark each year. Approximately 50% are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive BC (T1) and approximately 50% are diagnosed with a muscle invasive BC (T2-4). Male-female ratio is 75% - 25% and the median age among all diagnosed patients at time of diagnose is 73 years (range 32 - 98) (national data from September 1st 2014 to august 31st 2015).1 One third of all diagnosed patients will be treated with surgical removal of the urinary bladder, radical cystectomy (RC). Additional 14% will receive curative intended radiotherapy. At the Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, approximately 120 patients will be treated with RC due to BC every year.
2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) - positron emission tomography (PET) /computed tomography (CT) is standard for primary staging at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, when evaluating patients with muscle invasive BC before radical curative intended treatment.
Evaluation of disease stage is done by investigation for lymph node metastasis and non-local metastases separately.
FDG is a radioactively marked glucose analogue used as a tracer for cells with high glucose uptake. The uptake of glucose in most malignant cells are much greater than the glucose uptake in normal cells. Because of this, FDG can be used as a tracer in the diagnosis of cancers and hereby also BC. However, FDG is not a cancer specific tracer. Cells of the immune system like neutrophil leucocytes, macrophages and lymphocytes also have high glucose uptake and thus, high FDG uptake. Being a glucose analogue, the uptake of FDG in the cells is similar to the uptake of glucose by, the transport protein GLUT-1. Inside the cells FDG is phosphorylated into FDG-6-phosphate by the enzyme hexokinase. FDG-6-phosphate is not metabolized further and is trapped inside the cells. Malignant cells have a tendency to up-regulate both GLUT-1 and hexokinase which results in increase FDG uptake in cancer cells. Hereby optimizing imagine of primary tumour and possible metastasis but also possible inflammatory changes.
After intravenous injection of FDG, the distribution of FDG in the body can be visualized by performing a PET-scan. FDG-PET has a high sensitivity in detecting even small malignant changes but is not very specific to show the anatomical localization of these changes. Thus, the FDG-PET is combined with a CT-scan, which has a high sensitivity in anatomical localization. Hybrid PET/CT scanners are now widely used for imaging.
International studies have shown that FDG-PET/CT is superior to CT and magnetic resonance (MR) alone in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with BC.2,3
Aim: The aim of this study is to examine if late FDG-PET/CT images after intravenous FDG injection has a higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting local lymph node metastases in patients with muscle invasive BC than FDG-PET/CT images 60 minutes after FDG injection. The latter procedure has been routinely until now.
Hypothesis: FDG-PET/CT after 180 minutes post injection (PI) will have a higher specificity than FDG-PET/CT after 60 minutes PI regarding differentiation between local lymph node metastasis and benign inflammatory changes in local lymph nodes when evaluating patients with muscle invasive BC before radical treatment.
Method: 200 consecutive patients diagnosed with muscle invasive BC and candidate for radical cystectomy will be examined with an FDG-PET/CT scan as primary staging for evaluation of local lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. In our standard procedure, the patient is given intravenous FDG and will rest for 30 minutes and after 60 minutes a PET/CT-scan will be performed. The PET/CT scan will be performed over the course of 25-40 minutes. In this study, the included patients will have an additional PET/CT (low dose)-scan of the pelvic area performed 180 minutes PI.
The FDG-PET/CT scans will be evaluated by a experienced specialist in nuclear medicine together with a experienced specialist in radiology. SUVmax values of regional lymph nodes on early and late images will be compared with histology of removed lymph nodes.
Lymph node dissection during cystectomy will be performed according to an extended template with the aortic bifurcation as the proximal limit. Lymph nodes or lymph node packages that are FDG-positive on the preoperative PET/CT will be send marked separately for pathological evaluation if possible. All dissected lymph nodes will undergo pathological evaluation.
Histological evaluation will be performed by a specialist from the Institute of Pathology on histological tissue either from a needle biopsy or from dissected lymph nodes at the time of cystectomy.
The study will take place between the 1th of January 2017 and until a total of 100 patients are included, which is expected to be by the end of 2018.
Ethical aspects:
Patients included in this study will only receive small additional radiation dose (1-1 1/2 mSv) due to the extra low dose CT of the pelvic area. The patients will not receive further radiation dose from FDG. The patients will have a longer stay at The Department of Nuclear \& PET Center due to the extra PET/CT scan 2 hours after the first PET/CT scan. Duration of the extra scan of the pelvic area is 6-8 min. The radiation dose from the standard FDG PET/CT in bladder cancer is 18-28 mSv.
The regional ethics committee of Central Denmark Region was notified of the study. They considered this to be quality assurance and hence had no objections to the performance of the study.
After one year inclusion preliminary results will be evaluated. It is expected that 50 patients will be included by this time.
Perspectives: As of today it is common practice that all patients who are found possibly suitable for cystectomy due to BC will get an FDG-PET/CT performed prior to treatment to evaluate their disease stage. The sensitivity for FDG-PET/CT in detecting malignant local lymph nodes is high. The specificity, however, is invert proportional depending on SUVmax cut-off. If a method of improving the specificity could be found this would mean a significant difference for some of the patients who may get a better treatment due to their BC with lower mortality over time.
If the study finds that PET scan 180 minutes after FDG injection has a higher specificity in detecting malign local lymph nodes in patients with BC than PET scan after 60 minutes, we will change our procedure according to this. As a consequence, it will be better to evaluate the BC patients prior to potential curative treatment.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- late FDG
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
late FDGProcedure or surgery
In addition to regular FDG-PET/CT 60 minutes post injection, an extra scan 180 minutes post injection is made.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient with preoperatively detection of metastasis in lymph nodes
Number of patients with metastasis proven in lymph nodes by preoperative PET/CT
Measured: baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2017
- Study start1 Feb 2017
- Primary completion13 Aug 2019
- Study completion1 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03065725
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PETCT2
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 31 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is Late FDG-PET/CT Imaging Better Than Early FDG-PET/CT Imaging to Distinguish Between Malign and Inflammatory Changes in Lymph Nodes in Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Scheduled for Radical Cystectomy?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03065725
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETCT2
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jørgen Bjerggaard JensenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to examine if late FDG-PET/CT images after intravenous FDG injection has a higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting local lymph node metastases in patients with muscle invasive BC than FDG-PET/CT images 60 minutes after FDG injection. The latter procedure has been used routinely until now.
Detailed description
Background: Approximately 900 patients are diagnosed with invasive bladder cancer (BC) in Denmark each year. Approximately 50% are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive BC (T1) and approximately 50% are diagnosed with a muscle invasive BC (T2-4). Male-female ratio is 75% - 25% and the median age among all diagnosed patients at time of diagnose is 73 years (range 32 - 98) (national data from September 1st 2014 to august 31st 2015).1 One third of all diagnosed patients will be treated with surgical removal of the urinary bladder, radical cystectomy (RC). Additional 14% will receive curative intended radiotherapy. At the Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, approximately 120 patients will be treated with RC due to BC every year.
2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) - positron emission tomography (PET) /computed tomography (CT) is standard for primary staging at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, when evaluating patients with muscle invasive BC before radical curative intended treatment.
Evaluation of disease stage is done by investigation for lymph node metastasis and non-local metastases separately.
FDG is a radioactively marked glucose analogue used as a tracer for cells with high glucose uptake. The uptake of glucose in most malignant cells are much greater than the glucose uptake in normal cells. Because of this, FDG can be used as a tracer in the diagnosis of cancers and hereby also BC. However, FDG is not a cancer specific tracer. Cells of the immune system like neutrophil leucocytes, macrophages and lymphocytes also have high glucose uptake and thus, high FDG uptake. Being a glucose analogue, the uptake of FDG in the cells is similar to the uptake of glucose by, the transport protein GLUT-1. Inside the cells FDG is phosphorylated into FDG-6-phosphate by the enzyme hexokinase. FDG-6-phosphate is not metabolized further and is trapped inside the cells. Malignant cells have a tendency to up-regulate both GLUT-1 and hexokinase which results in increase FDG uptake in cancer cells. Hereby optimizing imagine of primary tumour and possible metastasis but also possible inflammatory changes.
After intravenous injection of FDG, the distribution of FDG in the body can be visualized by performing a PET-scan. FDG-PET has a high sensitivity in detecting even small malignant changes but is not very specific to show the anatomical localization of these changes. Thus, the FDG-PET is combined with a CT-scan, which has a high sensitivity in anatomical localization. Hybrid PET/CT scanners are now widely used for imaging.
International studies have shown that FDG-PET/CT is superior to CT and magnetic resonance (MR) alone in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with BC.2,3
Aim: The aim of this study is to examine if late FDG-PET/CT images after intravenous FDG injection has a higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting local lymph node metastases in patients with muscle invasive BC than FDG-PET/CT images 60 minutes after FDG injection. The latter procedure has been routinely until now.
Hypothesis: FDG-PET/CT after 180 minutes post injection (PI) will have a higher specificity than FDG-PET/CT after 60 minutes PI regarding differentiation between local lymph node metastasis and benign inflammatory changes in local lymph nodes when evaluating patients with muscle invasive BC before radical treatment.
Method: 200 consecutive patients diagnosed with muscle invasive BC and candidate for radical cystectomy will be examined with an FDG-PET/CT scan as primary staging for evaluation of local lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. In our standard procedure, the patient is given intravenous FDG and will rest for 30 minutes and after 60 minutes a PET/CT-scan will be performed. The PET/CT scan will be performed over the course of 25-40 minutes. In this study, the included patients will have an additional PET/CT (low dose)-scan of the pelvic area performed 180 minutes PI.
The FDG-PET/CT scans will be evaluated by a experienced specialist in nuclear medicine together with a experienced specialist in radiology. SUVmax values of regional lymph nodes on early and late images will be compared with histology of removed lymph nodes.
Lymph node dissection during cystectomy will be performed according to an extended template with the aortic bifurcation as the proximal limit. Lymph nodes or lymph node packages that are FDG-positive on the preoperative PET/CT will be send marked separately for pathological evaluation if possible. All dissected lymph nodes will undergo pathological evaluation.
Histological evaluation will be performed by a specialist from the Institute of Pathology on histological tissue either from a needle biopsy or from dissected lymph nodes at the time of cystectomy.
The study will take place between the 1th of January 2017 and until a total of 100 patients are included, which is expected to be by the end of 2018.
Ethical aspects:
Patients included in this study will only receive small additional radiation dose (1-1 1/2 mSv) due to the extra low dose CT of the pelvic area. The patients will not receive further radiation dose from FDG. The patients will have a longer stay at The Department of Nuclear \& PET Center due to the extra PET/CT scan 2 hours after the first PET/CT scan. Duration of the extra scan of the pelvic area is 6-8 min. The radiation dose from the standard FDG PET/CT in bladder cancer is 18-28 mSv.
The regional ethics committee of Central Denmark Region was notified of the study. They considered this to be quality assurance and hence had no objections to the performance of the study.
After one year inclusion preliminary results will be evaluated. It is expected that 50 patients will be included by this time.
Perspectives: As of today it is common practice that all patients who are found possibly suitable for cystectomy due to BC will get an FDG-PET/CT performed prior to treatment to evaluate their disease stage. The sensitivity for FDG-PET/CT in detecting malignant local lymph nodes is high. The specificity, however, is invert proportional depending on SUVmax cut-off. If a method of improving the specificity could be found this would mean a significant difference for some of the patients who may get a better treatment due to their BC with lower mortality over time.
If the study finds that PET scan 180 minutes after FDG injection has a higher specificity in detecting malign local lymph nodes in patients with BC than PET scan after 60 minutes, we will change our procedure according to this. As a consequence, it will be better to evaluate the BC patients prior to potential curative treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with bladder cancer scheduled for cystectomy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with BC who are candidates for cystectomy and undergo cystectomy with lymph node dissection or have a needle biopsy of at least one FDG-PET/CT local lymph node suspected for malignancy following the FDG-PET/CT due to their BC.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who have received chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in the timespan between the FDG-PET/CT and the needle biopsy or the lymph node dissection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| late FDGIn addition to regular FDG-PET/CT 60 minutes post injection, an extra scan 180 minutes post injection is made. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Patient with preoperatively detection of metastasis in lymph nodes
Time frame: baseline
Number of patients with metastasis proven in lymph nodes by preoperative PET/CT
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen at 2 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient with preoperatively detection of metastasis in lymph nodes (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2023.