Colorectal NeoplasmsB-ADENOMANCT03072472
BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities
A study testing Endocuff Vision in people with Colorectal Neoplasms and Colonic Polyp, run by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust at 16 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess the effect, if any, on the adenoma detection rate of BowelScope bowel cancer screening flexible sigmoidoscopies by using the Endocuff Vision device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 61 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyp, Adenoma
- What is being tested?
- Endocuff Vision
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,221 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 14 Feb 2017to 13 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 61 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and over
- Referral for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Ability to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Absolute contraindications to flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Established or suspicion of large bowel obstruction or pseudo-obstruction
- Known colon cancer or polyposis syndromes
- Known colonic strictures
- Known severe diverticular segment (that is likely to impede sigmoidoscope passage)
- Patients with known active colitis (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's colitis, diverticulitis, infective colitis)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients lacking capacity to give informed consent
- Patients who are on clopidogrel, warfarin, or other new generation anticoagulants which have not been stopped for the procedure as these will preclude polyp removal
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom16 sites
Bolton NHS Foundation Trust
Bolton
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cheltenham, GL53 7AN
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Trust
Dorchester
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
Durham, DH1 5TW
University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust
Kendal, LA9 7RG
Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust
Kettering, NN16 8UZ
North West London Hospitals NHS Trust
London, HA1 3UJ
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
North Shields, NE29 8NH
Oxford Health NHS Trust
Oxford, OX3 9DU
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Portsmouth, PO6 3LY
Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Rochdale, OL12 0NB
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield, S5 7AU
South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust
South Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE34 0PL
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust
Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 8PE
West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Watford
The Royal Wolverhamptom NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
About this study
This study aims to assess the effect, if any, on the adenoma detection rate of BowelScope bowel cancer screening flexible sigmoidoscopies by using the Endocuff Vision device.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer in the UK with 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Most CRCs arise from the adenoma-carcinoma sequence which is a process that can take up to 10 years. Population screening programmes allow for earlier detection and removal of adenomas that may become malignant over time thus reducing CRC mortality. The English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) programme began in 2013 and invites adults aged 55 and above for a one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy. The aim of the BSS programme is to reduce CRC development via the adenoma-carcinoma sequence through the detection and removal of adenomas from the left side of the colon. A large UK study has shown that offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy screening with adenoma clearance to adults aged 55-64 years reduced CRC incidence by 23% and mortality by 31%. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important marker of mucosal visualisation and is a surrogate marker of high quality colonoscopy. Data from colonoscopy studies have illustrated that a 1% increase in ADR is associated with a 3% decrease in interval colorectal cancer. In the BSS programme, ADR is comparatively lower the that shown in the initial sigmoidoscopy screening trials with a wide variation between endoscopists. Another marker that is often used is adenoma miss rates which also demonstrate a wide variation in clinical practice. Reasons for lesions not being detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy can be extrapolated from colonoscopy data and include; suboptimal technique; shorter withdrawal time; inadequate bowel preparation; presence of flat, depressed or subtle lesions; and the inability to visualise the proximal side of haustral folds, flexures (blind spots) and rectal valves. With the aid of the colonoscopic cuff Endocuff Vision®, the investigators aim to improve visualisation of the colonic mucosa by flattening colonic folds and manipulating them away from the field of forward view the investigators hypothesise that the Endocuff Vision® will improve adenoma detection rates by providing better fold retraction, a wider field of view and better scope tip stabilisation. This clinical randomised study will be conducted in subjects referred and scheduled for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy via the NHS English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) Programme and will compare Endocuff Vision®-Assisted Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (EAFS) with Standard Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (SFS).
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyp, Adenoma, Neoplasia GI, Digestive System Neoplasms, Intestinal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Endocuff Vision
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Endoscopy, Screening, Colonic Adenoma, Adenoma Detection Rate, Endocuff, Endocuff Vision
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Adenoma, Digestive System Neoplasms, Intestinal Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Digestive System Diseases, Intestinal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endocuff VisionDevice
The EndocuffTM (ARC Medical Design Ltd and Diagmed, UK) is a device (CE marked in UK) made of a soft plastic material with a unique dynamic shape. Endocuff Vision™ is placed snugly around the colonoscope tip prior to insertion. It does not project beyond the tip of the scope, providing an unrestricted view. It helps anchor the scope tip against the bowel wall to provide a stable platform of access. The soft, elastic projections are pushed back (recoiled) towards the scope shaft during insertion but evert during withdrawal to hold colon folds away from the field of view.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endocuff-assisted Flexible Sigmoidoscopy | Experimental | Patients in this arm will receive their screening sigmoidoscopy with the Endocuff Vision in situ on the scope Receives: Device: Endocuff Vision |
| Standard Flexible Sigmoidoscopy | No intervention | Patients in this arm will receive their screening sigmoidoscopy without the Endocuff on the scope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adenoma Detection Rate
Proportion of examinations expressed as a percentage where at least one adenoma is found
Measured: Day of procedure
Secondary outcomes (12)
Mean adenomas detected per procedure
Number of adenomas found in each procedure
Measured: Day of procedure
Rate of cuff exchange
How often the cuff is removed
Measured: Day of procedure
Non-inferiority of complete withdrawal time in procedures where no polyps are detected
Length of procedure in minutes and seconds
Measured: Day of procedure
Compare overall procedure time between groups
Length of procedure in minutes and seconds
Measured: Day of procedure
Measure differences in ADR accounting for patient procedure based variables (e.g. accounting for extent of examination and bowel preparation).
Proportion of examinations expressed as a percentage where at least one adenoma is found
Measured: Day of procedure
Compare the rate of discovered cancers between groups
Number of cancers found
Measured: On histology check 48-72 hours post procedure
Examination extent between groups based on presumed anatomical location with a straight endoscope
Anatomical location
Measured: Day of procedure
Examination extent between groups based on distance of insertion in centimetres with a straight endoscope
Depth of insertion in centimetres
Measured: Day of procedure
Patient satisfaction between groups using the Gloucester scale of assessment of patient comfort
Numerical 4 point patient comfort score
Measured: Day of procedure
Identify any difference in future colonoscopic workload produced by increased ADR in terms of number of patients referred for full colonoscopy between the EAFS and SFS groups.
Number of additional colonoscopies required
Measured: Day of procedure
Compare the ADR of the first 20% of patients scoped by each colonoscopist with the last 20% of patients in each arm to identify any changes in ADR to assess any learning curve effect.
Proportion of examinations expressed as a percentage where at least one adenoma is found
Measured: 18 months
Compare the baseline ADR of each colonoscopist prior to trial recruitment with their individual ADR in patients where EndocuffTM Vision was not used.
Proportion of examinations expressed as a percentage where at least one adenoma is found
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2017
- Study start14 Feb 2017
- Primary completion13 Feb 2018
- Study completion13 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 3,221 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ARC Medical Design Ltd, Norgine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Colin J Rees, MBBS MRCP FRCP, Principal investigator, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03072472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B-ADENOMA
- Acronym
- B-ADENOMA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rees CJ, Brand A, Ngu WS, Stokes C, Hoare Z, Totton N, Bhandari P, Sharp L, Bastable A, Rutter MD, Verma AM, Lee TJ, Walls M; B-ADENOMA trial group comprises. BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using Endocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities (the B-ADENOMA Study): a multicentre, randomised controlled flexible sigmoidoscopy trial. Gut. 2020 Nov;69(11):1959-1965. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319621. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
PubMed 32245908
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using ENdocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03072472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B-ADENOMA / B-ADENOMA
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyp, Adenoma, Neoplasia GI, Digestive System Neoplasms, Intestinal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Endoscopy, Screening, Colonic Adenoma, Adenoma Detection Rate, Endocuff, Endocuff Vision
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,221 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ARC Medical Design Ltd, Norgine
- Study start
- 14 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess the effect, if any, on the adenoma detection rate of BowelScope bowel cancer screening flexible sigmoidoscopies by using the Endocuff Vision device.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer in the UK with 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Most CRCs arise from the adenoma-carcinoma sequence which is a process that can take up to 10 years. Population screening programmes allow for earlier detection and removal of adenomas that may become malignant over time thus reducing CRC mortality. The English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) programme began in 2013 and invites adults aged 55 and above for a one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy. The aim of the BSS programme is to reduce CRC development via the adenoma-carcinoma sequence through the detection and removal of adenomas from the left side of the colon. A large UK study has shown that offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy screening with adenoma clearance to adults aged 55-64 years reduced CRC incidence by 23% and mortality by 31%. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important marker of mucosal visualisation and is a surrogate marker of high quality colonoscopy. Data from colonoscopy studies have illustrated that a 1% increase in ADR is associated with a 3% decrease in interval colorectal cancer. In the BSS programme, ADR is comparatively lower the that shown in the initial sigmoidoscopy screening trials with a wide variation between endoscopists. Another marker that is often used is adenoma miss rates which also demonstrate a wide variation in clinical practice. Reasons for lesions not being detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy can be extrapolated from colonoscopy data and include; suboptimal technique; shorter withdrawal time; inadequate bowel preparation; presence of flat, depressed or subtle lesions; and the inability to visualise the proximal side of haustral folds, flexures (blind spots) and rectal valves. With the aid of the colonoscopic cuff Endocuff Vision®, the investigators aim to improve visualisation of the colonic mucosa by flattening colonic folds and manipulating them away from the field of forward view the investigators hypothesise that the Endocuff Vision® will improve adenoma detection rates by providing better fold retraction, a wider field of view and better scope tip stabilisation. This clinical randomised study will be conducted in subjects referred and scheduled for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy via the NHS English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) Programme and will compare Endocuff Vision®-Assisted Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (EAFS) with Standard Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (SFS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endocuff-assisted Flexible Sigmoidoscopy | Experimental | Device: Endocuff VisionPatients in this arm will receive their screening sigmoidoscopy with the Endocuff Vision in situ on the scope |
| Standard Flexible Sigmoidoscopy | No intervention | –Patients in this arm will receive their screening sigmoidoscopy without the Endocuff on the scope |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 61 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 years and over
- Referral for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Ability to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Absolute contraindications to flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Established or suspicion of large bowel obstruction or pseudo-obstruction
- Known colon cancer or polyposis syndromes
- Known colonic strictures
- Known severe diverticular segment (that is likely to impede sigmoidoscope passage)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endocuff VisionThe EndocuffTM (ARC Medical Design Ltd and Diagmed, UK) is a device (CE marked in UK) made of a soft plastic material with a unique dynamic shape. Endocuff Vision™ is placed snugly around the colonoscope tip prior to insertion. It does not project beyond the tip of the scope, providing an unrestricted view. It helps anchor the scope tip against the bowel wall to provide a stable platform of access. The soft, elastic projections are pushed back (recoiled) towards the scope shaft during insertion but evert during withdrawal to hold colon folds away from the field of view. | Device | Endocuff-assisted Flexible Sigmoidoscopy |
Primary outcome
Adenoma Detection Rate
Time frame: Day of procedure
Proportion of examinations expressed as a percentage where at least one adenoma is found
12 secondary outcomes
Mean adenomas detected per procedure
Time frame: Day of procedure
Rate of cuff exchange
Time frame: Day of procedure
Non-inferiority of complete withdrawal time in procedures where no polyps are detected
Time frame: Day of procedure
Compare overall procedure time between groups
Time frame: Day of procedure
Measure differences in ADR accounting for patient procedure based variables (e.g. accounting for extent of examination and bowel preparation).
Time frame: Day of procedure
Compare the rate of discovered cancers between groups
Time frame: On histology check 48-72 hours post procedure
Examination extent between groups based on presumed anatomical location with a straight endoscope
Time frame: Day of procedure
Examination extent between groups based on distance of insertion in centimetres with a straight endoscope
Time frame: Day of procedure
Patient satisfaction between groups using the Gloucester scale of assessment of patient comfort
Time frame: Day of procedure
Identify any difference in future colonoscopic workload produced by increased ADR in terms of number of patients referred for full colonoscopy between the EAFS and SFS groups.
Time frame: Day of procedure
Compare the ADR of the first 20% of patients scoped by each colonoscopist with the last 20% of patients in each arm to identify any changes in ADR to assess any learning curve effect.
Time frame: 18 months
Compare the baseline ADR of each colonoscopist prior to trial recruitment with their individual ADR in patients where EndocuffTM Vision was not used.
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Sep 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32245908Rees CJ, Brand A, Ngu WS, Stokes C, Hoare Z, Totton N, Bhandari P, Sharp L, Bastable A, Rutter MD, Verma AM, Lee TJ, Walls M; B-ADENOMA trial group comprises. BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using Endocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities (the B-ADENOMA Study): a multicentre, randomised controlled flexible sigmoidoscopy trial. Gut. 2020 Nov;69(11):1959-1965. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319621. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
ABCSG R07 Rectal Cancer Registry
Rectal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of Rectum
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Colin J Rees, MBBS MRCP FRCP principal investigator
South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Endocuff Vision in people with Colorectal Neoplasms and Colonic Polyp, run by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust at 16 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adenoma Detection Rate (time frame: Day of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03072472, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2018.