Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryNCT03075852
Comparision of Retinal Surgery by Three-dimensional Heads-up Display to the Standard Operating Microscope
An observational study of Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery, run by MidAtlantic Retina at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study investigating a three dimensional heads up display for retinal surgery and comparing its outcomes and ease of use with the standard operative microscope. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Heads- Up Display Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 May 2017to 8 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery from the Mid Altantic Retina, Wills Eye location office, for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Who may be able to join
- Eligible patients are those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Who cannot join
- Prisoners, institutionalized patients, and those who have undergone previous pars plana vitrectomy will be excluded. Patients undergoing combined, simultaneous scleral buckle placement and pars plana vitrectomy will also be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
MidAtlantic Retina-Wills Eye Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Official title: Comparative Analysis of Three-dimensional Heads-up Display Surgical Platform to Standard Operating Microscope for Vitreoretinal Surgery
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study investigating a three dimensional heads up display for retinal surgery and comparing its outcomes and ease of use with the standard operative microscope.
Read the detailed description
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Patient are undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment. In this prospective, single-center, unmasked cross-sectional, observational case series, at minimum of 100 consecutive eyes will undergo 23-, 25-, or 27-gauge 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the Constellation Vision System (Alcon Laboratories, Hünenberg, Switzerland) using either the NGENUITY 3D HUD surgery platform or standard operating microscope (OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope with ReSight (Carl Zeiss AG, Gena, Germany), with 1:1 randomization. Surgical gauge will be dictated by operating surgeon preference. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients enrolled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable HIPPA regulations. All surgeries will be digitally recorded (as is routinely done for educational purposes) and video data will be stored on password-protected, encrypted external hard-disk drives. These drives will be stored in a secure, locked cabinet in the Research Department of the Retina Service when not in use. All surgeries will be performed by 2 surgeons (AH and JH). Those randomized to 3D HUD surgery will undergo PPV with a 3D high dynamic range camera (ICM5), specialized image processing software (Version 9.5.4; TrueWare, Santa Barbara, CA), and a 46" high-definition (1980x1024 pixel) liquid crystal display (GD-463D10, Yokohama, Japan). During surgery with the 3D HUD, the surgeon will wear passive 3-D polarized glasses and will be positioned approximately 1.5 m from the display. Iris aperture and image gain will be standardized and unchanged for all cases performed with the 3D HUD. Enrolled patients will be monitored at post-operative day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 to measure visual acuity, undergo optical coherence tomography (OCT) if clinically indicated, and further examination to document anterior segment and dilated funduscopic examination findings. Patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal for either macular pucker or macular hole repair will be subjected to a disease-specific surgical protocol to examine potential differences in macular surgery between 3D HUD and traditional microscope visualization. These patients will undergo 25-gauge 3-port PPV with 1:1 randomization to either visualization with the 3D HUD or standard operating microscope. Indocyanine green (ICG) vital dye (**% solution) will be injected in 0.1 cc aliquots to stain the ILM with the infusion cannula clamped and 60 seconds allowed for the dye to stain the ILM. Endoillumination levels will initially be set to 1% and will be increased by 1% intervals until the operating surgeon notes enough illumination to proceed with ERM/ILM peeling. ILM peeling will be performed to the boundaries of the retinal vascular arcades and the duration of membrane peeling will be documented. If the operating surgeon requests increased endoilluminaton power during membrane peeling, the increased value will be recorded. The number of macular hemorrhages and contusions induced by direct forcep trauma as well as iatrogenic retinal breaks sustained during membrane peeling will also be recorded. Data Collection Demographic data, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and history will be recorded for each patient on initial examination as is done in the course of routine care. Data elements will include age, race, date of birth, date of evaluation, medical record number, chief complaint, past ocular history, past medical history, visual acuity, anterior segment exam findings (i.e. ocular surface disease, lens status, etc.), funduscopic exams, preoperative imaging and testing (OCT, FAF, Fundus Photography). Intraoperative endoillumination levels will be recorded. Recorded surgical video files and follow-up status will be compiled for each patient and various metrics will be recorded including total operative time, time of ILM/ERM peeling, number of ICG aliquots required to visualize the ILM, and intraoperative complications. Baseline and follow up data will also include visual acuity, anterior segment and funduscopic examination, and OCT data if applicable. Other data collected will include subjective physician surveys on the use of the two visualization systems, including quality of visualization on a 10-point scale, perceived subjective difficulties with vitreoretinal visualization, and overall ergonomic comfort on a 10-point scale. Human Subjects and Informed Consent The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki will be followed and written informed consent obtained at the time of patient enrollment. Patients will also be provided with a lay explanation of the study goals and protocol. The decision to enroll in the study is entirely elective and patients will not be reimbursed for their participation. The PHI and privacy of subjects will be maintained by strict adherence to HIPPA and Wills Eye Institute policies. The aforementioned data will be stored prospectively as patients are enrolled. All data upon collection will be coded and de-identified. Codes will be created for each consecutive patient via a random number generator. All data will be stored on a computer stored and ecrypted hard drives within an ecrypted password protected Microsoft Excel file only accessible to members of the study team. De-identified data will be linked to medical record numbers and date of birth. No other patient identifiers will be recorded
- Being tested
- Heads- Up Display Surgery
- Keywords
- Heads-up display, NGENUITY, Vitreoretinal surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heads- Up Display SurgeryDevice
Also called NGENUITY surgical display system
Patient undergoes VR surgery with visualization using heads up display 3D monitor viewed by the operating surgeon.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3D VRS Patients | Those who undergo surgery with NGENUITY (3D VRS-Vitreoretinal surgery) Receives: Device: Heads- Up Display Surgery | |
| Standard operating microscope | Those who undergo surgery with the standard operating microscope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraoperative complications
Intraoperative complications including: increased surgical time, needing to switch to standard operating microscope, increased time for ILM/ ELM peeling
Measured: day of surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Visual Acuity
Snellen
Measured: baseline and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2017
- Study start26 May 2017
- Primary completion8 Aug 2018
- Study completion8 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MidAtlantic Retina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alcon Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, MidAtlantic Retina, Wills Eye
- Investigators
- Allen C Ho, MD, Principal investigator, Mid Atlantic Retina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03075852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-609E
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Eckardt C, Paulo EB. HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2016 Jan;36(1):137-47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
PubMed 26200516
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Analysis of Three-dimensional Heads-up Display Surgical Platform to Standard Operating Microscope for Vitreoretinal Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03075852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-609E
- Keywords
- Heads-up display, NGENUITY, Vitreoretinal surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MidAtlantic RetinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alcon Research
- Study start
- 26 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study investigating a three dimensional heads up display for retinal surgery and comparing its outcomes and ease of use with the standard operative microscope.
Detailed description
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Patient are undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment. In this prospective, single-center, unmasked cross-sectional, observational case series, at minimum of 100 consecutive eyes will undergo 23-, 25-, or 27-gauge 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the Constellation Vision System (Alcon Laboratories, Hünenberg, Switzerland) using either the NGENUITY 3D HUD surgery platform or standard operating microscope (OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope with ReSight (Carl Zeiss AG, Gena, Germany), with 1:1 randomization. Surgical gauge will be dictated by operating surgeon preference. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients enrolled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable HIPPA regulations. All surgeries will be digitally recorded (as is routinely done for educational purposes) and video data will be stored on password-protected, encrypted external hard-disk drives. These drives will be stored in a secure, locked cabinet in the Research Department of the Retina Service when not in use. All surgeries will be performed by 2 surgeons (AH and JH). Those randomized to 3D HUD surgery will undergo PPV with a 3D high dynamic range camera (ICM5), specialized image processing software (Version 9.5.4; TrueWare, Santa Barbara, CA), and a 46" high-definition (1980x1024 pixel) liquid crystal display (GD-463D10, Yokohama, Japan). During surgery with the 3D HUD, the surgeon will wear passive 3-D polarized glasses and will be positioned approximately 1.5 m from the display. Iris aperture and image gain will be standardized and unchanged for all cases performed with the 3D HUD. Enrolled patients will be monitored at post-operative day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 to measure visual acuity, undergo optical coherence tomography (OCT) if clinically indicated, and further examination to document anterior segment and dilated funduscopic examination findings. Patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal for either macular pucker or macular hole repair will be subjected to a disease-specific surgical protocol to examine potential differences in macular surgery between 3D HUD and traditional microscope visualization. These patients will undergo 25-gauge 3-port PPV with 1:1 randomization to either visualization with the 3D HUD or standard operating microscope. Indocyanine green (ICG) vital dye (**% solution) will be injected in 0.1 cc aliquots to stain the ILM with the infusion cannula clamped and 60 seconds allowed for the dye to stain the ILM. Endoillumination levels will initially be set to 1% and will be increased by 1% intervals until the operating surgeon notes enough illumination to proceed with ERM/ILM peeling. ILM peeling will be performed to the boundaries of the retinal vascular arcades and the duration of membrane peeling will be documented. If the operating surgeon requests increased endoilluminaton power during membrane peeling, the increased value will be recorded. The number of macular hemorrhages and contusions induced by direct forcep trauma as well as iatrogenic retinal breaks sustained during membrane peeling will also be recorded. Data Collection Demographic data, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and history will be recorded for each patient on initial examination as is done in the course of routine care. Data elements will include age, race, date of birth, date of evaluation, medical record number, chief complaint, past ocular history, past medical history, visual acuity, anterior segment exam findings (i.e. ocular surface disease, lens status, etc.), funduscopic exams, preoperative imaging and testing (OCT, FAF, Fundus Photography). Intraoperative endoillumination levels will be recorded. Recorded surgical video files and follow-up status will be compiled for each patient and various metrics will be recorded including total operative time, time of ILM/ERM peeling, number of ICG aliquots required to visualize the ILM, and intraoperative complications. Baseline and follow up data will also include visual acuity, anterior segment and funduscopic examination, and OCT data if applicable. Other data collected will include subjective physician surveys on the use of the two visualization systems, including quality of visualization on a 10-point scale, perceived subjective difficulties with vitreoretinal visualization, and overall ergonomic comfort on a 10-point scale. Human Subjects and Informed Consent The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki will be followed and written informed consent obtained at the time of patient enrollment. Patients will also be provided with a lay explanation of the study goals and protocol. The decision to enroll in the study is entirely elective and patients will not be reimbursed for their participation. The PHI and privacy of subjects will be maintained by strict adherence to HIPPA and Wills Eye Institute policies. The aforementioned data will be stored prospectively as patients are enrolled. All data upon collection will be coded and de-identified. Codes will be created for each consecutive patient via a random number generator. All data will be stored on a computer stored and ecrypted hard drives within an ecrypted password protected Microsoft Excel file only accessible to members of the study team. De-identified data will be linked to medical record numbers and date of birth. No other patient identifiers will be recorded
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3D VRS Patients | – | Device: Heads- Up Display SurgeryThose who undergo surgery with NGENUITY (3D VRS-Vitreoretinal surgery) |
| Standard operating microscope | – | –Those who undergo surgery with the standard operating microscope |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery from the Mid Altantic Retina, Wills Eye location office, for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Eligible patients are those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Prisoners, institutionalized patients, and those who have undergone previous pars plana vitrectomy will be excluded. Patients undergoing combined, simultaneous scleral buckle placement and pars plana vitrectomy will also be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heads- Up Display SurgeryAlso: NGENUITY surgical display systemPatient undergoes VR surgery with visualization using heads up display 3D monitor viewed by the operating surgeon. | Device | 3D VRS Patients |
Primary outcome
Intraoperative complications
Time frame: day of surgery
Intraoperative complications including: increased surgical time, needing to switch to standard operating microscope, increased time for ILM/ ELM peeling
1 secondary outcome
Visual Acuity
Time frame: baseline and 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26200516Eckardt C, Paulo EB. HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2016 Jan;36(1):137-47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Allen C Ho, MD principal investigator
Mid Atlantic Retina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery, run by MidAtlantic Retina at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraoperative complications (time frame: day of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03075852, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2018.