AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-small Cell Lung CancerNCT03077113

Pilot Study of Regional Lung Ventilation

A study testing 4-D CT Scan and SPECT-CT Scan in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective study of ventilation image comparison for lung functional information incorporation in thoracic cancer treatment planning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
4-D CT Scan and SPECT-CT Scan
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Oct 2012to 23 Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients that have early stage non-small cell lung cancer or clinical suspicion of the same in cases where the lesion is not amenable to biopsy but is enlarging and PET-positive. All patients are to be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a monotherapy.
  • Eligible patients must have appropriate staging studies identifying them as specific subsets of AJCC 7th edition stage I or II based on only one of the following combinations of TNM staging:
  • T1a-b, N0, M0
  • T2a, N0, M0
  • T3 (invading the chest wall, <5 cm in diameter) N0 M0
  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • Women of childbearing potential and male participants must use an effective contraceptive method such as condom/diaphragm and spermicidal foam, intrauterine device, or prescription birth control pills.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with T2b tumors or T3 tumors >5 cm or patients with tumors involving the central chest/structures of the mediastinum;
  • Primary tumor of any T-stage within or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree, defined as a volume 2 cm in all directions around the proximal bronchial tree (carina, right and left main bronchi, right and left upper lobe bronchi, bronchus intermedius, right middle lobe bronchus, lingular bronchus, right and left lower lobe bronchi.
  • Direct evidence of regional or distant metastases after appropriate staging studies
  • Patients with active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection;
  • Pregnant or lactating women, as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the embryo or fetus.
  • Patients that receive chemotherapy (induction or sequential)
  • Psychiatric or addictive disorders that impair subject's voluntary ability to participate in informed consent or protocol procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Study of Regional Lung Ventilation: Comparing Ventilation Images Computed From 4D CTs vs. Traditional Nuclear Medicine Ventilation Images

This is a prospective study of ventilation image comparison for lung functional information incorporation in thoracic cancer treatment planning.

Read the detailed description

Investigators hypothesize that a high resolution regional ventilation image (HRVI) based on 4D-CT imaging will correlate with the current low resolution state-of-the-art (SPECT-CT), which is the conventional way of measuring ventilation. HRVI may be a tool that could be widely used throughout the radiation therapy community because most radiation oncologists routinely employ 4D-CT technology in their own clinics. Investigators plan to test this hypothesis by comparing ventilation patterns on SPECT-CT images to HRVIs using a DICE analysis. As SPECT ventilation imaging is not included in our standard care, this study thus is designed as a pilot study.

Based on published data, the difference between the two methods for calculating the regional ventilation in the lower 50% ventilation volume is expected to have a standard deviation of about 0.1. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the regional ventilation between SPECT-CT and 4D-CT pre-treatment would have a width of no more than 0.14 if 10 patients are enrolled and as small as 0.10 when 20 patients are registered.

Being tested
4-D CT Scan, SPECT-CT Scan
Keywords
lung cancer, radiation therapy
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 4-D CT ScanDiagnostic test

    Also called 4-D computed tomography

    The 4-D CT scan shows how the tumor moves when patients breathe so that motion can be taken into account when planning the radiation. This is the usual way of planning lung radiation and everyone in this study will be planned using a 4-D CT scan.

  • SPECT-CT ScanDiagnostic test

    Also called Single-photon emission computed tomography

    It may be possible to make a more accurate plan by using a SPECT-CT scan for planning that would result in less damage to healthy lung tissue. This is not yet proven. A SPECT-CT scan uses a special camera to detect radioactivity to produce pictures which can lead to more precise information.

Study groups in NCT03077113
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ventilation Images for ComparisonOtherStandard of Care: 4-D CT scan will be used to make a radiation treatment plan. SPECT-CT Scan: This second scan will be done on another day to make a treatment plan for comparison to the first plan.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: 4-D CT Scan; Diagnostic Test: SPECT-CT Scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Correlation of Ventilation Images

    The primary objective is to compare the regional ventilation using SPECT-CT and that as determined from the pre-treatment 4D-CT routinely collected at simulation in lung/abdominal patients (standard of care). 50% of the lower portion lung image will be used for the purpose of determining the regional ventilation for this protocol.

    Measured: Up to 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2017
  2. Study start15 Oct 2012
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2015
  4. Study completion23 Aug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03077113
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCC-17070
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
2 Mar 2017
Last updated
13 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 4-D CT Scan and SPECT-CT Scan in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Correlation of Ventilation Images (time frame: Up to 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in