Irritable Bowel SyndromeMANTRANCT03078634
The Multi-disciplinary Treatment of Functional Gut Disorders Study
A study testing Multi-disciplinary clinic model and Standard outpatient care in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia, run by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
Randomised controlled trial comparing standard outpatient clinic treatment with multi-disciplinary clinic treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Patients will be followed up to end of clinic treatment and 12 months beyond the end of treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Constipation - Functional
- What is being tested?
- Multi-disciplinary clinic model and Standard outpatient care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2017to 28 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Functional gastrointestinal disorder as defined by Rome IV
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed or suspicion of organic gastrointestinal disorder (ie Coeliac, IBD)
- Age <18 or >80
- Non-English speaking
- Patient's from outside of metropolitan Melbourne who cannot attend clinic visits
- Prominent eating disorder
- Chronic opioid dependence
Show all 11Show fewer
- Medications which can explain functional gut symptoms
- Surgery of GI tract that can explain functional gut symptoms
- Major, non-GI, organ dysfunction
- Pregnancy
- Major Psychiatric disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The MANTRA Study: The Multi-disciplinary Treatment of Functional Gut Disorders Study
Randomised controlled trial comparing standard outpatient clinic treatment with multi-disciplinary clinic treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Patients will be followed up to end of clinic treatment and 12 months beyond the end of treatment. Symptoms, quality of life, costs to the healthcare system and psychological outcomes will be assessed.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Constipation - Functional, Faecal Incontinence, Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, Other Rome IV Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
- Being tested
- Multi-disciplinary clinic model, Standard outpatient care
- Keywords
- Irritable bowel syndrome, Constipation, Functional dyspepsia, Multi-disciplinary treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Encopresis, Constipation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multi-disciplinary clinic modelOther
Clinic model incorporating multiple disciplines for the treatment of functional gut disorders. Disciplines include: gastroenterologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, hypnotherapists, behavioural therapists and dieticians. End of clinic case conference involving clinical disciplines will also occur to coordinate care.
Standard outpatient careOther
Standard care provided in outpatient clinics staffed by GI doctors only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Disciplinary clinic | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Multi-disciplinary clinic model |
| Standard Gastrointestinal clinic | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Standard outpatient care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of subjects with global improvement in their condition.
Global improvement in their condition is defined as a response of either "slightly better" or "much better" to the question: "Compared with before I was first seen in clinic, I feel my gut condition is now:". The question is marked on a 5-point likert scale: Much worse, slightly worse, same, slightly better, much better.
Measured: Definition of discharge timepoint: Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Proportion of subjects, with Irritable bowel syndrome or centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome, with a 50% reduction in Irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS)
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with constipation who score a 50% reduction in Cleveland clinic constipation scoring system
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with faecal incontinence who score a 50% reduction in St Mark's Incontinence score
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with functional dyspepsia who score a 50% reduction in the symptom score of the Nepean dyspepsia index
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Quality of life as measured by RAND SF-36 v1
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Quality of life as measured by Euro-QOL EQ-5D
Scores from the EQ-5D will be compared between groups and QALY will be derived from EQ-5D.
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Psychological wellbeing as measured by hospital anxiety and depression score (HADS)
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B)12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with who answer yes to: In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your gut condition? [YES/NO]
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Somatisation as measured by somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8)
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Cost to the healthcare system
$AUD per patient cost to the Australian healthcare system.
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with global improvement in their condition.
Global improvement in their condition is defined as a response of either "slightly better" or "much better" to the question: "Compared with before I was first seen in clinic, I feel my gut condition is now:". The question is marked on a 5-point likert scale: Much worse, slightly worse, same, slightly better, much better.
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with a 50% reduction in gastrointestinal symptom severity index score
Patients will complete a GISSI (Gastrointestinal symptom severity index) questionnaire at time of "discharge from clinic" and 12 months after "discharge from clinic". The score used will be specific to their symptom cluster.
Measured: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2017
- Study start16 Mar 2017
- Primary completion28 Feb 2019
- Study completion28 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chamara Basnayake, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
- Investigators
- Chamara Basnayake, MBBS, Principal investigator, Gastroenterologist / PhD candidate
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03078634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MANTRA
- Acronym
- MANTRA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Stanley A, Wilson-O'Brien A, Burrell K, Lees-Trinca I, Khera A, Kantidakis J, Wong O, Fox K, Talley NJ, Liew D, Salzberg MR, Thompson AJ. Long-Term Outcome of Multidisciplinary Versus Standard Gastroenterologist Care for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;20(9):2102-2111.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
PubMed 34896645Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Stanley A, Wilson-O'Brien A, Burrell K, Lees-Trinca I, Khera A, Kantidakis J, Wong O, Fox K, Talley NJ, Liew D, Salzberg MR, Thompson AJ. Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;5(10):890-899. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30215-6. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
PubMed 32679040Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Salzberg M, Khera A, Liew D, Burrell K, Wilson-O'Brien A, Stanley A, Talley NJ, Thompson AJ. Defining Optimal Care for Functional Gut Disorders - Multi-Disciplinary Versus Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105828. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
PubMed 31437539
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The MANTRA Study: The Multi-disciplinary Treatment of Functional Gut Disorders Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03078634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MANTRA / MANTRA
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Constipation - Functional, Faecal Incontinence, Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, Other Rome IV Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
- Keywords
- Irritable bowel syndrome, Constipation, Functional dyspepsia, Multi-disciplinary treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St Vincent's Hospital MelbourneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Randomised controlled trial comparing standard outpatient clinic treatment with multi-disciplinary clinic treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Patients will be followed up to end of clinic treatment and 12 months beyond the end of treatment. Symptoms, quality of life, costs to the healthcare system and psychological outcomes will be assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Disciplinary clinic | Active comparator | Other: Multi-disciplinary clinic model |
| Standard Gastrointestinal clinic | Placebo comparator | Other: Standard outpatient care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Functional gastrointestinal disorder as defined by Rome IV
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Diagnosed or suspicion of organic gastrointestinal disorder (ie Coeliac, IBD)
- Age <18 or >80
- Non-English speaking
- Patient's from outside of metropolitan Melbourne who cannot attend clinic visits
- Prominent eating disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-disciplinary clinic modelClinic model incorporating multiple disciplines for the treatment of functional gut disorders. Disciplines include: gastroenterologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, hypnotherapists, behavioural therapists and dieticians. End of clinic case conference involving clinical disciplines will also occur to coordinate care. | Other | Multi-Disciplinary clinic |
| Standard outpatient careStandard care provided in outpatient clinics staffed by GI doctors only | Other | Standard Gastrointestinal clinic |
Primary outcome
Proportion of subjects with global improvement in their condition.
Time frame: Definition of discharge timepoint: Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first.
Global improvement in their condition is defined as a response of either "slightly better" or "much better" to the question: "Compared with before I was first seen in clinic, I feel my gut condition is now:". The question is marked on a 5-point likert scale: Much worse, slightly worse, same, slightly better, much better.
12 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects, with Irritable bowel syndrome or centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome, with a 50% reduction in Irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS)
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with constipation who score a 50% reduction in Cleveland clinic constipation scoring system
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with faecal incontinence who score a 50% reduction in St Mark's Incontinence score
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with functional dyspepsia who score a 50% reduction in the symptom score of the Nepean dyspepsia index
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Quality of life as measured by RAND SF-36 v1
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Quality of life as measured by Euro-QOL EQ-5D
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Psychological wellbeing as measured by hospital anxiety and depression score (HADS)
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B)12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with who answer yes to: In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your gut condition? [YES/NO]
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Somatisation as measured by somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8)
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Cost to the healthcare system
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with global improvement in their condition.
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Proportion of subjects with a 50% reduction in gastrointestinal symptom severity index score
Time frame: A) Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first. B) 12 months after discharge.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34896645Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Stanley A, Wilson-O'Brien A, Burrell K, Lees-Trinca I, Khera A, Kantidakis J, Wong O, Fox K, Talley NJ, Liew D, Salzberg MR, Thompson AJ. Long-Term Outcome of Multidisciplinary Versus Standard Gastroenterologist Care for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;20(9):2102-2111.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32679040Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Stanley A, Wilson-O'Brien A, Burrell K, Lees-Trinca I, Khera A, Kantidakis J, Wong O, Fox K, Talley NJ, Liew D, Salzberg MR, Thompson AJ. Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;5(10):890-899. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30215-6. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31437539Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Salzberg M, Khera A, Liew D, Burrell K, Wilson-O'Brien A, Stanley A, Talley NJ, Thompson AJ. Defining Optimal Care for Functional Gut Disorders - Multi-Disciplinary Versus Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105828. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
NEUROMODULATION WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION IN ADULTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLIND, SHAM-CONTROLLED CROSSOVER STUDY
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Recruiting
Visceral Sensitivity in IBD (Irritable Bowel Disease) and IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
IBS, Ulcerative Colitis, Active
RecruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Interoception and Postural Control in Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Constipation, Irritable Bowel Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
SIMBA in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Microbiome
Not yet recruiting
Psyllium Husk in Pediatric IBS
Prebiotic, IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chamara Basnayake, MBBS principal investigator
Gastroenterologist / PhD candidate
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multi-disciplinary clinic model and Standard outpatient care in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia, run by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of subjects with global improvement in their condition. (time frame: Definition of discharge timepoint: Day 1 of being discharged from clinic, or 9 months after baseline visit, whichever occurs first.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03078634, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.