Parkinson DiseaseNCT03079310
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait in Parkinson Disease
A study testing Spinal cord stimulation in people with Parkinson Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Balance and gait impairment increases the risk of falls and contributes to a reduced quality of life and shorter survival in Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical Parkinsonism patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease, Atypical Parkinsonism
- What is being tested?
- Spinal cord stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Apr 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consenting male and female participants, aged 18 years to 80 years
- Idiopathic PD with II-IV Hoehn-Yahn stage
- A history of frequent falls, gait and balance dysfunction and postural instability
- ON-freezing
- Ability to perform a gait/walking task (under close supervision),
- PD participants referred by Dr. Jog to the functional neurosurgeon for SCS implantation for treatment of their gait and balance dysfunction and/or for their freezing of gait.
Show all 13Show fewer
- SCS eligibility has been confirmed by neurologist and neurosurgeon
- Patients who receive SCS for their gait and mobility must participate in this study in order to determine which SCS parameters provide the patient with the best outcome for their PD symptoms.
- able to give informed consent
- Able to attend all clinic visits and assessments
- No dementia or psychiatric abnormalities on neuropsychological testing
- No significant secondary causes (such as cerebrovascular disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, peripheral neuropathy, severe degenerative lower limb or back disease).
- we had a few devices to include exploratory trial in atypical PD (MSA, PSP, and CBD confirmed diagnosis from clinic).
Who cannot join
- History of stroke
- History of ALS or Myasthenia Gravis
- Offending medications (Lithium, valproate, steroids, amiodarone, beta-adrenergic agonists (e.g. salbutamol).
- Persons prescribed zonisamide
- Women reporting that they are pregnant
- Persons medically unstable with contraindications to SCS will be excluded
Show all 15Show fewer
- Previous brain surgery or cardiac pacemaker
- Eligibility for deep brain stimulation surgery
- Moderately severe parkinsonism in the context of unstable pharmacological treatment
- Dementia as assessed by DSM criteria or severe cognitive disturbances
- Severe psychiatric symptoms (in particular, hallucinations and depression)
- Bad general health
- Lack of compliance at follow-up
- Severe dyskinesias
- Significant cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mandar Jog, MD contact
Olivia Samotus, MSc contact
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A5A5
Mandar Jog, MD, 519-685-8500 ext. 32758, mandar.jog@lhsc.on.ca
About this study
Official title: Thoracic Dorsal Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Gait and Balance Impairments in Parkinson Disease
Balance and gait impairment increases the risk of falls and contributes to a reduced quality of life and shorter survival in Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical Parkinsonism patients. In preliminary case studies, electrical epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to significantly improve gait, postural instability, rigidity, and tremor. Controlled studies for optimizing which stimulation settings produce the best clinical response for mobility and gait, and achieving these results chronically are all significant unmet needs. Using quantitative laboratory and mobile technologies to test a range of stimulation settings, this research study aims to determine which SCS parameters or combination of parameters is best suited to effectively alleviate disabling symptoms experienced by each patient.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Atypical Parkinsonism
- Being tested
- Spinal cord stimulation
- Keywords
- spinal cord stimulation, gait analysis, whole-body kinematics, Parkinson's disease, Neuromodulation, Feature extraction
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal cord stimulationDevice
Also called Boston Scientific Precision® System
Range of pulse widths (200-500 microseconds) and frequencies (30-130 Hz) will be assessed for each patient
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulation | Experimental | Boston Scientific SCS system Receives: Device: Spinal cord stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tailored SCS programming
Participants following SCS implantation will undergo 3 programming visits. 9 SCS programs will be tested in a repeated fashion on separate days and at different times of the day (morning vs afternoon). The SCS setting(s) to produce the best motor (gait) response will be used by the participant in-home. SCS device will not be used during this time period.
Measured: 3 weeks
Changes in spatiotemporal gait measures using objective gait analysis
Spatiotemporal gait parameters known to be affected in parkinsonian syndromes will be analyzed over a 12 month period using gait analysis software. Best SCS setting tailored to each participant's gait symptoms will be assessed at 3-, 6- and 12-months time-points.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Changes in UPDRS-III scores
UPDRS-III assessment will be assessed pre-surgery and post-surgery at 3-, 6- and 12-month time-points while participants are OFF/ON-dopaminergic medication and OFF/ON SCS.
Measured: 12 months
Changes in NFOG-Q scores
NFOG-Q scores will be assessed pre-surgery and post-surgery at 3-, 6- and 12-month time-points.
Measured: 12 months
Changes in PDQ-39 scores
PDQ-39 scores will be assessed pre-surgery and post-surgery at 3-, 6- and 12-month time-points.
Measured: 12 months
Changes in ABC scores
ABC scores will be assessed pre-surgery and post-surgery at 3-, 6- and 12-month time-points.
Measured: 12 months
Changes in QoL scores
QoL scores will be assessed pre-surgery and post-surgery at 3-, 6- and 12-month time-points.
Measured: 12 months
DaTscan imaging
Asymmetry and specific binding ratios (SBRs) of the striatal regions of dopamine transporter from I-123 FP-CIT SPECT images will be quantitatively analyzed from pre-surgery and 12-months of SCS use.
Measured: 12-months
Proprioception testing
KINARM and lower leg KINARM type of robot collects reaction time, speed, force, accuracy and trajectory using a robotic object hitting game to assess cognitive and motor skills to be conducted pre-surgery, and post-SCS at 3-, 6- and 12-months
Measured: 12-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2017
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionApr 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Western University, CanadaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, Canada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mandar Jog, MD, Principal investigator, LHSC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03079310
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 107451
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fuentes R, Petersson P, Nicolelis MA. Restoration of locomotive function in Parkinson's disease by spinal cord stimulation: mechanistic approach. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(7):1100-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07417.x.
PubMed 21039949Santana MB, Halje P, Simplicio H, Richter U, Freire MAM, Petersson P, Fuentes R, Nicolelis MAL. Spinal cord stimulation alleviates motor deficits in a primate model of Parkinson disease. Neuron. 2014 Nov 19;84(4):716-722. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.061. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
PubMed 25447740Jenkinson N, Nandi D, Muthusamy K, Ray NJ, Gregory R, Stein JF, Aziz TZ. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the pedunculopontine nucleus. Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):319-28. doi: 10.1002/mds.22189.
PubMed 19097193Nagatsua T, Sawadab M. L-dopa therapy for Parkinson's disease: past, present, and future. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Jan;15 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70004-5.
PubMed 19131039Liu HG, Zhang K, Yang AC, Zhang JG. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic and pedunculopontine nucleus in a patient with Parkinson's disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Apr;57(4):303-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.303. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
PubMed 25932301Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Tropepi D, Pierantozzi M, Brusa L, Scarnati E, Mazzone P. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1596-607. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl346. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
PubMed 17251240Ferraye MU, Debu B, Fraix V, Goetz L, Ardouin C, Yelnik J, Henry-Lagrange C, Seigneuret E, Piallat B, Krack P, Le Bas JF, Benabid AL, Chabardes S, Pollak P. Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus area stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):205-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp229. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
PubMed 19773356Giladi N, Horak FB, Hausdorff JM. Classification of gait disturbances: distinguishing between continuous and episodic changes. Mov Disord. 2013 Sep 15;28(11):1469-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25672.
PubMed 24132835Fuentes R, Petersson P, Siesser WB, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA. Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Science. 2009 Mar 20;323(5921):1578-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1164901.
PubMed 19299613Fenelon G, Goujon C, Gurruchaga JM, Cesaro P, Jarraya B, Palfi S, Lefaucheur JP. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain improved motor function in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Feb;18(2):213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Aug 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 21865071Hassan S, Amer S, Alwaki A, Elborno A. A patient with Parkinson's disease benefits from spinal cord stimulation. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Aug;20(8):1155-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.08.018. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
PubMed 23453160Agari T, Date I. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of abnormal posture and gait disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(7):470-4. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.470.
PubMed 22850494Landi A, Trezza A, Pirillo D, Vimercati A, Antonini A, Sganzerla EP. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of sensory symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease. Neuromodulation. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):276-9. doi: 10.1111/ner.12005. Epub 2012 Dec 10. No abstract available.
PubMed 23227965Yadav AP, Fuentes R, Zhang H, Vinholo T, Wang CH, Freire MA, Nicolelis MA. Chronic spinal cord electrical stimulation protects against 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Sci Rep. 2014 Jan 23;4:3839. doi: 10.1038/srep03839.
PubMed 24452435
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Thoracic Dorsal Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Gait and Balance Impairments in Parkinson Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03079310
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 107451
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Atypical Parkinsonism
- Keywords
- spinal cord stimulation, gait analysis, whole-body kinematics, Parkinson's disease, Neuromodulation, Feature extraction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Western University, CanadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Balance and gait impairment increases the risk of falls and contributes to a reduced quality of life and shorter survival in Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical Parkinsonism patients. In preliminary case studies, electrical epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to significantly improve gait, postural instability, rigidity, and tremor. Controlled studies for optimizing which stimulation settings produce the best clinical response for mobility and gait, and achieving these results chronically are all significant unmet needs. Using quantitative laboratory and mobile technologies to test a range of stimulation settings, this research study aims to determine which SCS parameters or combination of parameters is best suited to effectively alleviate disabling symptoms experienced by each patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulation | Experimental | Device: Spinal cord stimulationBoston Scientific SCS system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Consenting male and female participants, aged 18 years to 80 years
- Idiopathic PD with II-IV Hoehn-Yahn stage
- A history of frequent falls, gait and balance dysfunction and postural instability
- ON-freezing
- Ability to perform a gait/walking task (under close supervision),
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- History of stroke
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulationAlso: Boston Scientific Precision® SystemRange of pulse widths (200-500 microseconds) and frequencies (30-130 Hz) will be assessed for each patient | Device | Spinal cord stimulation |
Primary outcome
Tailored SCS programming
Time frame: 3 weeks
Participants following SCS implantation will undergo 3 programming visits. 9 SCS programs will be tested in a repeated fashion on separate days and at different times of the day (morning vs afternoon). The SCS setting(s) to produce the best motor (gait) response will be used by the participant in-home. SCS device will not be used during this time period.
Changes in spatiotemporal gait measures using objective gait analysis
Time frame: 12 months
Spatiotemporal gait parameters known to be affected in parkinsonian syndromes will be analyzed over a 12 month period using gait analysis software. Best SCS setting tailored to each participant's gait symptoms will be assessed at 3-, 6- and 12-months time-points.
7 secondary outcomes
Changes in UPDRS-III scores
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in NFOG-Q scores
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in PDQ-39 scores
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in ABC scores
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in QoL scores
Time frame: 12 months
DaTscan imaging
Time frame: 12-months
Proprioception testing
Time frame: 12-months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21039949Fuentes R, Petersson P, Nicolelis MA. Restoration of locomotive function in Parkinson's disease by spinal cord stimulation: mechanistic approach. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(7):1100-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07417.x.
- Background: PubMed 25447740Santana MB, Halje P, Simplicio H, Richter U, Freire MAM, Petersson P, Fuentes R, Nicolelis MAL. Spinal cord stimulation alleviates motor deficits in a primate model of Parkinson disease. Neuron. 2014 Nov 19;84(4):716-722. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.061. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 19097193Jenkinson N, Nandi D, Muthusamy K, Ray NJ, Gregory R, Stein JF, Aziz TZ. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the pedunculopontine nucleus. Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):319-28. doi: 10.1002/mds.22189.
- Background: PubMed 19131039Nagatsua T, Sawadab M. L-dopa therapy for Parkinson's disease: past, present, and future. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Jan;15 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70004-5.
- Background: PubMed 25932301Liu HG, Zhang K, Yang AC, Zhang JG. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic and pedunculopontine nucleus in a patient with Parkinson's disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Apr;57(4):303-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.303. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 17251240Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Tropepi D, Pierantozzi M, Brusa L, Scarnati E, Mazzone P. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1596-607. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl346. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 19773356Ferraye MU, Debu B, Fraix V, Goetz L, Ardouin C, Yelnik J, Henry-Lagrange C, Seigneuret E, Piallat B, Krack P, Le Bas JF, Benabid AL, Chabardes S, Pollak P. Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus area stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):205-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp229. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
- Background: PubMed 24132835Giladi N, Horak FB, Hausdorff JM. Classification of gait disturbances: distinguishing between continuous and episodic changes. Mov Disord. 2013 Sep 15;28(11):1469-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25672.
- Background: PubMed 19299613Fuentes R, Petersson P, Siesser WB, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA. Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Science. 2009 Mar 20;323(5921):1578-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1164901.
- Background: PubMed 21865071Fenelon G, Goujon C, Gurruchaga JM, Cesaro P, Jarraya B, Palfi S, Lefaucheur JP. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain improved motor function in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Feb;18(2):213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Aug 23. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23453160Hassan S, Amer S, Alwaki A, Elborno A. A patient with Parkinson's disease benefits from spinal cord stimulation. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Aug;20(8):1155-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.08.018. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 22850494Agari T, Date I. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of abnormal posture and gait disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(7):470-4. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.470.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mandar Jog, MD contact
Olivia Samotus, MSc contact
Mandar Jog, MD principal investigator
LHSC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal cord stimulation in people with Parkinson Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism, run by Western University, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mandar Jog, MD (519-685-8500 ext. 76708), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tailored SCS programming (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03079310, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.