AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle FracturesCROSSBAT 5YNCT03083028

Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Type B Ankle Fracture Treatment

A study testing Non Operative and Open reduction internal fixation of the ankl in people with Ankle Fractures, run by The University of New South Wales.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will determine whether operative management confers improved short and long-term outcomes for patients with isolated AO type 44-B1 distal fibula fractures when compared with non-operative management. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Fractures
What is being tested?
Non Operative and Open reduction internal fixation of the ankl
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2010to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type 44-B1 fibula fracture Patients aged between 18 and 65 inclusive. No talar shift - Medial clear space less than 2mm compared with the superior clear space on anterior-posterior (AP) view of the ankle.
  • Closed injury No concurrent fractures/dislocations Mobilising unaided/independently pre-injury Willingness to be followed up for 12 months Able to provide informed written consent

Who cannot join

  • Medically fit for general anaesthesia/surgery Dislocation on presentation Skeletally immature patients Previous trauma or surgery to the affected ankle Pregnancy Other injuries that impede mobilisation e.g. stroke, neurovascular deficit at presentation Non-English speaking

About this study

This study will determine whether operative management confers improved short and long-term outcomes for patients with isolated AO type 44-B1 distal fibula fractures when compared with non-operative management.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Ankle fractures are common. Recent clinical studies have shown that there is an increasing incidence of ankle fractures. Treatments vary and there is no clear consensus of the ideal approach to type 44-B1 distal fibular fractures. They range from open reduction and internal fixation to restore anatomical alignment to wearing below-knee walking plaster for an average of six weeks.

The argument for surgical fixation is that it addresses minor displacement and possible future displacement therefore potentially preventing future arthritis. On the other hand, there are numerous complications associated with surgery.

The argument for non-operative treatment is that non-union is not a common complication. Therefore surgery can be avoided in the majority of cases avoiding the clinical risks associated with surgery.

Aim:

Primary aim: To compare, ankle function and quality of life 5 years following an isolated AO type 44-B1 distal fibula fracture minimal talar shift, between patients treated operatively and non-operatively.

Research Design: Combined Randomised and Observational Study

Methods:

Recruitment:

All consecutive patients who present to a recruiting hospital with a distal fibular fracture during the study period will be screened for eligibility. In most hospitals, all surgeons on the on-call roster will participate in the study. Consenting patients of the surgeons who have agreed to participate in the randomised arm of the trial will be invited to have their treatment randomised. Patients of surgeons involved in the observational component of the study will be invited to be included in the observational arm together with the patients who decline to be randomised, but consent to follow-up

Written, informed consent will be obtained.

Eligible patients of surgeons participating in the randomised arm will have the option of having their treatment randomised. If consent is given, the surgeon will call a central number for patient allocation that is available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The randomisation schedule will be prepared and administered by an external party not otherwise involved in the study. If the patient declines randomisation, treatment will be determined after surgeon-patient discussion. Eligible patients of surgeons involved in the observational arm will also have their treatment provided (operative or non-operative) as per usual surgeon practice.

Typical demographic, anthropometric and surgical details (where appropriate) will be recorded for contextual reference.

Surgical intervention:

The surgical technique for each patient managed operatively, in both the observational and randomised arms of the study, will include fixation using a plate and screws. Any adverse intra-operative or post-operative event will be recorded. This includes but is not limited to death, infection, VTE and neurovascular injury. Post-operatively, all patients will be non weight bearing and placed in a below-knee plaster cast or walking boot. Discharge from hospital will be determined by the patient's ability to walk 25 m unaided by standby assistance as determined by a physiotherapist. The treating surgeon will review the patient after 10-14 days for assessment of the wound, removal of sutures and change of cast to a fibreglass cast or walking boot (cam walker). The patient will then be allowed to WBAT (weight bearing as tolerated) for a further 4 weeks. This protocol represents usual post-operative practice for this injury, as determined through meetings with the Australian Orthopaedic Trauma Society.

Non-Operative management:

Patients who are treated non-operatively will be treated with a walking boot and allowed WBAT. Discharge from hospital will be determined as for the surgical arm. All patients will be reviewed between 7 and 14 days post injury with repeat radiographs by the treating surgeon. This represents usual non-operative treatment for this injury.

Other management decisions such as need for antibiotics, VTE prophylaxis or anaesthetic type will be as per usual care for that institution and recorded by the research team. Referral for further physiotherapy post removal of cast or boot (either study arm) will be based on the presence of overt ankle stiffness affecting gait. The use of physiotherapy (type and duration) will be noted. Specific prescription of the type of physiotherapy is not possible as patients will be free to access public and private services. Study participants will record all hospitalisations and visits to any health professional. They will be required to report the main reason for such health service occasions during the first year of follow-up period.

Outcomes will be collected and results will be reported in peer-reviewed journals after appropriate statistical analysis.

Conditions
Ankle Fractures
Being tested
Non Operative, Open reduction internal fixation of the ankl
Keywords
Ankle Fracture
Medical subject headings
Ankle Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non OperativeProcedure or surgery

    Patients who are treated non-operatively will be treated with a walking boot and allowed WBAT. Discharge from hospital will be determined by the patient walking 25m unaided by standby assistance. All patients will be reviewed between 7 and 14 days post injury with repeat x-rays by the treating surgeon.

  • Open reduction internal fixation of the anklProcedure or surgery

    The specific procedure for each patient managed operatively, both in the observational study and the RCT, will be determined by the operating surgeon. Any adverse intra-operative or post-operative event will be recorded. This includes but is not limited to death, infection and neurovascular injury. Post operatively, all patients will be NWB (non weight bearing) and placed in a POP (plaster of paris) below knee cast or walking boot. Discharge from hospital will be determined by the patient walking 25m unaided by standby assistance. The treating surgeon will review the patients after 10-14 days for a wound review, removal of sutures and change of cast to a fibreglass cast or walking boot (cam walker). The patient will be WBAT (weight bearing as tolerated) for a further 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT03083028
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non OperativeActive comparatorNon-Operative Patients who are treated non-operatively will be treated with a walking boot and allowed WBAT. Discharge from hospital will be determined by the patient walking 25m unaided by standby assistance. All patients will be reviewed between 7 and 14 days post injury with repeat x-rays by the treating surgeon.
Receives: Procedure: Non Operative
OperativeActive comparatorThe specific procedure for each patient managed operatively, both in the observational study and the RCT, will be determined by the operating surgeon. Any adverse intra-operative or post-operative event will be recorded. This includes but is not limited to death, infection and neurovascular injury. Post operatively, all patients will be NWB (non weight bearing) and placed in a POP (plaster of paris) below knee cast or walking boot. Discharge from hospital will be determined by the patient walking 25m unaided by standby assistance. The treating surgeon will review the patients after 10-14 days for a wound review, removal of sutures and change of cast to a fibreglass cast or walking boot (cam walker). The patient will be WBAT (weight bearing as tolerated) for a further 4 weeks
Receives: Procedure: Open reduction internal fixation of the ankl

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire

    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire

    Measured: 5 years

  2. PCS of Short Form (SF)-12v2

    SF-12 version 2 Health Survey

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Complications

    Late surgery Infection Neurovascular complication Mortality

    Measured: 5 years

  2. MCS of Short Form (SF)-12v2

    SF-12 version 2 Health Survey

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2017
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomised Controlled Trial with an Observational Cohort
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03083028
Sponsor's protocol ID
CROSSBAT 5Y
Acronym
CROSSBAT 5Y
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
12 Mar 2017
Last updated
17 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Non Operative and Open reduction internal fixation of the ankl in people with Ankle Fractures, run by The University of New South Wales.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in