AzTrials
AzTrials

CTEPHInShapeIIINCT03083093

CTEPH Identification an Standard Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pulmonary Embolism Patients

An observational study of CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study the investigators will evaluate whether more careful reading (than the current standard) of routine computerised tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed in the clinical work-up of suspected (pulmonary embolism (PE) will differentiate patients with acute PE from those with more chronic or acute… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Early Diagnosis
What is being tested?
The initial CTPA will be reviewed
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
1 May 2017to 1 Mar 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The CTPA scans of the following patient populations will be compared. The first group consists of patients with confirmed CTEPH after a prior diagnosis of acute PE. The control group consists of patients with an episode of acute PE in whom CTEPH was excluded after 2 years of follow-up by echocardiography. The CTPA scans of case and control patients will be matched according to the right-to-left ventricule diameter ratio.

Who may be able to join

  • patients after an acute PE diagnosed with CTEPH according to current guidelines, patients after an acute PE in whom CTEPH is excluded by follow-up echocardiography
  • availability of the CTPA scan of the initial PE episode

Who cannot join

  • CTEPH diagnosis based on other test results than a RHC
  • Patients who did not receive anticoagulation after PE diagnosis
  • Patients under the age of 18 years old
  • Patients in the control group with a follow-up duration of less than 2 years after the index PE episode
  • Use of a CTPA scanner with less than 32-detector rows

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • LUMC

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Identification of CTEPH on Standard Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Performed in the Work-up of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

In this study the investigators will evaluate whether more careful reading (than the current standard) of routine computerised tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed in the clinical work-up of suspected (pulmonary embolism (PE) will differentiate patients with acute PE from those with more chronic or acute on chronic PE, which could be indicative of the presence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)"

Read the detailed description

The investigators will study 50 consecutive patients diagnosed with CTEPH as well as 50 patients diagnosed with acute PE in whom CTEPH was ruled out 2 years after the PE diagnosis by sequential echocardiography. The cases and controls will be matched based on the right-to-left ventrilcle diameter ratio.

Three experienced thorax radiologists with specific expertise on acute PE and CTEPH will blindly assess the index CTPAs of the study population. In addition to the binominal judgement whether CTEPH signs are already present (or not), the presence of the following items will be scored by all 3 readers independently:

  • Webs or bands
  • Residual thrombus attached to the vascular wall
  • Complete occlusion /retraction
  • Mosaic perfusion
  • Pulmonary infarct
  • Parenchymal bands
  • Bronchial arteries
  • Right atrial (RA) dilatation
  • Right ventricle (RV) dilatation
  • Flattening of the septum
  • Right ventricle (RV) hypertrophy
  • Dilated truncus pulmonalis
  • Cardiac signs of pulmonary hypertension (PH)
  • Further remarks (free text)
Being tested
The initial CTPA will be reviewed
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The initial CTPA will be reviewedDiagnostic test

    The initial CTPA will be reviewed

Study groups in NCT03083093
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CTEPH patientsthe initial CTPA scan will be reviewed in patients diagnosed with CTEPH after an episode of an acute PE
Receives: Diagnostic Test: The initial CTPA will be reviewed
non CTEPH patientsthe initial CTPA scan will be reviewed in patients after an episode of an acute PE in whom CTEPH was excluded
Receives: Diagnostic Test: The initial CTPA will be reviewed

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To Identify the Accuracy of Routine CTPA for the Distinction of CTEPH From Acute PE.

    The sensitivity of CTPA is determined by calculating the proportion of scans that are read as "positive for the CTEPH specific radiological pattern" in patients with confirmed CTEPH and the specificity is determined by calculating the proportion of scans that are read as "negative for the CTEPH specific radiological pattern" in patients without CTEPH.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 May 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03083093
Sponsor's protocol ID
G17.014
Acronym
InShapeIII
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
8 Mar 2017
Last updated
19 Apr 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: this has to be planned

Publications

  • Konstantinides SV. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Dec 1;35(45):3145-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu393. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25452462
  • Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46(4):903-75. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01032-2015. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

    PubMed 26318161
  • Pepke-Zaba J, Delcroix M, Lang I, Mayer E, Jansa P, Ambroz D, Treacy C, D'Armini AM, Morsolini M, Snijder R, Bresser P, Torbicki A, Kristensen B, Lewczuk J, Simkova I, Barbera JA, de Perrot M, Hoeper MM, Gaine S, Speich R, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Kovacs G, Hamid AM, Jais X, Simonneau G. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation. 2011 Nov 1;124(18):1973-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015008. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

    PubMed 21969018
  • Tunariu N, Gibbs SJ, Win Z, Gin-Sing W, Graham A, Gishen P, Al-Nahhas A. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension. J Nucl Med. 2007 May;48(5):680-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.039438.

    PubMed 17475953
  • Dogan H, de Roos A, Geleijins J, Huisman MV, Kroft LJ. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pulmonary embolism. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):307-16. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14403.

    PubMed 26133321
  • Kim NH, Delcroix M, Jenkins DP, Channick R, Dartevelle P, Jansa P, Lang I, Madani MM, Ogino H, Pengo V, Mayer E. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.024.

    PubMed 24355646
  • Lang IM, Pesavento R, Bonderman D, Yuan JX. Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a current understanding. Eur Respir J. 2013 Feb;41(2):462-8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00049312. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

    PubMed 22700839
  • Lang IM, Madani M. Update on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2014 Aug 5;130(6):508-18. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009309. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25092279
  • Lang IM, Simonneau G, Pepke-Zaba JW, Mayer E, Ambroz D, Blanco I, Torbicki A, Mellemkjaer S, Yaici A, Delcroix M. Factors associated with diagnosis and operability of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. A case-control study. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;110(1):83-91. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0097. Epub 2013 May 16.

    PubMed 23677493
  • van der Bijl N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, van Rooden JK, Mertens BJA, de Roos A, Kroft LJM. Measurement of right and left ventricular function by ECG-synchronized CT scanning in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: usefulness for predicting short-term outcome. Chest. 2011 Oct;140(4):1008-1015. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3174. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

    PubMed 21474573
  • Klok FA, Zondag W, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk AP, Tamsma JT, Heyning FH, Vliegen HW, Huisman MV. Patient outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism. A pooled survival analysis of different adverse events. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar 1;181(5):501-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1141OC. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

    PubMed 19965808

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To Identify the Accuracy of Routine CTPA for the Distinction of CTEPH From Acute PE. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03083093, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in