AzTrials
AzTrials

Vulvovaginal AtrophyNCT03083262

High Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

An observational study of Vulvovaginal Atrophy, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dyspareunia, or painful intercourse, is one of the most commonly reported complaints in postmenopausal women. One common cause of dyspareunia is vaginal atrophy (VVA), which occurs in >50% of postmenopausal women. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Vulvovaginal Atrophy
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
31 Jan 2017to 1 Feb 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: >/= 18 -90 years of age female any ethnic background

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA)

Who cannot join

  • not meeting the inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Mary's Health Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Retrospective Chart Review to Investigate an Association Between Vulvovaginal Atrophy and High Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (HTPFD)

Dyspareunia, or painful intercourse, is one of the most commonly reported complaints in postmenopausal women. One common cause of dyspareunia is vaginal atrophy (VVA), which occurs in >50% of postmenopausal women. At the time of menopause, a lack of estrogen thins the vaginal mucosa and lessons lubrication, making sex painful. Some women with vaginal atrophy will also have high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD) (also known as levator spasm). Successful treatment of the sexual pain requires treatment of both vaginal atrophy and HTPFD.

How often vaginal atrophy and HTPFD coexist has not been studied. In fact, the prevalence of HTPFD is unknown. This is most likely due to the fact that many clinicians are unaware of its existence or how to diagnose or treat it. Also, sexual symptoms tend to be underreported due to embarrassment or hesitation to seek care. HTPFD frequently coexists with other conditions that cause pain like vaginal atrophy, endometriosis or interstitial cystitis. Treatment includes treating both conditions. If only one is treated, then sexual pain is likely to continue. There are several available treatments for HTPFD that have been studied including physical therapy, botox and intravaginal diazepam.

This is an area where clinicians may be under treating a condition and limiting the possibility of restoring normal sexual function to many women. Treating only vaginal atrophy without appropriate evaluation and treatment of HTPFD leaves a cohort of women still struggling with sexual pain. With a better understanding of the relationship between HTPFD and vaginal atrophy, the investigators hope to bring awareness concerning the importance of treating both in restoring normal sexual function.

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective chart review that will be performed to identify all female patients in the electronic medical records with a diagnosis of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA).

The records of these patients with VVA will be examined for demographics, symptoms, answers to standardized questionnaires ( e.g. Female Sexual Function Index - FSFI - that is routinely assessed during clinical evaluation), work-up, diagnosis, and/or treatment of high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD). Symptoms of HTPFD include but are not limited to pelvic pressure or pain, and dyspareunia. These data will then undergo statistical analysis.

Being tested
no intervention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • no interventionOther

    None, there is no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. vulvovaginal atrophy

    Charts reviewed for HTPFD

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2017
  2. Study start31 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03083262
Sponsor's protocol ID
27975
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
3 Mar 2017
Last updated
7 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vulvovaginal Atrophy, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

vulvovaginal atrophy (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in