AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy VolunteersNCT03083483

Utilizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Laparoscopic Technical Skills Training

A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test the influences of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. For this purpose, the investigator will compare variants of tDCS in the first of 2 experiments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Volunteers
What is being tested?
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
71 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Apr 2017to 21 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >18 years, healthy male and female
  • Negative urine pregnancy test for female participants
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Able to follow study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Indwelling metallic implants
  • Neurological or psychiatric medical history
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Current or prior brain tumor
  • Current or prior seizures
  • Neuroactive medications
  • Current pregnancy
  • Damage, rash, or skin lesion in area of electrode placement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to test the influences of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. For this purpose, the investigator will compare variants of tDCS in the first of 2 experiments. The second arm of the trial will investigate gaze training in a similar study design. These questions will be evaluated using the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) module 1, with the overall goal of developing a surgical training curriculum that achieves expert level skill in an expedited timeframe. This research provides a novel approach to general surgery training that has the potential to reduce the amount of time and repetitions required to achieve expert laparoscopic skills.

Read the detailed description

Developing expert performance requires assessment of the thought processes underlying performance and continued refinement of skills in order to obtain automaticity and intuition. Therefore, developing expert surgical skill is a process likely to take longer than the length of residency, thereby diminishing the quality of care delivered to patients.

The proposed study will implement novel neuroscience techniques of transcranial direct current stimulation to determine if it has the capacity to accelerate technical surgical skill learning in order to achieve competency and expertise in an earlier timeframe. tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that delivers constant, low current stimulation via electrodes placed on the scalp to modify cortical excitability in an area of interest. When applied to the motor cortex, promising data indicates that tDCS-induced changes lead to expedited recovery in stroke patients as well as enhanced learning in healthy individuals.

This technique has never been applied in the training of surgical residents making this project an innovative approach to enhance skill development.

Experiment 1: Determine if tDCS can accelerate the learning of laparoscopic skills.

In this experiment the investigators will compare behavioral learning curves from FLS modules 1 and 5 in three cohorts who undergo either active tDCS to the bilateral motor cortex (bilateral configuration), active tDCS to the supplementary motor cortex (SMA configuration), or sham tDCS (half in each configuration). This will be tested in groups of 20 participants who train for 40-minutes in each of 6 sessions that occur within 3 weeks. The investigators hypothesize that both active bilateral and SMA tDCS will lead to faster skill acquisition as measured by trials required to gain proficient completion scores (calculated as time plus errors), relative to sham.

The investigators hypothesize that both bilateral and vertex tDCS will lead to faster skill acquisition, with bilateral greater than vertex as measured by trials required to gain proficient module completion scores, relative to the group of participants who practice without active tDCS.

Being tested
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Device

    Also called Soterix

    tDCS will apply a low, direct current for the duration of the study session while the subject is training the specific laparoscopic tasks.

Study groups in NCT03083483
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bilateral M1, active tDCSExperimentalParticipants will complete 6 sessions of the FLS peg transfer task over a 7-day time span. Participants randomized to this cohort had tdcs applied over the bilateral M1 areas of the brain by measurement of 20% length of periauricular distance left and right of the vertex. The anode was placed on the left side and the cathode was placed on the right side.
Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
SMA, active tDCSExperimentalParticipants will complete 6 sessions of the FLS peg transfer task over a 7-day time span. Participants randomized to this cohort had tdcs applied over the supplementary motor area. The cathode was placed 10% of nasion-inion distance above the nasion and 15% of nasion-inion distance anterior to the vertex.
Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
sham tDCSSham comparatorParticipants will complete 6 sessions of the FLS peg transfer task over a 7-day time span. Participants in this group were either randomized into either Bilateral or SMA configurations using the same measurements, but did not receive active stimulation. Half of these subjects will be placed in the SMA configuration and the other half in the bilateral M1 electrode configuration.
Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Completion

    Completion time for each repetition of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) task 1 in post-test (1 single repetition of the task that was timed after all training was completed)

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Tasks Completed

    The number of completed tasks will be calculated during retrospective review of recorded video through study completion. The six training sessions for data collection will be completed within a 7-day span.

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Number of Errors

    The number of errors (as defined by FLS) during completion of tasks will be recorded and transitioned into a time addition. This will be collected for every repetition performed during the 6 separate training sessions within a 7-day period. These errors will be defined and retrospective review of recorded video through study completion.

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion21 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Subjects are randomized into SMA or bilateral M1 tDCS configurations. They are further randomized into active or sham tDCS.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03083483
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00078782
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
14 Mar 2017
Last updated
6 Jan 2020
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cox ML, Deng ZD, Palmer H, Watts A, Beynel L, Young JR, Lisanby SH, Migaly J, Appelbaum LG. Utilizing transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance laparoscopic technical skills training: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

    PubMed 32289719

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Completion (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03083483, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in