AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaUH3NCT03084081

An Innovative Treatment for Cervical Precancer (UH3)

A study testing CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
What is being tested?
CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,132 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
1 Aug 2017to 15 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18 and older
  • Biopsy results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study
  • History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation)
  • Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years
  • Patient not eligible for cryotherapy (lesion >75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer)
  • Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

China1 site
  • Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Shanxi Bethune Hospital

    Taiyuan

Other trials in China

Colombia1 site
  • Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

    Bogotá

Other trials in Colombia

El Salvador1 site
  • Instituto Salvadoreno del Seguro Social (ISSS)

    San Salvador

Other trials in El Salvador

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cure Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and Higher (CIN2+) Treated With CO2-based Cryotherapy, CropPen, and Thermoablation (UH3)

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.

Read the detailed description

Cryotherapy is the current gold standard for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low resource settings. However, in recent years a number of issues-particularly the use of compressed gas, which requires storage and replenishment of large and potentially dangerous tanks-have emerged as clear limitations. Two technologies-the LMICs-adapted CryoPen®, manufactured and sold by CryoPen®, Inc. (TX, USA), and the thermoablator commercialized by WISAP Medical Technology (Germany) are treatment options for precancerous cervical lesions that run on electricity and avoid the difficulties associated with compressed gas. The LMIC-adapted CryoPen® (hereafter, CryoPen®) differs from previous cryotherapy methods in that it does not require an external source of gas (a tank), since the gas for cooling is built into the system. Thermoablation (also called thermocoagulation) has been used since the 1970s for treatment of cervical lesions. This is treatment with a probe heated to temperatures of 100 to 120ºC. It is also an effective, inexpensive method that does not require high-level healthcare providers.

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the CryoPen® and WiSAP thermoablator to CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of CIN2 or more severe diagnoses ("CIN2+") but excluding microinvasive or invasive cervical cancer. The primary objective is to compare CIN2+ cure rates after treatment with the LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, the WISAP thermoablator, and CO2-based cryotherapy.

Women will be recruited from the Salvadorian Social Security Hospital (ISSS) in San Salvador, El Salvador, La Liga Contra el Cancer in Lima, Peru and Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogota, Colombia. All are referral sites for women with abnormal cytology.

The investigators will approach approximately 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a 2.5 year enrollment phase (30 months). Assuming an approximately 80% participation rate, approximately 1,281 women will be enrolled- 1,152 (90%) will be eligible for cryotherapy (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments. The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the twelve-month visit, so that complete data will be available on a total of 922 women (57.55% of 1,602) treated with either CO2-based cryotherapy, LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, or thermoablation.

Eligible women with biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ will undergo HPV genotyping with next-generation sequencing. The specimen is taken prior to treatment to establish a baseline of which HPV types are present. If a different HPV type is present in the post-treatment specimen, this will be classified as a new rather than persistent infection. Testing will be conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, MD. Women will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms:

  1. CO2-based cryotherapy (double freeze), B. CryoPen® (single freeze), or C. Thermoablation for 40 seconds at 100ºC.

At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile ODT device will be taken before and after treatment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.

Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.

One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The goal is to evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.

Being tested
CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen, Thermocoagulator
Keywords
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Cryotherapy, Thermoablation, Thermocoagulation, Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CO2 standard therapyDevice

    Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue

  • CryoPenDevice

    Provides a means of freezing tissue without the use of gases or liquids

  • ThermocoagulatorDevice

    Thermoablation

Study groups in NCT03084081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CO2 standard therapyActive comparatorDouble freeze treatment consists of three-minute freeze, five-minute thaw, three-minute freeze
Receives: Device: CO2 standard therapy
CryoPenExperimentalSingle freeze treatment consists of one five-minute freeze
Receives: Device: CryoPen
ThermocoagulatorExperimentalThermoablation for 60-seconds at 100 degrees Celsius
Receives: Device: Thermocoagulator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+

    Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher with cervical cancer diagnosis

    Measured: 12-months post treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Self-reported Pain

    Patient pain scores using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale from 0-10 where 0 represents the best outcome (no pain) and 10 represents the worst outcome (worst pain). The underlying construct is pain experienced by the participant.

    Measured: Pain during treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,132 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03084081
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-294
Other IDs
UH3CA189883
Acronym
UH3
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
14 Mar 2017
Last updated
6 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: IDP data will not be shared at the completion of the study.

Publications

  • Soler M, Alfaro K, Masch RJ, Conzuelo Rodriguez G, Qu X, Wu S, Sun J, Hernandez Jovel DM, Bonilla J, Puentes LO, Murillo R, Alonzo TA, Felix JC, Castle P, Cremer M. Safety and Acceptability of Three Ablation Treatments for High-Grade Cervical Precancer: Early Data From a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Dec;8:e2200112. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00112.

    PubMed 36525620

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China, Colombia, El Salvador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+ (time frame: 12-months post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03084081, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in