Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaUH3NCT03084081
An Innovative Treatment for Cervical Precancer (UH3)
A study testing CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- What is being tested?
- CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,132 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 15 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 18 and older
- Biopsy results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study
- History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation)
- Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years
- Patient not eligible for cryotherapy (lesion >75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer)
- Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries.
3 sites in 3 countries
El Salvador1 site
Instituto Salvadoreno del Seguro Social (ISSS)
San Salvador
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cure Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and Higher (CIN2+) Treated With CO2-based Cryotherapy, CropPen, and Thermoablation (UH3)
The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.
Read the detailed description
Cryotherapy is the current gold standard for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low resource settings. However, in recent years a number of issues-particularly the use of compressed gas, which requires storage and replenishment of large and potentially dangerous tanks-have emerged as clear limitations. Two technologies-the LMICs-adapted CryoPen®, manufactured and sold by CryoPen®, Inc. (TX, USA), and the thermoablator commercialized by WISAP Medical Technology (Germany) are treatment options for precancerous cervical lesions that run on electricity and avoid the difficulties associated with compressed gas. The LMIC-adapted CryoPen® (hereafter, CryoPen®) differs from previous cryotherapy methods in that it does not require an external source of gas (a tank), since the gas for cooling is built into the system. Thermoablation (also called thermocoagulation) has been used since the 1970s for treatment of cervical lesions. This is treatment with a probe heated to temperatures of 100 to 120ºC. It is also an effective, inexpensive method that does not require high-level healthcare providers.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the CryoPen® and WiSAP thermoablator to CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of CIN2 or more severe diagnoses ("CIN2+") but excluding microinvasive or invasive cervical cancer. The primary objective is to compare CIN2+ cure rates after treatment with the LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, the WISAP thermoablator, and CO2-based cryotherapy.
Women will be recruited from the Salvadorian Social Security Hospital (ISSS) in San Salvador, El Salvador, La Liga Contra el Cancer in Lima, Peru and Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogota, Colombia. All are referral sites for women with abnormal cytology.
The investigators will approach approximately 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a 2.5 year enrollment phase (30 months). Assuming an approximately 80% participation rate, approximately 1,281 women will be enrolled- 1,152 (90%) will be eligible for cryotherapy (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments. The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the twelve-month visit, so that complete data will be available on a total of 922 women (57.55% of 1,602) treated with either CO2-based cryotherapy, LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, or thermoablation.
Eligible women with biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ will undergo HPV genotyping with next-generation sequencing. The specimen is taken prior to treatment to establish a baseline of which HPV types are present. If a different HPV type is present in the post-treatment specimen, this will be classified as a new rather than persistent infection. Testing will be conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, MD. Women will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms:
- CO2-based cryotherapy (double freeze), B. CryoPen® (single freeze), or C. Thermoablation for 40 seconds at 100ºC.
At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile ODT device will be taken before and after treatment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.
Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.
One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The goal is to evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.
- Conditions
- Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- Being tested
- CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen, Thermocoagulator
- Keywords
- Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Cryotherapy, Thermoablation, Thermocoagulation, Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CO2 standard therapyDevice
Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue
CryoPenDevice
Provides a means of freezing tissue without the use of gases or liquids
ThermocoagulatorDevice
Thermoablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 standard therapy | Active comparator | Double freeze treatment consists of three-minute freeze, five-minute thaw, three-minute freeze Receives: Device: CO2 standard therapy |
| CryoPen | Experimental | Single freeze treatment consists of one five-minute freeze Receives: Device: CryoPen |
| Thermocoagulator | Experimental | Thermoablation for 60-seconds at 100 degrees Celsius Receives: Device: Thermocoagulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+
Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher with cervical cancer diagnosis
Measured: 12-months post treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Self-reported Pain
Patient pain scores using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale from 0-10 where 0 represents the best outcome (no pain) and 10 represents the worst outcome (worst pain). The underlying construct is pain experienced by the participant.
Measured: Pain during treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion15 Aug 2024
- Study completion15 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Basic Health International, Inc., University of Southern California, Instituto Salvadoreno del Seguro Social, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Medical College of Wisconsin, Shanxi Bethune Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Miriam Cremer, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03084081
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-294
- Other IDs
- UH3CA189883
- Acronym
- UH3
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IDP data will not be shared at the completion of the study.
Publications
Soler M, Alfaro K, Masch RJ, Conzuelo Rodriguez G, Qu X, Wu S, Sun J, Hernandez Jovel DM, Bonilla J, Puentes LO, Murillo R, Alonzo TA, Felix JC, Castle P, Cremer M. Safety and Acceptability of Three Ablation Treatments for High-Grade Cervical Precancer: Early Data From a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Dec;8:e2200112. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00112.
PubMed 36525620
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cure Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and Higher (CIN2+) Treated With CO2-based Cryotherapy, CropPen, and Thermoablation (UH3)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03084081
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UH3 / 17-294
- Conditions
- Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- Keywords
- Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Cryotherapy, Thermoablation, Thermocoagulation, Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Basic Health International, Inc., University of Southern California, Instituto Salvadoreno del Seguro Social, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Medical College of Wisconsin, Shanxi Bethune Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.
Detailed description
Cryotherapy is the current gold standard for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low resource settings. However, in recent years a number of issues-particularly the use of compressed gas, which requires storage and replenishment of large and potentially dangerous tanks-have emerged as clear limitations. Two technologies-the LMICs-adapted CryoPen®, manufactured and sold by CryoPen®, Inc. (TX, USA), and the thermoablator commercialized by WISAP Medical Technology (Germany) are treatment options for precancerous cervical lesions that run on electricity and avoid the difficulties associated with compressed gas. The LMIC-adapted CryoPen® (hereafter, CryoPen®) differs from previous cryotherapy methods in that it does not require an external source of gas (a tank), since the gas for cooling is built into the system. Thermoablation (also called thermocoagulation) has been used since the 1970s for treatment of cervical lesions. This is treatment with a probe heated to temperatures of 100 to 120ºC. It is also an effective, inexpensive method that does not require high-level healthcare providers.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the CryoPen® and WiSAP thermoablator to CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of CIN2 or more severe diagnoses ("CIN2+") but excluding microinvasive or invasive cervical cancer. The primary objective is to compare CIN2+ cure rates after treatment with the LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, the WISAP thermoablator, and CO2-based cryotherapy.
Women will be recruited from the Salvadorian Social Security Hospital (ISSS) in San Salvador, El Salvador, La Liga Contra el Cancer in Lima, Peru and Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogota, Colombia. All are referral sites for women with abnormal cytology.
The investigators will approach approximately 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a 2.5 year enrollment phase (30 months). Assuming an approximately 80% participation rate, approximately 1,281 women will be enrolled- 1,152 (90%) will be eligible for cryotherapy (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments. The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the twelve-month visit, so that complete data will be available on a total of 922 women (57.55% of 1,602) treated with either CO2-based cryotherapy, LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, or thermoablation.
Eligible women with biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ will undergo HPV genotyping with next-generation sequencing. The specimen is taken prior to treatment to establish a baseline of which HPV types are present. If a different HPV type is present in the post-treatment specimen, this will be classified as a new rather than persistent infection. Testing will be conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, MD. Women will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms:
- CO2-based cryotherapy (double freeze), B. CryoPen® (single freeze), or C. Thermoablation for 40 seconds at 100ºC.
At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile ODT device will be taken before and after treatment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.
Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.
One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The goal is to evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 standard therapy | Active comparator | Device: CO2 standard therapyDouble freeze treatment consists of three-minute freeze, five-minute thaw, three-minute freeze |
| CryoPen | Experimental | Device: CryoPenSingle freeze treatment consists of one five-minute freeze |
| Thermocoagulator | Experimental | Device: ThermocoagulatorThermoablation for 60-seconds at 100 degrees Celsius |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women aged 18 and older
- Biopsy results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study
- History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation)
- Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years
- Patient not eligible for cryotherapy (lesion >75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer)
- Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 standard therapyStandard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue | Device | CO2 standard therapy |
| CryoPenProvides a means of freezing tissue without the use of gases or liquids | Device | CryoPen |
| ThermocoagulatorThermoablation | Device | Thermocoagulator |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+
Time frame: 12-months post treatment
Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher with cervical cancer diagnosis
1 secondary outcome
Self-reported Pain
Time frame: Pain during treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36525620Soler M, Alfaro K, Masch RJ, Conzuelo Rodriguez G, Qu X, Wu S, Sun J, Hernandez Jovel DM, Bonilla J, Puentes LO, Murillo R, Alonzo TA, Felix JC, Castle P, Cremer M. Safety and Acceptability of Three Ablation Treatments for High-Grade Cervical Precancer: Early Data From a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Dec;8:e2200112. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00112.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IDP data will not be shared at the completion of the study.
Related trials for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Liquid Biopsies in HPV-associated Cancer Treatment Monitoring
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Leveraging Methylated DNA Markers (MDMs) in the Detection of Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Cervical Cancer
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing Use of One Or Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Screen Positive Women Living With HIV in C1001P-CS2 Kenya
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS9 South Africa
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for TA Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS5 Rwanda
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Miriam Cremer, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CO2 standard therapy, CryoPen and Thermocoagulator in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in China, Colombia, El Salvador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+ (time frame: 12-months post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03084081, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2025.