COPDPhase 2GLIMMERNCT03084796
A 6-week Dose Ranging Study of CHF 5259 pMDI in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
A Phase 2 study testing CHF 5259 and Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation Capsule in people with COPD and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. at 112 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose-response of different doses of CHF 5259 pMDI on lung function and other clinical outcomes, to identify the optimal dose(s) in terms of benefit/ risk ratio for further development in the target subject population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- CHF 5259 and Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation Capsule
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 733 participants
- Where
- 112 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2017to 6 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 40 who have signed an Informed Consent Form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
- Subjects with a diagnosis of COPD (according to GOLD 2017 Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD Report) at least 12 months before the screening visit.
- Current smokers or ex-smokers who quit smoking at least 6 months prior to screening visit, with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
- A post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) ≥50% and <80% of the predicted normal value and,
- a post-bronchodilator FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 0.7 at screening and
- a demonstrated reversibility to ipratropium defined as ΔFEV1 ≥ 5% over baseline 30-45 minutes after inhaling 4 puffs of ipratropium
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subjects under regular COPD therapy for at least 2 months prior to screening with either inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), inhaled ICS/ long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), inhaled ICS + LAMA
- Symptomatic subjects at screening with a CAT score ≥10. This criterion must be confirmed at randomization
- Symptomatic subjects with a BDI focal score ≤ 10. This criterion must be confirmed at randomization
- A cooperative attitude and ability to demonstrate correct use of the inhalers and e-diary.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating women and all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant UNLESS they are willing to use highly effective birth control methods
- Diagnosis of asthma or Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) as described in global initiative for asthma (GINA) Report 2016, history of allergic rhinitis or atopy (atopy which may raise contra-indications or impact the efficacy of the study treatment according to Investigator's judgment)
- COPD Exacerbations: a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation that has not resolved ≤14 days prior to screening and ≤30 days following the last dose of any oral/systemic corticosteroid or antibiotic (whichever comes last). A Moderate or Severe COPD exacerbation during the run-in period
- Use of antibiotics for a lower respiratory tract infection in the 4 weeks prior to screening or during run-in
- Subjects treated with non-cardio-selective β-blockers in the month preceding screening or during the run-in period
- Subjects treated with long-acting anti-histamines unless taken at stable regimen at least 2 months prior to screening and to be maintained constant during the study, or if taken as needed
Show all 21Show fewer
- Subjects requiring long term (at least 12 hours daily) oxygen therapy for chronic hypoxemia
- Known respiratory disorders other than COPD which may impact the efficacy of the study treatment according the Investigator's judgment.
- Subjects who have clinically significant cardiovascular condition
- Subjects who have a clinically significant abnormal 12-lead ECG that results in active medical problem which may impact the safety of the subject according to Investigator's judgement
- Subjects whose 12-lead ECG shows Fridericia corrected QT interval (QTcF) >450 ms for males or QTcF >470 ms for females at screening visit
- Medical diagnosis of narrow-angle glaucoma, clinically relevant prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction that in the opinion of the Investigator would prevent use of anticholinergic agents
- History of hypersensitivity to M3 receptor antagonists, β2-adrenergic receptor agonist, corticosteroids or any of the excipients contained in any of the formulations used in the study which may raise contra-indications or impact the efficacy of the study treatment according to the Investigator's judgement
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities indicating a significant or unstable concomitant disease which may impact the efficacy or the safety of the study treatment according to Investigator's judgement
- Subjects with serum potassium levels <3.5 mEq/L (or 3.5 mmol/L) at screening
- Use of potent cytochrome P450 2D6 and 3A4 inhibitors within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Unstable or uncontrolled concurrent disease; fever, endocrine disease, gastrointestinal disease; neurological disease; hematological disease; autoimmune disorders, or other which may impact the feasibility of the results of the study according to Investigator's judgment
- History of alcohol abuse and/or substance/drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening
- Subjects who have received an investigational drug within 1 month or 5 half-lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit, or have been previously randomized in this trial, or are currently participating in another clinical trial.
- Subjects who are mentally or legally incapacitated, or subjects accommodated in an establishment as a result of an official or judicial order.
- Subjects who have undergone major surgery in the 3 months prior to screening visit or have a planned surgery during the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
112 sites in 1 country.
112 sites in 1 country
United States112 sites
Chiesi Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Chiesi Investigational Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Chiesi Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Chiesi Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Chiesi Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35244
Chiesi Investigational Site
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
Chiesi Investigational Site
Boerne, Texas, 78006
Chiesi Investigational Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80301
Chiesi Investigational Site
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Chiesi Investigational Site
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
Chiesi Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Chiesi Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Chiesi Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Chiesi Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Chiesi Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Chiesi Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Chiesi Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Chiesi Investigational Site
Crowley, Louisiana, 70526
Chiesi Investigational Site
Cypress, Texas, 77429
Chiesi Investigational Site
Dacula, Georgia, 30019
Clinical Research Solutions
Dayton, Ohio, 45409
Chiesi Investigational Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Chiesi Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Chiesi Investigational Site
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
Chiesi Investigational Site
Duluth, Georgia, 30096
Chiesi Investigational Site
Easley, South Carolina, 29640
Chiesi Investigational Site
East Providence, Rhode Island, 02914
Chiesi Investigational Site
Edgewater, Florida, 32132
Chiesi Investigational Site
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034
Chiesi Investigational Site
Escondido, California, 92025
Chiesi Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Chiesi Investigational Site
Everett, Washington, 98208
Chiesi Investigational Site
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Chiesi Investigational Site
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02721
Chiesi Investigational Site
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336
Chiesi Investigational Site
Flagstaff, Arizona, 86001
Chiesi Investigational Site
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707
Chiesi Investigational Site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067
Chiesi Investigational Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Chiesi Investigational Site
Gaffney, South Carolina, 29340
Chiesi Investigational Site
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
Chiesi Investigational Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Chiesi Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Chiesi Investigational Site
Grove City, Ohio, 43123
Chiesi Investigational Site
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28739
Chiesi Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Chiesi Investigational Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Chiesi Investigational Site
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Chiesi Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Chiesi Investigational Site
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026
Chiesi Investigational Site
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601
Chiesi Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Chiesi Investigational Site
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Clinical Trials Research
Lincoln, California, 95648
Chiesi Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Chiesi Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Chiesi Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Chiesi Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Chiesi Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40215
Chiesi Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40218
Chiesi Investigational Site
Lutherville, Maryland, 21093
Chiesi Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Chiesi Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Chiesi Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
Chiesi Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Chiesi Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33176
Chiesi Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33186
Chiesi Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Chiesi Investigational Site
Missoula, Montana, 59808
Chiesi Investigational Site
Montgomery, Alabama, 36106
Chiesi Investigational Site
Mooresville, North Carolina, 28117
Chiesi Investigational Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Chiesi Investigational Site
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130
Chiesi Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Chiesi Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Chiesi Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Chiesi Investigational Site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Chiesi Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32825
Chiesi Investigational Site
Panama City, Florida, 32405
Chiesi Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Chiesi Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Chiesi Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Chiesi Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Chiesi Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97202
Chiesi Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Chiesi Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Chiesi Investigational Site
Richland, Washington, 99352
Chiesi Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23225
Chiesi Investigational Site
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
Chiesi Investigational Site
Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301
Chiesi Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92120
Chiesi Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Chiesi Investigational Site
Seneca, South Carolina, 29678
Chiesi Investigational Site
Shelby, North Carolina, 28150
Chiesi Investigational Site
Sherman, Texas, 75092
Chiesi Investigational Site
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
Chiesi Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Chiesi Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Chiesi Investigational Site
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Chiesi Investigational Site
Surprise, Arizona, 85374
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tempe, Arizona, 85283
Chiesi Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, 10455
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37388
Chiesi Investigational Site
Tustin, California, 92780
Chiesi Investigational Site
Union, South Carolina, 29379
Chiesi Investigational Site
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383
Chiesi Investigational Site
Westminster, California, 92683
Chiesi Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Chiesi Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose-response of different doses of CHF 5259 pMDI on lung function and other clinical outcomes, to identify the optimal dose(s) in terms of benefit/ risk ratio for further development in the target subject population.
Read the detailed description
This is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled dose-ranging 6-arm parallel group study to identify the optimal dose of CHF 5259 pMDI (pressurized metered dose inhaler) with respect to lung function as well as other clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.
After a 2 week run-in period under rescue albuterol and background inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as needed, patients were randomized to one of the 6 study treatment groups. Following randomization, subjects were assessed after 3 weeks and 6 weeks of study treatment at the study center. A follow-up phone was performed a week after the last visit.
During the study, daily symptoms, rescue and background medication use and compliance with the study drug were recorded in a subject diary. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were assessed and recorded throughout the study. At screening and subsequent visits, subjects underwent physical and vital signs examinations, spirometry measurements, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Symptoms and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) health status were assessed through validated questionnaires. Routine hematology, blood chemistry, and pregnancy testing were performed before enrollment and at end of study. 24-hour (24-H) digital recording of ECGs (Holter) was performed before and after the first dose and just before the last dose of study treatment.
- Conditions
- COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- CHF 5259, Placebo, Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation Capsule
- Keywords
- CHF 5259, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), pMDI (pressurized metered dose inhaler), GLIMMER
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CHF 5259Drug
Dose Response: Test one of four different doses of CHF 5259
PlaceboDrug
Placebo Control
Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation CapsuleDrug
Also called SPIRIVA® HANDIHALER®
Active Control
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment A | Experimental | CHF 5259 pMDI 6.25 μg, 1 inhalation twice daily (bid); (total daily dose [TDD] of CHF 5259 12.5 μg) Receives: Drug: CHF 5259 |
| Treatment B | Experimental | CHF 5259 pMDI 12.5 μg, 1 inhalation bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 25 μg) Receives: Drug: CHF 5259 |
| Treatment C | Experimental | CHF 5259 pMDI 12.5 μg, 2 inhalations bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 50 μg) Receives: Drug: CHF 5259 |
| Treatment D | Experimental | CHF 5259 pMDI 25 μg, 2 inhalations bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 100 μg) Receives: Drug: CHF 5259 |
| Treatment E | Placebo comparator | Placebo, 2 inhalations of CHF 5259 pMDI-matched Placebo bid; Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Treatment F | Active comparator | Tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, SPIRIVA® HandiHaler®, 2 inhalations once daily (od) of the content of 1 capsule; (TDD of TIO: 18 μg) Receives: Drug: Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation Capsule |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time at Week 6
Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, at the end of treatment (Week 6).
Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).
Definitions:
AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;
Measured: Baseline, Week 6
Secondary outcomes (23)
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time on Day 1
Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1.
Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours).
Definitions:
AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;
Measured: Baseline, Day 1
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h), normalized by time on Day 1 of treatment (Week 0).
Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 on Day 1 and at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).
Definitions:
AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-4h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4h), normalized by time;
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FEV1 Peak(0-4h) at Day 1 and Week 6
Change from baseline in FEV1 peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at Week 6.
Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.
Definitions:
Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).
Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).
Definitions:
AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-12h)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Change from baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h), normalized by time, on Day 1 and at the end of treatment (Week 6).
Spirometry, used to measure FVC, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FVC was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FVC from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (4 hours).
Definitions:
AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; FVC AUC(0-4)=Mean FVC after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 4-h observation period (0-4 h), normalized by time;
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC Peak(0-4h) on Day 1 and at Week 6
Change from baseline in FVC peak(0-4h) (L) on Day 1 and at the end of treatment at Week 6. Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first 4 hours after dose of study medication.
Definitions:
Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug at Visit 2 (Week 0); FVC=Forced Vital Capacity; Peak(0-4h)=Maximum FEV1 between 0 and 4 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Time to Onset of Action (Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) on Day 1
Time to onset of action is defined as the time (in minutes) from receiving the study drug on Day 1, until the FEV1 change from baseline is ≥100 mL.
Measured: Day 1
Number of Patients Achieving Onset of Action - Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1
Number of patients achieving onset of action was defined as a change from baseline in post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1. These are the patients who contributed to the results, reported as median and 95% CI for 'time to onset of action' presented in Outcome Measure 8, above.
Measured: Day 1
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 3 and Week 6
Change from baseline in FEV1 at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6) of treatment. Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards.
Definitions:
Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second;
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 3 and Week 6
Change from baseline in IC at treatment Visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment Visit 4 (Week 6). Spirometry was used to measure IC and was performed according to internationally accepted standards.
Definitions:
Baseline: value of the measurement recorded at 45 mins pre-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0); IC=Inspiratory capacity;
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Response (Focal Score ≥1) at Week 3 and Week 6
Number of subjects achieving TDI focal score ≥1, at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and at treatment visit 4 (Week 6).
TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement); total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.
Definitions:
Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 3 and Week 6
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at treatment visit 3 (Week 3) and treatment visit 4 (Week 6).
TDI is a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline established by the BDI questionnaire. TDI consists of the same 24 items and 3 domains as the BDI, with the same 2-week recall period. Each category is rated by 7 grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), with a total score ranging from -9 to +9, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is considered a change of ≥1 unit. The same investigator or designee interviewed the subject for the BDI and TDI during the study period. A TDI focal score of ≥1 is considered as clinically important.
Definitions:
Baseline=The BDI focal score value at Visit 2 (Week 0); BDI=Baseline Dyspnea Index; MCID=Minimal Clinically Important Differences; TDI=Transition Dyspnea Index;
Measured: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Evaluate the number of rescue medication-free days compared with baseline. Results are shown as percentage (%) of rescue medication-free days; an increased value indicates improvement from baseline.
Definitions:
Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0).
Measured: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Change From Baseline in Average Use of Rescue Medication During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Evaluate the change from baseline in average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) during the inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period.
Results are shown as number of puffs/day; a decrease (implies improvement) from baseline in average use of rescue medication.
Definitions:
Baseline=Data recorded during the run-in period (a 2-week period prior to randomization to study treatment and study drug intake); Inter-visit period 1=Starts at randomization to treatment (Visit 2, Week 0) and runs to the day before the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3 (Week 3); Inter-visit period 2=Starts when the subject returns to the clinic (Visit 3, Week 3) and runs to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Entire Treatment period=From day of randomization to drug intake to the end of the randomized treatment period (Visit 4, Week 6); Randomization=Randomization to study drug treatment (Visit 2, Week 0);
Measured: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Change From Baseline in Average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) Total Score During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Change from baseline in average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) total score during inter-visit periods and the entire treatment period
E-RS in COPD uses 11 respiratory symptom items from the 14-item EXAcerbations of COPD tool (EXACT). E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity on a scale ranging from 0 to 40. Higher E-RS total scores indicate more severe symptoms and a declining total score indicates health improvement. E-RS questionnaire was completed by the patient each evening (e-diary).
Definitions:
For details on baseline, inter-visit periods, and the entire treatment period, please refer to outcome measure #15.
Measured: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Vital Signs -- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Vital signs -- Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at prespecified times, using a 12-Lead single ECGs were recorded at all study visits (pre-dose at V1 (Week -2) and V3 (Week 3), as well as at pre-dose and 1.5 hours post-dose at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Visit 4 (Week 6).
Results are shown by treatment group, as change from baseline (in mmHg) for representative timepoints.
Definitions:
Baseline=Values recorded pre-dose (Visit 2, Week 0); Day 1=Day of the first dose of randomized study drug (Visit 2, Week 0);
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate (HR)
Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Heart rate (HR)
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5m, +55m, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval
Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - PR Interval
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Interval
Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - QRS Interval
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values were recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT Interval (QTcF)
Change from baseline in 24-Hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF).
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male Subjects
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male subjects.
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female Subjects
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female subjects.
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change From Baseline
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change from baseline.
Subjects had a 24-h Holter recording before and 24 h after the 1st dose of study drug (Visit 2) and for 24 h before the last dose of study drug (Visit 4). The time-matched values recorded during the 24 h before the 1st dose of study drug on Visit 2 and served as the baseline for the Holter-extracted ECG parameters. The time-averaged baseline score is the average of the Day -1 scores at +5 min, +55 min, and at +2.5 h.
Results are presented as the number of subjects who had a change from baseline in QTcF of: > 30 msec, > 60 msec, and no prolongation (by > 30 msec or > 60 msec).
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Mar 2017
- Study start28 Jul 2017
- Primary completion23 May 2018
- Study completion6 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (80)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COPDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 733 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Edward Kerwin, MD, Principal investigator, Crisor LLC c/o Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03084796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCD-05993AA3-02
- Acronym
- GLIMMER
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Barker-Collo S, Bartels DH, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bhalla K, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Boufous S, Bucello C, Burch M, Burney P, Carapetis J, Chen H, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahodwala N, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ezzati M, Feigin V, Flaxman AD, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gonzalez-Medina D, Halasa YA, Haring D, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hoen B, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Keren A, Khoo JP, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Ohno SL, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Mallinger L, March L, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGrath J, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Michaud C, Miller M, Miller TR, Mock C, Mocumbi AO, Mokdad AA, Moran A, Mulholland K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nasseri K, Norman P, O'Donnell M, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Phillips D, Pierce K, Pope CA 3rd, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Raju M, Ranganathan D, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Rivara FP, Roberts T, De Leon FR, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Segui-Gomez M, Shepard DS, Singh D, Singleton J, Sliwa K, Smith E, Steer A, Taylor JA, Thomas B, Tleyjeh IM, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Undurraga EA, Venketasubramanian N, Vijayakumar L, Vos T, Wagner GR, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Wilkinson JD, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Yip P, Zabetian A, Zheng ZJ, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
PubMed 23245604Tilert T, Dillon C, Paulose-Ram R, Hnizdo E, Doney B. Estimating the U.S. prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2010. Respir Res. 2013 Oct 9;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-103.
PubMed 24107140Mannino DM. COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity. Chest. 2002 May;121(5 Suppl):121S-126S. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5_suppl.121s.
PubMed 12010839Tonnesen P. Smoking cessation and COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2013 Mar 1;22(127):37-43. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00007212.
PubMed 23457163van Eerd EA, van der Meer RM, van Schayck OC, Kotz D. Smoking cessation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 20;2016(8):CD010744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010744.pub2.
PubMed 27545342Kew KM, Mavergames C, Walters JA. Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 15;2013(10):CD010177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010177.pub2.
PubMed 24127118McGarvey L, Niewoehner D, Magder S, Sachs P, Tetzlaff K, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Bothner U, Vogelmeier C, Koch A, Ferguson GT. One-Year Safety of Olodaterol Once Daily via Respimat(R) in Patients with GOLD 2-4 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of a Pre-Specified Pooled Analysis. COPD. 2015;12(5):484-93. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.991864. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PubMed 25692310Dahl R, Chung KF, Buhl R, Magnussen H, Nonikov V, Jack D, Bleasdale P, Owen R, Higgins M, Kramer B; INVOLVE (INdacaterol: Value in COPD: Longer Term Validation of Efficacy and Safety) Study Investigators. Efficacy of a new once-daily long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist indacaterol versus twice-daily formoterol in COPD. Thorax. 2010 Jun;65(6):473-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.125435.
PubMed 20522841Keating GM. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder: a review of its use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs. 2012 Jan 22;72(2):273-300. doi: 10.2165/11208620-000000000-00000.
PubMed 22217233Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB, Witek TJ Jr, Kesten S. Improvement in exercise tolerance with the combination of tiotropium and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):809-17. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.3.809.
PubMed 15764761Kesten S, Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB. Improvement in self-reported exercise participation with the combination of tiotropium and rehabilitative exercise training in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(1):127-36. doi: 10.2147/copd.s2389.
PubMed 18488436Karner C, Chong J, Poole P. Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
PubMed 22786525D'Urzo A, Ferguson GT, van Noord JA, Hirata K, Martin C, Horton R, Lu Y, Banerji D, Overend T. Efficacy and safety of once-daily NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: the GLOW1 trial. Respir Res. 2011 Dec 7;12(1):156. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-156.
PubMed 22151296Kerwin E, Hebert J, Gallagher N, Martin C, Overend T, Alagappan VK, Lu Y, Banerji D. Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 study. Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1106-14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00040712. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PubMed 23060624Beeh KM, Singh D, Di Scala L, Drollmann A. Once-daily NVA237 improves exercise tolerance from the first dose in patients with COPD: the GLOW3 trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:503-13. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S32451. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PubMed 22973092
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03084796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GLIMMER / CCD-05993AA3-02
- Conditions
- COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- CHF 5259, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), pMDI (pressurized metered dose inhaler), GLIMMER
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 733 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose-response of different doses of CHF 5259 pMDI on lung function and other clinical outcomes, to identify the optimal dose(s) in terms of benefit/ risk ratio for further development in the target subject population.
Detailed description
This is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled dose-ranging 6-arm parallel group study to identify the optimal dose of CHF 5259 pMDI (pressurized metered dose inhaler) with respect to lung function as well as other clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.
After a 2 week run-in period under rescue albuterol and background inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as needed, patients were randomized to one of the 6 study treatment groups. Following randomization, subjects were assessed after 3 weeks and 6 weeks of study treatment at the study center. A follow-up phone was performed a week after the last visit.
During the study, daily symptoms, rescue and background medication use and compliance with the study drug were recorded in a subject diary. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were assessed and recorded throughout the study. At screening and subsequent visits, subjects underwent physical and vital signs examinations, spirometry measurements, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Symptoms and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) health status were assessed through validated questionnaires. Routine hematology, blood chemistry, and pregnancy testing were performed before enrollment and at end of study. 24-hour (24-H) digital recording of ECGs (Holter) was performed before and after the first dose and just before the last dose of study treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment A | Experimental | Drug: CHF 5259CHF 5259 pMDI 6.25 μg, 1 inhalation twice daily (bid); (total daily dose [TDD] of CHF 5259 12.5 μg) |
| Treatment B | Experimental | Drug: CHF 5259CHF 5259 pMDI 12.5 μg, 1 inhalation bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 25 μg) |
| Treatment C | Experimental | Drug: CHF 5259CHF 5259 pMDI 12.5 μg, 2 inhalations bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 50 μg) |
| Treatment D | Experimental | Drug: CHF 5259CHF 5259 pMDI 25 μg, 2 inhalations bid; (TDD of CHF 5259: 100 μg) |
| Treatment E | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo, 2 inhalations of CHF 5259 pMDI-matched Placebo bid; |
| Treatment F | Active comparator | Drug: Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation CapsuleTiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, SPIRIVA® HandiHaler®, 2 inhalations once daily (od) of the content of 1 capsule; (TDD of TIO: 18 μg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 40 who have signed an Informed Consent Form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
- Subjects with a diagnosis of COPD (according to GOLD 2017 Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD Report) at least 12 months before the screening visit.
- Current smokers or ex-smokers who quit smoking at least 6 months prior to screening visit, with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
- A post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) ≥50% and <80% of the predicted normal value and,
- a post-bronchodilator FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 0.7 at screening and
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating women and all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant UNLESS they are willing to use highly effective birth control methods
- Diagnosis of asthma or Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) as described in global initiative for asthma (GINA) Report 2016, history of allergic rhinitis or atopy (atopy which may raise contra-indications or impact the efficacy of the study treatment according to Investigator's judgment)
- COPD Exacerbations: a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation that has not resolved ≤14 days prior to screening and ≤30 days following the last dose of any oral/systemic corticosteroid or antibiotic (whichever comes last). A Moderate or Severe COPD exacerbation during the run-in period
- Use of antibiotics for a lower respiratory tract infection in the 4 weeks prior to screening or during run-in
- Subjects treated with non-cardio-selective β-blockers in the month preceding screening or during the run-in period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CHF 5259Dose Response: Test one of four different doses of CHF 5259 | Drug | Treatment A, Treatment B, Treatment C, Treatment D |
| PlaceboPlacebo Control | Drug | Treatment E |
| Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation CapsuleAlso: SPIRIVA® HANDIHALER®Active Control | Drug | Treatment F |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h), normalized by time, at the end of treatment (Week 6). Spirometry, used to measure FEV1, was performed according to internationally accepted standards. The AUC for FEV1 at Week 6 of treatment was calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule, based on the changes in FEV1 from the baseline values, and divided by the observation time (12 hours). Definitions: AUC=Area under the curve; Baseline=Baseline value was the average of the pre-dose measurements (at 45 mins and 15 mins pre-dose), at Visit 2 (Week 0); FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; FEV1 AUC(0-12h)=Mean FEV1 after inhalation, measured at prespecified times for up to 12-h observation period (0-12 h), normalized by time;
23 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time on Day 1
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FEV1 Peak(0-4h) at Day 1 and Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-12h), Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC AUC(0-4h) Normalized by Time on Day 1 and at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in FVC Peak(0-4h) on Day 1 and at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Time to Onset of Action (Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) on Day 1
Time frame: Day 1
Number of Patients Achieving Onset of Action - Change From Baseline in Post-dose FEV1 ≥100 mL on Day 1
Time frame: Day 1
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Morning FEV1 at Week 3 and Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 3 and Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Response (Focal Score ≥1) at Week 3 and Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 3 and Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Change From Baseline in Average Use of Rescue Medication During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Change From Baseline in Average EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) Total Score During Inter-Visit Periods and the Entire Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Inter-visit period 1, Inter-visit period 2, Entire treatment period
Vital Signs -- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate (HR)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Interval
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Fridericia-corrected QT Interval (QTcF)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Male Subjects
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Female Subjects
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
24-hour Holter ECG - Prolonged QTcF - Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23245604Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Barker-Collo S, Bartels DH, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bhalla K, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Boufous S, Bucello C, Burch M, Burney P, Carapetis J, Chen H, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahodwala N, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ezzati M, Feigin V, Flaxman AD, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gonzalez-Medina D, Halasa YA, Haring D, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hoen B, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Keren A, Khoo JP, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Ohno SL, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Mallinger L, March L, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGrath J, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Michaud C, Miller M, Miller TR, Mock C, Mocumbi AO, Mokdad AA, Moran A, Mulholland K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nasseri K, Norman P, O'Donnell M, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Phillips D, Pierce K, Pope CA 3rd, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Raju M, Ranganathan D, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Rivara FP, Roberts T, De Leon FR, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Segui-Gomez M, Shepard DS, Singh D, Singleton J, Sliwa K, Smith E, Steer A, Taylor JA, Thomas B, Tleyjeh IM, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Undurraga EA, Venketasubramanian N, Vijayakumar L, Vos T, Wagner GR, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Wilkinson JD, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Yip P, Zabetian A, Zheng ZJ, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
- Background: PubMed 24107140Tilert T, Dillon C, Paulose-Ram R, Hnizdo E, Doney B. Estimating the U.S. prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2010. Respir Res. 2013 Oct 9;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-103.
- Background: PubMed 12010839Mannino DM. COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity. Chest. 2002 May;121(5 Suppl):121S-126S. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5_suppl.121s.
- Background: PubMed 23457163Tonnesen P. Smoking cessation and COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2013 Mar 1;22(127):37-43. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00007212.
- Background: PubMed 27545342van Eerd EA, van der Meer RM, van Schayck OC, Kotz D. Smoking cessation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 20;2016(8):CD010744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010744.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24127118Kew KM, Mavergames C, Walters JA. Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 15;2013(10):CD010177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010177.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 25692310McGarvey L, Niewoehner D, Magder S, Sachs P, Tetzlaff K, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Bothner U, Vogelmeier C, Koch A, Ferguson GT. One-Year Safety of Olodaterol Once Daily via Respimat(R) in Patients with GOLD 2-4 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of a Pre-Specified Pooled Analysis. COPD. 2015;12(5):484-93. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.991864. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 20522841Dahl R, Chung KF, Buhl R, Magnussen H, Nonikov V, Jack D, Bleasdale P, Owen R, Higgins M, Kramer B; INVOLVE (INdacaterol: Value in COPD: Longer Term Validation of Efficacy and Safety) Study Investigators. Efficacy of a new once-daily long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist indacaterol versus twice-daily formoterol in COPD. Thorax. 2010 Jun;65(6):473-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.125435.
- Background: PubMed 22217233Keating GM. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder: a review of its use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs. 2012 Jan 22;72(2):273-300. doi: 10.2165/11208620-000000000-00000.
- Background: PubMed 15764761Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB, Witek TJ Jr, Kesten S. Improvement in exercise tolerance with the combination of tiotropium and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):809-17. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.3.809.
- Background: PubMed 18488436Kesten S, Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB. Improvement in self-reported exercise participation with the combination of tiotropium and rehabilitative exercise training in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(1):127-36. doi: 10.2147/copd.s2389.
- Background: PubMed 22786525Karner C, Chong J, Poole P. Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
- From the Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Glycopyrronium bromideLink provided by the sponsor.
- American Thoracic Society: Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) \& Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI).Link provided by the sponsor.
- American Thoracic Society: COPD Assessment Test (CAT).Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COPD
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home Telemonitoring and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD and Hypercapnia (EVALECO)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), Hypercapnia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edward Kerwin, MD principal investigator
Crisor LLC c/o Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Inc.
112 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing CHF 5259 and Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg Inhalation Capsule in people with COPD and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. at 112 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 112 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Normalized by Time at Week 6 (time frame: Baseline, Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03084796, which also lists 80 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2021.