Pancreatic CystPhase 3CHARMNCT03085004
CHARM II: Chemotherapy for Ablation and Resolution of Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts
A Phase 3 study testing Ethanol, Normal saline and Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture in people with Pancreatic Cyst and EUS-FNA, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapeutic pancreatic cyst ablation using ethanol lavage followed by the infusion of a dual-agent chemotherapeutic cocktail (paclitaxel + gemcitabine) compared with alcohol-free saline lavage followed by infusion of the same dual-agent… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cyst, EUS-FNA
- What is being tested?
- Ethanol, Normal saline and Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Apr 2019to 1 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult subjects over the age of 18.
- Patients with a previously-detected pancreatic cyst(s) 2-5 cm in diameter which is consistent with a mucinous type cyst as per ASGE guidelines, including indeterminate type cysts.
- Able to give written informed consent.
- Capable of safely undergoing endoscopy with deep sedation or general anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Lesions which are consistent with a benign cyst by clinical, cytological, chemical, and radiographic evaluation as per ASGE guidelines (i.e., consistent with a pseudocyst or serous cystadenoma).
- Known or suspected pancreatic cancer or pathologic lymphadenopathy.
- Cysts with the following high-risk features: main pancreatic duct dilation of > 5mm, epithelial type mural nodules (> 2mm)33, pathologically thick wall/septation (> 2mm), cytology showing high grade dysplasia or "suspicious for malignancy", signs of common bile duct or pancreatic duct obstruction, solid mass component within or associated with the cyst (> 2mm), pancreatic duct stricture associated with tail atrophy, or previous fine needle aspiration failure due to excessive cyst fluid viscosity. (Of note, the following higher-risk features ARE eligible: recent growth in size, atypical cells on cytology, and symptoms referable to the pancreas.)
- Septated cysts with > 4 compartments.
- Confirmed acute pancreatitis within the last 6 months.
- Baseline lab values (must be within 6 months of consent date) in the following ranges: white blood cells > 14 or < 2 K/uL, hematocrit <30%, platelets <30 K/uL, non-pharmacologic INR >1.7, CA19-9 >2x ULN, lipase >2x ULN, creatinine >3.0 mg/dl (unless stable on renal replacement therapy), ALT >500 U/L, total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dl.
- Any pre-existing or discovered medical condition that would, at the discretion of the investigator, interfere with the completion of and/or participation in the existing protocol. This includes severe pre-existing medical conditions which would preclude a reasonable 5 year life expectancy (and thus neutralize the patient's benefit from ablating a premalignant type pancreatic cyst).
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or incarcerated individual.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Indiana University Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
About this study
Official title: CHARM II: Chemotherapy for Ablation and Resolution of Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapeutic pancreatic cyst ablation using ethanol lavage followed by the infusion of a dual-agent chemotherapeutic cocktail (paclitaxel + gemcitabine) compared with alcohol-free saline lavage followed by infusion of the same dual-agent chemotherapeutic cocktail (paclitaxel + gemcitabine) for the ablation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms using endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle infusion (EUS-FNI) for agent delivery.
Read the detailed description
Pancreatic cystic lesions are increasingly encountered and typically discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging, occurring in approximately 2% of all American adults with a 37% prevalence in individuals over 80. Most of these cysts are mucinous (neoplastic) in origin and represent precursor lesions for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Discovering a pancreatic cyst typically presents a treatment dilemma, with options including either indefinite radiographic surveillance with MR (magnetic resonance) or CT imaging or surgical resection, both of which have significant limitations. Surveillance carries significant economic and possible psychological burdens while waiting for signs of malignancy to develop, as well as radiation exposure with computed tomography. On the other hand, surgical resection possesses a significant risk of serious adverse events (20%-40%) and mortality (1-2%). This clinical dilemma delineates the pressing need to develop effective, but more minimally invasive approaches for the elimination of these premalignant pancreatic cysts, and among these, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle infusion (EUS-FNI) has emerged as an innovative and promising approach. Between November 2011 and December 30, 2015, investigators from interventional endoscopy, surgical oncology, hematology oncology, and pathology of the Penn State Hershey Medical Center conducted the CHARM I clinical trial. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study with an N of 46 patients required for 80% power to prove non-inferiority. Final results from CHARM I were as follows: Patients treated included 23 females and 16 males with the majority of lesions located in the body and head of the pancreas. Both the alcohol and alcohol-free groups recorded a 47% rate of complete ablation at 6 months, which increased to 64% for both groups at the 1 year follow-up. One subject experienced a complication in the alcohol arm (6%), and no subjects experienced complications in the alcohol-free arm.
The overall objectives of CHARM II are to verify the significant findings of CHARM I in a multi-center clinical trial as requested by national investigators in this field. We expect that administering a specifically designed chemotherapeutic cocktail without prior ethanol lavage will result in an equivalent rate of cyst resolution with fewer complications when compared with lavage using alcohol. The results of this study will provide important information about the most efficient and safest method for treating premalignant pancreatic cysts, an important step for treating these lesions with a minimally invasive technique and preventing their progression to pancreatic cancer. Standard alternative treatment options for this patient group (if not taking part in this study) would be ongoing periodic radiographic surveillance with MR or CT imaging waiting for signs of malignancy to develop or to consider surgical resection (an option with significant rates of morbidity and mortality).
This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study evaluating ethanol lavage and chemotherapy for the ablation of mucinous and indeterminate type pancreatic cysts with malignant potential. Participants will be screened for the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After confirming their eligibility, patients will be randomized to one of the following EUS-FNI treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio:
Control arm: After removal of cyst fluid, cysts will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with >/=99% ethanol and then infused with an admixture of 3 mg/ml paclitaxel and 19 mg/ml gemcitabine.
Experimental arm: After removal of cyst fluid, cysts will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with normal saline and then infused with an admixture of 3 mg/ml paclitaxel and 19 mg/ml gemcitabine.
Patients will be contacted by the study team via phone call at both 72 hours and 30 days after their EUS procedure to assess any adverse events that may have occurred. Within 2-3 weeks of the having the EUS procedure, patients will receive the cyst fluid pathology results. At 3 months after the initial procedure, patients will undergo a follow-up EUS examination in the same manner as the initial EUS exam. During this exam, a complete pancreaticobiliary evaluation will be conducted, and the diameter of the previously treated cyst will be measured in the x and y dimensions to assess the 3 month response. Any cyst still >15mm and amenable to repeat ablation will undergo a second EUS-guided chemoablation treatment using the same lavage that the patient was randomized to initially. At both 12 months and 24 months after the initial procedure, the patient will be seen in the GI clinic and undergo either an MRI-MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) or enhanced CT scan for a full pancreaticobiliary evaluation to assess the end-point treatment response.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cyst, EUS-FNA
- Being tested
- Ethanol, Normal saline, Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture
- Keywords
- Pancreatic cyst, EUS-FNA, Chemotherapy, Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle infusion, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cyst ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Cyst
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EthanolDrug
The cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes using >/=99% ethanol as the lavage agent prior to infusing the cyst with the paclitaxel + gemcitabine admixture.
Normal salineDrug
The cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes using normal saline as the lavage agent prior to infusing the cyst with the paclitaxel + gemcitabine admixture.
Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixtureDrug
Following lavage, cysts will be infused with an admixture of 3mg/ml paclitaxel and 19mg/ml gemcitabine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with >/=99% ethanol. Following lavage with >/=99% ethanol, the cyst will be infused with an admixture of (3mg/ml paclitaxel + 19mg/ml gemcitabine). Receives: Drug: Ethanol; Drug: Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture |
| Study group | Experimental | Cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with normal saline. Following lavage with normal saline, the cyst will be infused with an admixture of (3mg/ml paclitaxel + 19mg/ml gemcitabine). Receives: Drug: Normal saline; Drug: Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of subjects achieving complete cyst resolution at 12 months
This is defined as Complete response greater than or equal to 95% reduction in cyst volume and measured by "r" as cyst volume 4/3×π×r3 at 12 months post initial treatment
Measured: 12 months post initial treatment
Percentage of subjects achieving complete cyst resolution at 24 months of long term follow up
This is defined as Complete response greater than or equal to 95% reduction in cyst volume and measured by "r" as cyst volume 4/3×π×r3 at 24 months post initial treatment
Measured: 24 months post initial treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Mar 2017
- Study start12 Apr 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion1 Feb 2026
Why it stopped: Grant ended
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CystStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthew T. Moyer, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- Matthew T. Moyer, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03085004
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5206
- Other IDs
- 1R01CA222648
- Acronym
- CHARM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CHARM II: Chemotherapy for Ablation and Resolution of Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03085004
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHARM / 5206
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cyst, EUS-FNA
- Keywords
- Pancreatic cyst, EUS-FNA, Chemotherapy, Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle infusion, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cyst ablation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Grant ended
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 12 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapeutic pancreatic cyst ablation using ethanol lavage followed by the infusion of a dual-agent chemotherapeutic cocktail (paclitaxel + gemcitabine) compared with alcohol-free saline lavage followed by infusion of the same dual-agent chemotherapeutic cocktail (paclitaxel + gemcitabine) for the ablation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms using endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle infusion (EUS-FNI) for agent delivery.
Detailed description
Pancreatic cystic lesions are increasingly encountered and typically discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging, occurring in approximately 2% of all American adults with a 37% prevalence in individuals over 80. Most of these cysts are mucinous (neoplastic) in origin and represent precursor lesions for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Discovering a pancreatic cyst typically presents a treatment dilemma, with options including either indefinite radiographic surveillance with MR (magnetic resonance) or CT imaging or surgical resection, both of which have significant limitations. Surveillance carries significant economic and possible psychological burdens while waiting for signs of malignancy to develop, as well as radiation exposure with computed tomography. On the other hand, surgical resection possesses a significant risk of serious adverse events (20%-40%) and mortality (1-2%). This clinical dilemma delineates the pressing need to develop effective, but more minimally invasive approaches for the elimination of these premalignant pancreatic cysts, and among these, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle infusion (EUS-FNI) has emerged as an innovative and promising approach. Between November 2011 and December 30, 2015, investigators from interventional endoscopy, surgical oncology, hematology oncology, and pathology of the Penn State Hershey Medical Center conducted the CHARM I clinical trial. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study with an N of 46 patients required for 80% power to prove non-inferiority. Final results from CHARM I were as follows: Patients treated included 23 females and 16 males with the majority of lesions located in the body and head of the pancreas. Both the alcohol and alcohol-free groups recorded a 47% rate of complete ablation at 6 months, which increased to 64% for both groups at the 1 year follow-up. One subject experienced a complication in the alcohol arm (6%), and no subjects experienced complications in the alcohol-free arm.
The overall objectives of CHARM II are to verify the significant findings of CHARM I in a multi-center clinical trial as requested by national investigators in this field. We expect that administering a specifically designed chemotherapeutic cocktail without prior ethanol lavage will result in an equivalent rate of cyst resolution with fewer complications when compared with lavage using alcohol. The results of this study will provide important information about the most efficient and safest method for treating premalignant pancreatic cysts, an important step for treating these lesions with a minimally invasive technique and preventing their progression to pancreatic cancer. Standard alternative treatment options for this patient group (if not taking part in this study) would be ongoing periodic radiographic surveillance with MR or CT imaging waiting for signs of malignancy to develop or to consider surgical resection (an option with significant rates of morbidity and mortality).
This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study evaluating ethanol lavage and chemotherapy for the ablation of mucinous and indeterminate type pancreatic cysts with malignant potential. Participants will be screened for the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After confirming their eligibility, patients will be randomized to one of the following EUS-FNI treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio:
Control arm: After removal of cyst fluid, cysts will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with >/=99% ethanol and then infused with an admixture of 3 mg/ml paclitaxel and 19 mg/ml gemcitabine.
Experimental arm: After removal of cyst fluid, cysts will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with normal saline and then infused with an admixture of 3 mg/ml paclitaxel and 19 mg/ml gemcitabine.
Patients will be contacted by the study team via phone call at both 72 hours and 30 days after their EUS procedure to assess any adverse events that may have occurred. Within 2-3 weeks of the having the EUS procedure, patients will receive the cyst fluid pathology results. At 3 months after the initial procedure, patients will undergo a follow-up EUS examination in the same manner as the initial EUS exam. During this exam, a complete pancreaticobiliary evaluation will be conducted, and the diameter of the previously treated cyst will be measured in the x and y dimensions to assess the 3 month response. Any cyst still >15mm and amenable to repeat ablation will undergo a second EUS-guided chemoablation treatment using the same lavage that the patient was randomized to initially. At both 12 months and 24 months after the initial procedure, the patient will be seen in the GI clinic and undergo either an MRI-MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) or enhanced CT scan for a full pancreaticobiliary evaluation to assess the end-point treatment response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Drug: Ethanol, Drug: Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixtureCyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with >/=99% ethanol. Following lavage with >/=99% ethanol, the cyst will be infused with an admixture of (3mg/ml paclitaxel + 19mg/ml gemcitabine). |
| Study group | Experimental | Drug: Normal saline, Drug: Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixtureCyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes with normal saline. Following lavage with normal saline, the cyst will be infused with an admixture of (3mg/ml paclitaxel + 19mg/ml gemcitabine). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult subjects over the age of 18.
- Patients with a previously-detected pancreatic cyst(s) 2-5 cm in diameter which is consistent with a mucinous type cyst as per ASGE guidelines, including indeterminate type cysts.
- Able to give written informed consent.
- Capable of safely undergoing endoscopy with deep sedation or general anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Lesions which are consistent with a benign cyst by clinical, cytological, chemical, and radiographic evaluation as per ASGE guidelines (i.e., consistent with a pseudocyst or serous cystadenoma).
- Known or suspected pancreatic cancer or pathologic lymphadenopathy.
- Cysts with the following high-risk features: main pancreatic duct dilation of > 5mm, epithelial type mural nodules (> 2mm)33, pathologically thick wall/septation (> 2mm), cytology showing high grade dysplasia or "suspicious for malignancy", signs of common bile duct or pancreatic duct obstruction, solid mass component within or associated with the cyst (> 2mm), pancreatic duct stricture associated with tail atrophy, or previous fine needle aspiration failure due to excessive cyst fluid viscosity. (Of note, the following higher-risk features ARE eligible: recent growth in size, atypical cells on cytology, and symptoms referable to the pancreas.)
- Septated cysts with > 4 compartments.
- Confirmed acute pancreatitis within the last 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EthanolThe cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes using >/=99% ethanol as the lavage agent prior to infusing the cyst with the paclitaxel + gemcitabine admixture. | Drug | Control Group |
| Normal salineThe cyst will be lavaged for 3 to 5 minutes using normal saline as the lavage agent prior to infusing the cyst with the paclitaxel + gemcitabine admixture. | Drug | Study group |
| Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixtureFollowing lavage, cysts will be infused with an admixture of 3mg/ml paclitaxel and 19mg/ml gemcitabine. | Drug | Control Group, Study group |
Primary outcome
Percentage of subjects achieving complete cyst resolution at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months post initial treatment
This is defined as Complete response greater than or equal to 95% reduction in cyst volume and measured by "r" as cyst volume 4/3×π×r3 at 12 months post initial treatment
Percentage of subjects achieving complete cyst resolution at 24 months of long term follow up
Time frame: 24 months post initial treatment
This is defined as Complete response greater than or equal to 95% reduction in cyst volume and measured by "r" as cyst volume 4/3×π×r3 at 24 months post initial treatment
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Grant ended). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pancreatic Cyst
RecruitingObservational study
Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium
Pancreas Cancer, Pancreas Cyst
Recruiting
Determination of Pancreatic Steatosis Prevalence and Correlation With High-risk Cyst Features
Pancreatic Steatosis, Pancreatic Cyst
Recruiting
EUS Examination Using EndoSound Vision System vs. Standard Echoendoscope
Pancreatic Disease, Pancreatic Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as an Imaging Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
Pancreatic Cyst
RecruitingPhase 1
Chemoprevention With Tamoxifen in Pre-Invasive Pancreas Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms Not Undergoing Immediate Resection
Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew T. Moyer, MD, MS principal investigator
Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ethanol, Normal saline and Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine admixture in people with Pancreatic Cyst and EUS-FNA, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Grant ended). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of subjects achieving complete cyst resolution at 12 months (time frame: 12 months post initial treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.