AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Biliary PancreatitisNCT03085407

Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - Optimal Time for Cholecystectomy

A study testing early cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy in people with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis, run by South Valley University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, early cholecystectomy within 48 hours might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy in our locality of conservative management and delayed cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
early cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jun 2014to 1 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient diagnosed with a first attack of mild biliary pancreatitis
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I, II or III
  • a serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration less than 100 mg/L,
  • no need for opioid analgesics,
  • normal oral diet tolerance

Who cannot join

  • 1. chronic pancreatitis 2. alcohol abuse 3. pregnancy

About this study

Official title: Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - Optimal Time for Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, early cholecystectomy within 48 hours might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy in our locality of conservative management and delayed cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support early cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare the benefits and harms of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis.

Read the detailed description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient diagnosed with a first attack of mild biliary pancreatitis
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I, II or III
  4. a serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration less than 100 mg/L,
  5. no need for opioid analgesics,
  6. normal oral diet tolerance Exclusion criteria
  7. chronic pancreatitis 2. alcohol abuse 3. pregnancy The number of patients needed was calculated. Considering a power of 80% and reliability of 0.05, we found that 53 patients should be present in each group. Eligible patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups (Group 1: early cholecystectomy, Group 2: delayed cholecystectomy) according to a computer-generated random numbers.

Procedure Early cholecystectomy was done within 48 after admission. Delayed cholecystectomy was done after 30 days after randomization. All cholecystectomies were done by, or under the direct supervision of, a surgeon who had undertaken at least 100 cholecystectomies in the past 5 years.

Being tested
early cholecystectomy, delayed cholecystectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • early cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery

    cholecystectomy was done within 48 after admission

  • delayed cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery

    cholecystectomy was done after 30 days after randomization

Study groups in NCT03085407
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
early cholecystectomyActive comparatorEarly cholecystectomy was done within 48 after admission
Receives: Procedure: early cholecystectomy
delayed cholecystectomySham comparatorDelayed cholecystectomy was done after 30 days after randomization.
Receives: Procedure: delayed cholecystectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gallstone related complications

    recurrent pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, obstructive choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or gallstone colic

    Measured: 6 month of onset of pancreatitis

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Difficulty of cholecystectomy

    the degree of difficulty of the procedureas assessed by the most experienced surgeon on a 0-10 visual analogue scale

    Measured: up to 3 hours

  2. Conversion to open cholecystectomy

    Measured: up to 2 hours

  3. Operative time

    from the begging of the operation to recovery of patient

    Measured: up to 10 hours

  4. Cholecystectomy related complications

    Measured: up to 1 month

  5. additional surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention

    Measured: up to 6 month

  6. Gall stones non related complications

    Measured: up to 6 month

  7. Length of hospital stay of index admission

    Measured: from admission to discharge of patient, up to 10 days

  8. Number of readmission

    Measured: up to 6 month

  9. Total length of hospital stay (including readmission)

    Measured: up to 6 month

  10. The number of patient-reported colics irrespective of readmission

    Measured: up to 6 month

  11. Need for intensive care unit admission

    Measured: up to 6 month

  12. Mortality

    death from gall stone related complication

    Measured: up to 6 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03085407
Sponsor's protocol ID
SVU 148
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
19 Mar 2017
Last updated
6 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing early cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy in people with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis, run by South Valley University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gallstone related complications (time frame: 6 month of onset of pancreatitis). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in