Percutaneous Coronary InterventionEASTBOURNENCT03085823
The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
An observational study of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, run by Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to observe and evaluate the performance of a Sirolimus-eluting Drug Coated Balloon for the treatment of any type of coronary lesions, including native vessel disease and in stent restenosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Coronary Angioplasty, Transluminal Balloon
- What is being tested?
- Sirolimus Coated Balloon
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 2,123 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Jan 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 24 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with a clinical indication for PCI.
Who may be able to join
- age at least 18
- patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (including chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, acute coronary syndromes) with clinical indication to percutaneous coronary intervention.
Who cannot join
- patients with one or more of the following criteria: known (and untreatable) hypersensitivity or contraindication to Aspirin, Heparin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Sirolimus, or a sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- patients enrolled in another trial.
- Target lesion/vessel with any of the following characteristics:
- successful pre-dilatation not performed in the target lesion, or not efficacious (residual stenosis >50%);
- severe calcification of the target vessel, also proximal to the lesion;
- highly tortuous lesions which can impair access of device to treatment site.
- visible thrombus at lesion which is not treatable with aspiration.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to observe and evaluate the performance of a Sirolimus-eluting Drug Coated Balloon for the treatment of any type of coronary lesions, including native vessel disease and in stent restenosis.
Read the detailed description
The drug coated balloons (DCB) are one of the most promising innovations in the interventional cardiology field, and in some cases represent a valid alternative to stents. The numerous devices currently on the market, and the clinical results sometimes encouraging, sometimes less, have clearly shown that there is no "class" effect. The DCB so far available were conformed to elute only paclitaxel, an high lipophilicity drug with a narrow therapeutic window, cytotoxic at medium-high dosage.
The DCB allow the drug release without needing to implant prostheses in the coronary vessel; such prostheses (stents have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, even years after implantation, caused by a non- healing of the vessel by the action of the drug itself or of the polymer, together with the presence of the metal of the stent . After a DCP angioplasty the absence of such implants, instead, ensures a quick recovery of the vessel function. Moreover, the absence of the prosthesis is particularly favorable in the case of small/medium diameter vessels, tortuous or severe calcific vessel, or for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
In the Bello study, the DCB IN.PACT Falcon, has reached the non-inferiority expected (and also the superiority, not expected), against the same DES regarding the primary endpoint of late lumen loss (LLL) at the angiographic control. The results of this study, encouraging for the drug-eluting balloon technology, however, are tainted by a now obsolete technology, the use of an endpoint that supports the balloon (LLL), and the comparison with a DES that is no longer in trade and is objectively inferior to those used in 2016.
Several new generation DCB have been developed in the last years, with the aim of improving the paclitaxel release in the coronary wall, thus reducing the risk of restenosis. In addition, several improvements have involved the trackability and deliverability of these devices even in tortuous and small vessels . The latest generation DCB have several advantages compared to the old generation DCB: paclitaxel is layered with an inert support (matrix or carrier) using a multi-layer technology, improving both its release and the persistence in the vessel wall; furthermore, significant improvements have been made to address the poor deliverability of first generation balloons.
In 2016 the Magic Touch, a new type of DCB has obtained, first, the CE mark for marketing in Europe; it is characterized by eluting sirolimus, a drug with potent inhibitory effect on cell growth, but with low lipophilicity. For this reason, its ability to penetrate the wall of the vessel is limited, and so far it has not been possible to develop a device that would allow an effective release, despite the drug is now known for years in cardiology.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the DCB Magic Touch performance in terms of efficacy and safety when used during coronary angioplasty, in a wide spectrum of coronary heart disease.
The primary objective of the study is to verify the rate of target vessel revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after implantation, both with new coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft.
Secondary objectives will be:
- angiographic success, defined as residual stenosis < 50% and TIMI 3 coronary flow; - procedural success, defined as angiographic success and absence of adverse cardiovascular events during initial hospitalization;
- major adverse cardiac events (MACE ), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and need for TLR at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of implantation;
- every single element determining the MACE endpoint. This is a multicenter, prospective, spontaneous, observational, single-arm, clinical study, where will be enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and clinical indication for coronary angioplasty.
The indication for coronary angioplasty will be stable angina pectoris, silent ischemia or acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction).
Before participating all subjects will be informed about the study, including the possible risks and benefit, and will be asked to provide a written informed consent. Subjects will be instructed that may not meet the general criteria for inclusion or those angiographic, or that could satisfy at least one criterion for exclusion and therefore be excluded from the study (screening failure), even after informed consent.
- Conditions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Coronary Angioplasty, Transluminal Balloon, Arteriosclerosis, Coronary
- Being tested
- Sirolimus Coated Balloon
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sirolimus Coated BalloonDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Target lesion revascularization
repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Angiographic success
residual stenosis <50%, TIMI FLOW 3
Measured: 10 minutes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
procedural success
angiographic success in absence of in-hospital events
Measured: up to 48 hours
major adverse cardiac events
cardiac death, Acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization
Measured: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
very single component of major adverse cardiac events
cardiac death, Acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization
Measured: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Mar 2017
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionDec 2020
- Study completionJan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,123 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 24 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bernardo Cortese, Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital
- Investigators
- Bernardo Cortese, Principal investigator, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, MI, ItalyAntonio Colombo, Study chair, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03085823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- fbf001
- Acronym
- EASTBOURNE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mangieri A, Testa L, Heang TM, Bossi I, Lee CY, Perez IS, Milazzo D, Nuruddin AA, Seresini G, Singh R, Cacucci M, Sciahbasi A, Torres A, Sengottvelu G, Colombo A, Cortese B; EASTBOURNE investigators. Safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy in a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus-coated balloon: Post hoc analysis from the prospective EASTBOURNE registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 May;74:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
PubMed 39191613Cortese B, Testa L, Heang TM, Ielasi A, Bossi I, Latini RA, Lee CY, Perez IS, Milazzo D, Caiazzo G, Tomai F, Benincasa S, Nuruddin AA, Stefanini G, Buccheri D, Seresini G, Singh R, Karavolias G, Cacucci M, Sciahbasi A, Ocaranza R, Menown IBA, Torres A, Sengottvelu G, Zanetti A, Pesenti N, Colombo A; EASTBOURNE Investigators. Sirolimus-Coated Balloon in an All-Comer Population of Coronary Artery Disease Patients: The EASTBOURNE Prospective Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1794-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.005.
PubMed 37495352
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03085823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EASTBOURNE / fbf001
- Conditions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Coronary Angioplasty, Transluminal Balloon, Arteriosclerosis, Coronary
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,123 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to observe and evaluate the performance of a Sirolimus-eluting Drug Coated Balloon for the treatment of any type of coronary lesions, including native vessel disease and in stent restenosis.
Detailed description
The drug coated balloons (DCB) are one of the most promising innovations in the interventional cardiology field, and in some cases represent a valid alternative to stents. The numerous devices currently on the market, and the clinical results sometimes encouraging, sometimes less, have clearly shown that there is no "class" effect. The DCB so far available were conformed to elute only paclitaxel, an high lipophilicity drug with a narrow therapeutic window, cytotoxic at medium-high dosage.
The DCB allow the drug release without needing to implant prostheses in the coronary vessel; such prostheses (stents have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, even years after implantation, caused by a non- healing of the vessel by the action of the drug itself or of the polymer, together with the presence of the metal of the stent . After a DCP angioplasty the absence of such implants, instead, ensures a quick recovery of the vessel function. Moreover, the absence of the prosthesis is particularly favorable in the case of small/medium diameter vessels, tortuous or severe calcific vessel, or for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
In the Bello study, the DCB IN.PACT Falcon, has reached the non-inferiority expected (and also the superiority, not expected), against the same DES regarding the primary endpoint of late lumen loss (LLL) at the angiographic control. The results of this study, encouraging for the drug-eluting balloon technology, however, are tainted by a now obsolete technology, the use of an endpoint that supports the balloon (LLL), and the comparison with a DES that is no longer in trade and is objectively inferior to those used in 2016.
Several new generation DCB have been developed in the last years, with the aim of improving the paclitaxel release in the coronary wall, thus reducing the risk of restenosis. In addition, several improvements have involved the trackability and deliverability of these devices even in tortuous and small vessels . The latest generation DCB have several advantages compared to the old generation DCB: paclitaxel is layered with an inert support (matrix or carrier) using a multi-layer technology, improving both its release and the persistence in the vessel wall; furthermore, significant improvements have been made to address the poor deliverability of first generation balloons.
In 2016 the Magic Touch, a new type of DCB has obtained, first, the CE mark for marketing in Europe; it is characterized by eluting sirolimus, a drug with potent inhibitory effect on cell growth, but with low lipophilicity. For this reason, its ability to penetrate the wall of the vessel is limited, and so far it has not been possible to develop a device that would allow an effective release, despite the drug is now known for years in cardiology.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the DCB Magic Touch performance in terms of efficacy and safety when used during coronary angioplasty, in a wide spectrum of coronary heart disease.
The primary objective of the study is to verify the rate of target vessel revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after implantation, both with new coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft.
Secondary objectives will be:
- angiographic success, defined as residual stenosis < 50% and TIMI 3 coronary flow; - procedural success, defined as angiographic success and absence of adverse cardiovascular events during initial hospitalization;
- major adverse cardiac events (MACE ), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and need for TLR at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of implantation;
- every single element determining the MACE endpoint. This is a multicenter, prospective, spontaneous, observational, single-arm, clinical study, where will be enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and clinical indication for coronary angioplasty.
The indication for coronary angioplasty will be stable angina pectoris, silent ischemia or acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction).
Before participating all subjects will be informed about the study, including the possible risks and benefit, and will be asked to provide a written informed consent. Subjects will be instructed that may not meet the general criteria for inclusion or those angiographic, or that could satisfy at least one criterion for exclusion and therefore be excluded from the study (screening failure), even after informed consent.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 24 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with a clinical indication for PCI.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age at least 18
- patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (including chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, acute coronary syndromes) with clinical indication to percutaneous coronary intervention.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patients with one or more of the following criteria: known (and untreatable) hypersensitivity or contraindication to Aspirin, Heparin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Sirolimus, or a sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- patients enrolled in another trial.
- successful pre-dilatation not performed in the target lesion, or not efficacious (residual stenosis >50%);
- severe calcification of the target vessel, also proximal to the lesion;
- highly tortuous lesions which can impair access of device to treatment site.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sirolimus Coated Balloon | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion
4 secondary outcomes
Angiographic success
Time frame: 10 minutes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
procedural success
Time frame: up to 48 hours
major adverse cardiac events
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
very single component of major adverse cardiac events
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39191613Mangieri A, Testa L, Heang TM, Bossi I, Lee CY, Perez IS, Milazzo D, Nuruddin AA, Seresini G, Singh R, Cacucci M, Sciahbasi A, Torres A, Sengottvelu G, Colombo A, Cortese B; EASTBOURNE investigators. Safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy in a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus-coated balloon: Post hoc analysis from the prospective EASTBOURNE registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 May;74:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37495352Cortese B, Testa L, Heang TM, Ielasi A, Bossi I, Latini RA, Lee CY, Perez IS, Milazzo D, Caiazzo G, Tomai F, Benincasa S, Nuruddin AA, Stefanini G, Buccheri D, Seresini G, Singh R, Karavolias G, Cacucci M, Sciahbasi A, Ocaranza R, Menown IBA, Torres A, Sengottvelu G, Zanetti A, Pesenti N, Colombo A; EASTBOURNE Investigators. Sirolimus-Coated Balloon in an All-Comer Population of Coronary Artery Disease Patients: The EASTBOURNE Prospective Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1794-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.005.
Related trials for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Not yet recruiting
Hs-CRP-Guided Colchicine Treatment Targets in Very-High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After PCI (TARGET-CHD)
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Not yet recruiting
ADVA ACE Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Disease Patients (ADVANCE)
Coronary Artery Disease, De Novo Stenosis Lesion
Recruiting
Algorithm-based Tailoring of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Improve Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
RecruitingPhase 3
Safety and Efficacy of Very Short DAPT in Older Patients Undergoing PCI
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bernardo Cortese principal investigator
Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, MI, Italy
Antonio Colombo study chair
Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, run by Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Target lesion revascularization (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03085823, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2024.