AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventral HerniaNCT03091790

Mesh Type in Ventral Hernia Repair

A study testing Synthetic Mesh and Biologic Mesh in people with Ventral Hernia, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ventral hernias are common following abdominal surgery. Currently, there is no equipoise on when synthetic and biologic meshes should be used. Among open ventral hernia repairs, half are repaired using biologic mesh while half are repaired using synthetic mesh. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ventral Hernia
What is being tested?
Synthetic Mesh and Biologic Mesh
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
87 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Mar 2017to 31 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient scheduled for open ventral hernia repair at LBJ General Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Active infection
  • Patient unlikely to survive with the next 2 years based upon surgeon judgment (i.e. metastatic cancer, end-stage cirrhosis)
  • Patient surgeon would not normally place a prosthetic (e.g. planned second surgery such as ostomy takedown)
  • Patient unlikely to follow-up (i.e. no phone)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UT Health at Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77026

Other trials in United States

About this study

Ventral hernias are common following abdominal surgery. Currently, there is no equipoise on when synthetic and biologic meshes should be used. Among open ventral hernia repairs, half are repaired using biologic mesh while half are repaired using synthetic mesh. The investigators hypothesize that biologic mesh as opposed to synthetic mesh repair of open ventral hernia repair is associated with decreased risk of major complications one year after surgery.

Conditions
Ventral Hernia
Being tested
Synthetic Mesh, Biologic Mesh
Keywords
ventral hernia, mesh
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Ventral

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Synthetic MeshDevice

    Synthetic mesh used during open ventral hernia repair

  • Biologic MeshDevice

    Biologic mesh used during open ventral hernia repair

Study groups in NCT03091790
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Synthetic MeshActive comparatorSynthetic mesh (mid-density polypropylene (generic) Bard soft mesh) will be used in open ventral hernia repair
Receives: Device: Synthetic Mesh
Biologic MeshActive comparatorBiologic mesh (non cross linked porcine acellular dermal matrix: Strattice) will be used in open ventral hernia repair
Receives: Device: Biologic Mesh

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complication free at 1 year post-operative

    Complication defined as hernia recurrence, chronic wound complications including mesh infection, and reoperation

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Complication free at 3 years post-operative

    Complication defined as hernia recurrence, chronic wound complications including mesh infection, and reoperation

    Measured: 3 years after surgery

  2. Dindo-clavien complications

    Grade I to V

    Measured: Pre-operative, 1 month after surgery, 1 year and 3 years after surgery

  3. Patient centered outcomes

    includes patient satisfaction, cosmetic satisfaction, modified assessment scale

    Measured: Pre-operative, 1 month after surgery, 1 year and 3 years after surgery

  4. Cost

    charges for all patient visits, admissions, and procedures

    Measured: 1 year and 3 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2017
  2. Study start27 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion26 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
87 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03091790
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-16-0936
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
21 Mar 2017
Last updated
22 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Synthetic Mesh and Biologic Mesh in people with Ventral Hernia, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complication free at 1 year post-operative (time frame: 1 year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in