AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy Young AdultsGESTNCT03094520

Cognitive Embodiment Activation by tDCS

A study testing tDCS in people with Healthy Young Adults, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of the proposed research is to extend our understanding of how gesture and language interact, focusing on the role of cognitive embodiment in this interaction, and to explore the neural systems that support links between language and actions systems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Young Adults
What is being tested?
tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 May 2016to 1 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Right handedness
  • unobtrusive neuropsychological screening

Who cannot join

  • History of severe alcoholism or use of drugs.
  • Severe psychiatric disorders such as depression, psychosis (if not in remission) and severe untreated medical problems.
  • Contraindication for MRT (claustrophobia, metallic implants, ferromagnetic metals in the body, disorders of thermoregulation, pregnant women).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Charité

    Berlin, 10117

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Gestural-verbal Brain Associations: the Role of Cognitive Embodiment

The main objective of the proposed research is to extend our understanding of how gesture and language interact, focusing on the role of cognitive embodiment in this interaction, and to explore the neural systems that support links between language and actions systems.

Being tested
tDCS, sham-tDCS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tDCSDevice

    Also called Neuroconn

    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

  • sham-tDCSDevice

    Also called Neuroconn

    sham stimulation

Study groups in NCT03094520
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anodal tDCS + semantic, motor, attentional tasksExperimentalCombination of gestural (subjects have to indicate if the gesture is related to the word), attentional and motor tasks with anodal stimulation
Receives: Device: tDCS
Sham tDCS + semantic, motor, attentional tasksSham comparatorCombination of gestural (subjects have to indicate if the gesture is related to the word), attentional and motor tasks with sham stimulation
Receives: Device: sham-tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. response time in semantic decision task

    Comparing response time in semantic decision task under anodal tDCS compared to sham stimulation (change from sham stimulation)

    Measured: assessed during stimulation or sham stimulation of semantic decision task (last approximately 10 min) at specific timepoint within 2 weeks

  2. performance in attentional load task

    Attentional load task: Participants are presented with a 6 positions ring that includes different shapes, they have to press V when they see a square and N when they see a diamond. They will have to ignore any shapes other than square and diamond within the ring or distractors that appear outside the ring.

    Comparing performance in attentional load task under anodal tDCS compared to sham stimulation (change from sham stimulation)

    Measured: assessed during stimulation or sham stimulation of attentional load task (last approximately 6 min) at specific timepoint within 2 weeks

  3. performance in motor task

    Motor Task: Participants are presented with a red Box and they have to click a button each time they see it as fast as they can.

    Comparing performance in motor task under anodal tDCS compared to sham stimulation (change from sham stimulation)

    Measured: assessed during stimulation or sham stimulation of motor task (last approximately 4 min) at specific timepoint within 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Functional connectivity predictors

    Connectivity as measured by resting-state fMRI during baseline as predictors for performance and tDCS responsiveness

    Measured: assessed during baseline testing

  2. Other cognitive outcomes: change in working memory performance

    Digit span backward performance assessed before (baseline) and after stimulation to test for tDCS effects on working memory

    Measured: change in working memory performance from baseline after 30 min (approximately)

  3. Other cognitive outcomes: change in Attention performance

    Digit span forward performance assessed before baseline) and after stimulation to test for tDCS effects on attention

    Measured: change in attention performance from baseline after 30 min (approximately)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 May 2016
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03094520
Sponsor's protocol ID
GEST
Acronym
GEST
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
24 Feb 2017
Last updated
11 May 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Cohen-Maximov T, Avirame K, Floel A, Lavidor M. Modulation of Gestural-verbal Semantic Integration by tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

    PubMed 25558040
  • Floel A, Ellger T, Breitenstein C, Knecht S. Language perception activates the hand motor cortex: implications for motor theories of speech perception. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Aug;18(3):704-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02774.x.

    PubMed 12911767
  • Floel A, Rosser N, Michka O, Knecht S, Breitenstein C. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1415-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20098.

    PubMed 18303984

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS in people with Healthy Young Adults, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

response time in semantic decision task (time frame: assessed during stimulation or sham stimulation of semantic decision task (last approximately 10 min) at specific timepoint within 2 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03094520, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in