AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisBENEFITNCT03100734

Observational Study to Evaluate the Real-Life Effectiveness of Benepali Following Transition From Enbrel

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Biogen at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of Benepali in participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA, following their transition from treatment with Enbrel. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
What is being tested?
Benepali and Enbrel
How many people
585 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 30 Nov 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Axial Spondyloarthritis to be identified from Primary Care Practice / Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Must have been diagnosed with either rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis, according to local practice
  • Transition from Enbrel to Benepali at the physician's (Investigator's) discretion prior to enrolment into the study
  • Must have been treated with the same dose of Enbrel for at least 6 months prior to transition to Benepali and have at least 1 efficacy data value including but not restricted to DAS-28 or BASDAI during that period
  • Must have a stable disease throughout the 2 month prior to enrolment based on the Investigator's judgement
  • Women of childbearing potential should be advised to use appropriate contraception to avoid becoming pregnant during Benepali therapy and for three weeks after discontinuation of therapy

Who cannot join

  • Have any medical conditions that precludes administration of Benepali according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), such as the following:
  • Hypersensitivity to the Benepali active substance, or to any of the associated excipients
  • Sepsis, or risk of sepsis
  • Active clinically significant local or chronic viral, bacterial or fungal infection, or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with parenteral anti-infectives within 2 months prior to enrollment
  • Show any clinical sign or medical condition not allowing for treatment continuation (of etanercept) in the judgment of the Investigator
  • Treatment with another biologic agent
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Are currently receiving or have previously received any therapies that would preclude administration of Benepali, such as the following:
  • Immunizations with live or live-attenuated vaccines within the last 6 months prior to transition point and throughout the observation period
  • Treatment with investigational agents within the last 6 months prior to transition point and during the period of observation.
  • Any other unspecified reasons that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, make the patient unsuitable for enrollment.
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Research Site

    München, Bavaria, 80639

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Multicentre Observational Study to Evaluate the Real-Life Effectiveness of Benepali® Following Transition From Enbrel® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) - The BENEFIT Study

The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of Benepali in participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA, following their transition from treatment with Enbrel.

The secondary objectives of this study are to describe clinical characteristics of patients transitioned from Enbrel® to Benepali® in routine practice, to evaluate safety during and following the transition from Enbrel to Benepali and to evaluate patient-reported outcomes during and following the transition from Enbrel to Benepali.

Being tested
Benepali, Enbrel
Keywords
Observational, Biosimilar, Etanercept, Benepali, Enbrel
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Axial Spondyloarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BenepaliBiological

    As specified in the treatment arm

  • EnbrelBiological

    Also called etanercept

    As specified in the treatment arm

Study groups in NCT03100734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
With RAParticipants with RA previously treated with Enbrel and transitioned to Benepali
Receives: Biological: Benepali; Biological: Enbrel
With axSpAParticipants with axSpA previously treated with Enbrel and transitioned to Benepali
Receives: Biological: Benepali; Biological: Enbrel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from transition point in Disease Activity Score (DAS-28 score)

    Score of 28 joints examined

    Measured: Approximately 3 months after the transition

  2. Change from transition point in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score

    Mean BASDAI score

    Measured: Approximately 3 months after the transition

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Change in the DAS-28 score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Score of 28 joints examined

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  2. Proportion of participants with low disease activity or remission over time following Transition Point

    Defined as DAS-28 score ≤ 3.2 or ≤ 2.6

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  3. Proportion of participants with worsening disease over time following Transition Point

    Defined by an increase in DAS-28 of ≥ 1.2, and a minimum DAS score of 3.2

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  4. Proportion of participants with an improvement of ≥ 1.2 points in DAS-28 score from Transition Point

    Improvement of ≥ 1.2 points in DAS-28 score data collected

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  5. Change in the General Health Score (assessed using VAS) over time following transition point

    Assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) over time

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  6. Change in the BASDAI score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    BASDAI score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  7. Change in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ASDAS-ESR ) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    (ASDAS-ESR ) or (CRP) score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  8. Proportion of participants with worsening disease over time following Transition Point

    Defined by an increase in ASDAS score of ≥1.1, and a minimum ASDAS score of 2.1

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Severity

    Safety surveillance

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  10. Change in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)-Disease activity-VAS score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using Disease activity-VAS score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  11. Change in Patient Global Assessment - Visual Analogue Scale (PGA PAIN-VAS) score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using PAIN-VAS score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  12. Change in Patient PGA FATIGUE -VAS score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using FATIGUE - VAS score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  13. Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using the HAQ-DI score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  14. Change in PAIN-VAS score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using Pain - VAS score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  15. Change in FATIGUE -VAS score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using FATIGUE - VAS score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  16. Change in HAQ-DI score over time from the value obtained at the Transition Point

    Assessed using the HAQ-DI score

    Measured: Approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  17. Number of Participants by Demographic Category

    Measured: At baseline and approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  18. Number of Participants by Relevant Medical History

    Measured: At baseline and approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  19. Number of Participants by Disease Status

    Measured: At baseline and approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

  20. Number of Participants by Relevant Medication Use

    Measured: At baseline and approximately 3 and 6 months after the transition

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
585 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03100734
Sponsor's protocol ID
EUR-BNP-16-11030
Acronym
BENEFIT
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
29 Mar 2017
Last updated
5 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Biogen at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from transition point in Disease Activity Score (DAS-28 score) (time frame: Approximately 3 months after the transition). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in