Stage II Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT03103321
Decision Aids in Improving Knowledge in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Internet-Based Intervention, Best Practice and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Stage II Prostate Cancer and Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 28 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This randomized phase III trial studies how well decision aids work in improving knowledge in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge of their condition and options for treatment, and may also help when talking with their doctor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stage II Prostate Cancer, Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Internet-Based Intervention, Best Practice and Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2017to 25 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have prostate biopsy within 4 months prior to registration showing newly diagnosed prostate cancer, stage T1-3N0M0; in addition, patients must have: Gleason score 6-10
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 50 ng/mL
- Patients who have had a history of non-cutaneous malignancy in the previous 5 years are not eligible; exception: patients with history of non-melanoma skin cancer are eligible
- Scheduled prostate cancer consultation to be the first consultation after diagnosis (i.e. not a second-opinion or a consultation following previous discussions of treatment options)
- Patients may not be concurrently enrolled to another clinical trial for the treatment of cancer; co-enrollment to biospecimen studies is allowed
- Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
- Patients must be able to read and comprehend English; non-English-speaking patients may participate so long as an interpreter (e.g., family member, clinic staff, etc.) is present for consent, for the decision aid administration, and gathering of baseline and follow-up measures
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 1 country.
28 sites in 1 country
United States28 sites
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Augusta University Medical Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Ochsner Health Center-Summa
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Kaiser Permanente-Bellflower
Bellflower, California, 90706
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Laurens
Clinton, South Carolina, 29325
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Easley
Easley, South Carolina, 29640
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Butternut
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Faris
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Prisma Health Greenville Memorial Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Eastside
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Greer
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Tripler Army Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96859
Northwell Health/Center for Advanced Medicine
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Kaiser Permanente-Cadillac
Los Angeles, California, 90034
Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
Kaiser Permanente Oakland-Broadway
Oakland, California, 94611
Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Seneca
Seneca, South Carolina, 29672
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Spartanburg
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29307
Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus
The Bronx, New York, 10467
James J Peters VA Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10468
About this study
Official title: Testing Decision Aids to Improve Prostate Cancer Decisions for Minority Men
This randomized phase III trial studies how well decision aids work in improving knowledge in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge of their condition and options for treatment, and may also help when talking with their doctor.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To test the comparative effectiveness of decision aids (DA's) on patient knowledge.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To test the impact of in-visit DA's alone compared to usual care on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
II. To test the impact of out-of-visit DA's alone compared to usual care on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
III. To test the impact of combined in-visit and out-of-visit DA's compared to both usual care and individual DAs on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
IV. To test the comparative effectiveness of DA's on minority men's knowledge. V. To compare clinic time required to administer the DA's across arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 4 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive decision aids "Knowing your Options" before and "Prostate Choice" during their consultation visit.
ARM B: Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit.
ARM C: Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit.
ARM D: Patients undergo usual care.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 12 months.
- Conditions
- Stage II Prostate Cancer, Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer, Stage III Prostate Cancer, Stage I Prostate Cancer, PSA Level Five to Ten
- Being tested
- Internet-Based Intervention, Best Practice, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Survey Administration
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Internet-Based InterventionOther
Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid
Internet-Based InterventionOther
Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid
Best PracticeOther
Also called standard of care, standard therapy
Undergo usual care
Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
Survey AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisOther
Correlative studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice") | Experimental | Patients receive decision aids "Knowing your Options" before and "Prostate Choice" during their consultation visit. Receives: Other: Internet-Based Intervention; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Other: Survey Administration; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis |
| Arm B ("Knowing your Options") | Experimental | Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Receives: Other: Internet-Based Intervention; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Other: Survey Administration; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis |
| Arm C ("Prostate Choice") | Experimental | Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Receives: Other: Internet-Based Intervention; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Other: Survey Administration; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis |
| Arm D (usual care) | Active comparator | Patients undergo usual care. Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Other: Survey Administration; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knowledge Assessed by Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire
The primary outcome, knowledge, will be assessed by a standardized questionnaire (i.e., Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire) administered once, immediately after the clinical consultation while the patient is still at the study site. The number correct from this 12-item measure will be reduced to a percentage of total number correct. With 100%(12 out of 12 item average) being the best possible outcome and 0%(0 out of 12 item average) the worst possible outcome
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Decisional Quality as Measured by Decisional Conflict Scale Decisional Regret
The Decisional Regret Scale is a short, 5-item scale measuring "distress or remorse after a (health care) decision." The instrument has been validated in other decision aid studies. Questions are answered on a 5-point agreement scale. A score of 0 means no decisional regret and 5 is the maximum level of regret. The median scores for each cohort were grouped into two categories, 0(no regret) and 1+(at least some regret).
Measured: 12 months
Clinical Time Required
Will be compared across DA types using linear mixed models. In particular, this model will include fixed effects for Prostate Choice and Knowing Your Options and a random, site-specific intercept to allow for subjects within the same site to be correlated. Will explore whether the overall effects of interventions on patient knowledge, quality of life, and treatment utilization differ by racial/ethnic subgroups.
Measured: 12 months
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite(EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life and returns summary scores for urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains with high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Scores will be converted into continuous summary scores using standard algorithms. For the EPIC-26 questionnaire, scores were transformed into 0 to 100 scales, with a score of 0 representing the worst possible health-related quality of life and a score of 100 representing the most favorable health-related quality of life. The questionnaire will be administered once; 12 months after the patient's initial consultation.
Measured: 12 months
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Will be categorized by the type of treatment the patient received. Will be compared across DA types using linear mixed models. In particular, this model will include fixed effects for Prostate Choice and Knowing Your Options and a random, site-specific intercept to allow for subjects within the same site to be correlated. Will explore whether the overall effects of interventions on patient knowledge, quality of life, and treatment utilization differ by racial/ethnic subgroups.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2017
- Study start2 Oct 2017
- Primary completion5 Dec 2019
- Study completion25 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stage II Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- tilburt.jon@mayo.edu tilburt.jon@mayo.edu, MD, Study chair, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03103321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A191402CD
- Other IDs
- NCI-2017-00482
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD that underlie results in the publication PubMed ID 34890060.
Publications
Tilburt JC, Zahrieh D, Pacyna JE, Petereit DG, Kaur JS, Rapkin BD, Grubb RL 3rd, Chang GJ, Morris MJ, Kovac EZ, Babaian KN, Sloan JA, Basch EM, Peil ES, Dueck AC, Novotny PJ, Paskett ED, Buckner JC, Joyce DD, Montori VM, Frosch DL, Volk RJ, Kim SP. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: Primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD). Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1242-1251. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34062. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
PubMed 34890060Pacyna JE, Kim S, Yost K, Sedlacek H, Petereit D, Kaur J, Rapkin B, Grubb R, Paskett E, Chang GJ, Sloan J, Basch E, Major B, Novotny P, Taylor J, Buckner J, Parsons JK, Morris M, Tilburt JC. The comparative effectiveness of decision aids in diverse populations with early stage prostate cancer: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial in the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Alliance A191402CD. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4672-3.
PubMed 30081846
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Testing Decision Aids to Improve Prostate Cancer Decisions for Minority Men
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03103321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A191402CD
- Conditions
- Stage II Prostate Cancer, Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer, Stage III Prostate Cancer, Stage I Prostate Cancer, PSA Level Five to Ten
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase III trial studies how well decision aids work in improving knowledge in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge of their condition and options for treatment, and may also help when talking with their doctor.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To test the comparative effectiveness of decision aids (DA's) on patient knowledge.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To test the impact of in-visit DA's alone compared to usual care on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
II. To test the impact of out-of-visit DA's alone compared to usual care on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
III. To test the impact of combined in-visit and out-of-visit DA's compared to both usual care and individual DAs on quality of life outcomes and treatment utilization.
IV. To test the comparative effectiveness of DA's on minority men's knowledge. V. To compare clinic time required to administer the DA's across arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 4 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive decision aids "Knowing your Options" before and "Prostate Choice" during their consultation visit.
ARM B: Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit.
ARM C: Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit.
ARM D: Patients undergo usual care.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice") | Experimental | Other: Internet-Based Intervention, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Survey Administration, Other: Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisPatients receive decision aids "Knowing your Options" before and "Prostate Choice" during their consultation visit. |
| Arm B ("Knowing your Options") | Experimental | Other: Internet-Based Intervention, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Survey Administration, Other: Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisPatients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. |
| Arm C ("Prostate Choice") | Experimental | Other: Internet-Based Intervention, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Survey Administration, Other: Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisPatients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. |
| Arm D (usual care) | Active comparator | Other: Best Practice, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Survey Administration, Other: Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisPatients undergo usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients must have prostate biopsy within 4 months prior to registration showing newly diagnosed prostate cancer, stage T1-3N0M0; in addition, patients must have: Gleason score 6-10
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 50 ng/mL
- Patients who have had a history of non-cutaneous malignancy in the previous 5 years are not eligible; exception: patients with history of non-melanoma skin cancer are eligible
- Scheduled prostate cancer consultation to be the first consultation after diagnosis (i.e. not a second-opinion or a consultation following previous discussions of treatment options)
- Patients may not be concurrently enrolled to another clinical trial for the treatment of cancer; co-enrollment to biospecimen studies is allowed
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Internet-Based InterventionReceive "Knowing your Options" decision aid | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm B ("Knowing your Options") |
| Internet-Based InterventionReceive "Prostate Choice" decision aid | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm C ("Prostate Choice") |
| Best PracticeAlso: standard of care, standard therapyUndergo usual care | Other | Arm D (usual care) |
| Quality-of-Life AssessmentAncillary studies | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm B ("Knowing your Options"), Arm C ("Prostate Choice"), Arm D (usual care) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm B ("Knowing your Options"), Arm C ("Prostate Choice"), Arm D (usual care) |
| Survey AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm B ("Knowing your Options"), Arm C ("Prostate Choice"), Arm D (usual care) |
| Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisCorrelative studies | Other | Arm A ("Knowing your Options", "Prostate Choice"), Arm B ("Knowing your Options"), Arm C ("Prostate Choice"), Arm D (usual care) |
Primary outcome
Knowledge Assessed by Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
The primary outcome, knowledge, will be assessed by a standardized questionnaire (i.e., Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire) administered once, immediately after the clinical consultation while the patient is still at the study site. The number correct from this 12-item measure will be reduced to a percentage of total number correct. With 100%(12 out of 12 item average) being the best possible outcome and 0%(0 out of 12 item average) the worst possible outcome
4 secondary outcomes
Decisional Quality as Measured by Decisional Conflict Scale Decisional Regret
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical Time Required
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34890060Tilburt JC, Zahrieh D, Pacyna JE, Petereit DG, Kaur JS, Rapkin BD, Grubb RL 3rd, Chang GJ, Morris MJ, Kovac EZ, Babaian KN, Sloan JA, Basch EM, Peil ES, Dueck AC, Novotny PJ, Paskett ED, Buckner JC, Joyce DD, Montori VM, Frosch DL, Volk RJ, Kim SP. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: Primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD). Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1242-1251. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34062. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30081846Pacyna JE, Kim S, Yost K, Sedlacek H, Petereit D, Kaur J, Rapkin B, Grubb R, Paskett E, Chang GJ, Sloan J, Basch E, Major B, Novotny P, Taylor J, Buckner J, Parsons JK, Morris M, Tilburt JC. The comparative effectiveness of decision aids in diverse populations with early stage prostate cancer: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial in the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Alliance A191402CD. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4672-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD that underlie results in the publication PubMed ID 34890060.
Related trials for Stage II Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Relugolix and Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Very High Risk Prostate Cancer, OPTIMAL Trial
Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Olaparib in Men With High-Risk Biochemically-Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy, With Integrated Biomarker Analysis
Prostate
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
tilburt.jon@mayo.edu tilburt.jon@mayo.edu, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
28 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Internet-Based Intervention, Best Practice and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Stage II Prostate Cancer and Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 28 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knowledge Assessed by Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03103321, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2025.