Knee OsteoarthritisMOANiNCT03106584
The Marigot Osteoarthritis Nutritional Intervention (MOANi) Trial
A study testing Aquamin-Plus and Glucosamine sulphate in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University College Dublin at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to test 30 individuals with mild-moderate knee joint osteoarthritis to investigate whether the combination of Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) and a polyphenol-rich pine bark extract (Enzogenol), when taken as a food supplement for 3 months has comparable or superior benefits… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Aquamin-Plus and Glucosamine sulphate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 1 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The project will focus on patients with a diagnosis of a mild-moderate KOA (level 1-3 Kellgren and Lawrence and WOMAC in the lower two quartiles), in the target knee, (Frestedt et al., 2008) and a BMI between 20 and 30 kg/m2.
Who cannot join
- [1] rheumatoid arthritis [2] gout [3] pseudo gout [4] Paget's disease [5] seizure disorder [6] insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [7] uncontrolled hypertension [8] unstable cardiovascular disease [9] active hepatic or renal disease [10] active cancer and/or HIV infection, involved in other clinical trial or experimental treatments in the past 3 months; pregnant, lactating, or at risk of becoming pregnant; intramuscular/systemic corticosteroid injection within 4 weeks; intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 2 months; or inter-articular hyaluronic acid injection within 4 months prior to enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ireland1 site
Institue for Sport and Health UCD
Dublin, Leinster, D04 V1W8
Shane Heffernan, PhD, 00353 1 716 3433 ext. 3433, shane.heffernan@ucd.ie
Mark McGroarty, MSc, 00353 86 0830034, mark.mcgroarty@ucd.ie
About this study
Official title: Investigating the Potential for Marigot's Nutrition Supplement to Improve Symptoms and Physical Function in Those With Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) Versus the Current Market Leader (Glucosamine Sulphate)
The purpose of the study is to test 30 individuals with mild-moderate knee joint osteoarthritis to investigate whether the combination of Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) and a polyphenol-rich pine bark extract (Enzogenol), when taken as a food supplement for 3 months has comparable or superior benefits to glucosamine sulphate in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA). From here on in we refer to Aquamin's combination product as Aquamin-plus. The main outcome measure is a reduction in pain.
Provision of data that demonstrate preliminary equivalency or superiority to current, non-pharmaceutical options such as glucosamine will broaden consumer choice, and provide them with an option that is supported by science, rather than marketing alone.
The hypothesis of the study is that the consumption of Aquamin-plus will have comparable effects on reducing pain in individuals with Knee Joint OA to glucosamine.
Read the detailed description
This project will be a double blinded randomized cross-over control (pilot) trial that will investigate whether the combination of Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) and a polyphenol-rich pine bark extract (Enzogenol), when taken as a food supplement for 3 months (12 weeks) has comparable or superior benefits to glucosamine sulphate in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA). From here on in we refer to Aquamin's combination product as Aquamin-plus. The main outcome measure is a reduction in pain (WOMAC index) and improve physical function (6MWD and TUG).
The hypothesis of the study is that the consumption of Aquamin-plus for a period of 3 months will have comparable or superior effects on to glucosamine sulphate in reducing pain and improving physical function in individuals with KOA.
According to the Food and Drug Administration et al. osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as a serious disease or condition because, among other aspects, it is "…associated with morbidity that has substantial impact on day-to-day functioning…" . Furthermore, the current Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) definition of OA has been proposed as, "OA is a disorder involving movable joints characterized by cell stress and extracellular matrix degradation initiated by micro- and macro-injury that activates maladaptive repair responses including pro-inflammatory pathways of innate immunity. The disease manifests first as a molecular derangement (abnormal joint tissue metabolism) followed by anatomic, and/or physiologic derangements (characterized by cartilage degradation, bone remodeling, osteophyte formation, joint inflammation and loss of normal joint function), that can culminate in illness"
The condition can be characterized as a branch of rheumatic disease that is a progressive condition of synovial joints and is caused by the failure of a joint to repair following damage. This damage may have been caused by stresses due to an abnormality in the articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, menisci, periarticular muscles, peripheral nerves or synovium. Failure of these normal biological processes leads to breakdown of cartilage and bone and is characterized by symptoms of pain, stiffness, functional disability and can and lead to negative effects on fatigue, mood, sleep and overall quality of life. OA has the highest frequency of all rheumatic diseases and is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the modern day. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, progressive ageing of the population could make OA the ninth cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in developed countries by the year 2020, with KOA accounting for 83% of the total OA burden.
Investigations into the heritability of OA have identified some interesting results. In a British twin cohort, the genetic contribution to radiographically defined hip and KOA was estimated to 39-65% in women with a Danish twin studies finding similar variance in hip arthroplasty due to OA (47%) but only 18% for knee arthroplasty due to OA. However, more recent data from a larger cohort (n = 9058) showed a heritability of 73% and 45% in hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively. Interestingly, identified that while hip OA associated arthroplasty remains highly heritable regardless of environmental factors, while the genetic component of KOA (for arthroplasty) was significantly modifiable with increasing BMI. These data show the requirement for clinical interventions to focus on symptomatic KOA, particularly considering the exponentially increasing BMI and obesity in the western world.
Data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) show that approximately 13% (women-17.3%, men-9.4%; self-reported) of Irish residence over the age of 50 suffer from symptomatic OA, with 19.2% of those reporting symptomatic KOA. These are similar to data from Arthritis Research UK showing an 18% prevalence of patients visiting a general practitioner presenting with symptoms of KOA. Moreover, these reported incidence rates are estimated to raise in tandem with population age (Arthritis Research UK, 2013). In fact, the prevalence of KOA in the US is 25% and increases by 2% each year, likely due to the aging population (as in the UK) and raising obesity rate, with a lifetime risk of symptomatic KOA as high as 60.5 % in obese individuals.
Joint pain is the most common complaint among those who seek medical care for OA and as a result of OA pain 80% of individuals with have some degree of movement limitation, 25% cannot perform major activities of daily living and 11% of adults with KOA need help with personal care. Consequentially, OA can lead to negative effects on quality of life, mood, fatigue and sleep. Interestingly, poor sleep occurs in ~70% of older individuals with OA and is linked with fatigue, which in turn is associated with a greater fall risk in the elderly and identifies fatigue as a further concern, in addition to joint instability, of fall-related complications.
OA is a progressive condition with no cure, however treatments do exist aimed at reducing symptoms and slowing progression of the disease. This in turn will improve mobility, quality of life and leads to a reduction in the need joint replacement surgery in the long-term and consequently reduces the demand on healthcare resource. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the traditional approach for clinical management of mild-to-moderate OA symptoms, however NSAIDs have been associated with potentially harmful side effects such as gastrointestinal complications, renal disturbances and cardiovascular events. Therefore, non-pharmaceutical alternatives have been developed such as glucosamine compounds, however the reported efficacy for reducing OA symptoms varies. Nonetheless, while glucosamine compounds have a lower risk of adverse effects compared to NSAIDs and other symptomatic slow-acting drugs for OA (SYSADOA), glucosamine compounds show higher risk of adverse side effects than placebo and as such alternatives should be sought. Further to possible adverse health effects, NSAIDs and SYASDOAs are costly and greatly affect the socioeconomic health of patients with OA. A recent meta-analysis of global generalized OA has shown that the individual annual incremental healthcare costs ranged from €705 to €19,715 and concluded that the social cost of OA could be between 0.25% and 0.50% of a country's GDP. More specifically, the individual cost of KOA (both social healthcare and private) can range from €528 to €11293 depending of severity. In fact, Hunter et al. recently called for urgent action to focus attention on opportunities to reduce the individual and socioeconomic burden of OA.
Glucosamine supplementation for the treatment of OA and OA related phenotypes spans many decades, with the first (to the authors' knowledge) patent filled in 1969 and research on human derived glucosamine published long before. The earliest identifiable mention (to the authors' knowledge) of Aqumin is from the late 90's with a patent, containing Aqumin, filled for human consumption in 2003, "Algae-based food supplement". Therefore, there is a significant advantage for glucosamine in the accumulation of large high quality studies into its therapeutic effects. Nonetheless, the few small pilot studies concerned with the therapeutic effects of Aquamin supplementation show promising results in comparison to both placebo and Glucosamine formulas. In fact, for some important OA phenotypes, Aquamin performs better, particularly in the reduction of NSAID use. While the proposed mechanisms of action differ considerable between the two supplements, inflammatory reduction occurs because of both. Currently, there have been no long-term trials concerned with the efficacy of Aquamin in the reduction of KOA related joint structural decline however, because Aquamin reduces inflammatory markers of KOA, albeit in only one small human study, it is possible that Aquamin might improve joint structural decline and KOA prognosis through possibly reducing joint tissue damage.
This project will be a double blinded randomized cross-over control trial with a sample size of 30 participants (based off a sample size calculation detailed below). The project will investigate two supplements on their effects on self-reported pain, quality of life, knee extensor/flexor strength, knee extensor/flexor myoelectric activity, functional mobility and biomarkers associated with inflammation. The participants will first be assessed for baseline measurements of the outcome measures mentioned above. They will then be randomly allocated to either group A or B and will take either supplement A or B for a period of 12 weeks. Following this there will be follow up assessments of the same outcome measures. This will be followed by a 4-week washout period prior to each subjects' baseline measures being reassessed and each participant allocated the 'other' supplement. After 12 weeks' supplementation, the subjects will then be retested for a final time.
An a priori sample size calculation indicated a total of 29 patients was required to enter this two-treatment crossover study to assess the primary outcomes. The probability is 80 percent that the study will detect a treatment difference at a two-sided 0.05 significance level, if the true difference between treatments is 12.000 units. This is based on the assumption that the within-patient standard deviation of the response variable is 15.62."
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Aquamin-Plus, Glucosamine sulphate
- Keywords
- Knee pain, Glucosamine, WOMAC, Osteoarthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aquamin-PlusDietary supplement
Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) - 666.7mg magnesium hydroxide - 66.66mg pine bark - 30mg vitamin d3 - 2.5μg
Dosage:
4 Capsules is equal to effective dose
Glucosamine sulphateDietary supplement
The Glucosamine sulphate supplement contains 500mg of the active ingredient Glucosamine sulphate per serving (one capsule).
Dosage:
4 Capsules is equal to effective dose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Glucosamine sulphate | Active comparator | Glucosamine sulphate will be consumed as either supplement A or B (i.e. blinded) for a period of 12-weeks. Glucosamine will be taken 2 times daily with food.
After 12 weeks of supplementation, participants will begin taking the alternative supplement (Aquamin-plus), after a washout period of not less than 1 month between the intervention arms of the study. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Aquamin-Plus; Dietary Supplement: Glucosamine sulphate |
| Aquamin-plus | Experimental | Aquamin-plus will be consumed as either supplement A or B (i.e. blinded) for a period of 12-weeks. Aquamin-plus will be taken 2 times daily with food.
After 12 weeks of supplementation, participants will begin taking the alternative supplement (Glucosamine sulphate), after a washout period of not less than 1 month between the intervention arms of the study. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Aquamin-Plus; Dietary Supplement: Glucosamine sulphate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self reported KOA pain
The primary outcome measure will be an assessment of the participants' knee pain. This will be measured using the validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function sub-scale. This will allow for the determination of the comparability, superiority or otherwise of Aquamin-plus compared to glucosamine sulphate in improving participant's self-reported knee pain and function. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Baseline, mid intervention (4 and 8 weeks) post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), mid intervention (20 and 24 weeks) post intervention (28 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Quality of life questionnaire
This will be quantified by the EuroQoL-5D. The EuroQoL-5D will assess participants on their levels of function surrounding mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Knee flexor and extensor muscle strength
Participants knee joint strength will be assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex). Specifically isometric strength of the quadricep and hamstring muscles. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Knee flexor and extensor muscle electrical activity
Muscles activation (via electromyography) during the performance of the isometric testing will be assessed for the quadricep and hamstring muscles. Both the agonist and antagonist muscle activity will be assessed and a co-contraction value will be calculated. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Biomarkers
Biomarkers known to be involved in the biological response to KOA will be assessed to investigate possible mechanistic effects and differences of both interventions. As such, in order to investigate these possible mechanistic parameters include venous blood sampling (10 mL). Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Functional mobility
This will be assessed using the Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). These tests indicate levels of functional. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Body Composition
A Dule-Energy X ray Absorptimetry (DEXA) will be used to assess participants body composition. Change from baseline assessed.
Measured: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2017
- Study start1 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (37)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The project is a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial (pilot), with a cross-over design. Participants, will be randomized to begin taking either Aquamin-plus or Glucosamine sulphate following medical diagnosis and baseline assessment. Following 12 weeks of supplementation of Glucosamine sulphate or Aquamin-plus there will be a 4-week washout period before participants consume the other supplement.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College Dublin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marigot Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giuseppe De Vito, Prof., Study chair, UCDEamonn Delahunt, PhD, Principal investigator, UCDConor McCarthy, MD, Principal investigator, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03106584
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LS-17-10-Delahunt-DeVito
- Acronym
- MOANi
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Frestedt JL, Walsh M, Kuskowski MA, Zenk JL. A natural mineral supplement provides relief from knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Nutr J. 2008 Feb 17;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-9.
PubMed 18279523Frestedt JL, Kuskowski MA, Zenk JL. A natural seaweed derived mineral supplement (Aquamin F) for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, placebo controlled pilot study. Nutr J. 2009 Feb 2;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-7.
PubMed 19187557Murphy, C. T., et al.
Kraus VB, Blanco FJ, Englund M, Karsdal MA, Lohmander LS. Call for standardized definitions of osteoarthritis and risk stratification for clinical trials and clinical use. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Aug;23(8):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PubMed 25865392Lane NE, Brandt K, Hawker G, Peeva E, Schreyer E, Tsuji W, Hochberg MC. OARSI-FDA initiative: defining the disease state of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 May;19(5):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
PubMed 21396464Pena Ayala AH, Fernandez-Lopez JC. [Prevalence and risk factors in osteoarthritis]. Reumatol Clin. 2007 Oct;3 Suppl 3:S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/S1699-258X(07)73648-3. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Spanish.
PubMed 21794484Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1002/art.24021.
PubMed 18759314Haq SA, Davatchi F. Osteoarthritis of the knees in the COPCORD world. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011 May;14(2):122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01615.x.
PubMed 21518310Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Jordan JM, Katz JN, Kremers HM, Wolfe F; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176.
PubMed 18163497Carmona L, Ballina J, Gabriel R, Laffon A; EPISER Study Group. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the general population of Spain: results from a national survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Nov;60(11):1040-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.11.1040.
PubMed 11602475Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, Niu J, Clancy M, Kvien TK, Felson DT. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1581-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150078. Epub 2011 May 27.
PubMed 21622766Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;10(7):437-41. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PubMed 24662640Kopec JA, Richardson CG, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Klinkhoff A, Carswell A, Chalmers A. Probabilistic threshold technique showed that patients' preferences for specific trade-offs between pain relief and each side effect of treatment in osteoarthritis varied. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;60(9):929-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 May 8.
PubMed 17689809Magnusson K, Scurrah K, Ystrom E, Orstavik RE, Nilsen T, Steingrimsdottir OA, Ferreira P, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Hagen KB. Genetic factors contribute more to hip than knee surgery due to osteoarthritis - a population-based twin registry study of joint arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jun;25(6):878-884. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
PubMed 27986619Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, Mullany EC, Biryukov S, Abbafati C, Abera SF, Abraham JP, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Achoki T, AlBuhairan FS, Alemu ZA, Alfonso R, Ali MK, Ali R, Guzman NA, Ammar W, Anwari P, Banerjee A, Barquera S, Basu S, Bennett DA, Bhutta Z, Blore J, Cabral N, Nonato IC, Chang JC, Chowdhury R, Courville KJ, Criqui MH, Cundiff DK, Dabhadkar KC, Dandona L, Davis A, Dayama A, Dharmaratne SD, Ding EL, Durrani AM, Esteghamati A, Farzadfar F, Fay DF, Feigin VL, Flaxman A, Forouzanfar MH, Goto A, Green MA, Gupta R, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hankey GJ, Harewood HC, Havmoeller R, Hay S, Hernandez L, Husseini A, Idrisov BT, Ikeda N, Islami F, Jahangir E, Jassal SK, Jee SH, Jeffreys M, Jonas JB, Kabagambe EK, Khalifa SE, Kengne AP, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kim D, Kimokoti RW, Kinge JM, Kokubo Y, Kosen S, Kwan G, Lai T, Leinsalu M, Li Y, Liang X, Liu S, Logroscino G, Lotufo PA, Lu Y, Ma J, Mainoo NK, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Mokdad AH, Moschandreas J, Naghavi M, Naheed A, Nand D, Narayan KM, Nelson EL, Neuhouser ML, Nisar MI, Ohkubo T, Oti SO, Pedroza A, Prabhakaran D, Roy N, Sampson U, Seo H, Sepanlou SG, Shibuya K, Shiri R, Shiue I, Singh GM, Singh JA, Skirbekk V, Stapelberg NJ, Sturua L, Sykes BL, Tobias M, Tran BX, Trasande L, Toyoshima H, van de Vijver S, Vasankari TJ, Veerman JL, Velasquez-Melendez G, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wang C, Wang X, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wright JL, Yang YC, Yatsuya H, Yoon J, Yoon SJ, Zhao Y, Zhou M, Zhu S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Gakidou E. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Epub 2014 May 29.
PubMed 24880830
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating the Potential for Marigot's Nutrition Supplement to Improve Symptoms and Physical Function in Those With Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) Versus the Current Market Leader (Glucosamine Sulphate)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03106584
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOANi / LS-17-10-Delahunt-DeVito
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Knee pain, Glucosamine, WOMAC, Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University College DublinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marigot Ltd.
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to test 30 individuals with mild-moderate knee joint osteoarthritis to investigate whether the combination of Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) and a polyphenol-rich pine bark extract (Enzogenol), when taken as a food supplement for 3 months has comparable or superior benefits to glucosamine sulphate in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA). From here on in we refer to Aquamin's combination product as Aquamin-plus. The main outcome measure is a reduction in pain.
Provision of data that demonstrate preliminary equivalency or superiority to current, non-pharmaceutical options such as glucosamine will broaden consumer choice, and provide them with an option that is supported by science, rather than marketing alone.
The hypothesis of the study is that the consumption of Aquamin-plus will have comparable effects on reducing pain in individuals with Knee Joint OA to glucosamine.
Detailed description
This project will be a double blinded randomized cross-over control (pilot) trial that will investigate whether the combination of Aquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) and a polyphenol-rich pine bark extract (Enzogenol), when taken as a food supplement for 3 months (12 weeks) has comparable or superior benefits to glucosamine sulphate in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA). From here on in we refer to Aquamin's combination product as Aquamin-plus. The main outcome measure is a reduction in pain (WOMAC index) and improve physical function (6MWD and TUG).
The hypothesis of the study is that the consumption of Aquamin-plus for a period of 3 months will have comparable or superior effects on to glucosamine sulphate in reducing pain and improving physical function in individuals with KOA.
According to the Food and Drug Administration et al. osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as a serious disease or condition because, among other aspects, it is "…associated with morbidity that has substantial impact on day-to-day functioning…" . Furthermore, the current Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) definition of OA has been proposed as, "OA is a disorder involving movable joints characterized by cell stress and extracellular matrix degradation initiated by micro- and macro-injury that activates maladaptive repair responses including pro-inflammatory pathways of innate immunity. The disease manifests first as a molecular derangement (abnormal joint tissue metabolism) followed by anatomic, and/or physiologic derangements (characterized by cartilage degradation, bone remodeling, osteophyte formation, joint inflammation and loss of normal joint function), that can culminate in illness"
The condition can be characterized as a branch of rheumatic disease that is a progressive condition of synovial joints and is caused by the failure of a joint to repair following damage. This damage may have been caused by stresses due to an abnormality in the articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, menisci, periarticular muscles, peripheral nerves or synovium. Failure of these normal biological processes leads to breakdown of cartilage and bone and is characterized by symptoms of pain, stiffness, functional disability and can and lead to negative effects on fatigue, mood, sleep and overall quality of life. OA has the highest frequency of all rheumatic diseases and is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the modern day. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, progressive ageing of the population could make OA the ninth cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in developed countries by the year 2020, with KOA accounting for 83% of the total OA burden.
Investigations into the heritability of OA have identified some interesting results. In a British twin cohort, the genetic contribution to radiographically defined hip and KOA was estimated to 39-65% in women with a Danish twin studies finding similar variance in hip arthroplasty due to OA (47%) but only 18% for knee arthroplasty due to OA. However, more recent data from a larger cohort (n = 9058) showed a heritability of 73% and 45% in hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively. Interestingly, identified that while hip OA associated arthroplasty remains highly heritable regardless of environmental factors, while the genetic component of KOA (for arthroplasty) was significantly modifiable with increasing BMI. These data show the requirement for clinical interventions to focus on symptomatic KOA, particularly considering the exponentially increasing BMI and obesity in the western world.
Data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) show that approximately 13% (women-17.3%, men-9.4%; self-reported) of Irish residence over the age of 50 suffer from symptomatic OA, with 19.2% of those reporting symptomatic KOA. These are similar to data from Arthritis Research UK showing an 18% prevalence of patients visiting a general practitioner presenting with symptoms of KOA. Moreover, these reported incidence rates are estimated to raise in tandem with population age (Arthritis Research UK, 2013). In fact, the prevalence of KOA in the US is 25% and increases by 2% each year, likely due to the aging population (as in the UK) and raising obesity rate, with a lifetime risk of symptomatic KOA as high as 60.5 % in obese individuals.
Joint pain is the most common complaint among those who seek medical care for OA and as a result of OA pain 80% of individuals with have some degree of movement limitation, 25% cannot perform major activities of daily living and 11% of adults with KOA need help with personal care. Consequentially, OA can lead to negative effects on quality of life, mood, fatigue and sleep. Interestingly, poor sleep occurs in ~70% of older individuals with OA and is linked with fatigue, which in turn is associated with a greater fall risk in the elderly and identifies fatigue as a further concern, in addition to joint instability, of fall-related complications.
OA is a progressive condition with no cure, however treatments do exist aimed at reducing symptoms and slowing progression of the disease. This in turn will improve mobility, quality of life and leads to a reduction in the need joint replacement surgery in the long-term and consequently reduces the demand on healthcare resource. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the traditional approach for clinical management of mild-to-moderate OA symptoms, however NSAIDs have been associated with potentially harmful side effects such as gastrointestinal complications, renal disturbances and cardiovascular events. Therefore, non-pharmaceutical alternatives have been developed such as glucosamine compounds, however the reported efficacy for reducing OA symptoms varies. Nonetheless, while glucosamine compounds have a lower risk of adverse effects compared to NSAIDs and other symptomatic slow-acting drugs for OA (SYSADOA), glucosamine compounds show higher risk of adverse side effects than placebo and as such alternatives should be sought. Further to possible adverse health effects, NSAIDs and SYASDOAs are costly and greatly affect the socioeconomic health of patients with OA. A recent meta-analysis of global generalized OA has shown that the individual annual incremental healthcare costs ranged from €705 to €19,715 and concluded that the social cost of OA could be between 0.25% and 0.50% of a country's GDP. More specifically, the individual cost of KOA (both social healthcare and private) can range from €528 to €11293 depending of severity. In fact, Hunter et al. recently called for urgent action to focus attention on opportunities to reduce the individual and socioeconomic burden of OA.
Glucosamine supplementation for the treatment of OA and OA related phenotypes spans many decades, with the first (to the authors' knowledge) patent filled in 1969 and research on human derived glucosamine published long before. The earliest identifiable mention (to the authors' knowledge) of Aqumin is from the late 90's with a patent, containing Aqumin, filled for human consumption in 2003, "Algae-based food supplement". Therefore, there is a significant advantage for glucosamine in the accumulation of large high quality studies into its therapeutic effects. Nonetheless, the few small pilot studies concerned with the therapeutic effects of Aquamin supplementation show promising results in comparison to both placebo and Glucosamine formulas. In fact, for some important OA phenotypes, Aquamin performs better, particularly in the reduction of NSAID use. While the proposed mechanisms of action differ considerable between the two supplements, inflammatory reduction occurs because of both. Currently, there have been no long-term trials concerned with the efficacy of Aquamin in the reduction of KOA related joint structural decline however, because Aquamin reduces inflammatory markers of KOA, albeit in only one small human study, it is possible that Aquamin might improve joint structural decline and KOA prognosis through possibly reducing joint tissue damage.
This project will be a double blinded randomized cross-over control trial with a sample size of 30 participants (based off a sample size calculation detailed below). The project will investigate two supplements on their effects on self-reported pain, quality of life, knee extensor/flexor strength, knee extensor/flexor myoelectric activity, functional mobility and biomarkers associated with inflammation. The participants will first be assessed for baseline measurements of the outcome measures mentioned above. They will then be randomly allocated to either group A or B and will take either supplement A or B for a period of 12 weeks. Following this there will be follow up assessments of the same outcome measures. This will be followed by a 4-week washout period prior to each subjects' baseline measures being reassessed and each participant allocated the 'other' supplement. After 12 weeks' supplementation, the subjects will then be retested for a final time.
An a priori sample size calculation indicated a total of 29 patients was required to enter this two-treatment crossover study to assess the primary outcomes. The probability is 80 percent that the study will detect a treatment difference at a two-sided 0.05 significance level, if the true difference between treatments is 12.000 units. This is based on the assumption that the within-patient standard deviation of the response variable is 15.62."
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The project is a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial (pilot), with a cross-over design. Participants, will be randomized to begin taking either Aquamin-plus or Glucosamine sulphate following medical diagnosis and baseline assessment. Following 12 weeks of supplementation of Glucosamine sulphate or Aquamin-plus there will be a 4-week washout period before participants consume the other supplement.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Glucosamine sulphate | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Aquamin-Plus, Dietary Supplement: Glucosamine sulphateGlucosamine sulphate will be consumed as either supplement A or B (i.e. blinded) for a period of 12-weeks. Glucosamine will be taken 2 times daily with food. After 12 weeks of supplementation, participants will begin taking the alternative supplement (Aquamin-plus), after a washout period of not less than 1 month between the intervention arms of the study. |
| Aquamin-plus | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Aquamin-Plus, Dietary Supplement: Glucosamine sulphateAquamin-plus will be consumed as either supplement A or B (i.e. blinded) for a period of 12-weeks. Aquamin-plus will be taken 2 times daily with food. After 12 weeks of supplementation, participants will begin taking the alternative supplement (Glucosamine sulphate), after a washout period of not less than 1 month between the intervention arms of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The project will focus on patients with a diagnosis of a mild-moderate KOA (level 1-3 Kellgren and Lawrence and WOMAC in the lower two quartiles), in the target knee, (Frestedt et al., 2008) and a BMI between 20 and 30 kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- [1] rheumatoid arthritis [2] gout [3] pseudo gout [4] Paget's disease [5] seizure disorder [6] insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [7] uncontrolled hypertension [8] unstable cardiovascular disease [9] active hepatic or renal disease [10] active cancer and/or HIV infection, involved in other clinical trial or experimental treatments in the past 3 months; pregnant, lactating, or at risk of becoming pregnant; intramuscular/systemic corticosteroid injection within 4 weeks; intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 2 months; or inter-articular hyaluronic acid injection within 4 months prior to enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aquamin-PlusAquamin (a calcium-rich marine multi-mineral) - 666.7mg magnesium hydroxide - 66.66mg pine bark - 30mg vitamin d3 - 2.5μg Dosage: 4 Capsules is equal to effective dose | Dietary supplement | Aquamin-plus, Glucosamine sulphate |
| Glucosamine sulphateThe Glucosamine sulphate supplement contains 500mg of the active ingredient Glucosamine sulphate per serving (one capsule). Dosage: 4 Capsules is equal to effective dose | Dietary supplement | Aquamin-plus, Glucosamine sulphate |
Primary outcome
Self reported KOA pain
Time frame: Baseline, mid intervention (4 and 8 weeks) post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), mid intervention (20 and 24 weeks) post intervention (28 weeks)
The primary outcome measure will be an assessment of the participants' knee pain. This will be measured using the validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function sub-scale. This will allow for the determination of the comparability, superiority or otherwise of Aquamin-plus compared to glucosamine sulphate in improving participant's self-reported knee pain and function. Change from baseline assessed.
6 secondary outcomes
Quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Knee flexor and extensor muscle strength
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Knee flexor and extensor muscle electrical activity
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Biomarkers
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Functional mobility
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Body Composition
Time frame: Participants will be assessed on 4 separate occasions: Baseline, post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), post intervention (28 weeks)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2017.
- Background: PubMed 18279523Frestedt JL, Walsh M, Kuskowski MA, Zenk JL. A natural mineral supplement provides relief from knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Nutr J. 2008 Feb 17;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-9.
- Background: PubMed 19187557Frestedt JL, Kuskowski MA, Zenk JL. A natural seaweed derived mineral supplement (Aquamin F) for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, placebo controlled pilot study. Nutr J. 2009 Feb 2;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-7.
- BackgroundMurphy, C. T., et al.
- Background: PubMed 25865392Kraus VB, Blanco FJ, Englund M, Karsdal MA, Lohmander LS. Call for standardized definitions of osteoarthritis and risk stratification for clinical trials and clinical use. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Aug;23(8):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 21396464Lane NE, Brandt K, Hawker G, Peeva E, Schreyer E, Tsuji W, Hochberg MC. OARSI-FDA initiative: defining the disease state of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 May;19(5):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 21794484Pena Ayala AH, Fernandez-Lopez JC. [Prevalence and risk factors in osteoarthritis]. Reumatol Clin. 2007 Oct;3 Suppl 3:S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/S1699-258X(07)73648-3. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 18759314Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1002/art.24021.
- Background: PubMed 21518310Haq SA, Davatchi F. Osteoarthritis of the knees in the COPCORD world. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011 May;14(2):122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01615.x.
- Background: PubMed 18163497Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Jordan JM, Katz JN, Kremers HM, Wolfe F; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176.
- Background: PubMed 11602475Carmona L, Ballina J, Gabriel R, Laffon A; EPISER Study Group. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the general population of Spain: results from a national survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Nov;60(11):1040-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.11.1040.
- Background: PubMed 21622766Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, Niu J, Clancy M, Kvien TK, Felson DT. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1581-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150078. Epub 2011 May 27.
- Background: PubMed 24662640Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;10(7):437-41. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Algae-based food supplement PATENTLink provided by the sponsor.
- Method of preparing a novel antacid pharmaceutical product PATENTLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Medically Refractory Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Recruiting
The Effect of Different Exercise Training Programs on Muscle Oxygenation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giuseppe De Vito, Prof. study chair
UCD
Eamonn Delahunt, PhD principal investigator
UCD
Conor McCarthy, MD principal investigator
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Aquamin-Plus and Glucosamine sulphate in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University College Dublin at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shane M Heffernan, Phd (00353 1 716 3433, shane.heffernan@ucd.ie), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self reported KOA pain (time frame: Baseline, mid intervention (4 and 8 weeks) post intervention (12 weeks), post washout period (16 weeks), mid intervention (20 and 24 weeks) post intervention (28 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03106584, which also lists 37 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2017.