Overactive BladderPhase 2NCT03106623
Study of ONO-8577 in Patients With Overactive Bladder
A Phase 2 study testing ONO-8577 and solifenacin succinate + mirabegron in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 30 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ONO-8577 compared to combination of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron or placebo for overactive bladder Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder
- What is being tested?
- ONO-8577 and solifenacin succinate + mirabegron
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 207 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2017to 26 Sep 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥6 months
Who cannot join
- Patient with genuine stress incontinence, or with stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence
- Patient who has never experienced urge urinary incontinence during disease duration of overactive bladder
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
Japan30 sites
Hyogo Clinical Site 02
Akashi, Hyōgo
Tokyo Clinical Site 10
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 01
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo
Osaka Clinical Site 03
Higashiosaka, Osaka
Osaka Clinical Site 04
Ibaraki, Osaka
Kanagawa Clinical Site 01
Isehara, Kanagawa
Tokyo Clinical Site 06
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo
Kanagawa Clinical Site 02
Kamakura, Kanagawa
Hyogo Clinical Site 01
Kobe, Hyōgo
Hyogo Clinical Site 03
Kobe, Hyōgo
Saitama Clinical Site 01
Kumagaya, Saitama
Kyoto Clinical Site 01
Kyoto
Gunma Clinical Site 02
Maebashi, Gunma
Tokyo Clinical Site 09
Nakano-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 07
Nerima-ku, Tokyo
Osaka Clinical Site 02
Osaka, Osaka
Osaka Clinical Site 01
Osaka, Takatsuki-shi
Tokyo Clinical Site 03
Ōta-ku, Tokyo
Kanagawa Clinical Site 03
Sagamihara, Kanagawa
Tokyo Clinical Site 08
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 11
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 04
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 05
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Clinical Site 02
Suginami-ku, Tokyo
Osaka Clinical Site 05
Suita, Osaka
Hyogo Clinical Site 04
Takarazuka, Hyōgo
Gunma Clinical Site 01
Takasaki, Gunma
Osaka Clinical Site 06
Toyonaka, Osaka
Osaka Clinical Site 07
Toyonaka, Osaka
Kanagawa Clinical Site 04
Yokohama, Kanagawa
About this study
Official title: Phase 2a Exploratory, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study of ONO-8577 Compared to Combination of Solifenacin Succinate/ Mirabegron for Overactive Bladder
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ONO-8577 compared to combination of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron or placebo for overactive bladder
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Being tested
- ONO-8577, solifenacin succinate + mirabegron, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ONO-8577Drug
Oral administration of ONO-8577 once a daily for 4 weeks
solifenacin succinate + mirabegronDrug
Oral administration of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron once a daily for 4 weeks
PlaceboDrug
Oral administration of Placebo once a daily for 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ONO-8577 Arm | Experimental | Oral administration of ONO-8577 once a daily for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: ONO-8577 |
| Active Comparator Arm | Active comparator | Oral administration of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron once a daily for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: solifenacin succinate + mirabegron |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Oral administration of Placebo once a daily for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Secondary outcomes (14)
Safety (adverse event, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiography, residual urine volume, clinical laboratory test)
Measured: Up to Week 4
Pharmacokinetics (plasma concentration at one point on each visit)
Measured: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline and Week 2
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Percentage of Participants With ˂8 times of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 2 and 4)
Measured: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 2 and 4
Measured: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition)
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) )
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Health-related Quality of Life)
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Efficacy (Patient Global Impression at Week 4)
Measured: Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2017
- Study start7 Apr 2017
- Primary completion29 Aug 2017
- Study completion26 Sep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 207 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hitoshi Kajitani, Study director, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03106623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ONO-8577-02
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 3 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 2a Exploratory, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study of ONO-8577 Compared to Combination of Solifenacin Succinate/ Mirabegron for Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03106623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ONO-8577-02
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 207 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ONO-8577 compared to combination of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron or placebo for overactive bladder
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ONO-8577 Arm | Experimental | Drug: ONO-8577Oral administration of ONO-8577 once a daily for 4 weeks |
| Active Comparator Arm | Active comparator | Drug: solifenacin succinate + mirabegronOral administration of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron once a daily for 4 weeks |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOral administration of Placebo once a daily for 4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient with symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥6 months
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient with genuine stress incontinence, or with stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence
- Patient who has never experienced urge urinary incontinence during disease duration of overactive bladder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ONO-8577Oral administration of ONO-8577 once a daily for 4 weeks | Drug | ONO-8577 Arm |
| solifenacin succinate + mirabegronOral administration of solifenacin succinate and mirabegron once a daily for 4 weeks | Drug | Active Comparator Arm |
| PlaceboOral administration of Placebo once a daily for 4 weeks | Drug | Placebo Arm |
Primary outcome
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
14 secondary outcomes
Safety (adverse event, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiography, residual urine volume, clinical laboratory test)
Time frame: Up to Week 4
Pharmacokinetics (plasma concentration at one point on each visit)
Time frame: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Percentage of Participants With ˂8 times of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 2 and 4)
Time frame: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 2 and 4
Time frame: Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change and Change Rate From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) )
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 and 4
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Health-related Quality of Life)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Efficacy (Patient Global Impression at Week 4)
Time frame: Week 4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Behavioral and/or Mirabegron to Treat Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson Disease
Overactive Bladder, Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Active, not recruiting
APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Symptoms Among People With Stroke
Stroke, Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
RecruitingObservational study
Tensi+ European Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up
Overactive Bladder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hitoshi Kajitani study director
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ONO-8577 and solifenacin succinate + mirabegron in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 30 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy (Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours) (time frame: Baseline and Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2024.