AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac SurgeryNCT03107572

Predictive and Prognostic Value of Cellular Dysoxia Markers After Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation

An observational study of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiopulmonary Bypass, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study consist of evaluation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) setting the ability of PCO2 derived variables (ΔPCO2, ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio), compared to lactate and ScVO2 to predict major postoperative adverse events. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
330 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in the university hospital of Lille.

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years old or more
  • Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Tip of a central venous catheter positioned in superior vena cava or right atria
  • Arterial catheter correctly positioned

Who cannot join

  • KDIGO 3 AKI prior to surgery
  • Hepatic insufficiency prior to surgery
  • Extracorporeal life support prior to surgery '
  • Live expectancy lower than 48 hours
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation CCV Hôpital Cardiologique Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille

    Lille, NORD, 59000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Cellular Dysoxia Markers in the Postoperative Period of Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation

The study consist of evaluation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) setting the ability of PCO2 derived variables (ΔPCO2, ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio), compared to lactate and ScVO2 to predict major postoperative adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with serious morbidity and mortality especially in moderate and high-risk patients. This procedure is associated with systemic inflammatory response as a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass, surgical insult and genetic background of patients leading to organ injury and worse outcome. This pitfall may be worsened by hemodynamic changes with inadequate hemodynamic management.

During and after CPB, substantial changes in macrocirculation and microcirculation are observed and sustain impairment may result in reduced oxygen delivery and/or impaired oxygen extraction. The main consequence is cellular dysorexia that may trigger postoperative organ dysfunction. Rapid identification of cellular dysorexia and rapid hemodynamic management are therefore among key strategies that may reduce mortality.

In this purpose various marker can be considered. Traditionally lactatemia is considered as surrogate of anaerobic metabolism resulting from ischemia. However it interpretation may be challenging particularly in case of reduced hepatic clearance, use of epinephrine or massive blood transfusion. Venous or central venous oxygenation (S(c)VO2), a surrogate of oxygen extraction that is believed to reflect balance between oxygen delivery and consumption, is considered as an acceptable alternative as it was shown to be associated with organ dysfunction in various clinical setting. Nevertheless ScVO2 suffers from the difficulties to define adequate threshold as very high S(c)VO2 as well as low S(c)VO2 may be associated with poor outcome. Recently PCO2 derived dysorexia and perfusion markers have been shown to be predicting outcome in both septic patient and high risk surgical patient. Central venous to arterial difference in PCO2 (ΔPCO2) a global perfusion index is show to be correlated to microcirculation dysfunction and may reflect impaired tissue perfusion. In high risk non-cardiac surgical patients and in septic patient, ΔPCO2 predicted worse outcome better than S(c)VO2 and lactate. Besides this performance may be improve when using a clinically available surrogate based on ΔPCO2. When anaerobic metabolism occurred as a result of sustained hypoxia, CO2 production increases therefore the respiratory quotient (CO2 production (VCO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) ratio) increases. VCO2/VO2 can be simplified as ΔPCO2 /Ca-vO2 ratio, where Ca-vO2 is arteriovenous O2 content difference. All these variables have never been compared in cardiac surgery setting and their association with microcirculation impaired is poorly documented. The hypotheses is that ΔPCO2, and ΔPCO2 /Ca-vO2 ratio may better predict major postoperative adverse events than blood lactate and S(c)VO2 after cardiac surgery with CPB.

Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion markers (ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio) measured 2 hours after CPB to predict major postoperative adverse events (MPAE) in the 48 hours following cardiac surgery.

    Composite outcome defined as:

    • Acute kidney injury (AKI) with KDIGO score of 2 or more
    • Acute myocardial infarction according to the universal definition of acute myocardial ischemia
    • ARDS according to Berlin definition or respiratory failure (P/F ratio < 300 mmHg + need of mechanical ventilation)
    • Stroke or generalized seizure
    • Cardiogenic or distributive shock defined as hypotension (SAP <90 mmHg, MAP< 65 mmHg) and reduced of cardiac index, ejection fraction or worsening of previously known reduce cardiac index or ejection fraction.
    • Revision surgery
    • Hemorrhagic shock
    • Death

    Measured: First 2 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion marker measured ICU admission, 6 and 24 hours after CPB to predict major postoperative adverse events (MPAE) in the 2 and 7 days following cardiac surgery.

    Measured: 2 and 7 days following cardiac surgery

  2. Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion marker measured ICU admission, 6 and 24 hours after CPB to predict organ failure (any organ failure with specific SOFA of 2 or more) in the 2 and 7 days after surgery.

    Measured: 2 and 7 days following surgery

  3. Kinetics and relation of PCO2 derived variables, lactate and ScVO2 in the 24 hours following surgery.

    Measured: 24 hours following surgery

  4. Association of CO2 derived variables with lactate clearance, vasopressive score and outcome variables (ICU and hospital length of stay, ICU and hospital mortality).

    Measured: 24 hours following surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2017
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
330 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03107572
Sponsor's protocol ID
NI_2016
Other IDs
IRB 00010254 --2016-030, DEC2015-136
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
15 Mar 2017
Last updated
18 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shahbazi S, Khademi S, Shafa M, Joybar R, Hadibarhaghtalab M, Sahmeddini MA. Serum Lactate Is not Correlated with Mixed or Central Venous Oxygen Saturation for Detecting Tissue Hypo Perfusion During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2013 Dec;7(4):130-4. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

    PubMed 24757637
  • Laine GA, Hu BY, Wang S, Thomas Solis R, Reul GJ Jr. Isolated high lactate or low central venous oxygen saturation after cardiac surgery and association with outcome. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1271-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.031. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

    PubMed 24011873
  • Balzer F, Sander M, Simon M, Spies C, Habicher M, Treskatsch S, Mezger V, Schirmer U, Heringlake M, Wernecke KD, Grubitzsch H, von Heymann C. High central venous saturation after cardiac surgery is associated with increased organ failure and long-term mortality: an observational cross-sectional study. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 16;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0889-6.

    PubMed 25888321
  • Futier E, Robin E, Jabaudon M, Guerin R, Petit A, Bazin JE, Constantin JM, Vallet B. Central venous O(2) saturation and venous-to-arterial CO(2) difference as complementary tools for goal-directed therapy during high-risk surgery. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R193. doi: 10.1186/cc9310. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

    PubMed 21034476
  • Gasparovic H, Gabelica R, Ostojic Z, Kopjar T, Petricevic M, Ivancan V, Biocina B. Diagnostic accuracy of central venous saturation in estimating mixed venous saturation is proportional to cardiac performance among cardiac surgical patients. J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):828-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

    PubMed 24857639
  • Robin E, Futier E, Pires O, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Lebuffe G, Vallet B. Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care. 2015 May 13;19(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0917-6.

    PubMed 25967737
  • Ospina-Tascon GA, Umana M, Bermudez W, Bautista-Rincon DF, Hernandez G, Bruhn A, Granados M, Salazar B, Arango-Davila C, De Backer D. Combination of arterial lactate levels and venous-arterial CO2 to arterial-venous O 2 content difference ratio as markers of resuscitation in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):796-805. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3720-6. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

    PubMed 25792204
  • Mallat J, Lemyze M, Meddour M, Pepy F, Gasan G, Barrailler S, Durville E, Temime J, Vangrunderbeeck N, Tronchon L, Vallet B, Thevenin D. Ratios of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide content or tension to arteriovenous oxygen content are better markers of global anaerobic metabolism than lactate in septic shock patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0110-3. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

    PubMed 26842697
  • Moussa MD, Durand A, Leroy G, Vincent L, Lamer A, Gantois G, Joulin O, Ait-Ouarab S, Deblauwe D, Caroline B, Decoene C, Vincentelli A, Vallet B, Labreuche J, Kipnis E, Robin E. Central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference, arteriovenous oxygen content and outcome after adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):279-289. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000949.

    PubMed 30664011

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiopulmonary Bypass, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion markers (ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio) measured 2 hours after CPB to predict major postoperative adverse events (MPAE) in the 48 hours following cardiac surgery. (time frame: First 2 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03107572, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03107572 | AzTrials