PainPhase 4NCT03107754
Buffered Lidocaine in Paracervical Blocks
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine and Lidocaine-Sodium Bicarbonate in people with Pain, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
For pain relief during a first trimester surgical aspiration, most providers use the paracervical block, either alone or in combination with other pain control techniques. Some providers use buffered lidocaine due to a belief that it decreases pain. Others use plain lidocaine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine and Lidocaine-Sodium Bicarbonate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 25 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women 14 years and older
- Desiring uterine aspiration for pregnancy or surgical management of a miscarriage
- Gestational age up to 13 weeks and 6 days to be established by best dating (i.e. last menstrual period or earliest ultrasound)
- Treatment plan involves outpatient uterine aspiration
- Participant able to provide informed consent in English and willing to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Unable to read, speak, or understand English
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Currently incarcerated
- Under the age of 14 years
- Contraindications to receiving lidocaine or buffered lidocaine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Buffered Lidocaine for Paracervical Block to Decrease Injection Pain During First Trimester Uterine Aspirations
For pain relief during a first trimester surgical aspiration, most providers use the paracervical block, either alone or in combination with other pain control techniques. Some providers use buffered lidocaine due to a belief that it decreases pain. Others use plain lidocaine. At our clinics, the standard pain management protocol is using 20 cc of 1% plain lidocaine in a two site injection. Few studies have compared buffered versus unbuffered lidocaine for paracervical blocks during first trimester uterine aspirations. This study seeks to determine if buffered lidocaine decreases injection pain versus plain lidocaine for paracervical blocks.
Read the detailed description
Potential participants will be identified at their office visits to the University Women's Health Specialists. If a patient desires uterine aspiration of a first trimester pregnancy or management of a failed pregnancy in the first trimester, they will first receive standard counseling. Only after providing written informed consent for the procedure will the patient's be screened for eligibility for our study. If the patient is eligible, she will be asked by a member of the research team if she is interested in participating. If she is, the study will be explained to her and written consent will be obtained after she is given the opportunity to have all of her questions answered. The patient will then complete a written questionnaire to collect demographic data.
This prospective randomized control trial will consist of two study arms. Participants will be randomly assigned to Arm 1, where a paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine, which is our standard office protocol, or to Arm 2, where a paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Prior to the start of the study, study assignments will be generated in a 1:1 ratio.
All patients who consent to the study will receive standard counseling prior to their procedure. The procedure will start with a bimanual exam by the provider. Next, the provider will place a speculum, cleanse the cervix with betadine solution, and place a single-tooth tenaculum on the anterior lip of the cervix. At this point, participants assigned to Arm 1 will receive a paracervical block loaded with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine and injected at 2, 4, 8 and 10 o'clock positions of the cervicovaginal junction. Participants assigned to Arm 2 will receive a paracervical block loaded with 18 cc of 1% lidocaine and 2 cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate and inject the block in the same fashion. The research assistant will ask the patient to verbally report their level of pain based on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) at the following points of the procedure:
- Prior to the start of the procedure (baseline anxiety)
- After speculum placement
- After paracervical block
- After cervical dilation
- After suction curettage
- At end of procedure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LidocaineDrug
Also called Paracervical anesthesia
Paracervical block will be injected at 2 points at the cervicovaginal junction to decrease pain
Lidocaine-Sodium BicarbonateDrug
Also called Buffered paracervical anesthesia
Paracervical block will be injected at 2 points at the cervicovaginal junction to decrease pain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard paracervical block | Placebo comparator | A paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine, which is our standard office protocol Receives: Drug: Lidocaine |
| Buffered lidocaine paracervical block | Experimental | A paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate Receives: Drug: Lidocaine-Sodium Bicarbonate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Injection Pain
For the primary outcome, pain immediately after paracervical block injection was measured by a scale. The scale used was the 100-mm visual analog scale. The minimum score was 0 and the maximum score was 100. Higher numbers indicate worse pain.
Measured: Immediately after injection of the paracervical block
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain After Speculum Placement, Cervical Dilation, and Aspiration
Pain scores were measured at multiple points throughout the procedure. Pain scores were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale with 0 being no pain and 100 being the worst pain ever.
Measured: Immediately after speculum placement, cervical dilation, uterine aspiration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2017
- Study start15 May 2017
- Primary completion25 Oct 2018
- Study completion25 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Hawaii
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator, Principal investigator, University of Hawaii
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03107754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-00083
- Other IDs
- 2017
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wiebe ER, Rawling M. Pain control in abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jul;50(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02416-a.
PubMed 7556858Renner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman AB. Pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception. 2010 May;81(5):372-88. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
PubMed 20399943Renner RM, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Li H, Edelman AB. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e.
PubMed 22525915Renner RM, Edelman AB, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Lim JY, Bednarek PH. Refining paracervical block techniques for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 25.
PubMed 27235677Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
PubMed 8604867Wiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91645-7.
PubMed 1442914Welch MN, Czyz CN, Kalwerisky K, Holck DE, Mihora LD. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia. Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
PubMed 22771049Kizer NT, Zhao Q, Peipert JF, Ioffe Y, Massad LS. A randomized trial of buffered versus nonbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine for cervical loop excision. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Jan;18(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31828deffd.
PubMed 23774079Narvaez J, Wessels I, Bacon G, Chin VR, Baqai WK, Zimmerman GJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of short-term complications when using buffered or unbuffered lidocaine 1% with epinephrine for blepharoplasty surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):33-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80c13.
PubMed 20090482Hobeich P, Simon S, Schneiderman E, He J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations. J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23611375Harreld TK, Fowler S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Efficacy of a Buffered 4% Lidocaine Formulation for Incision and Drainage: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
PubMed 26253800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Buffered Lidocaine for Paracervical Block to Decrease Injection Pain During First Trimester Uterine Aspirations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03107754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-00083
- Conditions
- Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of HawaiiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 May 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
For pain relief during a first trimester surgical aspiration, most providers use the paracervical block, either alone or in combination with other pain control techniques. Some providers use buffered lidocaine due to a belief that it decreases pain. Others use plain lidocaine. At our clinics, the standard pain management protocol is using 20 cc of 1% plain lidocaine in a two site injection. Few studies have compared buffered versus unbuffered lidocaine for paracervical blocks during first trimester uterine aspirations. This study seeks to determine if buffered lidocaine decreases injection pain versus plain lidocaine for paracervical blocks.
Detailed description
Potential participants will be identified at their office visits to the University Women's Health Specialists. If a patient desires uterine aspiration of a first trimester pregnancy or management of a failed pregnancy in the first trimester, they will first receive standard counseling. Only after providing written informed consent for the procedure will the patient's be screened for eligibility for our study. If the patient is eligible, she will be asked by a member of the research team if she is interested in participating. If she is, the study will be explained to her and written consent will be obtained after she is given the opportunity to have all of her questions answered. The patient will then complete a written questionnaire to collect demographic data.
This prospective randomized control trial will consist of two study arms. Participants will be randomly assigned to Arm 1, where a paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine, which is our standard office protocol, or to Arm 2, where a paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Prior to the start of the study, study assignments will be generated in a 1:1 ratio.
All patients who consent to the study will receive standard counseling prior to their procedure. The procedure will start with a bimanual exam by the provider. Next, the provider will place a speculum, cleanse the cervix with betadine solution, and place a single-tooth tenaculum on the anterior lip of the cervix. At this point, participants assigned to Arm 1 will receive a paracervical block loaded with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine and injected at 2, 4, 8 and 10 o'clock positions of the cervicovaginal junction. Participants assigned to Arm 2 will receive a paracervical block loaded with 18 cc of 1% lidocaine and 2 cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate and inject the block in the same fashion. The research assistant will ask the patient to verbally report their level of pain based on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) at the following points of the procedure:
- Prior to the start of the procedure (baseline anxiety)
- After speculum placement
- After paracervical block
- After cervical dilation
- After suction curettage
- At end of procedure
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard paracervical block | Placebo comparator | Drug: LidocaineA paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine, which is our standard office protocol |
| Buffered lidocaine paracervical block | Experimental | Drug: Lidocaine-Sodium BicarbonateA paracervical block will be administered with 20 cc of 1% lidocaine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant women 14 years and older
- Desiring uterine aspiration for pregnancy or surgical management of a miscarriage
- Gestational age up to 13 weeks and 6 days to be established by best dating (i.e. last menstrual period or earliest ultrasound)
- Treatment plan involves outpatient uterine aspiration
- Participant able to provide informed consent in English and willing to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unable to read, speak, or understand English
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Currently incarcerated
- Under the age of 14 years
- Contraindications to receiving lidocaine or buffered lidocaine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LidocaineAlso: Paracervical anesthesiaParacervical block will be injected at 2 points at the cervicovaginal junction to decrease pain | Drug | Standard paracervical block |
| Lidocaine-Sodium BicarbonateAlso: Buffered paracervical anesthesiaParacervical block will be injected at 2 points at the cervicovaginal junction to decrease pain | Drug | Buffered lidocaine paracervical block |
Primary outcome
Injection Pain
Time frame: Immediately after injection of the paracervical block
For the primary outcome, pain immediately after paracervical block injection was measured by a scale. The scale used was the 100-mm visual analog scale. The minimum score was 0 and the maximum score was 100. Higher numbers indicate worse pain.
1 secondary outcome
Pain After Speculum Placement, Cervical Dilation, and Aspiration
Time frame: Immediately after speculum placement, cervical dilation, uterine aspiration
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 7556858Wiebe ER, Rawling M. Pain control in abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jul;50(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02416-a.
- Background: PubMed 20399943Renner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman AB. Pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception. 2010 May;81(5):372-88. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
- Background: PubMed 22525915Renner RM, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Li H, Edelman AB. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e.
- Background: PubMed 27235677Renner RM, Edelman AB, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Lim JY, Bednarek PH. Refining paracervical block techniques for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 8604867Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
- Background: PubMed 1442914Wiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91645-7.
- Background: PubMed 22771049Welch MN, Czyz CN, Kalwerisky K, Holck DE, Mihora LD. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia. Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
- Background: PubMed 23774079Kizer NT, Zhao Q, Peipert JF, Ioffe Y, Massad LS. A randomized trial of buffered versus nonbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine for cervical loop excision. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Jan;18(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31828deffd.
- Background: PubMed 20090482Narvaez J, Wessels I, Bacon G, Chin VR, Baqai WK, Zimmerman GJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of short-term complications when using buffered or unbuffered lidocaine 1% with epinephrine for blepharoplasty surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):33-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80c13.
- Background: PubMed 23611375Hobeich P, Simon S, Schneiderman E, He J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations. J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 26253800Harreld TK, Fowler S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Efficacy of a Buffered 4% Lidocaine Formulation for Incision and Drainage: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Recruiting
Conventional and Nano-Metronidazole Irrigation With/Without Activation in Necrotic Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
The Mechanism Underlying the Analgesic Effect of the Music of IBS Pain
Abdominal Pain/ Discomfort, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Nonopioid Pain Control Regimen After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Traumatic Fractures
Opioid Use, Fractures, Bone
Enrolling by invitation
Efficacy of a Chronic Pain Treatment Prior to Gender-affirming Surgery
Pain Catastrophizing, Pain, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Principal Investigator principal investigator
University of Hawaii
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine and Lidocaine-Sodium Bicarbonate in people with Pain, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Injection Pain (time frame: Immediately after injection of the paracervical block). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03107754, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2021.