AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisNCT03107923

Better Patient Selection to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates whether a preoperative assessment of myocardial contractile reserve by tissue Doppler Imaging and myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can enhance the patient selection and risk stratification to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Dobutamine stress test
How many people
103 participants
Where
2 sitesNorway
Study dates
26 Apr 2017to 31 Mar 2021
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients scheduled for transfemoral aortic valve implantation at Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet

Who may be able to join

  • Patients declined surgical aortic valve replacement and scheduled for transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

Who cannot join

  • Aortic valve endocarditis
  • aortic annulus >31mm
  • preoperative pacemaker
  • severe aortic insufficiency (>grad 3)
  • rapid atrial fibrillation
  • unprotected left main coronary stenosis not suitable for percutaneous intervention.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • unstable angina
  • life expectancy less than 12 months
  • mental disorder including dementia and condition which interferes with protocol compliance.
  • renal failure (glomerular filtration rate < 45 ml/min/m2), only have T1 mapping by CMRI.
  • Patients with metal not suitable for MRI.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Norway2 sites
  • Oslo Universtity Hospital

    Oslo, 0424

  • The Intervention Centre

    Oslo, 0424

Other trials in Norway

About this study

This study evaluates whether a preoperative assessment of myocardial contractile reserve by tissue Doppler Imaging and myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can enhance the patient selection and risk stratification to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Read the detailed description

In this prospective observation study we will investigate whether a preoperative test of myocardial contractile reserve can predict adverse outcome after TAVI. We intend to examine preoperative myocardial contractile reserve by use a low dose dobutamine test and relate this to pre-existing myocardial focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis detected by new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and new echocardiographic methods. These measures will be primarily related to long term (12 months) mortality.

Being tested
Dobutamine stress test
Keywords
Myocardial fibrosis, Aortic Valve Stenosis, TAVI, Outcome
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dobutamine stress testDiagnostic test

    Test of myocardial reserve

Study groups in NCT03107923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Preoperative myocardial reserve yes/noPatients with extensive myocardial fibrosis typically presents with limited myocardial contractile reserve that can be assessed by a dobutamine stress test. The patients will be allocated to a responder and non-responder group according to the results from this test.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Dobutamine stress test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MACE

    MACE at 12 months follow-up after TAVI, MACE definition: rehospitalization for heart failure or other valve related complications, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or (cardiovascular) death

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. NYHA functional classification of heart failure, Lack of improvement and/ or function class III or IV 12 months after the procedure defined unfavorable outcome

    Number of Participants hospitalizated for heart related diseases during 12 month follow-up.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Patient quality of life (QoL)

    Quality of life record (SF 36), Physical function (age adjusted normal value 71.6 (SD 26.9)) and Physical role (age adjusted normal value 57.0 (SD 43.8)) , the patients were divided into groups using the predefined minimal change of 15 and 18,75 points, respectively. Changes above these tresholds at 12 month follow-up indicat better QoL outcomes.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. 6 Minute Walking Test

    Favorable outcome defined as improvement in walking distance of 30 meters or longer at one year follow up.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2017
  2. Study start26 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
103 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03107923
Sponsor's protocol ID
535444
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
5 Apr 2017
Last updated
29 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bax JJ, Delgado V, Bapat V, Baumgartner H, Collet JP, Erbel R, Hamm C, Kappetein AP, Leipsic J, Leon MB, MacCarthy P, Piazza N, Pibarot P, Roberts WC, Rodes-Cabau J, Serruys PW, Thomas M, Vahanian A, Webb J, Zamorano JL, Windecker S. Open issues in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Part 1: patient selection and treatment strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 7;35(38):2627-38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu256. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

    PubMed 25062952
  • Eidet J, Dahle G, Bugge JF, Bendz B, Rein KA, Aaberge L, Offstad JT, Fosse E, Aakhus S, Halvorsen PS. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the impact of intraoperative tissue Doppler echocardiography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;23(3):403-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw159. Epub 2016 May 30.

    PubMed 27241050
  • Saevik M, Andersen MH, Beitnes JO, Aaberge L, Halvorsen PS. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis patients: exploring a novel threshold for clinically significant improvement after 12 months. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 May 26;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00894-1.

    PubMed 40418351

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MACE (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03107923, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in