AzTrials
AzTrials

ThyroidectomyNCT03108742

Randomized Control Study of Dermal Staples vs Subcuticular Sutures on Postoperative Scar After Thyroidectomy

A study testing INSORB and classic intradermal suture in people with Thyroidectomy and Pain, run by Inje University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, a randomized controlled study was conducted between two groups of 20 classic recipients of intradermal sutures and 20 recipients of intradermal staple methods for patients undergoing the same cervical incision. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Thyroidectomy, Pain, Esthetic
What is being tested?
INSORB and classic intradermal suture
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Oct 2016to 28 Jan 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient who will have thyroid surgery

Who cannot join

  • done thyroid surgery before
  • done any radiotherapy on neck
  • who needs neck dissection
  • laparoscopic ot robotic surgery
  • under 18 years old or over 70 years old
  • bad general condition, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (over 3)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • who used immunosuppressive drugs in 6 months
  • breast feeder or pregnancy
  • who disagrees to do this trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Dongsik Bae

    Busan

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

In this study, a randomized controlled study was conducted between two groups of 20 classic recipients of intradermal sutures and 20 recipients of intradermal staple methods for patients undergoing the same cervical incision. This is a study to see if there is any difference in pain and esthetics in scar formation of these groups.

Being tested
INSORB, classic intradermal suture
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • INSORBDevice

    dermal stapler for skin closure

  • classic intradermal sutureProcedure or surgery

    intradermal suture for skin closure

Study groups in NCT03108742
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
dermal staplerExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: INSORB
classic intradermal sutureActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: classic intradermal suture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBES)

    Evaluate scar

    Measured: Change from Baseline scar at 6 months

  2. Manchester Scar Scale (MSS)

    Evaluate scar

    Measured: Change from Baseline scar at 6 months

  3. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Evaluate pain

    Measured: Change from Baseline pain at 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2017
  2. Study start1 Oct 2016
  3. Primary completion28 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion28 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03108742
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-12-010-001
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
20 Mar 2017
Last updated
25 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing INSORB and classic intradermal suture in people with Thyroidectomy and Pain, run by Inje University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBES) (time frame: Change from Baseline scar at 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in