Rheumatoid ArthritisPROMETHEENCT03110094
Investigation of Immunological and Pharmacological Factors for Response to Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis
A study testing Adalimumab and Healthy volunteers in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab and Healthy volunteers
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 59 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2017to 13 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed according to EULAR 2010 criteria (European League Against Rheumatism);
- Active rheumatoid arthritis, defined by DAS 28> 3.2;
- Corticotherapy systemic ≤ 15mg /day, stable for ≥ 15 days;
- Refractory or intolerant rheumatoid arthritis with at least one chemical background treatment;
- Previous biological treatment stopped for ≥ 3 months for monoclonal antibodies (except Rituximab) and 15 days for Etanercept;
- Patients who have given written informed consent.
- For healthy volunteers: subjects aged 18 coming to the French blood establishment of Rennes for a donation of blood
Who cannot join
- Patient minor;
- Presence of a contraindication to biological treatment;
- Previous treatment with Rituximab;
- Vaccination or surgery in the month preceding the study or planned within 3 months of inclusion;
- Patient not affiliated to social security;
- Major persons subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of their liberty.
- For healthy volunteers: Minor subject ; Subject not affiliated with social security ; Major persons subject to legal protection (legal safeguards, guardianship, tutorship), persons deprived of their liberty
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigation of Immunological and Pharmacological Factors for Response to Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis, With Analysis of CD4 + Follicular Helper T Subpopulations
Interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric.
Read the detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with synovial tropism, characterized by joint pain and swelling, secondary to inflammation of the synovial membrane and which can lead to joint destruction, with the risk of a major functional disability. Biological treatments have revolutionized its management over the past 15 years. However, they are not effective in all patients, they are expensive, and are not without side effects sometimes severe.
Currently, there is no predictive factor for response to biotherapy beyond the severity criteria of rheumatoid arthritis (presence of erosions, presence of anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody (ACPA), importance of biological and clinical inflammation ).
The role of T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes has been widely studied in rheumatoid arthritis. The activity of rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a Th1 and Th17 type CD4 + T polarization, with pro-inflammatory cytokine production and decreased Treg activity.
In recent years, a population of CD4 + T lymphocytes, Tfh (T follicular helper cells) has been demonstrated and seems likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Physiologically these cells were initially described in the secondary lymphoid organs where they are essential for the survival and differentiation of B lymphocytes into antibody-secreting cells. More recently, they have been described in the blood (c Tfh for circulating T follicular helper cells) and appear to be a reflection of Tfh activity in tissues.
Several studies have focused on c Tfh in rheumatoid arthritis. A significantly higher level of c Tfh was observed in rheumatoid arthritis than in healthy controls. A significant positive correlation was also observed between the level of c Tfh and the titre of ACPA and between the rate of c Tfh and the activity of the rheumatoid arthritis, measured by the Disease Activity Score (DAS). However, each research group characterized the c Tfh t with different markers, which limits the comparison of the different results obtained.
The rate of c Tfh also appears to be influenced by treatments. In a Chinese rheumatoid arthritis study, the level of c Tfh was analyzed before and after one month of treatment with Methotrexate and phytotherapy with Tripterygium wilfordii. The rate of cTfh had significantly decreased in the responders whereas it had not decreased in the non responders. All of these first results, observed in a limited number of patients, are in favor of a relationship between the level of c Tfh and the activity and / or severity of rheumatoid arthritis, and on the other hand, suggest that variations in c Tfh might be related to response to treatment.
The analysis of peripheral blood lymphocyte cells has the advantage of ease of access, by simple venipuncture. However, these cells do not always accurately reflect the populations present within the synovial membrane. The analysis of the cells of the synovial membrane requires the realization of a biopsy, invasive gesture and incompatible with the practice in routine care. The analysis of the cells of the articular fluid would make it possible to better apprehend the resident populations of the synovial membrane without generating an over-risk for the patient. Indeed the gesture of joint puncture is justified in case of effusion by the diagnosis (to eliminate an infection) and therapeutic (to carry out if necessary an injection of corticosteroids). Rheumatoid arthritis joint fluids are inflammatory, defined by a number of nucleated elements greater than 2000 / mm3. The flow cytometry study, using the same phenotypic markers as those used for peripheral blood analysis, in patients in thrust will allow comparison of lymphocyte blood subpopulations and joint fluid.
The existence of a predictive serum biomarker of response or nonresponse to anti-TNFα therapy would improve the management of patients by avoiding delaying the use of potentially more effective treatment in patients Priori non-responders to an anti-TNF α biotherapy. If approximately 25% of the patients are not responding to a first biotherapy, it would be interesting to be able to identify them upstream, using a predictive marker, in order to orient them early to another therapy.
Remote infrared infrared spectroscopy, using a chalcogenide glass optical fiber, allows the study of the functional groups of the molecules present in a biological sample. It showed its ability, through the demonstration of changes in spectroscopic profiles, to discriminate samples representing physiological and pathological situations. This method has shown an interest in the early diagnosis of septic arthritis from joint puncture fluid, for the diagnosis of RA from serum and for staging of hepatic steatosis from serum.
The objective of this work is to investigate whether the quantitative and / or qualitative variations of different lymphocyte subpopulations (especially Tfh) in a rheumatoid arthritis population treated with the same anti-TNF alpha (Tumor Necrosis Factor ), Adalimumab, are likely to influence the response or non-response to treatment at 6 months.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Healthy volunteers
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabOther
Also called Additional Biological Sample
It will be an interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric, in current care. Patient management will not be changed during the study. It will be taken at two different tracking points (M0 and M3) 4 additional tubes and use of surplus articular fluid (M0 and M3).
Healthy volunteersOther
Also called Recovery of blood tubes during a donation
Collection of 2 tubes of blood. The values of the quantitative study of lymphocyte subpopulations will be compared to those obtained from healthy blood donors to define the standards used in this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis - Adalimumab | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Adalimumab |
| Healthy volunteer | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Healthy volunteers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months defined by a value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) ≤ 3.2.
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) calculated in every patients after clinical examination.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 1 year defined by a value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) ≤ 3.2.
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) calculated in every patients after clinical examination.
Measured: 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the SDAI scores
SDAI score will be calculated in every patients after clinical examination.
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the CDAI scores
CDAI score will be calculated in every patients after clinical examination.
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the HAQ scores
HAQ will be calculated in every patients after self-assessment questionnaire.
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Residual plasmatic Adalimumab concentration
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months
Count of Anti-Adalimumab antibody
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months
Second derivative spectrometric profiles
Serum and joint fluid
Measured: Baseline and 3 monts
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2017
- Study start13 Mar 2017
- Primary completion13 Jan 2020
- Study completion13 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Rennes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aleth Perdriger, Principal investigator, Rennes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03110094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 35RC17_3063_PROMETHEE
- Acronym
- PROMETHEE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of Immunological and Pharmacological Factors for Response to Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis, With Analysis of CD4 + Follicular Helper T Subpopulations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03110094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMETHEE / 35RC17_3063_PROMETHEE
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric.
Detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with synovial tropism, characterized by joint pain and swelling, secondary to inflammation of the synovial membrane and which can lead to joint destruction, with the risk of a major functional disability. Biological treatments have revolutionized its management over the past 15 years. However, they are not effective in all patients, they are expensive, and are not without side effects sometimes severe.
Currently, there is no predictive factor for response to biotherapy beyond the severity criteria of rheumatoid arthritis (presence of erosions, presence of anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody (ACPA), importance of biological and clinical inflammation ).
The role of T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes has been widely studied in rheumatoid arthritis. The activity of rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a Th1 and Th17 type CD4 + T polarization, with pro-inflammatory cytokine production and decreased Treg activity.
In recent years, a population of CD4 + T lymphocytes, Tfh (T follicular helper cells) has been demonstrated and seems likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Physiologically these cells were initially described in the secondary lymphoid organs where they are essential for the survival and differentiation of B lymphocytes into antibody-secreting cells. More recently, they have been described in the blood (c Tfh for circulating T follicular helper cells) and appear to be a reflection of Tfh activity in tissues.
Several studies have focused on c Tfh in rheumatoid arthritis. A significantly higher level of c Tfh was observed in rheumatoid arthritis than in healthy controls. A significant positive correlation was also observed between the level of c Tfh and the titre of ACPA and between the rate of c Tfh and the activity of the rheumatoid arthritis, measured by the Disease Activity Score (DAS). However, each research group characterized the c Tfh t with different markers, which limits the comparison of the different results obtained.
The rate of c Tfh also appears to be influenced by treatments. In a Chinese rheumatoid arthritis study, the level of c Tfh was analyzed before and after one month of treatment with Methotrexate and phytotherapy with Tripterygium wilfordii. The rate of cTfh had significantly decreased in the responders whereas it had not decreased in the non responders. All of these first results, observed in a limited number of patients, are in favor of a relationship between the level of c Tfh and the activity and / or severity of rheumatoid arthritis, and on the other hand, suggest that variations in c Tfh might be related to response to treatment.
The analysis of peripheral blood lymphocyte cells has the advantage of ease of access, by simple venipuncture. However, these cells do not always accurately reflect the populations present within the synovial membrane. The analysis of the cells of the synovial membrane requires the realization of a biopsy, invasive gesture and incompatible with the practice in routine care. The analysis of the cells of the articular fluid would make it possible to better apprehend the resident populations of the synovial membrane without generating an over-risk for the patient. Indeed the gesture of joint puncture is justified in case of effusion by the diagnosis (to eliminate an infection) and therapeutic (to carry out if necessary an injection of corticosteroids). Rheumatoid arthritis joint fluids are inflammatory, defined by a number of nucleated elements greater than 2000 / mm3. The flow cytometry study, using the same phenotypic markers as those used for peripheral blood analysis, in patients in thrust will allow comparison of lymphocyte blood subpopulations and joint fluid.
The existence of a predictive serum biomarker of response or nonresponse to anti-TNFα therapy would improve the management of patients by avoiding delaying the use of potentially more effective treatment in patients Priori non-responders to an anti-TNF α biotherapy. If approximately 25% of the patients are not responding to a first biotherapy, it would be interesting to be able to identify them upstream, using a predictive marker, in order to orient them early to another therapy.
Remote infrared infrared spectroscopy, using a chalcogenide glass optical fiber, allows the study of the functional groups of the molecules present in a biological sample. It showed its ability, through the demonstration of changes in spectroscopic profiles, to discriminate samples representing physiological and pathological situations. This method has shown an interest in the early diagnosis of septic arthritis from joint puncture fluid, for the diagnosis of RA from serum and for staging of hepatic steatosis from serum.
The objective of this work is to investigate whether the quantitative and / or qualitative variations of different lymphocyte subpopulations (especially Tfh) in a rheumatoid arthritis population treated with the same anti-TNF alpha (Tumor Necrosis Factor ), Adalimumab, are likely to influence the response or non-response to treatment at 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis - Adalimumab | Other | Other: Adalimumab |
| Healthy volunteer | Other | Other: Healthy volunteers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed according to EULAR 2010 criteria (European League Against Rheumatism);
- Active rheumatoid arthritis, defined by DAS 28> 3.2;
- Corticotherapy systemic ≤ 15mg /day, stable for ≥ 15 days;
- Refractory or intolerant rheumatoid arthritis with at least one chemical background treatment;
- Previous biological treatment stopped for ≥ 3 months for monoclonal antibodies (except Rituximab) and 15 days for Etanercept;
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient minor;
- Presence of a contraindication to biological treatment;
- Previous treatment with Rituximab;
- Vaccination or surgery in the month preceding the study or planned within 3 months of inclusion;
- Patient not affiliated to social security;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: Additional Biological SampleIt will be an interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric, in current care. Patient management will not be changed during the study. It will be taken at two different tracking points (M0 and M3) 4 additional tubes and use of surplus articular fluid (M0 and M3). | Other | Rheumatoid arthritis - Adalimumab |
| Healthy volunteersAlso: Recovery of blood tubes during a donationCollection of 2 tubes of blood. The values of the quantitative study of lymphocyte subpopulations will be compared to those obtained from healthy blood donors to define the standards used in this study. | Other | Healthy volunteer |
Primary outcome
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months defined by a value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) ≤ 3.2.
Time frame: 6 months
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) calculated in every patients after clinical examination.
7 secondary outcomes
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 1 year defined by a value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) ≤ 3.2.
Time frame: 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the SDAI scores
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the CDAI scores
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months and 1 year defined by the HAQ scores
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Residual plasmatic Adalimumab concentration
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Count of Anti-Adalimumab antibody
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Second derivative spectrometric profiles
Time frame: Baseline and 3 monts
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aleth Perdriger principal investigator
Rennes University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Adalimumab and Healthy volunteers in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient responding or not responding to treatment with Adalimumab at 6 months defined by a value of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) ≤ 3.2. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.