Benign TumorsPhase 3NCT03110783
Bioseal Dural Sealing Study BIOS-14-001
A Phase 3 study testing Bioseal in people with Benign Tumors and Malignant Tumors, run by Guangzhou Bioseal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. at 10 sites in China.
Trial summary
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blinded, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Benign Tumors, Malignant Tumors, Vascular Malformation
- What is being tested?
- Bioseal
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 14 Sep 2017to 20 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Preoperative
- Patient undergoing elective craniotomy/craniectomy for pathological processes (such as benign and malignant tumors, vascular malformation) in the posterior fossa or in the supratentorial region.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients who are able and willing to comply with the procedures required by the protocol.
- Signed and dated written informed consent from the subject or from his/her legal representative prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Intraoperative
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient undergoing elective craniotomy/craniectomy for pathological processes (such as benign and malignant tumors, vascular malformation) in the posterior fossa or in the supratentorial region and who are demonstrated to have persistent CSF leakage following suture closure of the dural incision. CSF leakage will be evaluated during a period of Valsalva of 10-20 cm of H20 for 5-10 seconds. If a spontaneous leak is apparent immediately after dural closure, no Valsalva will be performed.
- Surgical wound classification Class I. Penetration of mastoid air cells during partial mastoidectomy is permitted.
- The cuff of native dura along the craniotomy edge is ≥10 mm wide, to facilitate suturing and to allow for sufficient surface area for adherence of the investigational product.
Who cannot join
- Preoperative
- Subjects with a dura lesion from a recent surgery that still has the potential for CSF leakage.
- The previous craniotomy/ craniectomy within 6 months or radiation therapy within 2 years before this surgery.
- Chemotherapy or radiation therapy scheduled within 7 days following surgery.
- Subjects with severely altered renal (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL) and/or hepatic function [ALT, AST > 5 x upper limit of norm (ULN)].
- Severe Anemia (Hemoglobin <60 g/L) or Hypoproteinemia (Total protein <60 g/L or 6g% ) .
Show all 24Show fewer
- Non-compliant or insufficient treatment of diabetes mellitus [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 7.5%].
- Conditions compromising the immune system; existence of autoimmune disease.
- Evidence of a potential infection: fever >38℃, WBC <3500/uL or >13000/uL, positive urine culture, positive blood culture, positive chest X-ray, evidence of infection along the planned surgical path.
- Known hypersensitivity to the porcine fibrin sealant product.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential with a positive urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to surgery.
- Female subjects who are breastfeeding or intend to become pregnant during the clinical study period.
- Participation in another clinical trial with exposure to another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to enrolment.
- Intraoperative
- Native dura cuff during craniotomy/craniectomy that cannot be completely repaired.
- Use of implants made of synthetic materials coming into direct contact with dura (e.g., PTFE patches, shunts, ventricular and subdural drains).
- Occlusive hydrocephalus caused by posterior fossa pathology or partial blockage of CSF pathways during surgical procedure.
- Existing CSF drains on the surgical path.
- Use of other fibrin sealants for hemostasis.
- Placement of Gliadel Wafers or similar products.
- Persistently increased brain surface tension that may lead to an incomplete repair requiring.
- Intersecting durotomy scars in the surgical path from a previous operation that cannot be completely removed by the planned dura resection.
- Two or more separate dura defects during surgery.
- Others in addition to above exclusion criteria, the subject, in the opinion of the investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
China10 sites
Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005
ZhuJiang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280
The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
Guiyang, Guizhou, 550004
Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006
TongJi Hospital, TongJi Medical College of HUST
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000
The first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blinded, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blinded, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, single blinded, multi-center controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of Bioseal as an adjunct to sutured dural closure compared to control to obtain an intra-operative watertight dural closure.
- Conditions
- Benign Tumors, Malignant Tumors, Vascular Malformation
- Being tested
- Bioseal
- Keywords
- Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair, elective posterior fossa, supratentorial procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Vascular Malformations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BiosealBiological
Upon completion of the sutured dural repair, the closure will be evaluated for intra-operative CSF leakage with a baseline Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5-10 seconds. Subjects who have a CSF leak will be enrolled into the study. If randomized to receive Bioseal, a thin layer will be applied to the entire length of the suture line and the adjacent area to approximately 5mm away, including all suture holes. Up to two layers of Bioseal may be used for each application. While Bioseal achieves complete coagulation, CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| suture (control) | No intervention | Subjects randomized to control will receive additional dural sutures as deemed necessary by the surgeon. CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds. Closure of the remaining layers of the surgical site will be performed according to the surgeon's standard of practice. |
| Bioseal | Experimental | Subjects randomized to receive Bioseal, a thin layer will be applied to the entire length of the suture line and the adjacent area to approximately 5mm away, including all suture holes. Up to two layers of Bioseal may be used for each application. While Bioseal achieves complete coagulation, CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds. Up to two applications (one application includes applying up to two layers of Bioseal product followed by the CSF leakage re-evaluation with Valsalva maneuver) per subject are allowed. Closure of the remaining layers of the surgical site will be performed according to the surgeon's standard of practice. Receives: Biological: Bioseal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of success (watertight closure) CSF leakage
no CSF leakage from dural repair intra-operatively
Measured: 5 to 10 seconds after final Valsalva maneuver
Secondary outcomes (4)
Incidence of CSF leakage
Incidence of CSF leakage post-surgery to discharge
Measured: Up to Discharge, an average of 3-5days in general
Incidence of CSF leakage
Incidence of CSF leakage 30 (±7) days post operatively
Measured: Up to 30(+/-7)Days
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of adverse events
Measured: Up to 30(±7)Days
Incidence of surgical site infections (SSI)
Incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) according to Surgical Site Infection Infection Prevention and Control Guideline (MOH) criteria
Measured: Up to 30(± 7) days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2017
- Study start14 Sep 2017
- Primary completion20 Sep 2019
- Study completion20 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Benign TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Guangzhou Bioseal Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ying Mao, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hua Shan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityRichard Kocharian, MD, PhD, Study director, Ethicon, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03110783
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BIOS-14-001
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Du S, Zhao J, Qiao G, Wu S, Han Y. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Application of a Porcine-Derived Fibrin Sealant for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in China. Clin Ther. 2022 Apr;44(4):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
PubMed 35450755
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blinded, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03110783
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIOS-14-001
- Conditions
- Benign Tumors, Malignant Tumors, Vascular Malformation
- Keywords
- Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair, elective posterior fossa, supratentorial procedure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Guangzhou Bioseal Biotechnology Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blinded, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Bioseal as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair
Detailed description
This is a randomized, single blinded, multi-center controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of Bioseal as an adjunct to sutured dural closure compared to control to obtain an intra-operative watertight dural closure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| suture (control) | No intervention | –Subjects randomized to control will receive additional dural sutures as deemed necessary by the surgeon. CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds. Closure of the remaining layers of the surgical site will be performed according to the surgeon's standard of practice. |
| Bioseal | Experimental | Biological: BiosealSubjects randomized to receive Bioseal, a thin layer will be applied to the entire length of the suture line and the adjacent area to approximately 5mm away, including all suture holes. Up to two layers of Bioseal may be used for each application. While Bioseal achieves complete coagulation, CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds. Up to two applications (one application includes applying up to two layers of Bioseal product followed by the CSF leakage re-evaluation with Valsalva maneuver) per subject are allowed. Closure of the remaining layers of the surgical site will be performed according to the surgeon's standard of practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Preoperative
- Intraoperative
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Preoperative
- Intraoperative
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BiosealUpon completion of the sutured dural repair, the closure will be evaluated for intra-operative CSF leakage with a baseline Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5-10 seconds. Subjects who have a CSF leak will be enrolled into the study. If randomized to receive Bioseal, a thin layer will be applied to the entire length of the suture line and the adjacent area to approximately 5mm away, including all suture holes. Up to two layers of Bioseal may be used for each application. While Bioseal achieves complete coagulation, CSF leakage will be re-evaluated with the Valsalva maneuver to 10-20 cm H2O for 5 to 10 seconds. | Biological | Bioseal |
Primary outcome
Proportion of success (watertight closure) CSF leakage
Time frame: 5 to 10 seconds after final Valsalva maneuver
no CSF leakage from dural repair intra-operatively
4 secondary outcomes
Incidence of CSF leakage
Time frame: Up to Discharge, an average of 3-5days in general
Incidence of CSF leakage
Time frame: Up to 30(+/-7)Days
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Up to 30(±7)Days
Incidence of surgical site infections (SSI)
Time frame: Up to 30(± 7) days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35450755Du S, Zhao J, Qiao G, Wu S, Han Y. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Application of a Porcine-Derived Fibrin Sealant for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in China. Clin Ther. 2022 Apr;44(4):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
Related trials for Benign Tumors
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Twenty-five Years of Advanced RadioTherapy at San Raffaele Hospital
Malignant Tumor, Benign Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 3
Using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool for Melanoma Diagnosis
Malignant Melanoma of Skin, Other and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Skin
Active, not recruiting
Gait Training Through a Novel Over-ground Wearable Robotic System in People With Pyramidal Hemisyndromes
Stroke, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
RecruitingObservational study
Plasma DNA Methylation for Preoperative Classification of Renal Masses
Renal Cell Carcinoma, Benign Renal Mass
Not yet recruiting
A Study Using Brain Stimulation and Behavioral Therapy to Increase Extent of Resection in Low-Grade Gliomas
Glioma, Glioma Intracranial
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ying Mao, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hua Shan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Richard Kocharian, MD, PhD study director
Ethicon, Inc.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bioseal in people with Benign Tumors and Malignant Tumors, run by Guangzhou Bioseal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. at 10 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of success (watertight closure) CSF leakage (time frame: 5 to 10 seconds after final Valsalva maneuver). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03110783, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.