Lifestyle-related ConditionNCT03115645
Evaluation of the Dynamic Work Intervention for Office Workers to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour
A study testing Dynamic Work in people with Lifestyle-related Condition, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 4 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Long-term sitting has been associated with multiple health risks. To reduce sitting time for office workers in a Dutch insurance company, an intervention will be implemented. The goal of this study is to evaluate this intervention on the short term (3 months) and long-term (12 months). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lifestyle-related Condition
- What is being tested?
- Dynamic Work
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 244 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2017to 18 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Employed by the insurance company for at least the duration of the study (12 months)
- Employed at least 28 hours per week
- Employed at one of the participating departments
Who cannot join
- Already access to the Dynamic Working Intervention
- Unable to stand or walk for longer time periods (i.e. wheelchair bound)
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands4 sites
Achmea
Apeldoorn
Achmea
Leeuwarden
Achmea
Leusden
Achmea
Tilburg
About this study
Long-term sitting has been associated with multiple health risks. To reduce sitting time for office workers in a Dutch insurance company, an intervention will be implemented. The goal of this study is to evaluate this intervention on the short term (3 months) and long-term (12 months).
Read the detailed description
Large volumes of sitting time have been associated with multiple health risks such as diabetes, heart disease and premature death. Especially, in office workers sitting time per day can accumulate to over 10 hours a day. To reduce sitting time for office workers in a Dutch insurance company, an intervention will be implemented. The intervention contains the introduction of alternative workstations, intervention sessions with an occupational physiotherapist and an activity tracker with a self-help program booklet. The goal of this study is to evaluate the (cost) effectiveness of this intervention on the short term (3 months) and long-term (12 months). The primary outcome is objectively assessed sitting time.
In a cluster randomized controlled trial 250 employees of an insurance company will participate in the study. After baseline measurements, matched departments will be randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. The evaluation includes an economic and process evaluation.
- Conditions
- Lifestyle-related Condition
- Being tested
- Dynamic Work
- Medical subject headings
- Mental Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dynamic WorkOther
Also called Dynamisch Werken
The intervention consists of the introduction of sit-stand workstations and desk bikes in the participants work environment in a ratio of 1:2 with traditional desks and chairs. Employees will receive a half hour intervention session at the start of the intervention from an occupational physiotherapist, who will provide further intervention support in the ensuing 12 weeks. Intervention participants will also receive an activity tracker which provides feedback on sitting time and physical activity levels.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group will receive the Dynamic Working Intervention program, as described in the next section. Receives: Other: Dynamic Work |
| Control group | No intervention | Participants in the control group will not receive any intervention and will perform their work in the same manner as before. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sitting time
Total sitting time will be measured objectively with the activPAL activity tracker
Measured: Change in sitting time between baseline and 12 month follow up assessment
Secondary outcomes (26)
Occupational sitting time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, non-occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Total standing time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational standing time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational standing time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, non-occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Total stepping time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational stepping time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational stepping time
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, non-occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, non-occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Objectively assessed by the activPAL activity tracker, non-occupational time will be recorded and linked with a diary
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Waist circumference and body height
Waist circumference and body height will be objectively measured in cm
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Body weight
Body weight will be objectively measured in kg and used to calculate body mass index (BMI)
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Individual Work Performance
Will be assessed with the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ)
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Need for recovery
This will be assessed with the Need For Recovery (NFR) questionnaire
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Effort-reward imbalance
This will be assessed with the short Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI-short) questionnaire
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Musculoskeletal complaints
This will be assessed with the Nordic Musculoskeletal questionnaire
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Vitality
This will be assessed with the Vita-16© TNO questionnaire
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L
This will be assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Absenteeism
This will be self-reported as well as assessed with company records
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Healthcare consumption
This includes general practitioner, allied health professionals, complementary medicine consumption
Measured: Assessed at 3 months and 12 months
Sitting, physical activity and work related outcomes
These will be assessed with custom sitting, physical activity and work questions
Measured: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Process evaluation
A process evaluation will be performed using qualitative (focus group interviews) and quantitative methods (questionnaires) in order to determine the level of implementation of the intervention as well as barriers and facilitators of this implementation.
Measured: Assessed at 3 months and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2017
- Study start23 Jan 2017
- Primary completion18 Apr 2018
- Study completion18 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lifestyle-related ConditionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Cluster randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Achmea
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, H. P. Van der Ploeg, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03115645
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DynamicWork
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jelsma JGM, van der Ploeg HP, Renaud LR, Stijnman DPM, Loyen A, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, van Nassau F. Mixed-methods process evaluation of the Dynamic Work study: A multicomponent intervention for office workers to reduce sitting time. Appl Ergon. 2022 Oct;104:103823. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103823. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
PubMed 35724470Mastenbroek VJEZ, Jelsma JGM, van der Ploeg HP, Stijnman DPM, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, van Nassau F. Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of the occupational health intervention 'Dynamic Work': a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 11;22(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13230-9.
PubMed 35546228Renaud LR, Jelsma JGM, Huysmans MA, van Nassau F, Lakerveld J, Spekle EM, Bosmans JE, Stijnman DPM, Loyen A, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP. Effectiveness of the multi-component dynamic work intervention to reduce sitting time in office workers - Results from a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103027. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103027. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
PubMed 31987512Jelsma JGM, Renaud LR, Huysmans MA, Coffeng JK, Loyen A, van Nassau F, Bosmans JE, Spekle EM, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP. The Dynamic Work study: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of an occupational health intervention aimed at reducing sitting time in office workers. BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6467-0.
PubMed 30760231
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Dynamic Work Intervention for Office Workers to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03115645
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DynamicWork
- Conditions
- Lifestyle-related Condition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Achmea
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Long-term sitting has been associated with multiple health risks. To reduce sitting time for office workers in a Dutch insurance company, an intervention will be implemented. The goal of this study is to evaluate this intervention on the short term (3 months) and long-term (12 months).
Detailed description
Large volumes of sitting time have been associated with multiple health risks such as diabetes, heart disease and premature death. Especially, in office workers sitting time per day can accumulate to over 10 hours a day. To reduce sitting time for office workers in a Dutch insurance company, an intervention will be implemented. The intervention contains the introduction of alternative workstations, intervention sessions with an occupational physiotherapist and an activity tracker with a self-help program booklet. The goal of this study is to evaluate the (cost) effectiveness of this intervention on the short term (3 months) and long-term (12 months). The primary outcome is objectively assessed sitting time.
In a cluster randomized controlled trial 250 employees of an insurance company will participate in the study. After baseline measurements, matched departments will be randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. The evaluation includes an economic and process evaluation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Cluster randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Dynamic WorkParticipants in the intervention group will receive the Dynamic Working Intervention program, as described in the next section. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Participants in the control group will not receive any intervention and will perform their work in the same manner as before. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Employed by the insurance company for at least the duration of the study (12 months)
- Employed at least 28 hours per week
- Employed at one of the participating departments
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Already access to the Dynamic Working Intervention
- Unable to stand or walk for longer time periods (i.e. wheelchair bound)
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic WorkAlso: Dynamisch WerkenThe intervention consists of the introduction of sit-stand workstations and desk bikes in the participants work environment in a ratio of 1:2 with traditional desks and chairs. Employees will receive a half hour intervention session at the start of the intervention from an occupational physiotherapist, who will provide further intervention support in the ensuing 12 weeks. Intervention participants will also receive an activity tracker which provides feedback on sitting time and physical activity levels. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Sitting time
Time frame: Change in sitting time between baseline and 12 month follow up assessment
Total sitting time will be measured objectively with the activPAL activity tracker
26 secondary outcomes
Occupational sitting time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Total standing time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational standing time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational standing time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Total stepping time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational stepping time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational stepping time
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time in bouts of 30 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Occupational sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Non-occupational sitting time in bouts of 60 min
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Waist circumference and body height
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Body weight
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Individual Work Performance
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Need for recovery
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Effort-reward imbalance
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Musculoskeletal complaints
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Vitality
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Absenteeism
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Healthcare consumption
Time frame: Assessed at 3 months and 12 months
Sitting, physical activity and work related outcomes
Time frame: Assessed at baseline 3 months and 12 months
Process evaluation
Time frame: Assessed at 3 months and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35724470Jelsma JGM, van der Ploeg HP, Renaud LR, Stijnman DPM, Loyen A, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, van Nassau F. Mixed-methods process evaluation of the Dynamic Work study: A multicomponent intervention for office workers to reduce sitting time. Appl Ergon. 2022 Oct;104:103823. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103823. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35546228Mastenbroek VJEZ, Jelsma JGM, van der Ploeg HP, Stijnman DPM, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, van Nassau F. Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of the occupational health intervention 'Dynamic Work': a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 11;22(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13230-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31987512Renaud LR, Jelsma JGM, Huysmans MA, van Nassau F, Lakerveld J, Spekle EM, Bosmans JE, Stijnman DPM, Loyen A, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP. Effectiveness of the multi-component dynamic work intervention to reduce sitting time in office workers - Results from a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103027. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103027. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30760231Jelsma JGM, Renaud LR, Huysmans MA, Coffeng JK, Loyen A, van Nassau F, Bosmans JE, Spekle EM, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP. The Dynamic Work study: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of an occupational health intervention aimed at reducing sitting time in office workers. BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6467-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Lifestyle-related Condition
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALKS 7290 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ALKS 7290-201)
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomics of Stimulant Treatment Response
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dynamic Work in people with Lifestyle-related Condition, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 4 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sitting time (time frame: Change in sitting time between baseline and 12 month follow up assessment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03115645, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2019.