Chronic Post-Procedural PainNCT03116048
Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II
A study testing Chronic pain evaluation in people with Chronic Post-Procedural Pain and Breast Cancer, run by GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Background and objectives The Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II is a regional anesthesia technique that provides post-surgical pain relief for patients undergoing breast surgery. Post-procedural pain relief is known to diminish persistent pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Post-Procedural Pain, Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Chronic pain evaluation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 121 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 2 May 2017to 24 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- participated in the Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery (NCT02544282)
Who cannot join
- patient refusal
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II: a Prospective Follow-up After a Prospective Double Blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trail
Background and objectives The Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II is a regional anesthesia technique that provides post-surgical pain relief for patients undergoing breast surgery. Post-procedural pain relief is known to diminish persistent pain. In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluated whether the Pecs II block, compared to placebo, is effective in reducing persistent post-procedural pain after breast cancer surgery in female patients.
Patients and methods 140 breast cancer stage 1-3 patients undergoing mastectomy or tumorectomy with sentinel node or axillary node dissection under general anesthesia were randomized to receive a Pecs block (levobupivacaine 0.25%) or placebo (saline 0.9%). Patients were invited between 9 and 31 months after surgery to complete a persistent postsurgical pain survey.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. For breast cancer patients, surgery is the most effective therapeutic intervention. Up to two thirds of female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery develop chronic post-procedural pain. This can be best understood by the fact that chronic post-procedural pain is strongly associated with acute post-procedural pain and that even minimal breast surgery can result in significant post-procedural pain.
Regional anesthesia techniques can improve acute and chronic post-procedural pain outcomes. In the prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial, the investigators found that the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block type II, as described by Blanco et al., provides reliable and effective post-procedural analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery.
In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluate whether the Pecs II block is effective in reducing chronic post-procedural pain in female adult patients undergoing breast cancer surgery compared to placebo.
- Conditions
- Chronic Post-Procedural Pain, Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Chronic pain evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chronic pain evaluationOther
Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pecs group (study group) | Other | Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire Receives: Other: Chronic pain evaluation |
| Control group (placebo group) | Other | Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire Receives: Other: Chronic pain evaluation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chronic post- procedural pain evaluation through questionaire
Evaluation of the chronic post procedural pain in breast surgery under general anesthesia with a pecs or placebo block
Measured: 1-3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2017
- Study start2 May 2017
- Primary completion12 Jun 2017
- Study completion24 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Post-Procedural PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patrick Van Houwe, MD, Study director, GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03116048
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GZA-ANE-PECS-02
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
PubMed 25220842El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):665-71. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245833.48399.9a.
PubMed 17457156Poleshuck EL, Katz J, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain. 2006 Sep;7(9):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007.
PubMed 16942948Mejdahl MK, Andersen KG, Gartner R, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ. 2013 Apr 11;346:f1865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1865.
PubMed 23580693Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
PubMed 16698416Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.
PubMed 10825328Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2215-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.
PubMed 21704871Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
PubMed 22939099Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.
PubMed 19903919Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.
PubMed 19836888Wijayasinghe N, Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Analgesic and Sensory Effects of the Pecs Local Anesthetic Block in Patients with Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study. Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):185-191. doi: 10.1111/papr.12423. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
PubMed 26857336
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II: a Prospective Follow-up After a Prospective Double Blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trail
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03116048
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GZA-ANE-PECS-02
- Conditions
- Chronic Post-Procedural Pain, Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-AugustinusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and objectives The Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II is a regional anesthesia technique that provides post-surgical pain relief for patients undergoing breast surgery. Post-procedural pain relief is known to diminish persistent pain. In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluated whether the Pecs II block, compared to placebo, is effective in reducing persistent post-procedural pain after breast cancer surgery in female patients.
Patients and methods 140 breast cancer stage 1-3 patients undergoing mastectomy or tumorectomy with sentinel node or axillary node dissection under general anesthesia were randomized to receive a Pecs block (levobupivacaine 0.25%) or placebo (saline 0.9%). Patients were invited between 9 and 31 months after surgery to complete a persistent postsurgical pain survey.
Detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. For breast cancer patients, surgery is the most effective therapeutic intervention. Up to two thirds of female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery develop chronic post-procedural pain. This can be best understood by the fact that chronic post-procedural pain is strongly associated with acute post-procedural pain and that even minimal breast surgery can result in significant post-procedural pain.
Regional anesthesia techniques can improve acute and chronic post-procedural pain outcomes. In the prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial, the investigators found that the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block type II, as described by Blanco et al., provides reliable and effective post-procedural analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery.
In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluate whether the Pecs II block is effective in reducing chronic post-procedural pain in female adult patients undergoing breast cancer surgery compared to placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pecs group (study group) | Other | Other: Chronic pain evaluationChronic pain assessment with study questionnaire |
| Control group (placebo group) | Other | Other: Chronic pain evaluationChronic pain assessment with study questionnaire |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- participated in the Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery (NCT02544282)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patient refusal
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic pain evaluationChronic pain assessment with study questionnaire | Other | Control group (placebo group), Pecs group (study group) |
Primary outcome
Chronic post- procedural pain evaluation through questionaire
Time frame: 1-3 years
Evaluation of the chronic post procedural pain in breast surgery under general anesthesia with a pecs or placebo block
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25220842Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 17457156El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):665-71. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245833.48399.9a.
- Background: PubMed 16942948Poleshuck EL, Katz J, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain. 2006 Sep;7(9):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007.
- Background: PubMed 23580693Mejdahl MK, Andersen KG, Gartner R, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ. 2013 Apr 11;346:f1865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1865.
- Background: PubMed 16698416Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
- Background: PubMed 10825328Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.
- Background: PubMed 21704871Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2215-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.
- Background: PubMed 22939099Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
- Background: PubMed 19903919Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.
- Background: PubMed 19836888Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.
- Background: PubMed 26857336Wijayasinghe N, Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Analgesic and Sensory Effects of the Pecs Local Anesthetic Block in Patients with Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study. Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):185-191. doi: 10.1111/papr.12423. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Post-Procedural Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
NonNarcotic Pain Control in Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy of Elbow
Elbow Pain, Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrick Van Houwe, MD study director
GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chronic pain evaluation in people with Chronic Post-Procedural Pain and Breast Cancer, run by GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chronic post- procedural pain evaluation through questionaire (time frame: 1-3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03116048, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.