AzTrials
AzTrials

Climacteric SyndromeNCT03118908

Clinical Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Amberen and Smart B by Women With Climacteric Syndrome

A study testing Amberen and Smart B in people with Climacteric Syndrome and Menopause, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of combined use of dietary supplements Amberen and Smart B by women with a typical (without complications) form of climacteric syndrome, with mild to moderate symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 42 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Climacteric Syndrome, Menopause
What is being tested?
Amberen and Smart B
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
107 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
24 Apr 2017to 10 Oct 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 42 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients, 42-60 years of age;
  • Patient with diagnosis of "climacteric syndrome", in typical or non-complicated form, mild or moderate vegetative symptoms during menopause i.e. absence of menstrual period for at least 1 year;
  • Ability to read and understand informed consent form for the study's participation;
  • Patients without risk factors and changes in the breast tissue based on the mammogram;
  • Patients with medical history of risk factors without changes in the breast tissue;
  • Ability to adhere to the conditions of the study.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of female reproductive system cancers (breast cancer, cervical cancer etc.);
  • Presence of extragenital oncological conditions, except those in complete remission for 5 years or more;
  • Conditions requiring emergency or planned hospitalization in the next 6 months;
  • Presence of hormonally-active extragenital endocrine diseases (thyroid, adrenal, pituitary, hypothalamus);
  • Surgical interventions done on sex organs or breasts, 1 year or less prior to the screening;
  • Any surgeries done less than 3 months prior to the screening;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients receiving HRT;
  • Psychiatric conditions;
  • Diabetes;
  • Total ovariectomy
  • Patients taking any other dietary supplements that can affect climacteric syndrome within the last month before enrolling in the study
  • High risk of non-compliance

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • Sechenov First Moscow Medical University

    Moscow, 119991

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Use of Dietary Supplements Amberen and Smart B by Women With Climacteric Syndrome

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of combined use of dietary supplements Amberen and Smart B by women with a typical (without complications) form of climacteric syndrome, with mild to moderate symptoms.

Read the detailed description
  1. To evaluate effectiveness of combined use of dietary supplements Amberen and Smart B (vs placebo) by women with a typical (without complications) form of climacteric syndrome, with mild to moderate vegetative symptoms during perimenopause and menopause in regards to vasomotor, endocrine-metabolic, and neuro-psychological dysfunctions;
  2. To evaluate safety of combined use of dietary supplements Amberen and Smart B (vs placebo) by women with a typical (without complications) form of climacteric syndrome, with mild to moderate vegetative symptoms during perimenopause and menopause, lasting no less than 1 year in regards to vasomotor, endocrine-metabolic, and neuro-psychological dysfunctions;
  3. To develop recommendations for combined use of dietary supplements Amberen and Smart B for women with a typical (without complications) form of climacteric syndrome, with mild to moderate vegetative symptoms during perimenopause and menopause (menopausal for at least 1 year).
Being tested
Amberen, Smart B, Placebo
Keywords
Succinate, B complex vitamins, menopause

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AmberenDietary supplement

    Amberen is a succinate-based dietary supplement previously shown to help provide relief for common menopausal symptoms.

  • Smart BDietary supplement

    Smart B contains vitamins B1, B2, B6, B9, B12 and sodium fumarate.

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Placebo capsules are identical to Amberen and Smart B capsules.

Study groups in NCT03118908
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Amberen and Smart BExperimentalAmberen - a dietary supplement: 2 capsules (one while capsule 200 mg and one orange capsule 200 mg) are taken once a day with a meal, preferably after breakfast, for 3 months. SMART В - a dietary supplement: 1 capsule per day (166 mg) is taken once a day with a meal, preferably after breakfast, for 3 months, concurrently with Amberen.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Amberen; Dietary Supplement: Smart B
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo is taken as follows: 3 capsules (one while capsule 200 mg, one orange capsule 200 mg, one capsule 166mg) are taken once a day with a meal, preferably after breakfast, for 3 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Spilberger-Hanin (Situational anxiety)

    The decrease of situational anxiety, measured as statistically significant reduction of the score in corresponding subscale

    Measured: week 12

  2. Spilberger-Hanin (Personal anxiety)

    The decrease of personal anxiety, measured as statistically significant reduction of the score in corresponding subscale

    Measured: week 12

  3. Spilberger-Hanin (Actual anxiety)

    The decrease of actual anxiety, measured as statistically significant reduction of the score in corresponding subscale. Actual anxiety as a sum of situational and personal anxiety scores was introduced by Hanin in his modification of original State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

    Measured: week 12

  4. WELL-BEING, LEVEL OF ACTIVITY, MOOD QUESTIONNAIRE (well-being)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  5. WELL-BEING, LEVEL OF ACTIVITY, MOOD QUESTIONNAIRE (activity)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  6. WELL-BEING, LEVEL OF ACTIVITY, MOOD QUESTIONNAIRE (mood)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  7. Anxiety (measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  8. Depression (measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. "Heart beating quickly and strongly" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  2. "Feeling tense or nervous" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  3. "Difficulty in sleeping" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  4. "Excitable" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  5. "Attacks of panic" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  6. "Difficulty in concentrating" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  7. "Feeling tired or lacking in energy" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  8. "Loss of interest in most things" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  9. "Feeling unhappy or depressed" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  10. "Crying spells" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  11. "Irritability" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  12. "Feeling dizzy or faint" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  13. "Pressure or tightness in head or body" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  14. "Parts of body feeling numb or tingling" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  15. "Headaches" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  16. "Muscle or joint pains" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  17. "Loss of feeling in hands or feet" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  18. Breathing difficulties" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  19. "Hot flushes" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  20. "Sweating at night" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  21. "Loss of interest in sex" symptom (Greene Climacteric Scale)

    Statistically significant reduction in designated symptom severity, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  22. Blood plasma estradiol levels, pg/ml

    Statistically significant reduction in the levels, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

  23. Weight, kg

    Statistically significant reduction in the measurement, compared between arms

    Measured: week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2017
  2. Study start24 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion10 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
107 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03118908
Sponsor's protocol ID
AmberenSmartB-2017
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
13 Apr 2017
Last updated
20 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Amberen and Smart B in people with Climacteric Syndrome and Menopause, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Spilberger-Hanin (Situational anxiety) (time frame: week 12). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in