Internal Carotid Artery StenosisPhase 3CREST-HNCT03121209
Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial - Hemodynamics (CREST-H)
A Phase 3 study testing Revascularization and Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone in people with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Cognitive Impairment, run by Columbia University at 58 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
We aim to determine whether cognitive impairment attributable to cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is reversible with restoration of flow. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 86 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis, Cognitive Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Revascularization and Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 392 participants
- Where
- 58 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 18 Jan 2018to 12 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 86 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled and randomized into CREST-2 (parent study)
- age 35-86
- Exclusion Criteria (in addition to the exclusion criteria for CREST-2):
- unable to undergo MRI (e.g. metal in body, pacemaker)
- known allergy gadolinium contrast dye
- pre-existing diagnosis of dementia
Show all 10Show fewer
- contralateral ICA stenosis >70% by MRA, CTA or Doppler ultrasound
- history of severe head trauma
- major depression
- education less than 8 years
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
58 sites in 2 countries.
58 sites in 2 countries
United States56 sites
UPMC Altoona
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16601
University of Maryland VA
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Overlake Hospital Medical Center
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
SUNY Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14203
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Ohio State Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Ohio Health Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214,
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, 60208
Inova Fairfax Health Care
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Michigan Vascular Center/McLaren-Flint
Flint, Michigan, 48532
University of Florida Health at Shands
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Adventist HealthCare/White Oak Medical Center
Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20878
Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Ltd./ North Memorial Medical Center
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Huntsville Hospital/ Heart Center Research Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 322224
Tennova Healthcare/ Turkey Creek Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37934
Gundersen Clinic, Ltd
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Central Arkansas Veteran's Healthcare System
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72143
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
University of California at Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
University of Miami Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Ochsner Health System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center/ Barrow
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
UPMC Presbyterian University Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102
The Miriam Hospital/ Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Mercy Health Riverside
Rockford, Illinois, 61114
University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Kaiser Permanente
San Diego, California, 92123
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92182
San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94121
University of Washington Medicine-Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
Seattle, Washington, 98108
North Central Heart Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108
Mercy Hospital St Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Novant Health Forsythe
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Canada2 sites
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
St. Boniface Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB R2H 2A6
About this study
Official title: Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial - Hemodynamics
We aim to determine whether cognitive impairment attributable to cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is reversible with restoration of flow. To accomplish this aim CREST-H will add on to the NINDS-sponsored CREST-2 trial (parallel, outcome-blinded Phase 3 clinical trials for patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis which will compare carotid endarterectomy plus intensive medical management (IMM) versus IMM alone (n=1,240), and carotid artery stenting plus IMM versus IMM alone (n=1,240) to prevent stroke and death).
CREST-H addresses the intriguing question of whether cognitive impairment can be reversed when it arises from abnormal cerebral hemodynamic perfusion in a hemodynamically impaired subset of the CREST-2 -randomized patients. We will enroll 385 patients from CREST-2, all of whom receive cognitive assessments at baseline and yearly thereafter. We anticipate identifying 100 patients with hemodynamic impairment as measured by an inter-hemispheral MRI perfusion "time to peak" (TTP) delay on the side of stenosis. Among those who are found to be hemodynamically impaired and have baseline cognitive impairment, the cognitive batteries at baseline and at 1 year will determine if those with flow failure who are randomized to a revascularization arm in CREST-2 will have better cognitive outcomes than those in the medical-only arm compared with this treatment difference for those who have no flow failure.
We hypothesize that hemodynamically significant "asymptomatic" carotid disease may represent one of the few examples of treatable causes of cognitive impairment. If cognitive decline can be reversed in these patients, then we will have established a new indication for carotid revascularization independent of the risk of recurrent stroke.
Read the detailed description
CREST-H sites will be drawn from actively-enrolling CREST-2 centers. The additional information obtained in CREST-H in this protocol will be the MR or CT imaging, which will be done at baseline for all patients enrolled in CREST-H, and at 1 year for those with hemodynamic impairment at baseline. The protocol will recommend an unblinded investigator at each CREST-H site who will order and obtain the study-related MRI sequences, upload de-identified image files to the CREST-2 central imaging site at U Maryland, and maintain blinding of the hemodynamic imaging data for their site (see Blinding below). Image analysis will be done at UCLA (for perfusion studies) and at Mayo Rochester for structural scans -- silent infarcts, WMH and microbleeds. Data management and statistical analysis will be done at UAB, which serves this role for CREST-2.
Cognitive Assessment.
CREST-H will use existing CREST-2 cognitive assessment infrastructure -- the Survey Research Unit at University of Alabama Birmingham. Added to the current CREST-2 battery is the Oral Trail Making A \& B as an additional measure of executive function, which will be administered to every CREST-2 patient, regardless of their participation in CREST-H. Cognitive assessments in CREST-H must take place prior to revascularization or within two weeks after assignment to medical therapy alone. Testing in CREST-2 is repeated at 1 year, and every year thereafter up to 4 years. At each test interval, a composite (mean) Z-score is derived from published normative samples for each test outcome. The CREST-H primary outcome will be at 1 year in which the change in the composite Z-score from baseline will be calculated. Covariates will include age, education and depression. The test battery will be administered by a blinded assessor the same way for all CREST-2 and CREST-H enrolled patients. The cognitive domains being assessed in CREST-2/H are entirely consistent with those encompassed within the NINDS Common Data Elements (CDE).
Imaging protocol.
Multimodal MRI or CT perfusion imaging will be performed at baseline on every study subject.
Multimodal MRI, including routine parenchymal sequences and PWI utilizing dynamic susceptibility contrast technique, will be acquired at each participating CREST H site who have been approved for this imaging modality. CT perfusion, using iodinated contrast, will be used as an alternative PWI image for sites approved for this modality. Imaging will take place within 14 days after CREST-H enrollment and prior to any CREST 2 intervention for those randomized to CEA or CAS.
Standardized contrast agent injection protocol, appropriate preparation, and IV setup is used to ensure good scan quality. An antecubital vein IV catheter of 18-20 gauge is required. A test injection will be performed with approximately 10 ml of normal saline solution.
MRI image acquisition DWI/ADC (b=0, 1000 s/mm2 applied in each of three principal gradient directions), FLAIR, high-resolution T1, and GRE sequences will be acquired on 1.5-3.0 T scanners equipped with echo-planar imaging capability, using standard clinical protocols at participating CREST-H sites Total scanning time will be approximately 40 minutes. PWI acquisition protocol will be standardized across all CREST-H sites, using sequential T2*-weighted (gradient echo) EPI time sequence scanning. A modified 2-phase contrast injection scheme will be used to perform CEMRA and DSC perfusion imaging, without need for additional contrast.
CT perfusion imaging will follow the protocol outlined in the updated Imaging MOP for CREST-H. The CT perfusion study is identical to the clinical CTP protocol used for acute stroke imaging in most institutions.
Perfusion imaging analysis.
PWI source images will be sent to the core laboratory at UCLA and processed with the OleaSphere software platform, using deconvolution of tissue and arterial signals in an expedited manner, yielding standardized data regardless of the acquisition system at each site. Hemodynamic impairment is defined as TTP >1.25 sec in the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the ipsilateral hemisphere to the carotid lesion compared with the same territory in the opposite hemisphere. Longitudinal analyses will investigate the change in the TTP >1.25 sec lesion at 1 year comparing the revascularization versus the medical only arm. Continuous values for this volumetric change will be used to calculate the correlation between degree of cognitive change and degree of perfusion change. The continuous Tmax variable, as well as standard perfusion parameters of CBV, CBF Tmax, and MTT will be analyzed on the serial imaging studies in each case with MR imaging. Co-registered, voxel-based changes in serial perfusion values will also be explored with multiparametric (e.g. CBV, CBF, Tmax, MTT) values.
Image de-identification and blinding.
All MR or CT image files will be de-identified under the supervision of an unblinded Investigator (UI) at each institution and uploaded to the CREST-2 Imaging Core site at U Maryland. In order to assure that the PWI scan information from CREST-H does not compromise the integrity of the parent trial, the results of the perfusion scan will be blinded to the investigator team.
Image transfer.
Participating sites will utilize the same file transfer protocol (ftp) to transfer images to U Maryland for CREST-H as is already established for CREST-2. The images will be stored in a HIPAA-compliant, firewall protected server within the U Maryland archival system. A CREST-2 dedicated ftp linkage between the VIC at U Maryland and UCLA; and the VIC at U Maryland and Mayo-Rochester will be utilized to make each perfusion image file available for download by UCLA (Liebeskind lab) and each structural image (DWI, FLAIR, GRE) by Mayo-Rochester (Huston lab).
MRI structural analysis.
Structural MRI analysis at Mayo-Rochester will utilize NIH NINDS Common Data Elements developed for the CREST-2 grant. The following definitions apply:
- silent infarct --- non-confluent hyperintense lesion >1mm on FLAIR sequence on 1-year MRI not present on baseline FLAIR MRI.
- Cerebral microbleed - hypointense 1-2mm non-confluent lesion on baseline GRE sequence.
- WMH volume -- White matter hyperintensity volume refers to confluent periventricular high intensity lesions on FLAIR imaging, and will be derived using an automated T2 WMH quantification at the Huston lab.
Data from image analysis (TTP delay, WMHV, silent infarct count, microbleed count) performed at UCLA and Mayo-Rochester will be entered electronically on CREST-H data forms via the CREST-2 SDCC website at UAB, where it will be stored on a separate webpage linked to the rest of the CREST-2 data, including baseline and yearly cognitive assessments. The electronic data entry system (eDES) for CREST-2 is a mature system, successfully reviewed by FDA audit in other studies, providing standard approaches for entry-confirmation-locking of data forms, and supporting range and validity checking for data provided.
. Analysis.
Specific Aim 1. To determine whether cognition can be improved by revascularization among a subset of CREST-2 patients with hemodynamic impairment at baseline.
The primary hypothesis is to assess if the magnitude of the treatment differences (revascularization versus medical management alone) differs between those with flow failure compared to those without flow failure using the Z-scored cognitive outcomes (C0, C(1). That is, the primary hypothesis is an interaction hypothesis that will be assessed using linear regression, specifically: (C1 - C0) = β0 + β1T + β2F + β3TF + β4C0 + (other covariates), where C1 is the cognitive z-score at year 1, C0 the cognitive z-score at baseline, T the treatment indicator variable, F the flow failure indicator variable, and βi the regression parameters to be estimated. The parameter of interest for the primary hypothesis is then β3 that would assess if the magnitude of treatment difference in the change in cognitive score between baseline and 1-year is similar for those with versus without flow failure.
Secondary Aims: To determine if the number of silent infarcts and white matter hyperintensity volume at 1 year is different between the revascularization and the medical-only arms.
For the secondary aims we will calculate the number of new silent cerebral infarctions occurring over the first year, and the change in the WMH volume. The approach for analysis of the number of new silent infarcts will depend on the average number and distribution of the number of new infarcts. The analytic approach will be linear regression if the number of new infarcts is large (considered more likely the case), or Poisson Regression if the number is smaller (considered less likely the case). The analysis of the change in WMH will use a linear regression approach.
- Being tested
- Revascularization, Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone
- Medical subject headings
- Carotid Stenosis, Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RevascularizationProcedure or surgery
Patients in this arm are randomized to CEA/CAS plus IMM
Intensive Medical Management (IMM) aloneOther
Patients in this arm are randomized to intensive medical management (IMM) alone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Revascularization Arm (CEA or CAS) | Active comparator | These patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive intensive medical management as well as either Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA--if they are in the parent study Surgical trial) or Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS--if they are in the parent study Stenting trial). Receives: Procedure: Revascularization |
| Intensive Medical Management (IMM) Arm | Active comparator | These patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive medical management only, which includes aspirin. high dose cholesterol lowering agent to a target LDL<70, intensive blood pressure management to target <130/80, smoking cessation, and diabetic control. Receives: Other: Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive score at 1 year
Change in composite cognitive Z-score at 1 year will be computed from the cognitive battery of the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2; NCT02089217). Range: -2.0 to 2.0. Positive Z-score change indicates improvement; negative Z-score change indicates worsening.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
MRI-determined silent infarcts present at 1 year that were not present at baseline.
A neuroradiology study investigator assesses for new silent infarcts as defined by any non-confluent hyperintense lesion >3mm on T2 FLAIR sequence on 1-year MRI not present on baseline T2 FLAIR MRI
Measured: 1 year
Change from baseline of White matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume as measured by T2 FLAIR sequence on brain MRI.
A neuroradiology study investigator assesses for change in White matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume as defined by confluent periventricular high intensity lesions on T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) imaging.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2017
- Study start18 Jan 2018
- Primary completion12 Sep 2025
- Study completion12 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Internal Carotid Artery StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Phase 3 prospective blinded outcome randomized clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 392 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Mayo Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Maryland, University of California, Los Angeles
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Randolph S. Marshall, MD, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Randolph S Marshall, MD, Study chair, Columbia UniversityRonald M Lazar, PhD, Study director, University of Alabama at BirminghamE Sander Connolly, MD, Study director, Columbia UniversityDavid S Liebeskind, MD, Study director, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03121209
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAR5617
- Other IDs
- 1R01NS097876-01A1
- Acronym
- CREST-H
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: To share individual participant data (IPD) of baseline characteristics, follow up, outcomes, etc. based on NIH/NINDS requirements.
Publications
Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Liebeskind DS, Connolly ES, Howard G, Lal BK, Huston J 3rd, Meschia JF, Brott TG. Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis - Hemodynamics (CREST-H): Study design and rationale. Int J Stroke. 2018 Dec;13(9):985-991. doi: 10.1177/1747493018790088. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
PubMed 30132751Marshall RS, Liebeskind DS, Iii JH, Edwards LJ, Howard G, Meschia JF, Brott TG, Lal BK, Heck D, Lanzino G, Sangha N, Kashyap VS, Morales CD, Cotton-Samuel D, Rivera AM, Brickman AM, Lazar RM. Cortical Thinning in High-Grade Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. J Stroke. 2023 Jan;25(1):92-100. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.02285. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
PubMed 36592969Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Meschia JF, Huston J, Edwards LJ, Brott TG, Lal BK, Howard G, Mena-Hurtado C, Heck D, Sangha N, Lanzino G, Kashyap VS, Aronow HD, Sharafuddin M, Voeks J, Zhang Y, Slane K, Liebeskind DS. Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis With Hemodynamic Impairment and Cognitive Outcomes: The CREST-H Substudy of the CREST-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Sep 16:e2613384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.13384. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42747834Marshall RS, Lal BK, Edwards LJ, Huston J, Meschia JF, Brott TG, Howard G, Mena-Hurtado C, Heck D, Sangha N, Lanzino G, Kashyap VS, Aronow HD, Sharafuddin M, Rai P, Jumani S, Voeks JH, Zhang Y, Slane KJ, Lazar RM, Liebeskind DS; CREST-H Investigators. Relationship Between Degree of Stenosis and Time-to-Peak Delay in High Grade Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease. Stroke. 2026 Apr;57(4):992-999. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.054149. Epub 2026 Jan 29.
PubMed 41608800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial - Hemodynamics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03121209
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CREST-H / AAAR5617
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 392 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Mayo Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Maryland, University of California, Los Angeles
- Study start
- 18 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We aim to determine whether cognitive impairment attributable to cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is reversible with restoration of flow. To accomplish this aim CREST-H will add on to the NINDS-sponsored CREST-2 trial (parallel, outcome-blinded Phase 3 clinical trials for patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis which will compare carotid endarterectomy plus intensive medical management (IMM) versus IMM alone (n=1,240), and carotid artery stenting plus IMM versus IMM alone (n=1,240) to prevent stroke and death).
CREST-H addresses the intriguing question of whether cognitive impairment can be reversed when it arises from abnormal cerebral hemodynamic perfusion in a hemodynamically impaired subset of the CREST-2 -randomized patients. We will enroll 385 patients from CREST-2, all of whom receive cognitive assessments at baseline and yearly thereafter. We anticipate identifying 100 patients with hemodynamic impairment as measured by an inter-hemispheral MRI perfusion "time to peak" (TTP) delay on the side of stenosis. Among those who are found to be hemodynamically impaired and have baseline cognitive impairment, the cognitive batteries at baseline and at 1 year will determine if those with flow failure who are randomized to a revascularization arm in CREST-2 will have better cognitive outcomes than those in the medical-only arm compared with this treatment difference for those who have no flow failure.
We hypothesize that hemodynamically significant "asymptomatic" carotid disease may represent one of the few examples of treatable causes of cognitive impairment. If cognitive decline can be reversed in these patients, then we will have established a new indication for carotid revascularization independent of the risk of recurrent stroke.
Detailed description
CREST-H sites will be drawn from actively-enrolling CREST-2 centers. The additional information obtained in CREST-H in this protocol will be the MR or CT imaging, which will be done at baseline for all patients enrolled in CREST-H, and at 1 year for those with hemodynamic impairment at baseline. The protocol will recommend an unblinded investigator at each CREST-H site who will order and obtain the study-related MRI sequences, upload de-identified image files to the CREST-2 central imaging site at U Maryland, and maintain blinding of the hemodynamic imaging data for their site (see Blinding below). Image analysis will be done at UCLA (for perfusion studies) and at Mayo Rochester for structural scans -- silent infarcts, WMH and microbleeds. Data management and statistical analysis will be done at UAB, which serves this role for CREST-2.
Cognitive Assessment.
CREST-H will use existing CREST-2 cognitive assessment infrastructure -- the Survey Research Unit at University of Alabama Birmingham. Added to the current CREST-2 battery is the Oral Trail Making A \& B as an additional measure of executive function, which will be administered to every CREST-2 patient, regardless of their participation in CREST-H. Cognitive assessments in CREST-H must take place prior to revascularization or within two weeks after assignment to medical therapy alone. Testing in CREST-2 is repeated at 1 year, and every year thereafter up to 4 years. At each test interval, a composite (mean) Z-score is derived from published normative samples for each test outcome. The CREST-H primary outcome will be at 1 year in which the change in the composite Z-score from baseline will be calculated. Covariates will include age, education and depression. The test battery will be administered by a blinded assessor the same way for all CREST-2 and CREST-H enrolled patients. The cognitive domains being assessed in CREST-2/H are entirely consistent with those encompassed within the NINDS Common Data Elements (CDE).
Imaging protocol.
Multimodal MRI or CT perfusion imaging will be performed at baseline on every study subject.
Multimodal MRI, including routine parenchymal sequences and PWI utilizing dynamic susceptibility contrast technique, will be acquired at each participating CREST H site who have been approved for this imaging modality. CT perfusion, using iodinated contrast, will be used as an alternative PWI image for sites approved for this modality. Imaging will take place within 14 days after CREST-H enrollment and prior to any CREST 2 intervention for those randomized to CEA or CAS.
Standardized contrast agent injection protocol, appropriate preparation, and IV setup is used to ensure good scan quality. An antecubital vein IV catheter of 18-20 gauge is required. A test injection will be performed with approximately 10 ml of normal saline solution.
MRI image acquisition DWI/ADC (b=0, 1000 s/mm2 applied in each of three principal gradient directions), FLAIR, high-resolution T1, and GRE sequences will be acquired on 1.5-3.0 T scanners equipped with echo-planar imaging capability, using standard clinical protocols at participating CREST-H sites Total scanning time will be approximately 40 minutes. PWI acquisition protocol will be standardized across all CREST-H sites, using sequential T2*-weighted (gradient echo) EPI time sequence scanning. A modified 2-phase contrast injection scheme will be used to perform CEMRA and DSC perfusion imaging, without need for additional contrast.
CT perfusion imaging will follow the protocol outlined in the updated Imaging MOP for CREST-H. The CT perfusion study is identical to the clinical CTP protocol used for acute stroke imaging in most institutions.
Perfusion imaging analysis.
PWI source images will be sent to the core laboratory at UCLA and processed with the OleaSphere software platform, using deconvolution of tissue and arterial signals in an expedited manner, yielding standardized data regardless of the acquisition system at each site. Hemodynamic impairment is defined as TTP >1.25 sec in the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the ipsilateral hemisphere to the carotid lesion compared with the same territory in the opposite hemisphere. Longitudinal analyses will investigate the change in the TTP >1.25 sec lesion at 1 year comparing the revascularization versus the medical only arm. Continuous values for this volumetric change will be used to calculate the correlation between degree of cognitive change and degree of perfusion change. The continuous Tmax variable, as well as standard perfusion parameters of CBV, CBF Tmax, and MTT will be analyzed on the serial imaging studies in each case with MR imaging. Co-registered, voxel-based changes in serial perfusion values will also be explored with multiparametric (e.g. CBV, CBF, Tmax, MTT) values.
Image de-identification and blinding.
All MR or CT image files will be de-identified under the supervision of an unblinded Investigator (UI) at each institution and uploaded to the CREST-2 Imaging Core site at U Maryland. In order to assure that the PWI scan information from CREST-H does not compromise the integrity of the parent trial, the results of the perfusion scan will be blinded to the investigator team.
Image transfer.
Participating sites will utilize the same file transfer protocol (ftp) to transfer images to U Maryland for CREST-H as is already established for CREST-2. The images will be stored in a HIPAA-compliant, firewall protected server within the U Maryland archival system. A CREST-2 dedicated ftp linkage between the VIC at U Maryland and UCLA; and the VIC at U Maryland and Mayo-Rochester will be utilized to make each perfusion image file available for download by UCLA (Liebeskind lab) and each structural image (DWI, FLAIR, GRE) by Mayo-Rochester (Huston lab).
MRI structural analysis.
Structural MRI analysis at Mayo-Rochester will utilize NIH NINDS Common Data Elements developed for the CREST-2 grant. The following definitions apply:
- silent infarct --- non-confluent hyperintense lesion >1mm on FLAIR sequence on 1-year MRI not present on baseline FLAIR MRI.
- Cerebral microbleed - hypointense 1-2mm non-confluent lesion on baseline GRE sequence.
- WMH volume -- White matter hyperintensity volume refers to confluent periventricular high intensity lesions on FLAIR imaging, and will be derived using an automated T2 WMH quantification at the Huston lab.
Data from image analysis (TTP delay, WMHV, silent infarct count, microbleed count) performed at UCLA and Mayo-Rochester will be entered electronically on CREST-H data forms via the CREST-2 SDCC website at UAB, where it will be stored on a separate webpage linked to the rest of the CREST-2 data, including baseline and yearly cognitive assessments. The electronic data entry system (eDES) for CREST-2 is a mature system, successfully reviewed by FDA audit in other studies, providing standard approaches for entry-confirmation-locking of data forms, and supporting range and validity checking for data provided.
. Analysis.
Specific Aim 1. To determine whether cognition can be improved by revascularization among a subset of CREST-2 patients with hemodynamic impairment at baseline.
The primary hypothesis is to assess if the magnitude of the treatment differences (revascularization versus medical management alone) differs between those with flow failure compared to those without flow failure using the Z-scored cognitive outcomes (C0, C(1). That is, the primary hypothesis is an interaction hypothesis that will be assessed using linear regression, specifically: (C1 - C0) = β0 + β1T + β2F + β3TF + β4C0 + (other covariates), where C1 is the cognitive z-score at year 1, C0 the cognitive z-score at baseline, T the treatment indicator variable, F the flow failure indicator variable, and βi the regression parameters to be estimated. The parameter of interest for the primary hypothesis is then β3 that would assess if the magnitude of treatment difference in the change in cognitive score between baseline and 1-year is similar for those with versus without flow failure.
Secondary Aims: To determine if the number of silent infarcts and white matter hyperintensity volume at 1 year is different between the revascularization and the medical-only arms.
For the secondary aims we will calculate the number of new silent cerebral infarctions occurring over the first year, and the change in the WMH volume. The approach for analysis of the number of new silent infarcts will depend on the average number and distribution of the number of new infarcts. The analytic approach will be linear regression if the number of new infarcts is large (considered more likely the case), or Poisson Regression if the number is smaller (considered less likely the case). The analysis of the change in WMH will use a linear regression approach.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Phase 3 prospective blinded outcome randomized clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Revascularization Arm (CEA or CAS) | Active comparator | Procedure: RevascularizationThese patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive intensive medical management as well as either Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA--if they are in the parent study Surgical trial) or Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS--if they are in the parent study Stenting trial). |
| Intensive Medical Management (IMM) Arm | Active comparator | Other: Intensive Medical Management (IMM) aloneThese patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive medical management only, which includes aspirin. high dose cholesterol lowering agent to a target LDL<70, intensive blood pressure management to target <130/80, smoking cessation, and diabetic control. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 86 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Enrolled and randomized into CREST-2 (parent study)
- age 35-86
- unable to undergo MRI (e.g. metal in body, pacemaker)
- known allergy gadolinium contrast dye
- pre-existing diagnosis of dementia
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RevascularizationPatients in this arm are randomized to CEA/CAS plus IMM | Procedure or surgery | Revascularization Arm (CEA or CAS) |
| Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alonePatients in this arm are randomized to intensive medical management (IMM) alone | Other | Intensive Medical Management (IMM) Arm |
Primary outcome
Cognitive score at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Change in composite cognitive Z-score at 1 year will be computed from the cognitive battery of the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2; NCT02089217). Range: -2.0 to 2.0. Positive Z-score change indicates improvement; negative Z-score change indicates worsening.
2 secondary outcomes
MRI-determined silent infarcts present at 1 year that were not present at baseline.
Time frame: 1 year
Change from baseline of White matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume as measured by T2 FLAIR sequence on brain MRI.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30132751Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Liebeskind DS, Connolly ES, Howard G, Lal BK, Huston J 3rd, Meschia JF, Brott TG. Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis - Hemodynamics (CREST-H): Study design and rationale. Int J Stroke. 2018 Dec;13(9):985-991. doi: 10.1177/1747493018790088. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
- Background: PubMed 36592969Marshall RS, Liebeskind DS, Iii JH, Edwards LJ, Howard G, Meschia JF, Brott TG, Lal BK, Heck D, Lanzino G, Sangha N, Kashyap VS, Morales CD, Cotton-Samuel D, Rivera AM, Brickman AM, Lazar RM. Cortical Thinning in High-Grade Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. J Stroke. 2023 Jan;25(1):92-100. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.02285. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42747834Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Meschia JF, Huston J, Edwards LJ, Brott TG, Lal BK, Howard G, Mena-Hurtado C, Heck D, Sangha N, Lanzino G, Kashyap VS, Aronow HD, Sharafuddin M, Voeks J, Zhang Y, Slane K, Liebeskind DS. Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis With Hemodynamic Impairment and Cognitive Outcomes: The CREST-H Substudy of the CREST-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Sep 16:e2613384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.13384. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41608800Marshall RS, Lal BK, Edwards LJ, Huston J, Meschia JF, Brott TG, Howard G, Mena-Hurtado C, Heck D, Sangha N, Lanzino G, Kashyap VS, Aronow HD, Sharafuddin M, Rai P, Jumani S, Voeks JH, Zhang Y, Slane KJ, Lazar RM, Liebeskind DS; CREST-H Investigators. Relationship Between Degree of Stenosis and Time-to-Peak Delay in High Grade Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease. Stroke. 2026 Apr;57(4):992-999. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.054149. Epub 2026 Jan 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. To share individual participant data (IPD) of baseline characteristics, follow up, outcomes, etc. based on NIH/NINDS requirements.
Related trials for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting Combined With Intermittent Hypoxia Intervention in Patients With Severe Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Randolph S Marshall, MD study chair
Columbia University
Ronald M Lazar, PhD study director
University of Alabama at Birmingham
E Sander Connolly, MD study director
Columbia University
58 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Revascularization and Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone in people with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Cognitive Impairment, run by Columbia University at 58 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 58 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive score at 1 year (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03121209, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.