AzTrials
AzTrials

Localized Breast CancerRPOS+NCT03121469

Technique of Per-Operative Radiotherapy (RPO) by Papillon +TM in Localized Breast Cancer

A study testing Papillon +TM in people with Localized Breast Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phase 1/2 study, open, monocenter, non-randomized Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Localized Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Papillon +TM
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
25 Oct 2018to 10 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with grade 1 or 2 invasive ductal adenocarcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ, regardless of grade (found on mammography by an outbreak of Single microcalcification with a diameter not exceeding 2 cm or a tumor opacity <2 cm),
  • Patient aged 60 years or older (patients 60 years of age in the year may be included);
  • Unilateral adenocarcinoma, unifocal, positive HR, non-overexpressed HER-2 - T1 N0 radio-clinical , Operable patient with breast volume compatible with conservative surgery,
  • Patients who have been made aware of the information sheet and have given their written signed informed consent.
  • Patients benefitting from social health insurance coverage.

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 60 years
  • Patient with grade 3 invasive breast carcinoma
  • Patient with lymphatic invasion / peri-nerve involvement / vascular emboli
  • Metastatic patient
  • Multifocal and / or bilateral tumor
  • N1 proved by ultrasound guided
  • Patient with psychological and / or psychiatric disorders
  • Vulnerable patient: a person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, a major person who is the object of a legal protection measure or is unable to express his / her consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne

    Nice, 06189

Other trials in France

About this study

Phase 1/2 study, open, monocenter, non-randomized

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer, like the majority of cancers, has an incidence wich increased with age. Breast cancer in elderly women from an age of more than 70 years is defined but even from the age of 60, a simplified conservative treatment appears to be of interest, It is reserved for well selected tumors, small sizes, with low risk of local relapse.

In practice, the ratio of tumor to breast volume optimizes the selection of patients who can benefit from conservative treatment.

Standard conservative treatment is represented by tumorectomy (with axillary or sentinel lymph node) associated with irradiation of the entire breast. A dose of 60 Grays in 6 weeks is considered as standard.

To reduce radiation therapy, accelerated partial irradiation of the breast (IPAS) is a widely explored research pathway with several technical options. Among these IPAS techniques, per-operative radiotherapy (RPO) is an alternative that can be performed by various techniques: electrontherapy or by X-rays of 50 Kv, or even by MammositeTM or interstitial brachytherapy but in this case with an irradiation carried out at a distance from the intervention which has been used to set up the vectors to carry out this irradiation secondarily.

Currently, 7 randomized trials tested the results of IPAS, including 2 in perioperative ELIOT (Electron Intraoperative therapy) and TARGIT A (Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy.

The TARGIT trial started in 2003 recruited 1730 patients in the total breast irradiation arm (ITS) and 1721 patients in the partial irradiation arm (IPAS). It is a worldwide recruitment on 5 continents. It compares for the T1N0 stages after 50 years a standard treatment (tumorectomy associated with axillary node exploration and spreading irradiation: 60 Gy / 6 weeks) to per-operative radiotherapy delivering with the IntrabeamTM 50 Kv a dose of 20 Gy In 30 minutes at the surface of the tumor excision cavity. The results show, with a median follow-up of 60 months, that there are significantly more local relapses in the IPAS arm (1.3% vs 3.3%, p = 0.042) but that if RPO is performed during surgical time Not deferred) the rate of local relapse is only 2.1%. There was no difference in overall survival and mortality from intercurrent disease was lower in the RPO group. The results of F Wenz and the German teams published recently at the DEGRO German Congress show that for the 185 patients included in Mannheim in the TARGIT A trial there is no local relapse at 5 years in the arm RPO and that the G3 toxicity rate is <5%. For patients included in the TARGIT E trial (patients> 70 years) out of 273 patients treated in 20 German centers, there was 1 local relapse and no severe toxicity. (Strahl 2016). The rate of patients in Germany requiring external radiotherapy is less than 3%; Indicating a good selection of patients and appropriate treatment.

In Germany and Spain the RPO 50 Kv of the breast is admitted to the financial assumption by the insurance companies. In France, a recent report (May 2016) of the HAS considers that the rendered medical service of the RPO is still not validated and that this technique must always be carried out within a framework of clinical research which justifies the present study.

Alternative to Intrabeam TM. The Philips RT50TM x 50 KV radiotherapy radiotherapy device, introduced in 1948, has been used to treat skin, eyelid and rectal cancers. It could be used for breast cancer RPO to irradiate the areola-nipple plaque (MAP) after total subcutaneous mastectomy retaining PAM. Since this device is no longer manufactured, a new 50 KV device, Papillon 50TM has been used since 2009 in 10 centers in Europe (France, UK, Sweden, Denmark and Switzerland) with good results and a good tolerance in cancers of the Rectum, skin and eyelids. In 2010, the Center Antoine Lacassagne was awarded a research contract by the French National Research Agency (ANR) to develop and evaluate applicators to irradiate various tumors (skin, rectum, vagina). With the PAPILLON 50 BTM device, during the year 2011, the surgeons in the surgery of an applicator irradiating the tumoral area of excision on a volume of two thirds of sphere, made it possible for surgeons Center Antoine Lacassagne to note a good coverage of the tissues at risk of residual disease. In the TARGIT test, the Intrabeam ™ irradiates a practically spherical volume. The good results of the TARGIT test and the argument of a large volume irradiated cells have justified an evolution of the Papillon 50 ™ device.

A specific applicator was designed and tested between 2010 and 2012 to realize an RPO in breast cancer: Applicator NBA (Nice Breast Applicator) who obtained a European patent held by the Center Antoine Lacassagne.

In October 2016 ARIANE put on the market a device (Papillon + TM) which, thanks to an original X-ray tube and using the NBA applicator, irradiates satisfactorily (310 °) Resection after lumpectomy. This irradiation is comparable to that achieved by the Intrabeam apparatus. The advantage of the Papillon + TM device is its high dose rate, which can deliver the dose of 20 Gy (to the surface of the NBA applicator) in 2 to 4 minutes instead of 30 minutes using the Intrabeam technique .

Moreover, in view of the results of the TARGIT A trial, it is necessary to add to our RPO protocol, post-operative radiotherapy of the whole breast depending on whether the final histological result is in favor of an intermediate risk of relapse.

In the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy will be started within 5 to 8 weeks after surgery.

The aim of this clinical research is to validate the use of the PAPILLON + TM device for the RPO of small breast cancers in patients over 60 years.

Being tested
Papillon +TM

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Papillon +TMDevice

    Technique of Per-Operative Radiotherapy (RPO) by Papillon +TM

Study groups in NCT03121469
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Per-Operative RadiotherapyExperimentalTechnique of Per-Operative Radiotherapy (RPO) by Papillon +TM
Receives: Device: Papillon +TM

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In Vivo Measurement of the Delivered Radiation Dose During Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT).

    Assesses the absorbed radiation dose delivered to the tumor bed cavity during surgery. In vivo dosimetry measurements are recorded at two distinct anatomical locations relative to the spherical applicator surface: the south pole and the equator. Data will be reported as the mean value and standard deviation (SD) in Gray (Gy) for each measurement site.

    Measured: Days 1 during per-Operative radiotherapy

  2. Number of Participants With a Compliant Delivered Radiation Dose by Measurement Location.

    Assesses treatment conformity relative to the prescribed dose of 20 Gray (Gy). A delivered dose is defined as compliant if it reaches at least 80% of the prescription (i.e., $\ge$ 16 Gy). In vivo measurements are evaluated independently at two locations (south pole and equator). Data will be reported as the number (and percentage) of participants achieving this 16 Gy compliance threshold at each site.

    Measured: During surgery (at the time of intraoperative radiotherapy delivery).

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. In Vivo Measurement of the Radiation Dose Delivered to the Skin.

    Assesses skin tolerance by measuring the absorbed radiation dose delivered to the skin surface during the procedure. In vivo dosimetry measurements are recorded via two separate skin dosimeters. Data will be reported as the mean value and standard deviation (SD) in Gray (Gy) for each dosimeter site to evaluate exposure levels.

    Measured: During surgery (at the time of intraoperative radiotherapy delivery).

  2. Number of Participants With a Compliant Skin Radiation Dose by Dosimeter Site.

    Evaluates compliance with safety protocols for skin tolerance. The maximum acceptable skin dose is set at 6 Gray (Gy). A measurement is defined as compliant if the delivered dose does not exceed this safety threshold ($\le$ 6 Gy). Data will report the number (and percentage) of participants achieving this compliance status at each of the two skin dosimeter sites.

    Measured: During surgery (at the time of intraoperative radiotherapy delivery).

  3. 5-year Local Relapse-Free Survival (LRFS) Rate.

    Evaluates the probability of local relapse-free survival at 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Local relapse-free survival is defined as the time from surgery to the date of first documentation of local recurrence within the treated area or death from any cause. Patients without local recurrence at the time of last follow-up are censored. Data will be reported as the 5-year survival rate percentage along with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

    Measured: up to 5 years

  4. Surgical Assessment of Applicator Coverage Within the Tumor Bed.

    The surgeon and the radiation oncologist will define the satisfaction or not about the application by appreciating the good coaptation of the breast tissues to be irradiated after the local excision (tumor area) with the NBA applicator of RPO.

    Evaluates the quality of the applicator placement as judged by the operating surgeon based on the percentage of the tumor bed covered. Results are classified into 4 categories: Highly Satisfactory (greater than 90% coverage), Satisfactory (greater than 80% to 90% coverage), Moderately Satisfactory (greater than 50% to 80% coverage), and Unsatisfactory (less than or equal to 50% coverage). Data will report the count of participants in each category.

    Measured: During surgery (at the time of applicator placement).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2017
  2. Study start25 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03121469
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016/65
Acronym
RPOS+
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
12 Apr 2017
Last updated
2 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Papillon +TM in people with Localized Breast Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In Vivo Measurement of the Delivered Radiation Dose During Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT). (time frame: Days 1 during per-Operative radiotherapy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in