OncologyNCT03121768
A New Prognostic Model for Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)
An observational study of Oncology and Bladder Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
A prospective observational study to re-establish a new prognostic model for predicting the outcome in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using the current recommendation regimen for intermediate and high risk groups and including all potential and highly prognostic factors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Oncology, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer
- How many people
- 761 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 1 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Eligible patient presented with NMIBC will be asked to participate in this study and will be provided with an informed consent form in line with Good Clinical Practise and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Who may be able to join
- -Patient with NMIBC
Who cannot join
- Refuse to complete study requirements
- Contraindication to BCG therapy
- Muscle invasive disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ahmed M Harraz, MD contact
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Urology and Nephrology Center
Mansora, Aldakahlia, 35516
Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc, 01069678979 ext. 002, abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com
About this study
Official title: A New Prognostic Model for Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Clinical Histopathological and Biological Markers
A prospective observational study to re-establish a new prognostic model for predicting the outcome in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using the current recommendation regimen for intermediate and high risk groups and including all potential and highly prognostic factors.
Read the detailed description
Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most common cancer of the urinary tract and is the 7th most common cancer in males and the 7th most common cancer in females. Most of newly diagnosed cases of urothelial cancer of the bladder are non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and including stages Ta, T1, or Carcinoma in situ (CIS). The initial management is endoscopic resection, aiming at complete removal of all visible papillary lesions, and accurate staging of the bladder tumor. The future plan is determined based on the results of histopathological diagnosis and included either re-resection or adjuvant immunotherapy.
The incidence of recurrence and progression to muscle invasive disease after resection of NMIBC reaches up to 42 % and 21%, respectively, concluding that alternative treatments are urgently required. Therefore, the development of prognostic models is of ultimate importance to minimize long-term morbidity and improve the outcome. The most commonly used stratification systems are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables and the The Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) scoring model. The EORTC risk tables have been constructed based on 2596 patients diagnosed with Ta/T1 urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nevertheless, there were low number of patients treated with BCG (7%), as well as immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy (<10%); in addition, there was no second-look transurethral resection (re-TUR) of the bladder was performed. The CUETO scoring model has been built based on a retrospective analysis of 1,062 patients underwent TUR of bladder tumor followed by 6-month BCG maintenance therapy. Nevertheless, the study was limited by the relatively old grading systems, lack of re-TUR or immediate intravesical instillation, and inadequacy for determining the time of recurrence.
Pan et al have developed a prognostic nomogram from the retrospective analysis of 1366 patients with NMIBC classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology grading system. Similarly, this study was limited by the retrospective nature, lack of the current recommendations of immediate intravesical instillation, and lack of studying other different prognostic factors . Ali-El-Dein et al have constructed a nomogram for recurrence and progression based on a retrospective analysis of more than 1000 patients from a single institution. Nevertheless, there was heterogeneity on the adjuvant regimens, in addition, re-TUR were not performed in all patients.
Recently, Cambier et al have published their nomograms and risk stratification systems based on a data from 1812 patients with intermediate risk and high risk NMIBC with adjuvant BCG maintenance therapy 1-3 years. Although this study presents the first prognostic factor analysis in NMIBC patients receiving the currently recommended 1-3 yr of maintenance BCG, it has several limitations. There was no repeat transurethral resection in high risk patients during the study period. In addition, there was no central pathology review, and there was no data on upper tract status at time of recurrence or progression.
Although all previously mentioned nomograms have demonstrated significant ability for detecting the outcome after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Neither of these papers has included any other biological markers that have been proven to improve the predictive ability. Recently, special emphasis has been focused on the relation between smoking with recurrence and progression of NMIBC. It has been shown that smoking not only increases the risk of disease recurrence and progression, but also Current and heavy long-term smokers seem to be at the greatest risk for both end points. In addition, Ogihara et al have shown that a positive smoking history was an independent predictor for NMIBC recurrence and refraining from smoking for 15 years or more reduced the risk of tumor recurrence in former smokers with regardless of the intensity or duration of smoking.
Inflammation in the tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in the proliferation and survival of malignant cells through enhanced angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. The underlying mechanisms include recruitment of T lymphocytes, chemokines, activated cytokines, secretion of CRP, and neutrophilia . In a recent meta-analysis, Masson-Lecomte et al have shown that among different inflammatory predictors, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and urinary and serum interleukin levels were the most prognostic factors for bladder cancer prognosis. Furthermore, Kamat et al have shown that a cytokine panel had the potential for identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence during BCG treatment. In addition, interleukin IL-2 have been shown to be the most prognostic biomarker for response to BCG therapy.
In a recent meta-analysis including 15,215 patients, Martin-Doyle et al have shown that the highest impact risk factor was depth of invasion into lamina propria. In addition, lymphovascular invasion, associated carcinoma in situ, tumor size > 3 cm, and older age were independent predictors for progression and cancer specific survival.
Currently, all publications investigating the outcome after treatment of NMIBC lack several factors including the re-staging TUR, maintenance BCG therapy, inclusion of other highly prognostic factors e.g. smoking, inflammatory biomarkers, depth of lamina invasion. Therefore, this protocol is constructed to combine all clinically affordable biomarkers into a prognostic model for predicting the outcome after NMIBC.
- Conditions
- Oncology, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer, Recurrence, Progression, BCG
- Keywords
- Prognostic Model, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer, Recurrence, Progression, BCG
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms, Recurrence, Disease Progression
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Construct a new prognostic model for the prediction of recurrence and progression of NMIBC
Outcome Measure by counting and cmparing number of patients surviving for two year without tumor recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
cancer-specific survival (CSS) after treatment of NMIBC
Outcome Measure by counting and comparing number of patients surviving for five year without tumor. Mortality cases will be counted if oncology is the cause of mortality
Measured: 5 years
overall survival (OS) after treatment of NMIBC
Outcome Measure by conting and comparing number of patients surviving for five year without tumor. Mortality cases will be counted if the cause of mortality is other than oncology
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2017
- Study start15 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for OncologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 761 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abdelwahab Hashem, Mansoura University
- Investigators
- Ahmed Mosbah, MD, Study chair, Urology and Nephrology Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03121768
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RP/16.08.87
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 16 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: meta-analyses by contact the Prof. Ahmed Mosbah MD (Study Chair)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A New Prognostic Model for Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Clinical Histopathological and Biological Markers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03121768
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RP/16.08.87
- Conditions
- Oncology, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer, Recurrence, Progression, BCG
- Keywords
- Prognostic Model, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer, Recurrence, Progression, BCG
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 761 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective observational study to re-establish a new prognostic model for predicting the outcome in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using the current recommendation regimen for intermediate and high risk groups and including all potential and highly prognostic factors.
Detailed description
Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most common cancer of the urinary tract and is the 7th most common cancer in males and the 7th most common cancer in females. Most of newly diagnosed cases of urothelial cancer of the bladder are non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and including stages Ta, T1, or Carcinoma in situ (CIS). The initial management is endoscopic resection, aiming at complete removal of all visible papillary lesions, and accurate staging of the bladder tumor. The future plan is determined based on the results of histopathological diagnosis and included either re-resection or adjuvant immunotherapy.
The incidence of recurrence and progression to muscle invasive disease after resection of NMIBC reaches up to 42 % and 21%, respectively, concluding that alternative treatments are urgently required. Therefore, the development of prognostic models is of ultimate importance to minimize long-term morbidity and improve the outcome. The most commonly used stratification systems are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables and the The Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) scoring model. The EORTC risk tables have been constructed based on 2596 patients diagnosed with Ta/T1 urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nevertheless, there were low number of patients treated with BCG (7%), as well as immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy (<10%); in addition, there was no second-look transurethral resection (re-TUR) of the bladder was performed. The CUETO scoring model has been built based on a retrospective analysis of 1,062 patients underwent TUR of bladder tumor followed by 6-month BCG maintenance therapy. Nevertheless, the study was limited by the relatively old grading systems, lack of re-TUR or immediate intravesical instillation, and inadequacy for determining the time of recurrence.
Pan et al have developed a prognostic nomogram from the retrospective analysis of 1366 patients with NMIBC classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology grading system. Similarly, this study was limited by the retrospective nature, lack of the current recommendations of immediate intravesical instillation, and lack of studying other different prognostic factors . Ali-El-Dein et al have constructed a nomogram for recurrence and progression based on a retrospective analysis of more than 1000 patients from a single institution. Nevertheless, there was heterogeneity on the adjuvant regimens, in addition, re-TUR were not performed in all patients.
Recently, Cambier et al have published their nomograms and risk stratification systems based on a data from 1812 patients with intermediate risk and high risk NMIBC with adjuvant BCG maintenance therapy 1-3 years. Although this study presents the first prognostic factor analysis in NMIBC patients receiving the currently recommended 1-3 yr of maintenance BCG, it has several limitations. There was no repeat transurethral resection in high risk patients during the study period. In addition, there was no central pathology review, and there was no data on upper tract status at time of recurrence or progression.
Although all previously mentioned nomograms have demonstrated significant ability for detecting the outcome after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Neither of these papers has included any other biological markers that have been proven to improve the predictive ability. Recently, special emphasis has been focused on the relation between smoking with recurrence and progression of NMIBC. It has been shown that smoking not only increases the risk of disease recurrence and progression, but also Current and heavy long-term smokers seem to be at the greatest risk for both end points. In addition, Ogihara et al have shown that a positive smoking history was an independent predictor for NMIBC recurrence and refraining from smoking for 15 years or more reduced the risk of tumor recurrence in former smokers with regardless of the intensity or duration of smoking.
Inflammation in the tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in the proliferation and survival of malignant cells through enhanced angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. The underlying mechanisms include recruitment of T lymphocytes, chemokines, activated cytokines, secretion of CRP, and neutrophilia . In a recent meta-analysis, Masson-Lecomte et al have shown that among different inflammatory predictors, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and urinary and serum interleukin levels were the most prognostic factors for bladder cancer prognosis. Furthermore, Kamat et al have shown that a cytokine panel had the potential for identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence during BCG treatment. In addition, interleukin IL-2 have been shown to be the most prognostic biomarker for response to BCG therapy.
In a recent meta-analysis including 15,215 patients, Martin-Doyle et al have shown that the highest impact risk factor was depth of invasion into lamina propria. In addition, lymphovascular invasion, associated carcinoma in situ, tumor size > 3 cm, and older age were independent predictors for progression and cancer specific survival.
Currently, all publications investigating the outcome after treatment of NMIBC lack several factors including the re-staging TUR, maintenance BCG therapy, inclusion of other highly prognostic factors e.g. smoking, inflammatory biomarkers, depth of lamina invasion. Therefore, this protocol is constructed to combine all clinically affordable biomarkers into a prognostic model for predicting the outcome after NMIBC.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Eligible patient presented with NMIBC will be asked to participate in this study and will be provided with an informed consent form in line with Good Clinical Practise and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Patient with NMIBC
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Refuse to complete study requirements
- Contraindication to BCG therapy
- Muscle invasive disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Construct a new prognostic model for the prediction of recurrence and progression of NMIBC
Time frame: 2 years
Outcome Measure by counting and cmparing number of patients surviving for two year without tumor recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer
2 secondary outcomes
cancer-specific survival (CSS) after treatment of NMIBC
Time frame: 5 years
overall survival (OS) after treatment of NMIBC
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. meta-analyses by contact the Prof. Ahmed Mosbah MD (Study Chair)
Related trials for Oncology
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmed M Harraz, MD contact
Ahmed Mosbah, MD study chair
Urology and Nephrology Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Oncology and Bladder Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc (01069678979 ext. 002, abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Construct a new prognostic model for the prediction of recurrence and progression of NMIBC (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2017.