AzTrials
AzTrials

OncologyNCT03121768

A New Prognostic Model for Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

An observational study of Oncology and Bladder Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective observational study to re-establish a new prognostic model for predicting the outcome in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using the current recommendation regimen for intermediate and high risk groups and including all potential and highly prognostic factors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
761 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
15 May 2017to 1 Apr 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Eligible patient presented with NMIBC will be asked to participate in this study and will be provided with an informed consent form in line with Good Clinical Practise and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Who may be able to join

  • -Patient with NMIBC

Who cannot join

  • Refuse to complete study requirements
  • Contraindication to BCG therapy
  • Muscle invasive disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc contact

01069678979 ext. 002

abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com

Ahmed M Harraz, MD contact

ahmed.harraz@hotmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Urology and Nephrology Center

    Mansora, Aldakahlia, 35516

    Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc, 01069678979 ext. 002, abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A New Prognostic Model for Predicting the Outcome of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Clinical Histopathological and Biological Markers

A prospective observational study to re-establish a new prognostic model for predicting the outcome in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using the current recommendation regimen for intermediate and high risk groups and including all potential and highly prognostic factors.

Read the detailed description

Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most common cancer of the urinary tract and is the 7th most common cancer in males and the 7th most common cancer in females. Most of newly diagnosed cases of urothelial cancer of the bladder are non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and including stages Ta, T1, or Carcinoma in situ (CIS). The initial management is endoscopic resection, aiming at complete removal of all visible papillary lesions, and accurate staging of the bladder tumor. The future plan is determined based on the results of histopathological diagnosis and included either re-resection or adjuvant immunotherapy.

The incidence of recurrence and progression to muscle invasive disease after resection of NMIBC reaches up to 42 % and 21%, respectively, concluding that alternative treatments are urgently required. Therefore, the development of prognostic models is of ultimate importance to minimize long-term morbidity and improve the outcome. The most commonly used stratification systems are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables and the The Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) scoring model. The EORTC risk tables have been constructed based on 2596 patients diagnosed with Ta/T1 urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nevertheless, there were low number of patients treated with BCG (7%), as well as immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy (<10%); in addition, there was no second-look transurethral resection (re-TUR) of the bladder was performed. The CUETO scoring model has been built based on a retrospective analysis of 1,062 patients underwent TUR of bladder tumor followed by 6-month BCG maintenance therapy. Nevertheless, the study was limited by the relatively old grading systems, lack of re-TUR or immediate intravesical instillation, and inadequacy for determining the time of recurrence.

Pan et al have developed a prognostic nomogram from the retrospective analysis of 1366 patients with NMIBC classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology grading system. Similarly, this study was limited by the retrospective nature, lack of the current recommendations of immediate intravesical instillation, and lack of studying other different prognostic factors . Ali-El-Dein et al have constructed a nomogram for recurrence and progression based on a retrospective analysis of more than 1000 patients from a single institution. Nevertheless, there was heterogeneity on the adjuvant regimens, in addition, re-TUR were not performed in all patients.

Recently, Cambier et al have published their nomograms and risk stratification systems based on a data from 1812 patients with intermediate risk and high risk NMIBC with adjuvant BCG maintenance therapy 1-3 years. Although this study presents the first prognostic factor analysis in NMIBC patients receiving the currently recommended 1-3 yr of maintenance BCG, it has several limitations. There was no repeat transurethral resection in high risk patients during the study period. In addition, there was no central pathology review, and there was no data on upper tract status at time of recurrence or progression.

Although all previously mentioned nomograms have demonstrated significant ability for detecting the outcome after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Neither of these papers has included any other biological markers that have been proven to improve the predictive ability. Recently, special emphasis has been focused on the relation between smoking with recurrence and progression of NMIBC. It has been shown that smoking not only increases the risk of disease recurrence and progression, but also Current and heavy long-term smokers seem to be at the greatest risk for both end points. In addition, Ogihara et al have shown that a positive smoking history was an independent predictor for NMIBC recurrence and refraining from smoking for 15 years or more reduced the risk of tumor recurrence in former smokers with regardless of the intensity or duration of smoking.

Inflammation in the tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in the proliferation and survival of malignant cells through enhanced angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. The underlying mechanisms include recruitment of T lymphocytes, chemokines, activated cytokines, secretion of CRP, and neutrophilia . In a recent meta-analysis, Masson-Lecomte et al have shown that among different inflammatory predictors, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and urinary and serum interleukin levels were the most prognostic factors for bladder cancer prognosis. Furthermore, Kamat et al have shown that a cytokine panel had the potential for identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence during BCG treatment. In addition, interleukin IL-2 have been shown to be the most prognostic biomarker for response to BCG therapy.

In a recent meta-analysis including 15,215 patients, Martin-Doyle et al have shown that the highest impact risk factor was depth of invasion into lamina propria. In addition, lymphovascular invasion, associated carcinoma in situ, tumor size > 3 cm, and older age were independent predictors for progression and cancer specific survival.

Currently, all publications investigating the outcome after treatment of NMIBC lack several factors including the re-staging TUR, maintenance BCG therapy, inclusion of other highly prognostic factors e.g. smoking, inflammatory biomarkers, depth of lamina invasion. Therefore, this protocol is constructed to combine all clinically affordable biomarkers into a prognostic model for predicting the outcome after NMIBC.

Keywords
Prognostic Model, Bladder Cancer, Superficial Bladder Cancer, Recurrence, Progression, BCG
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms, Recurrence, Disease Progression

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Construct a new prognostic model for the prediction of recurrence and progression of NMIBC

    Outcome Measure by counting and cmparing number of patients surviving for two year without tumor recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. cancer-specific survival (CSS) after treatment of NMIBC

    Outcome Measure by counting and comparing number of patients surviving for five year without tumor. Mortality cases will be counted if oncology is the cause of mortality

    Measured: 5 years

  2. overall survival (OS) after treatment of NMIBC

    Outcome Measure by conting and comparing number of patients surviving for five year without tumor. Mortality cases will be counted if the cause of mortality is other than oncology

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2017
  2. Study start15 May 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
761 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03121768
Sponsor's protocol ID
RP/16.08.87
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
15 Mar 2017
Last updated
16 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: meta-analyses by contact the Prof. Ahmed Mosbah MD (Study Chair)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Oncology and Bladder Cancer, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc (01069678979 ext. 002, abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Construct a new prognostic model for the prediction of recurrence and progression of NMIBC (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in