AzTrials
AzTrials

Colitis, UlcerativePhase 2NCT03123120

A Study in Patients With Mild or Moderate Ulcerative Colitis Who Take a TNF Inhibitor. The Study Investigates Whether Bowel Inflammation Improves When Patients Take BI 655130 in Addition to Their Current Therapy

A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 16 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objectives of this trial are safety and efficacy (proof-of-concept) of induction of mucosal healing by BI 655130 add-on therapy in patients with mild or moderate ulcerative colitis and persisting endoscopic activity despite pre-existing TNFi treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Colitis, Ulcerative
What is being tested?
Spesolimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
22 participants
Where
16 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
7 Jun 2017to 16 Sep 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 - 75 years at screening and randomisation
  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis >= 5 months prior to screening
  • Receiving TNFi treatment with doses (i.e. dose and dosing interval) unchanged for >= 4 months (Infliximab) or >= 2 Monaten (Adalimumab or Golimumab) prior to randomisation
  • Mild or moderate disease activity, defined as total Mayo Score (MCS) (<= 10)
  • Further inclusion criteria apply

Who cannot join

  • Prior use of more than two different TNF inhibitors or vedolizumab
  • Extensive colonic resection
  • Evidence of infection with C. difficile or other intestinal pathogen <28 days prior to screening
  • Active or latent tuberculosis
  • Further exclusion criteria apply

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 6 countries.

16 sites in 6 countries

Germany5 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, 30625

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

    Kiel, 24105

  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Denmark3 sites
  • Aalborg Sygehus Syd

    Aalborg, 9100

  • Sanos Clinic

    Herlev, 2730

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Spain3 sites
  • Hospital Puerta de Hierro

    Majadahonda, 28222

  • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla

    Santander, 39008

  • Hospital Politècnic La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom3 sites
  • St James's University Hospital

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Guy's Hospital

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Whiston Hospital

    Prescot, L35 5DR

Other trials in United Kingdom

Netherlands1 site
  • Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

Norway1 site
  • Akershus Universitetssykehus HF

    Lørenskog, N-1478

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Proof-of-concept Study of BI 655130 add-on Treatment in Patients With Mild-to-moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis During TNF Inhibitor Therapy

The objectives of this trial are safety and efficacy (proof-of-concept) of induction of mucosal healing by BI 655130 add-on therapy in patients with mild or moderate ulcerative colitis and persisting endoscopic activity despite pre-existing TNFi treatment.

This trial will explore safety and efficacy of a dose of BI 655130 that was modelled to achieve the similar exposures as the highest exposures tested and found safe and tolerable in preceding single and multiple dose studies in healthy subjects, as add-on to pre-existing TNFi (Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) treatment. Secondary and further objectives include assessment of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BI 655130 and early exploration of specific biomarkers with potential usefulness to predict clinical efficacy or safety outcome or help understand BI 655130's mode of action.

Being tested
Spesolimab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SpesolimabDrug

    Also called BI 655130

    12 weeks treatment

  • PlaceboDrug

    12 weeks treatment

Study groups in NCT03123120
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SpesolimabExperimental1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively).
Receives: Drug: Spesolimab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorMatching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12

    Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement (Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤1) at Week 12 was reported. The endoscopic improvement (mucosal healing) was defined as the Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1 point. The MCS mESS ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The mESS was assessed by a central reader who was independent from the investigator. The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

    Measured: At Week 12

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Proportion of Participants With Total Clinical Remission (tCR) Based on Total Mayo Clinical Score at Week 12

    Proportion of participants with total clinical remission based on total Mayo clinical score at Week 12 was reported. The total clinical remission based on total Mayo clinical score was defined as the total Mayo clinical score ≤ 2 points and all sub-scores ≤ 1 point.

    The total Mayo clinical score was a composite disease activity score consisting of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total Mayo score was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease.

    The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

    Measured: At Week 12

  2. Proportion of Participants With Histological Remission at Week 12

    Proportion of participants with histological remission at Week 12 was reported. The histological remission was defined as the Robarts histology index score ≤ 6.

    The Robarts histopathology index (RHI) was a histologic activity score, scoring the components chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium and erosion or ulceration on a scale of 0 to 3. The 4 components were weighted differently to calculate the RHI, with RHI = 1 × chronic inflammatory infiltrate level + 2 × lamina propria neutrophils + 3 × neutrophils in epithelium + 5 × erosion or ulceration. The resulting RHI score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity).

    The 95% confidence intervals (in descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

    Measured: At Week 12

  3. Proportion of Participants With Clinical Remission (CR) Based on Mayo Clinical Score at Week 12

    Proportion of participants with clinical remission (CR) based on Mayo clinical score at Week 12 was reported. The clinical remission based on Mayo clinical score was defined as the total Mayo clinical Score ≤ 2 and Rectal Bleeding Subscore = 0, Stool Frequency Score =0 or 1 and drop ≥ 1 from baseline, and Modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1.

    The total Mayo clinical score was a composite disease activity score consisting of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total Mayo clinical score was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease.

    The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

    Measured: At Week 12

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Number of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported.

    Measured: From first does of study medication until end of the follow-up period, up to 36 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2017
  2. Study start7 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion16 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03123120
Sponsor's protocol ID
1368-0010
Other IDs
2016-004572-21, 2016
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
13 Apr 2017
Last updated
16 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 16 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Germany, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, Netherlands and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12 (time frame: At Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in