Crohn DiseaseANDINCT03134586
Advanced Non-Invasive Diagnostics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
A study testing Diagnostic imaging in people with Crohn Disease, run by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark at 3 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Non-invasive endoscopic procedures (pillcam colon capsule endoscopy, PCCE) and non-ionizing radiological modalities (MR enterocolonography, MREC and ultrasound, US) - offer a sufficiently high diagnostic validity in patients with suspected CD compared to the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Crohn Disease
- What is being tested?
- Diagnostic imaging
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 153 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to 23 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General criterion
- All of the following:
- Clinical suspicion of CD
- Age > 15 years
- Negative serologic markers for celiac disease, negative stool culture (or polymerase chain reaction) for pathogenic bacteria and a negative microscopy for intestinal parasites
- Fecal calprotectin > 50 mg/kg
- Signed informed consent
- Clinical criterion Diarrhea and/or abdominal pain for more than 1 month (or repeated episodes of diarrhea and/or abdominal pain) associated with one or more of the following findings: (1) C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L, (2) thrombocytosis (> 400 x 109/L), anemia (hemoglobin < 7.0 mmol/L for women and < 8.0 mmol /L for men or a decrease > 0.5 mmol/L compared to the usual level), (3) prolonged fever (> 37.5 C for more than 2 weeks), (5) weight loss (≥ 3 kg or ≥ 5% compared to the normal body weight), (6) perianal abscess/fistula, or (7) a family history of inflammatory bowel disease.
Who cannot join
- Acute bowel obstruction
- Intake of NSAIDs or acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 4 weeks before inclusion except prophylactic treatment with low dose Aspirin (≤ 150 mg per day)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Known gastrointestinal disorder other than inflammatory bowel disease
- Renal failure defined by a plasma-creatinine above the normal reference range
Show all 9Show fewer
- Claustrophobia, cardiac pacemaker or implanted magnetic foreign bodies that precludes MREC
- Interpreter required or inability to understand the oral and written information
- Colonoscopy contraindicated, performed within 3 months or unwillingness to go through colonoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Denmark3 sites
Sydvestjysk sygehus
Esbjerg, DK-6700
Odense university Hospital
Odense, DK-5000
Sygehus Lillebaelt
Vejle, DK-7100
About this study
Official title: A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Validity of Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Capsule Endoscopy of Both the Small and Large Intestine in Suspected Crohn's Disease
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Non-invasive endoscopic procedures (pillcam colon capsule endoscopy, PCCE) and non-ionizing radiological modalities (MR enterocolonography, MREC and ultrasound, US) - offer a sufficiently high diagnostic validity in patients with suspected CD compared to the traditional invasive approach using ileocolonoscopy with biopsies as first line diagnostic modality
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, blinded, multicenter study of the diagnostic validity, inter-observer agreement, image quality and subjective experience of discomfort with PCCE, MREC and US in patients with suspected CD. Ileocolonoscopy serves as the diagnostic gold standard. Patients are recruited from 3 centers in the Region of Southern Denmark managing adult patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Each patient goes through a standardized work-up including medical history, physical examination, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, ileocolonoscopy, PCCE, MREC and US. All examinations are reviewed and described in a standardized fashion. The radiologists and physicians describing PCCE, MREC, and US are blinded to the findings at ileocolonoscopy and the other imaging modalities.
- Conditions
- Crohn Disease
- Being tested
- Diagnostic imaging
- Keywords
- Capsule endoscopy, Crohn's disease, Magnetic resonance enterography, Ileocolonoscopy, Bowel Ultrasound, diagnostic imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Crohn Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diagnostic imagingOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| trial participant | Other | All participants undergoes the same diagnostic imaging Receives: Other: Diagnostic imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD located in the terminal ileum and colon (per patient \& per segment). Ileocolonoscopy serves as gold standard
Measured: 36 months
Correlation of disease severity
Correlation of disease severity assessed with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
Measured: 36 months
Inter-observer agreement
Inter-observer agreement with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Diagnostic yield of proximal CD
Diagnostic yield of PCCE, MREC and US for CD located proximal to the terminal ileum
Measured: 36 months
Patients reported experience
Patients' subjective experience of discomfort during PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
Measured: 36 months
Interobserver PCCE
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE with different reading protocols
Measured: 36 months
Utility of diffusion weighed magnetic resonance imaging (dw-MREC) and US Doppler flow
Utility of diffusion weighed magnetic resonance imaging (dw-MREC) and US Doppler flow (Limberg score): Sensitivity, specificity and correlation with endoscopic disease activity
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2017
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completion31 Aug 2020
- Study completion23 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Crohn DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Odense University Hospital, Sygehus Lillebaelt
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacob Brodersen, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Investigators
- Jacob B Brodersen, MD, Principal investigator, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03134586
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ANDI 1
- Acronym
- ANDI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brodersen JB, Jensen MD, Juel MA, Kjeldsen J, Knudsen T, Rafaelsen SR. Intestinal ultrasound in patients with suspected Crohn's disease - results of a prospective evaluation by trainees. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(12):1405-1411. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2234538. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
PubMed 37459054Brodersen JB, Knudsen T, Kjeldsen J, Juel MA, Rafaelsen SR, Jensen MD. Diagnostic accuracy of pan-enteric capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterocolonography in suspected Crohn's disease. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):973-982. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12307. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
PubMed 36069336
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Validity of Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Capsule Endoscopy of Both the Small and Large Intestine in Suspected Crohn's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03134586
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANDI / ANDI 1
- Conditions
- Crohn Disease
- Keywords
- Capsule endoscopy, Crohn's disease, Magnetic resonance enterography, Ileocolonoscopy, Bowel Ultrasound, diagnostic imaging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Odense University Hospital, Sygehus Lillebaelt
- Study start
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Non-invasive endoscopic procedures (pillcam colon capsule endoscopy, PCCE) and non-ionizing radiological modalities (MR enterocolonography, MREC and ultrasound, US) - offer a sufficiently high diagnostic validity in patients with suspected CD compared to the traditional invasive approach using ileocolonoscopy with biopsies as first line diagnostic modality
Detailed description
This is a prospective, blinded, multicenter study of the diagnostic validity, inter-observer agreement, image quality and subjective experience of discomfort with PCCE, MREC and US in patients with suspected CD. Ileocolonoscopy serves as the diagnostic gold standard. Patients are recruited from 3 centers in the Region of Southern Denmark managing adult patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Each patient goes through a standardized work-up including medical history, physical examination, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, ileocolonoscopy, PCCE, MREC and US. All examinations are reviewed and described in a standardized fashion. The radiologists and physicians describing PCCE, MREC, and US are blinded to the findings at ileocolonoscopy and the other imaging modalities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| trial participant | Other | Other: Diagnostic imagingAll participants undergoes the same diagnostic imaging |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- General criterion
- Clinical suspicion of CD
- Age > 15 years
- Negative serologic markers for celiac disease, negative stool culture (or polymerase chain reaction) for pathogenic bacteria and a negative microscopy for intestinal parasites
- Fecal calprotectin > 50 mg/kg
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Acute bowel obstruction
- Intake of NSAIDs or acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 4 weeks before inclusion except prophylactic treatment with low dose Aspirin (≤ 150 mg per day)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Known gastrointestinal disorder other than inflammatory bowel disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic imaging | Other | trial participant |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD
Time frame: 36 months
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD located in the terminal ileum and colon (per patient \& per segment). Ileocolonoscopy serves as gold standard
Correlation of disease severity
Time frame: 36 months
Correlation of disease severity assessed with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
Inter-observer agreement
Time frame: 36 months
Inter-observer agreement with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
4 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic yield of proximal CD
Time frame: 36 months
Patients reported experience
Time frame: 36 months
Interobserver PCCE
Time frame: 36 months
Utility of diffusion weighed magnetic resonance imaging (dw-MREC) and US Doppler flow
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37459054Brodersen JB, Jensen MD, Juel MA, Kjeldsen J, Knudsen T, Rafaelsen SR. Intestinal ultrasound in patients with suspected Crohn's disease - results of a prospective evaluation by trainees. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(12):1405-1411. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2234538. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36069336Brodersen JB, Knudsen T, Kjeldsen J, Juel MA, Rafaelsen SR, Jensen MD. Diagnostic accuracy of pan-enteric capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterocolonography in suspected Crohn's disease. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):973-982. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12307. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Crohn Disease
Recruiting
A Randomized Crossover Trial of Bright Light Therapy in Crohn's Disease on Intestinal Barrier Homeostasis
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study Evaluating AZD7798 for Treatment in Crohn's Disease Patients With an Ileostomy
Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of CM551 in Healthy Participants
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis)
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study of Vedolizumab in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD) in the Community Setting
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacob B Brodersen, MD principal investigator
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diagnostic imaging in people with Crohn Disease, run by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark at 3 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD (time frame: 36 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03134586, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2022.