Femoral Neck FracturesNCT03134664
Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach for the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures
A study testing Experimental group in people with Femoral Neck Fractures, run by Shanghai Pudong Hospital.
Trial summary
To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 75 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Femoral Neck Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Experimental group
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 75 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Femoral head fractures as diagnosed by X-ran and CT;
- Garden III, IV;
- An age of > 75 years;
- Both genders.
Who cannot join
- Fractures with spinal cord injury;
- Fractures with nerve injury;
- Refusal to sign the informed consent.
About this study
Official title: Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach for the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures: a Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Read the detailed description
Femoral neck fracture is one of the most common diseases in the elderly. Artificial hip replacement is currently the preferred treatment for femoral neck fractures, and characterized by no presence of postoperative bone nonunion, femoral head necrosis and other complications, though longer operative time and larger surgical incision are unavoidable. Patients undergoing artificial hip replacement can recover weight-bearing walk early after surgery, making rehabilitation rapid, to avoid a variety of complications, such as bed rests. Hip replacement via posterolateral approach is generally used, but limited by large incision, cutting off the extortor, and postoperative hip dislocation.
The minimally invasive approach for hip replacement has the advantages of less blood loss and less trauma compared with conventional approaches. The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach (Appendix 1) is consistent with the posterolateral approach in the anatomical landmark, preserving all the advantages of the posterior approach. Compared with the conventional approaches, the SuperPATH approach has no neurovascular interface that is uneasy to damage blood vessels and nerves during operation, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and retains all of the joint capsules and supinator muscles, significantly reducing the probability of postoperative dislocation of the hip. Osteotomy via this approach can be completed without hip dislocation, thus reducing incidence of vascular distortion and postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Hip replacement via the SuperPATH approach can be completed under direct vision rather than perspective inspection, and the surgical incision on the femur is made according to the femoral anteversion angle. In addition, this approach is also used for femoral intramedullary nail implantation. These surgical procedures are more likely to be grasped by clinicians. Preservation of the joint capsule and supinator muscles makes physical activities unrestricted and speeds up rehabilitation. Moreover, there is a corresponding reduction in the hospital stay and costs. However, SuperPATH technology is rarely reported in China as it has been introduced for a short time and in few hospitals.
Previous studies have reported that SuperPATH approach for artificial hip replacement exhibits better short-term effect on elderly femoral neck fractures. In this trial, the follow-up period will be prolonged to 6 months in order to observe the short-to-mid term effect in the elderly with femoral neck fractures.
Adverse events Postoperative adverse events including incision pain and infection, back muscle pain, spinal cord/nerve injury, length inequality of the lower limbs, prosthesis falling-off and prosthetic loosening will be recorded during the follow-up period. If severe adverse events occur, details including the data of occurrence, type of adverse events and therapeutic measures will be reported to the project manager and the institutional review board within 24 hours.
Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection Clinical data, including demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, and allergic history (drug allergy), will be collected and summarized using standardized case report forms. These data will be processed and recorded electronically.
Data management Researchers will be responsible for data processing, confirming and locking. The locked data will be unable to be altered and preserved by the Pudong Hospital of Fudan University. In addition to these researchers, only the persons who have permission will have the right to query the database.
Data analysis All data will be statistically analyzed by professional statisticians who will responsible for completing an outcome analysis report that will be submitted to the principle investigator who will be responsible for completing a research report. An independent data monitoring committee is responsible for data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial to ensure scientific accuracy, stringency, authenticity, and integrity.
- Conditions
- Femoral Neck Fractures
- Being tested
- Experimental group, Control group
- Medical subject headings
- Femoral Neck Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental groupProcedure or surgery
Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group.
Control groupProcedure or surgery
Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group. Receives: Procedure: Experimental group |
| Control group | Experimental | Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group. Receives: Procedure: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Harris hip scores
To assess hip function recovery in patients. The hip function is assessed by Harris scores ranging from 0-100: excellent ≥ 90, good 80-90, fair 70-79, bad < 70. The higher scores indicate better hip function.
Measured: changes of baseline, week 1 and month 6 postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (2)
Length of surgical incision
A smaller surgical incision causes smaller surgical trauma to patients.
Measured: during the surgery
Intraoperative blood loss
Less blood loss indicates the surgical practice is more normative and safe.
Measured: during the surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2017
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Femoral Neck FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Forty patients with femoral neck fractures admitted at Pudong Hospital of Fudan University, China are randomly divided into two groups.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Pudong Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lianghao Wu, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Pudong Hospital of Fudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03134664
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ShanghaiPudongH_002
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 1 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach for the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures: a Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03134664
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ShanghaiPudongH_002
- Conditions
- Femoral Neck Fractures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Pudong HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Detailed description
Femoral neck fracture is one of the most common diseases in the elderly. Artificial hip replacement is currently the preferred treatment for femoral neck fractures, and characterized by no presence of postoperative bone nonunion, femoral head necrosis and other complications, though longer operative time and larger surgical incision are unavoidable. Patients undergoing artificial hip replacement can recover weight-bearing walk early after surgery, making rehabilitation rapid, to avoid a variety of complications, such as bed rests. Hip replacement via posterolateral approach is generally used, but limited by large incision, cutting off the extortor, and postoperative hip dislocation.
The minimally invasive approach for hip replacement has the advantages of less blood loss and less trauma compared with conventional approaches. The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach (Appendix 1) is consistent with the posterolateral approach in the anatomical landmark, preserving all the advantages of the posterior approach. Compared with the conventional approaches, the SuperPATH approach has no neurovascular interface that is uneasy to damage blood vessels and nerves during operation, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and retains all of the joint capsules and supinator muscles, significantly reducing the probability of postoperative dislocation of the hip. Osteotomy via this approach can be completed without hip dislocation, thus reducing incidence of vascular distortion and postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Hip replacement via the SuperPATH approach can be completed under direct vision rather than perspective inspection, and the surgical incision on the femur is made according to the femoral anteversion angle. In addition, this approach is also used for femoral intramedullary nail implantation. These surgical procedures are more likely to be grasped by clinicians. Preservation of the joint capsule and supinator muscles makes physical activities unrestricted and speeds up rehabilitation. Moreover, there is a corresponding reduction in the hospital stay and costs. However, SuperPATH technology is rarely reported in China as it has been introduced for a short time and in few hospitals.
Previous studies have reported that SuperPATH approach for artificial hip replacement exhibits better short-term effect on elderly femoral neck fractures. In this trial, the follow-up period will be prolonged to 6 months in order to observe the short-to-mid term effect in the elderly with femoral neck fractures.
Adverse events Postoperative adverse events including incision pain and infection, back muscle pain, spinal cord/nerve injury, length inequality of the lower limbs, prosthesis falling-off and prosthetic loosening will be recorded during the follow-up period. If severe adverse events occur, details including the data of occurrence, type of adverse events and therapeutic measures will be reported to the project manager and the institutional review board within 24 hours.
Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection Clinical data, including demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, and allergic history (drug allergy), will be collected and summarized using standardized case report forms. These data will be processed and recorded electronically.
Data management Researchers will be responsible for data processing, confirming and locking. The locked data will be unable to be altered and preserved by the Pudong Hospital of Fudan University. In addition to these researchers, only the persons who have permission will have the right to query the database.
Data analysis All data will be statistically analyzed by professional statisticians who will responsible for completing an outcome analysis report that will be submitted to the principle investigator who will be responsible for completing a research report. An independent data monitoring committee is responsible for data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial to ensure scientific accuracy, stringency, authenticity, and integrity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Forty patients with femoral neck fractures admitted at Pudong Hospital of Fudan University, China are randomly divided into two groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Procedure: Experimental groupPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group. |
| Control group | Experimental | Procedure: Control groupPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 75 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Femoral head fractures as diagnosed by X-ran and CT;
- Garden III, IV;
- An age of > 75 years;
- Both genders.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Fractures with spinal cord injury;
- Fractures with nerve injury;
- Refusal to sign the informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental groupPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group. | Procedure or surgery | Experimental group |
| Control groupPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group. | Procedure or surgery | Control group |
Primary outcome
Harris hip scores
Time frame: changes of baseline, week 1 and month 6 postoperatively
To assess hip function recovery in patients. The hip function is assessed by Harris scores ranging from 0-100: excellent ≥ 90, good 80-90, fair 70-79, bad < 70. The higher scores indicate better hip function.
2 secondary outcomes
Length of surgical incision
Time frame: during the surgery
Intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: during the surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Femoral Neck Fractures
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
BDSF Vs DHS With Anterotational Screw in Vertical FNF
Evaluation of BDSF in FNF
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Not yet recruiting
Trochanteric Bursa Repair and Lateral Hip Pain After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
Femoral Neck Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
Recruiting
MAPT Protocol: Fixation Versus Arthroplasty Surgical Treatments for Early Recovery After HIP Fracture (FASTER-HIP)
Femoral Neck Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lianghao Wu, Ph.D principal investigator
Pudong Hospital of Fudan University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental group in people with Femoral Neck Fractures, run by Shanghai Pudong Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Harris hip scores (time frame: changes of baseline, week 1 and month 6 postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2017.