AzTrials
AzTrials

Femoral Neck FracturesNCT03134664

Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach for the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures

A study testing Experimental group in people with Femoral Neck Fractures, run by Shanghai Pudong Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 75 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Femoral Neck Fractures
What is being tested?
Experimental group
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 75 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Femoral head fractures as diagnosed by X-ran and CT;
  • Garden III, IV;
  • An age of > 75 years;
  • Both genders.

Who cannot join

  • Fractures with spinal cord injury;
  • Fractures with nerve injury;
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent.

About this study

Official title: Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach for the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures: a Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Read the detailed description

Femoral neck fracture is one of the most common diseases in the elderly. Artificial hip replacement is currently the preferred treatment for femoral neck fractures, and characterized by no presence of postoperative bone nonunion, femoral head necrosis and other complications, though longer operative time and larger surgical incision are unavoidable. Patients undergoing artificial hip replacement can recover weight-bearing walk early after surgery, making rehabilitation rapid, to avoid a variety of complications, such as bed rests. Hip replacement via posterolateral approach is generally used, but limited by large incision, cutting off the extortor, and postoperative hip dislocation.

The minimally invasive approach for hip replacement has the advantages of less blood loss and less trauma compared with conventional approaches. The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach (Appendix 1) is consistent with the posterolateral approach in the anatomical landmark, preserving all the advantages of the posterior approach. Compared with the conventional approaches, the SuperPATH approach has no neurovascular interface that is uneasy to damage blood vessels and nerves during operation, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and retains all of the joint capsules and supinator muscles, significantly reducing the probability of postoperative dislocation of the hip. Osteotomy via this approach can be completed without hip dislocation, thus reducing incidence of vascular distortion and postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Hip replacement via the SuperPATH approach can be completed under direct vision rather than perspective inspection, and the surgical incision on the femur is made according to the femoral anteversion angle. In addition, this approach is also used for femoral intramedullary nail implantation. These surgical procedures are more likely to be grasped by clinicians. Preservation of the joint capsule and supinator muscles makes physical activities unrestricted and speeds up rehabilitation. Moreover, there is a corresponding reduction in the hospital stay and costs. However, SuperPATH technology is rarely reported in China as it has been introduced for a short time and in few hospitals.

Previous studies have reported that SuperPATH approach for artificial hip replacement exhibits better short-term effect on elderly femoral neck fractures. In this trial, the follow-up period will be prolonged to 6 months in order to observe the short-to-mid term effect in the elderly with femoral neck fractures.

Adverse events Postoperative adverse events including incision pain and infection, back muscle pain, spinal cord/nerve injury, length inequality of the lower limbs, prosthesis falling-off and prosthetic loosening will be recorded during the follow-up period. If severe adverse events occur, details including the data of occurrence, type of adverse events and therapeutic measures will be reported to the project manager and the institutional review board within 24 hours.

Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection Clinical data, including demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, and allergic history (drug allergy), will be collected and summarized using standardized case report forms. These data will be processed and recorded electronically.

Data management Researchers will be responsible for data processing, confirming and locking. The locked data will be unable to be altered and preserved by the Pudong Hospital of Fudan University. In addition to these researchers, only the persons who have permission will have the right to query the database.

Data analysis All data will be statistically analyzed by professional statisticians who will responsible for completing an outcome analysis report that will be submitted to the principle investigator who will be responsible for completing a research report. An independent data monitoring committee is responsible for data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial to ensure scientific accuracy, stringency, authenticity, and integrity.

Being tested
Experimental group, Control group
Medical subject headings
Femoral Neck Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental groupProcedure or surgery

    Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group.

  • Control groupProcedure or surgery

    Patients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group.

Study groups in NCT03134664
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the SuperPATH approach in the experimental group.
Receives: Procedure: Experimental group
Control groupExperimentalPatients with femoral neck fractures are randomly assigned to undergo femoral head replacement via the conventional posterior approach in the control group.
Receives: Procedure: Control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Harris hip scores

    To assess hip function recovery in patients. The hip function is assessed by Harris scores ranging from 0-100: excellent ≥ 90, good 80-90, fair 70-79, bad < 70. The higher scores indicate better hip function.

    Measured: changes of baseline, week 1 and month 6 postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Length of surgical incision

    A smaller surgical incision causes smaller surgical trauma to patients.

    Measured: during the surgery

  2. Intraoperative blood loss

    Less blood loss indicates the surgical practice is more normative and safe.

    Measured: during the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2017
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Forty patients with femoral neck fractures admitted at Pudong Hospital of Fudan University, China are randomly divided into two groups.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03134664
Sponsor's protocol ID
ShanghaiPudongH_002
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
26 Apr 2017
Last updated
1 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental group in people with Femoral Neck Fractures, run by Shanghai Pudong Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Harris hip scores (time frame: changes of baseline, week 1 and month 6 postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in