AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Gastric CancerLGENCT03136354

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Against Laparoscopic Assisted Gastrectomy for Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer

A study testing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Laparoscopic assisted Gastrectomy in people with Early Gastric Cancer, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators compared the perioperative, oncological, functional and immunological outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection against laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Early Gastric Cancer
What is being tested?
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Laparoscopic assisted Gastrectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
May 2009to Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Early gastric cancer with biopsy confirmed high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (intestinal type)
  • Preoperative investigation with magnifying endoscopy and / or EUS predicted to be mucosal lesion
  • Any tumor size if the early gastric cancer has no ulceration
  • Tumor size ≤ 3cm if the early gastric cancer has ulceration

Who cannot join

  • Gastric cancer with preoperative magnifying endoscopy and / or EUS predicted to beyond submucosal invasion
  • Poorly differentiated or signet ring cell adenocarcinoma
  • Age > 80 or < 16
  • Pregnancy
  • ASA > IV

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Combined Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong, 00000

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

The investigators compared the perioperative, oncological, functional and immunological outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection against laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. With virtually no abdominal incisions and minimal pain induced, endoscopic submucosal dissection is expected to be less invasive when compared to laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. This study will show that endoscopic submucosal dissection is associated with a significantly better perioperative recovery and less immunological disturbance. Moreover, it will also induce a better long term outcomes as the stomach can be preserved, hence the digestive function is maintained to prevent long term functional morbidities of the gastrointestinal tract.

This study will be the unique first study in the literature to show that intramucosal early gastric cancer can be adequately treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection with better perioperative, functional and quality of life outcomes when compared to laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy.

Being tested
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Laparoscopic assisted Gastrectomy
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionProcedure or surgery

  • Laparoscopic assisted GastrectomyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT03136354
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESD GroupActive comparatorEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
LAG GroupActive comparatorLaparoscopic Assisted Gastrectomy
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic assisted Gastrectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complication

    Measured: 30 days after procedure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Postop VAS score on pain measurement

    Measured by VAS pain score daily until the day of discharge by dedicated independent assessor Daily measurement until the day of discharge the type and dose of analgesic requirement is also documented

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Hospital stay

    The number of days that patient stayed in hospital

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Time (hours) for Operative

    The Time measured by hours from start of operation after general anesthesia until end of the operation

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

  4. Quality of life assessment by SF36

    As measured by SF 36

    Measured: From date of operation on every followup appointment until 24 months after operation

  5. Mortality

    Measured: 30 days after procedure

  6. Overall Survival

    Measured: up to 5 years after operation

  7. Recurrence

    Measured: up to 5 years after operation

  8. Disease free survival

    Measured: up to 5 years after operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2017
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2019
  4. Study completionJul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03136354
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRE-2009.165T
Acronym
LGE
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
27 Nov 2016
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Laparoscopic assisted Gastrectomy in people with Early Gastric Cancer, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complication (time frame: 30 days after procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in