MidwiferyNCT03137251
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation During Labor.
A study testing TENS 1 and TENS 2 in people with Midwifery and Pregnancy, run by University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Transcutaneus Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) during the labour. TENS is a low frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- TENS 1 and TENS 2
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 30 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Parturients with a low-risk pregnancy.
- A gestational age > 37 weeks.
- A single foetus.
- Cervical dilation of 4 cm.
- To be older than 18 years old.
- Visual deficit that causes difficulty to take the Visual Scale Analogue.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to take part in the survey.
- Failure to Sign Consent Form.
- Planned Cesarean.
- High-risk pregnancy.
- Present skin lesions in the area of the application of the electrodes.
- Pregnant with physical or mental handicap that prevents the application of the TENS device.
- Have implanted pacemakers or automatic defibrillators.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, 35016
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation During Labor. A Triple Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Transcutaneus Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) during the labour. TENS is a low frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology.
The investigators will have three groups of participants to be administered the TENS, a different dose in two groups, while the third will correspond to placebo.
The hypothesis of the study is to verify if the TENS is effective as a non-pharmacological method in the relief of pain during childbirth
Read the detailed description
- Background: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that many women could experience during their lives, and it can be influenced by the anatomical and physiological factors of the labouring women, and also, by their psychological experiences, as well as by cultural, social, and environmental factors. Neuraxial analgesia during labour is the most effective method for pain relief, but it appears to be associated with certain side effects, such as maternal hypotension, decreased uteroplacental perfusion, foetal bradycardia, fever, pruritus, an increased oxytocin requirement, a prolonged second stage of labour, a higher rate of operative delivery, and high costs. The use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief includes a wide variety of techniques aimed at improving physical sensations and preventing psychoemotional perception of pain. Among the main nonpharmacological methods of pain relief at delivery is the application of Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Its application during childbirth is based on the Gait Control theory of pain of Melzack and Wall. According to their theory, the application of TENS reduces the excitability of the delta A and C pain fibers, thus reducing the amount of painful messages ascending the spinal cord. Activation of these fibers stimulates the release of natural pain inhibitors. Furthermore, many non-pharmacological methods of managing pain increase the satisfaction of women with their childbirth experience. TENS have used for labour analgesia and there are several studies which show its effectiveness. The effectiveness of TENS depends on the duration, frequency and amplitude of the stimulating current and the site of application of the electrodes. TENS can be administered by either dermatomal stimulation or by stimulation of acupuncture points for labour analgesia. In addition, all studies stated that it was safe and there was no side effects on the mother and the baby. This work was conducted to study the effectiveness of TENS on labour analgesia, maternal and fetal outcome using TENS by dermatomal stimulation technique. Thus, device will be used as follows: Through electrodes applied to the lower back, the parturient can control both parameters, the frequency and intensity of the low-voltage electrical impulses emitted from the TENS device. When applying to the lower back, the TENS unit emits electrical impulses which excite afferent nerves, and thus inhibit the transmission of painful stimuli arising from the uterus, vagina and perineum during labour. These electrodes are attached to the skin bilaterally at paravertebral positions T10 and S2. In the present study the investigators will use three equal devices (two different dose and one placebo) .They will be assigned a number that associate to each group of participants. Safety profile in the use of TENS: It is a non-invasive technique, easy to administer, without side effects or interactions with other drugs, it cannot produce toxicity in the tissue or cellular level. The current literature does not reflect any complications, either on the part of the pregnant woman and in the fetus, during the application of TENS in the labor phase. The use of TENS should be contraindicated in women whose gestational age does not exceed 37 weeks, women with pacemakers and water births. It should not be applied in the maternal abdomen, at any time during pregnancy or childbirth, to avoid stimulation near the fetal heart.
- Objectives: Primary aim:
- To know if the application of TENS is effective in reducing pain during childbirth. Secondary aim:
- To determine the most effective dose in the use of TENS in pregnant women during labor.
- To analyze the degree of satisfaction of the pregnant women who participate in the study.
- To evaluate whether the use of TENS reduces the dose of the painkillers during childbirth.
- Material and Methods:
This study is a triple blind randomized trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding for some outcomes, and intention-to-treat analysis.
It was accepted by the Ethic Committee of the Hospital Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain, with registration number CEIm-CHUIMI-2016/875.
3.1. Allocation: All participants will be recruited from a group of women admitted to the hospital. If the pregnant woman meets the inclusion criteria, she will be asked to participate in the study. If yes, they must sign the informed consent, approved by the same ethical committee of the hospital.
The assignment to each group was made through the website www.random.org to perform randomization. In addition, each group has a different TENS, which has the group number. Participants in all groups will receive all the other routine obstetric care.
3.2. Sample size determination: The sample size and power calculations were performed using the software GRANMO 7.11. Calculations were based on detecting differences of 2 units in a 10 numerical pain rate scale at post-data, assuming a standard deviation of 1.9, a 2-tailed test, an alpha level of 0.05, and a desired power of 80%. These assumptions generated a sample size of 63 subjects, 21 per group.
There is a specialiced nurse that will supervised the correct functionality every day. He will be responsible for resolving dispositive problems like low charge or insufficient electrodes.
- Being tested
- TENS 1, TENS 2, Placebo TENS
- Keywords
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, TENS, Analgesia, Labour pain, Physical therapy modality
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Labor Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TENS 1Device
A portable TENS unit will be used by the principal investigator to apply the experimental intervention. Two pairs of electrodes measuring 5 x 9 cm will be fixed on the paravertebral regions of the participants of the experimental group using hypoallergenic surgical tape. Two paired electrodes will be placed 1 cm laterally on either side of the spine at the T10 to L1 and S2 to S4 levels.
TENS 2Device
An intervention similar to arm 1 will be performed but with different doses.
Placebo TENSDevice
An intervention similar to arm 1and 2 will be performed but,in this case, it is a sham device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TENS 1 | Experimental | This group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour.
Dose TENS 1: Biphasic asymmetric pulse, pulse width of 100 µs and a frequency of 100 Hz. The intensity is individually titrated according to the sensitivity of the parturient. Receives: Device: TENS 1; Device: TENS 2 |
| TENS 2 | Experimental | This group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour.
Dose TENS 2: Biphasic asymmetric pulse, pulse width of 350 µs and a variable frequency between 80 and 100Hz. The intensity is individually titrated according to the sensitivity of the parturient. Receives: Device: TENS 2; Device: Placebo TENS |
| Placebo TENS | Sham comparator | This group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour. However, TENS has been modified, so that it emits light and sound but does not transmit electrical current. Receives: Device: TENS 1; Device: Placebo TENS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain (VAS)
The instrument will be used to measure the change of pain before and after the intervention will be the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Participants will be asked to mark the level of their pain on a 100 mm, no hatched VAS scale marked at one end as "no pain" and at the other as "worst pain imaginable".
Measured: - At the beginning of the use of TENS, 10 minutes later and 30 minutes later; for measuring the change of pain.
Pregnant Satisfaction
The investigators will use a scale called Care in Obstetrics : measure for testing satisfaction (COMFORTS). This scale measures satisfaction during delivery and the postnatal period.
. This scale is a valid and reliable scale to measure women's satisfaction with the care during labour and postpartum period. The investigators obtained the authorization to use the Spanish version of the COMFORTS scale.
Measured: Twenty-four hours postpartum, other midwife will ask participants to answer questions regarding their satisfaction with the care provided (COMFORTS scale) and if they would prefer to receive the same type of care in the future.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 May 2017
- Study start1 May 2017
- Primary completion30 Jul 2018
- Study completion30 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MidwiferyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aníbal Báez Suárez, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
- Investigators
- Juan Francisco Loro, Professor, Study director, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03137251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABSuarez
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S16-24. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121427.
PubMed 12011870Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 9;1:139-54. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s4553.
PubMed 21072284Simkin P, Bolding A. Update on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(6):489-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.007.
PubMed 15544978Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Jan;20(1):38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
PubMed 21146977Lieberman E, O'donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S31-68. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.122522.
PubMed 12011872Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C. Epub 2004 May 28.
PubMed 15169744Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2.
PubMed 16235275Cambic CR, Wong CA. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i50-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq311.
PubMed 21148655Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
PubMed 22419342Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
PubMed 5320816Tournaire M, Theau-Yonneau A. Complementary and alternative approaches to pain relief during labor. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2007 Dec;4(4):409-17. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem012.
PubMed 18227907Field T. Pregnancy and labor alternative therapy research. Altern Ther Health Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):28-34.
PubMed 18780582Wang SM, Kain ZN, White P. Acupuncture analgesia: I. The scientific basis. Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):602-10. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000277493.42335.7b.
PubMed 18227322Chao AS, Chao A, Wang TH, Chang YC, Peng HH, Chang SD, Chao A, Chang CJ, Lai CH, Wong AMK. Pain relief by applying transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acupuncture points during the first stage of labor: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
PubMed 17030438Dowswell T, Bedwell C, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD007214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007214.pub2.
PubMed 19370680
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation During Labor. A Triple Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03137251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABSuarez
- Keywords
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, TENS, Analgesia, Labour pain, Physical therapy modality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Transcutaneus Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) during the labour. TENS is a low frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology.
The investigators will have three groups of participants to be administered the TENS, a different dose in two groups, while the third will correspond to placebo.
The hypothesis of the study is to verify if the TENS is effective as a non-pharmacological method in the relief of pain during childbirth
Detailed description
- Background: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that many women could experience during their lives, and it can be influenced by the anatomical and physiological factors of the labouring women, and also, by their psychological experiences, as well as by cultural, social, and environmental factors. Neuraxial analgesia during labour is the most effective method for pain relief, but it appears to be associated with certain side effects, such as maternal hypotension, decreased uteroplacental perfusion, foetal bradycardia, fever, pruritus, an increased oxytocin requirement, a prolonged second stage of labour, a higher rate of operative delivery, and high costs. The use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief includes a wide variety of techniques aimed at improving physical sensations and preventing psychoemotional perception of pain. Among the main nonpharmacological methods of pain relief at delivery is the application of Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Its application during childbirth is based on the Gait Control theory of pain of Melzack and Wall. According to their theory, the application of TENS reduces the excitability of the delta A and C pain fibers, thus reducing the amount of painful messages ascending the spinal cord. Activation of these fibers stimulates the release of natural pain inhibitors. Furthermore, many non-pharmacological methods of managing pain increase the satisfaction of women with their childbirth experience. TENS have used for labour analgesia and there are several studies which show its effectiveness. The effectiveness of TENS depends on the duration, frequency and amplitude of the stimulating current and the site of application of the electrodes. TENS can be administered by either dermatomal stimulation or by stimulation of acupuncture points for labour analgesia. In addition, all studies stated that it was safe and there was no side effects on the mother and the baby. This work was conducted to study the effectiveness of TENS on labour analgesia, maternal and fetal outcome using TENS by dermatomal stimulation technique. Thus, device will be used as follows: Through electrodes applied to the lower back, the parturient can control both parameters, the frequency and intensity of the low-voltage electrical impulses emitted from the TENS device. When applying to the lower back, the TENS unit emits electrical impulses which excite afferent nerves, and thus inhibit the transmission of painful stimuli arising from the uterus, vagina and perineum during labour. These electrodes are attached to the skin bilaterally at paravertebral positions T10 and S2. In the present study the investigators will use three equal devices (two different dose and one placebo) .They will be assigned a number that associate to each group of participants. Safety profile in the use of TENS: It is a non-invasive technique, easy to administer, without side effects or interactions with other drugs, it cannot produce toxicity in the tissue or cellular level. The current literature does not reflect any complications, either on the part of the pregnant woman and in the fetus, during the application of TENS in the labor phase. The use of TENS should be contraindicated in women whose gestational age does not exceed 37 weeks, women with pacemakers and water births. It should not be applied in the maternal abdomen, at any time during pregnancy or childbirth, to avoid stimulation near the fetal heart.
- Objectives: Primary aim:
- To know if the application of TENS is effective in reducing pain during childbirth. Secondary aim:
- To determine the most effective dose in the use of TENS in pregnant women during labor.
- To analyze the degree of satisfaction of the pregnant women who participate in the study.
- To evaluate whether the use of TENS reduces the dose of the painkillers during childbirth.
- Material and Methods:
This study is a triple blind randomized trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding for some outcomes, and intention-to-treat analysis.
It was accepted by the Ethic Committee of the Hospital Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain, with registration number CEIm-CHUIMI-2016/875.
3.1. Allocation: All participants will be recruited from a group of women admitted to the hospital. If the pregnant woman meets the inclusion criteria, she will be asked to participate in the study. If yes, they must sign the informed consent, approved by the same ethical committee of the hospital.
The assignment to each group was made through the website www.random.org to perform randomization. In addition, each group has a different TENS, which has the group number. Participants in all groups will receive all the other routine obstetric care.
3.2. Sample size determination: The sample size and power calculations were performed using the software GRANMO 7.11. Calculations were based on detecting differences of 2 units in a 10 numerical pain rate scale at post-data, assuming a standard deviation of 1.9, a 2-tailed test, an alpha level of 0.05, and a desired power of 80%. These assumptions generated a sample size of 63 subjects, 21 per group.
There is a specialiced nurse that will supervised the correct functionality every day. He will be responsible for resolving dispositive problems like low charge or insufficient electrodes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TENS 1 | Experimental | Device: TENS 1, Device: TENS 2This group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Dose TENS 1: Biphasic asymmetric pulse, pulse width of 100 µs and a frequency of 100 Hz. The intensity is individually titrated according to the sensitivity of the parturient. |
| TENS 2 | Experimental | Device: TENS 2, Device: Placebo TENSThis group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Dose TENS 2: Biphasic asymmetric pulse, pulse width of 350 µs and a variable frequency between 80 and 100Hz. The intensity is individually titrated according to the sensitivity of the parturient. |
| Placebo TENS | Sham comparator | Device: TENS 1, Device: Placebo TENSThis group will receive TENS continuously for 30 minutes starting at the beginning of the active phase of labour. However, TENS has been modified, so that it emits light and sound but does not transmit electrical current. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Parturients with a low-risk pregnancy.
- A gestational age > 37 weeks.
- A single foetus.
- Cervical dilation of 4 cm.
- To be older than 18 years old.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Refusal to take part in the survey.
- Failure to Sign Consent Form.
- Planned Cesarean.
- High-risk pregnancy.
- Present skin lesions in the area of the application of the electrodes.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TENS 1A portable TENS unit will be used by the principal investigator to apply the experimental intervention. Two pairs of electrodes measuring 5 x 9 cm will be fixed on the paravertebral regions of the participants of the experimental group using hypoallergenic surgical tape. Two paired electrodes will be placed 1 cm laterally on either side of the spine at the T10 to L1 and S2 to S4 levels. | Device | Placebo TENS, TENS 1 |
| TENS 2An intervention similar to arm 1 will be performed but with different doses. | Device | TENS 1, TENS 2 |
| Placebo TENSAn intervention similar to arm 1and 2 will be performed but,in this case, it is a sham device. | Device | Placebo TENS, TENS 2 |
Primary outcome
Pain (VAS)
Time frame: - At the beginning of the use of TENS, 10 minutes later and 30 minutes later; for measuring the change of pain.
The instrument will be used to measure the change of pain before and after the intervention will be the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants will be asked to mark the level of their pain on a 100 mm, no hatched VAS scale marked at one end as "no pain" and at the other as "worst pain imaginable".
Pregnant Satisfaction
Time frame: Twenty-four hours postpartum, other midwife will ask participants to answer questions regarding their satisfaction with the care provided (COMFORTS scale) and if they would prefer to receive the same type of care in the future.
The investigators will use a scale called Care in Obstetrics : measure for testing satisfaction (COMFORTS). This scale measures satisfaction during delivery and the postnatal period. . This scale is a valid and reliable scale to measure women's satisfaction with the care during labour and postpartum period. The investigators obtained the authorization to use the Spanish version of the COMFORTS scale.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2018.
- Background: PubMed 12011870Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S16-24. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121427.
- Background: PubMed 21072284Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 9;1:139-54. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s4553.
- Background: PubMed 15544978Simkin P, Bolding A. Update on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(6):489-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.007.
- Background: PubMed 21146977Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Jan;20(1):38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 12011872Lieberman E, O'donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S31-68. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.122522.
- Background: PubMed 15169744Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C. Epub 2004 May 28.
- Background: PubMed 16235275Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 21148655Cambic CR, Wong CA. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i50-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq311.
- Background: PubMed 22419342Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 5320816Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18227907Tournaire M, Theau-Yonneau A. Complementary and alternative approaches to pain relief during labor. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2007 Dec;4(4):409-17. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem012.
- Background: PubMed 18780582Field T. Pregnancy and labor alternative therapy research. Altern Ther Health Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):28-34.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Midwifery
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Novel Episiotomy Repair Simulator on Midwifery Students' Self-Efficacy and Anxiety
Episiotomy Repair Training
Recruiting
Effect of Squatting Position in the Second Stage of Labor on Birth Outcomes
Nulliparity, Labor Stage, Second
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Skin-to-Skin Contact on Pain and Anxiety During Episiotomy Repair
Episiotomy, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Gamified Neonatal Initial Care Education on Midwifery Students
Midwifery Education, Neonatal Care Education
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety During Surgical Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Loss
Early Pregnancy Loss, Procedural Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juan Francisco Loro, Professor study director
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TENS 1 and TENS 2 in people with Midwifery and Pregnancy, run by University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain (VAS) (time frame: - At the beginning of the use of TENS, 10 minutes later and 30 minutes later; for measuring the change of pain.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03137251, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2018.