AzTrials
AzTrials

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestEXACTNCT03138005

Reduction of Oxygen After Cardiac Arrest

A study testing target SpO2 98-100% and target SpO2 90-94% in people with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Monash University at 21 sites in Australia.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Reduction of oxygen after cardiac arrest (EXACT) is a multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether reducing oxygen administration to target an oxygen saturation of 90-94%, compared to 98-100%, as soon as possible following successful resuscitation from OHCA improves outcome at hospital… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
What is being tested?
target SpO2 98-100% and target SpO2 90-94%
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
428 participants
Where
21 sitesAustralia
Study dates
11 Dec 2017to 5 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (age 18 years or older)
  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause
  • All cardiac arrest rhythms
  • Unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale <9)
  • Return of spontaneous circulation
  • Pulse oximeter measures oxygen saturation at ≥95% with oxygen flow set at >10L/min or FiO2 at 100%
  • Patient has an endotracheal tube (ETT) or supraglottic airway (SGA) (e.g. laryngeal mask airway -LMA) and is spontaneously breathing or ventilated
  • Transport is planned to a participating hospital

Who cannot join

  • Female who is known or suspected to be pregnant
  • Dependent on others for activities of daily living (i.e. facilitated care or nursing home residents)
  • "Not for Resuscitation" order or Advanced Care Directives in place
  • Pre-existing oxygen therapy (i.e. for COPD)
  • Cardiac arrest due to drowning, trauma or hanging

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 1 country.

21 sites in 1 country

Australia21 sites
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5011

  • SA Ambulance Service

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5063

  • Lyell McEwin Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5112

  • Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • Western Health: Footscray Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3011

  • Western Health: Sunshine Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3021

  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3050

  • St Vincents Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3065

  • Northern Health: The Northern Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3076

  • Austin Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3084

  • Box Hill Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3128

  • Ambulance Victoria

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3130

  • Eastern Health: Maroondah Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3135

  • Monash Medical Centre

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3168

  • Peninusla Health: Frankston Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3199

  • Barwon Health: Geelong

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3220

  • Royal Perth Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6000

  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6009

  • Fiona Stanley Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6150

  • St John Ambulance Western Australia

    Perth, Western Australia, 6984

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Reduction of Oxygen After Cardiac Arrest (EXACT): The EXACT Study

The Reduction of oxygen after cardiac arrest (EXACT) is a multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether reducing oxygen administration to target an oxygen saturation of 90-94%, compared to 98-100%, as soon as possible following successful resuscitation from OHCA improves outcome at hospital discharge.

Read the detailed description

Currently out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who achieve ROSC are routinely ventilated with the highest fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) possible (i.e. FiO2 1.0 or 100% oxygen) until admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) - usually a period of 2 to 6 hours post-ROSC.

Post-ROSC oxygen therapy begins in the field by emergency medical services (EMS). EMS typically deliver a high flow of oxygen at rate of >10L/min (~100% oxygen), and use a pulse oximeter to monitor oxygen levels (SpO2). Normal SpO2 levels are considered to be 94% to 100%. The delivery of 100% oxygen is then usually continued throughout a patient's stay in the emergency department (ED) and during any diagnostic testing (e.g. computed tomography scans and cardiac angiography). During this time, oxygen is delivered to patients who remain unconscious via a mechanical ventilator, with levels continuously monitored by pulse oximetry and periodically by a blood test called an arterial blood gas (ABG). The ABG measurements include the oxygen pressure in the blood (PaO2) in mmHg. Once a patient is admitted to the ICU, the PaO2 is assessed and the oxygen fraction is typically reduced and then titrated (reduced or increased) on the ventilator to achieve a normal level of PaO2 ("normoxia") of between 80-100mmHg.

The administration of 100% oxygen for the first hours after resuscitation is based largely on convention and not on any supportive clinical data. It has been thought that maximizing oxygen delivery for several hours might be beneficial in a patient who has suffered profound deprivation of oxygen supply ("hypoxia") during a cardiac arrest. In addition, if a lower fraction of inspired oxygen is delivered, there is a perceived risk that the patient might become hypoxic (i.e. SpO2 <90% or PaO2 <80mmHg). Until recently, there has been no particular reason to recommend a decrease in oxygen delivery to the post-arrest patient prior to admission to ICU.

However, recent systematic reviews of compelling experimental data and supportive human observational studies indicate that the administration of 100% oxygen can create "hyperoxic" levels in the early post arrest period which may lead to additional neurological injury, and thus result in worse clinical outcome. No randomised control trials have yet tested titrating oxygen administration to lower but normal levels (i.e. "normoxia").

EXACT is a Phase 3 multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) aiming to determine whether reducing oxygen administration to target an oxygen saturation of 90-94%, compared to 98-100%, as soon as possible following successful resuscitation from OHCA improves outcome at hospital discharge.

Being tested
target SpO2 98-100%, target SpO2 90-94%
Keywords
Emergency Care, Prehospital, Resuscitation, Oxygen, Cardiac Arrest, Heart Arrest
Medical subject headings
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Heart Arrest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • target SpO2 98-100%Other

    Prehospital, post-ROSC oxygen maintained at ≥10L/minute of oxygen (equivalent to ~100% oxygen) into SGA/ETT if hand ventilated or 100% (i.e. FiO2 of 1.0) oxygen settings if mechanically ventilated. Patients will continue on treatment to handover in the ED. Between arrival at ED and first ABG in ICU, the oxygen setting may then be decreased provided SpO2 is maintained between 98-100%.

  • target SpO2 90-94%Other

    Prehospital, post-ROSC oxygen reduced initially to 4L/minute (i.e. approximately 70% oxygen) into SGA/ETT if hand ventilated or an air mix setting if mechanically ventilated. If oxygen saturation remains ≥94% for 5 minutes, the oxygen flow rate will be further reduced to 2L/minute (i.e. approximately 46% oxygen) and hand ventilated to target an oxygen saturation between 90-94%. This treatment will continue to patient handover in the emergency department. Between arrival at ED and first ABG in ICU, oxygen will be titrated to target a oxygen saturation of 90-94%.

Study groups in NCT03138005
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
target SpO2 98-100%Active comparatorPost ROSC oxygen titrated to maintain SpO2 between 98-100%
Receives: Other: target SpO2 98-100%
target SpO2 90-94%ExperimentalPost ROSC oxygen titrated to maintain SpO2 between 90-94%
Receives: Other: target SpO2 90-94%

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival to hospital discharge

    Survival to hospital discharge

    Measured: At hospital discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Neurological outcome

    Cerebral Performance Category score

    Measured: At hospital discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-4 weeks

  2. Incidence of hypoxia (SpO2<90%)

    Incidence of hypoxia (SpO2<90%)

    Measured: Before ICU admission, an expected average of 4-6 hours

  3. Recurrent cardiac arrest

    Recurrent cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions before admission to ICU and not related to withdrawal of life sustaining-treatment

    Measured: Before ICU admission, an expected average of 4-6 hours

  4. Myocardial Injury

    Median peak troponin

    Measured: First 24 hours of hospital admission

  5. Survival to intensive care unit discharge

    Survival to intensive care unit discharge

    Measured: Intensive care discharge, an expected average of 7 days

  6. Length of ICU stay

    Length of ICU stay

    Measured: Intensive care discharge, an expected average of 7 days

  7. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Measured: At hospital discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-4 weeks

  8. Cause of death during hospital stay

    e.g. cardiogenic shock, re-arrest with no ROSC, treatment withdrawn -hypoxic brain injury, brain death

    Measured: At hospital discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-4 weeks

  9. Quality of Life SF-12

    The SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess health outcomes from the patient's perspective.

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Quality of Life EQ-5D-3L

    Quality of life assessment using the EQ-5D-3L descriptive system that comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.

    Measured: 12 months

  11. Neurological Function

    Modified Rankin Score

    Measured: 12 months

  12. Degree of recovery (GOS-E)

    Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale

    Measured: 12 months

  13. Survival at 12 months

    Survival at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2017
  2. Study start11 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion5 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion5 Aug 2020

Why it stopped: Pandemic reduced enrolment and changed clinical protocols

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
428 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03138005
Sponsor's protocol ID
EXACT01
Other IDs
APP1107509
Acronym
EXACT
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
21 Apr 2017
Last updated
2 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • http://www.ambulance.vic.gov.au/Media/docs/VACAR-Annual-Report-201112-39a60ff4-083f-4893-af52-efeef570f6d1-0.pdf

  • Kaneda T, Ku K, Inoue T, Onoe M, Oku H. Postischemic reperfusion injury can be attenuated by oxygen tension control. Jpn Circ J. 2001 Mar;65(3):213-8. doi: 10.1253/jcj.65.213.

    PubMed 11266197
  • Richards EM, Fiskum G, Rosenthal RE, Hopkins I, McKenna MC. Hyperoxic reperfusion after global ischemia decreases hippocampal energy metabolism. Stroke. 2007 May;38(5):1578-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.473967. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

    PubMed 17413048
  • Pilcher J, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Bellomo R, Young P, Beasley R. The effect of hyperoxia following cardiac arrest - A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal trials. Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

    PubMed 22226734
  • Balan IS, Fiskum G, Hazelton J, Cotto-Cumba C, Rosenthal RE. Oximetry-guided reoxygenation improves neurological outcome after experimental cardiac arrest. Stroke. 2006 Dec;37(12):3008-13. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000248455.73785.b1. Epub 2006 Oct 26.

    PubMed 17068310
  • Saugstad OD. Resuscitation of newborn infants: from oxygen to room air. Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):1970-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60543-0. Epub 2010 Jul 19. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20663546
  • Hellstrom-Westas L, Forsblad K, Sjors G, Saugstad OD, Bjorklund LJ, Marsal K, Kallen K. Earlier Apgar score increase in severely depressed term infants cared for in Swedish level III units with 40% oxygen versus 100% oxygen resuscitation strategies: a population-based register study. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1798-804. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0102.

    PubMed 17142501
  • Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Angelos MG, Milcarek B, Hunter K, Parrillo JE, Trzeciak S; Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.707.

    PubMed 20516417
  • Bellomo R, Bailey M, Eastwood GM, Nichol A, Pilcher D, Hart GK, Reade MC, Egi M, Cooper DJ; Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group. Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R90. doi: 10.1186/cc10090. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

    PubMed 21385416
  • Ihle JF, Bernard S, Bailey MJ, Pilcher DV, Smith K, Scheinkestel CD. Hyperoxia in the intensive care unit and outcome after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):186-90.

    PubMed 23944204
  • Suzuki S, Eastwood GM, Glassford NJ, Peck L, Young H, Garcia-Alvarez M, Schneider AG, Bellomo R. Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot before-and-after trial. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1414-22. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000219.

    PubMed 24561566
  • Kuisma M, Boyd J, Voipio V, Alaspaa A, Roine RO, Rosenberg P. Comparison of 30 and the 100% inspired oxygen concentrations during early post-resuscitation period: a randomised controlled pilot study. Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.08.010. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

    PubMed 16500018
  • Young P, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Bernard S, Dicker B, Freebairn R, Henderson S, Mackle D, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Smith T, Swain A, Weatherall M, Beasley R. HyperOxic Therapy OR NormOxic Therapy after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (HOT OR NOT): a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

    PubMed 25261605
  • Young P, Pilcher J, Patel M, Cameron L, Braithwaite I, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Delivery of titrated oxygen via a self-inflating resuscitation bag. Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.08.330. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

    PubMed 22955052
  • Bernard SA, Smith K, Cameron P, Masci K, Taylor DM, Cooper DJ, Kelly AM, Silvester W; Rapid Infusion of Cold Hartmanns Investigators. Induction of prehospital therapeutic hypothermia after resuscitation from nonventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest*. Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):747-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182377038.

    PubMed 22020244

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing target SpO2 98-100% and target SpO2 90-94% in people with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Monash University at 21 sites in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Pandemic reduced enrolment and changed clinical protocols). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival to hospital discharge (time frame: At hospital discharge, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03138005, which also lists 25 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in