Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaNCT03138213
Comparing Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
A study testing Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open pancreaticoduodenectomy in people with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Surgery, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Introduction Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complex abdominal operations to perform, and it is usually conducted for tumours of the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Surgery, Periampullary Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 656 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 May 2018to 1 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven periampullary cancer, including pancreatic cancer, bile duct cancer, duodenal cancer, et al.
- Highly presumed malignancy with difficulties to obtain histological evidence.
- Preoperative staging work up performed by upper abdomen enhanced CT scan.
- The subject understands the nature of this trial and willing to comply.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Patients treated with curative intent in accordance to international guidelines
Who cannot join
- Distant metastases: peritoneal carcinomatosis, liver metastases, distant lymph node metastases, involvement of other organs.
- Subjects undergoing left, central or total pancreatectomy.
- Patients with high operative risk as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >4.
- Synchronous malignancy in other organs.
- Previous underwent pancreatic resections.
- Palliative surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tongji Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000
Hang Zhang, M.D., +8613407148260, okashiiyo@126.com
About this study
Official title: Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy(TJDBPS01) a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complex abdominal operations to perform, and it is usually conducted for tumours of the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively being developed for pancreatic surgery, first with the advent of hybrid-laparoscopy and recently with total laparoscopic surgery. Issues including the safety and efficacy of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently being debated. Studies comparing these two surgical techniques are emerging, and large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking but are clearly required.
Methods and analysis TJDBPS01 is a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in fourteen centres with pancreatic surgery experts who have performed ≥104 TLPDs and OPDs. A total of 656 patients who will undergo PD are randomly allocated to the TLPD group or OPD group in a 1:1 ratio. The trial hypothesis is that TLPD has superior or equivalent safety and advantages in postoperative recovery compared with OPD. The primary outcome is the postoperative length of stay (LOS).
Ethics and dissemination The Instituitional Review Board Approval of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology has approved this trial and will be routinely monitoring the trial at frequent intervals, as will an independent third-party organization. Any results from this trial (publications, conference presentations) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.
- Being tested
- Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Keywords
- pancreaticoduodenectomy, surgical outcome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyProcedure or surgery
Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Open pancreaticoduodenectomyProcedure or surgery
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TLPD | Experimental | Ttotal laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy Receives: Procedure: Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy |
| OPD | Experimental | Open pancreaticoduodenectomy Receives: Procedure: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of stay
Length of stay was defined as the postoperative time interval in days
Measured: Up to 24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Estimated blood loss
The amount of blood loss during surgical procedure.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Operation time
Time between first incision and last skin closure.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Mortality
Mortality was defined as any death that occurred in the 30 days after surgery or during the hospital stay.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Complication rate
Clavien-Dindo
Measured: Up to 24 months
CCI
comprehensive complication index
Measured: Up to 24 months
2 year survival
Overall survival rate for 24 months after surgery
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2017
- Study start1 May 2018
- Primary completion1 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 656 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tongji Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shandong Provincial Hospital, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Renyi Qin, Tongji Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03138213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TJDBPS01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Qin T, Zhang H, Pan S, Liu J, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Ke J, Liu X, Chen B, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Wang M, Qin R; Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China's International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM). Effect of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Periampullary Tumors: Three-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;279(4):605-612. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006149. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
PubMed 37965767Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Qin T, Ma J, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Han W, Meng L, Ke J, Feng F, Chen B, Yin X, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Zhang H, Qin R; Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China's International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM). Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
PubMed 33915091Zhang H, Feng Y, Zhao J, Chen R, Chen X, Yin X, Cheng W, Li D, Li J, Huang X, Li J, Liu J, Liu J, Liu Y, Tan Z, Zhao W, Huang H, Li D, Yu Y, Wang M, Qin R. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (TJDBPS01): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e033490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033490.
PubMed 32047015
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy(TJDBPS01) a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03138213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TJDBPS01
- Keywords
- pancreaticoduodenectomy, surgical outcome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 656 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tongji HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shandong Provincial Hospital, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Study start
- 1 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complex abdominal operations to perform, and it is usually conducted for tumours of the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively being developed for pancreatic surgery, first with the advent of hybrid-laparoscopy and recently with total laparoscopic surgery. Issues including the safety and efficacy of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently being debated. Studies comparing these two surgical techniques are emerging, and large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking but are clearly required.
Methods and analysis TJDBPS01 is a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in fourteen centres with pancreatic surgery experts who have performed ≥104 TLPDs and OPDs. A total of 656 patients who will undergo PD are randomly allocated to the TLPD group or OPD group in a 1:1 ratio. The trial hypothesis is that TLPD has superior or equivalent safety and advantages in postoperative recovery compared with OPD. The primary outcome is the postoperative length of stay (LOS).
Ethics and dissemination The Instituitional Review Board Approval of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology has approved this trial and will be routinely monitoring the trial at frequent intervals, as will an independent third-party organization. Any results from this trial (publications, conference presentations) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TLPD | Experimental | Procedure: Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyTtotal laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy |
| OPD | Experimental | Procedure: Open pancreaticoduodenectomyOpen pancreaticoduodenectomy |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically proven periampullary cancer, including pancreatic cancer, bile duct cancer, duodenal cancer, et al.
- Highly presumed malignancy with difficulties to obtain histological evidence.
- Preoperative staging work up performed by upper abdomen enhanced CT scan.
- The subject understands the nature of this trial and willing to comply.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Distant metastases: peritoneal carcinomatosis, liver metastases, distant lymph node metastases, involvement of other organs.
- Subjects undergoing left, central or total pancreatectomy.
- Patients with high operative risk as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >4.
- Synchronous malignancy in other organs.
- Previous underwent pancreatic resections.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyTotal laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy | Procedure or surgery | TLPD |
| Open pancreaticoduodenectomyOpen pancreaticoduodenectomy | Procedure or surgery | OPD |
Primary outcome
Length of stay
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Length of stay was defined as the postoperative time interval in days
6 secondary outcomes
Estimated blood loss
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Operation time
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Mortality
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Complication rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
CCI
Time frame: Up to 24 months
2 year survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37965767Qin T, Zhang H, Pan S, Liu J, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Ke J, Liu X, Chen B, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Wang M, Qin R; Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China's International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM). Effect of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Periampullary Tumors: Three-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;279(4):605-612. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006149. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33915091Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Qin T, Ma J, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Han W, Meng L, Ke J, Feng F, Chen B, Yin X, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Zhang H, Qin R; Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China's International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM). Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32047015Zhang H, Feng Y, Zhao J, Chen R, Chen X, Yin X, Cheng W, Li D, Li J, Huang X, Li J, Liu J, Liu J, Liu Y, Tan Z, Zhao W, Huang H, Li D, Yu Y, Wang M, Qin R. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (TJDBPS01): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e033490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033490.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Chemotherapy With or Without INCB161734 in Previously Untreated, KRAS G12D-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Zimberelimab and Quemliclustat in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08098488 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors.
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium
Pancreas Cancer, Pancreas Cyst
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open pancreaticoduodenectomy in people with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Surgery, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of stay (time frame: Up to 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03138213, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.