Glaucoma EyeNCT03138928
An Innovation in Glaucoma Surgery: XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation
An observational study of Glaucoma Eye, run by Trakya University.
Trial summary
Purpose: To report the follow-up data for patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation, a new method of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Material and Methods: Fifteen eyes of fifteen patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery were investigated in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma Eye
- What is being tested?
- XEN45 gel stent implantation in glaucoma surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Fifteen patients who had an XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery between January 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma, with uncontrolled IOP and progressive visual field damage despite using the maximum tolerated dose of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Patients who had previous glaucoma surgery were included as well.
Who cannot join
- The exclusion criteria included primary closed-angle glaucoma, a history of uveitis, and the presence of corneal disease. Patients who did not attend follow-up visits were also excluded.
About this study
Official title: XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation in Glaucoma Surgery
Purpose: To report the follow-up data for patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation, a new method of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).
Material and Methods: Fifteen eyes of fifteen patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery were investigated in the study. All the patients were examined preoperatively and at the following postoperative time points: 1 day; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Combined surgical procedures (XEN 45 + phacoemulsification + intraocular lens) were performed in the cases that had cataracts in addition to glaucoma.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that results in damage to the optic nerve and permanent visual loss; more than 60 million people around the world are affected by glaucoma. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important risk factor for the development of optic nerve damage and changes in the visual field. Therefore, the most effective treatment modality is the reduction of IOP, in order to prevent glaucoma progression and optic nerve atrophy. Trabeculectomy and episcleral aqueous drainage implants are currently the most widely used surgical methods for reducing IOP and treating glaucoma. Unfortunately, these procedures have potentially destructive intraoperative and postoperative complications, such as hypotony, choroidal effusion, blebitis, and endophthalmitis. Therefore, there is a trend of developing new surgical procedures to avoid the complications arising from conventional surgical procedures. These new surgical methods, called "minimally invasive glaucoma surgery" (MIGS), have some advantages over the conventional glaucoma surgical procedures, such as ab interno applicability, the elimination of external intervention requirements, and the ease of performance alongside cataract surgery. These advantages allow MIGS methods to be safer and less invasive than other surgical methods.
The XEN gel stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a recently developed, permanent, ab interno collagen implant that reduces IOP by draining aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space. The stent is a hydrophilic tube that is 6 mm long and composed of porcine gelatin crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. There are three sizes of this stent: 45 μm, 63 μm, and 140 μm, all with different inner diameters. The XEN45 gel stent is CE-marked in the European Union, and it is indicated for the treatment of refractory glaucoma that has proven resistant to previous surgical treatment and for patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma that cannot be controlled with the maximum tolerated medical therapy. It is also licensed for use in Canada, Switzerland, and Turkey. The XEN45 gel stent was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Because it is a new device, there are still unknown aspects of its efficacy and safety and of the proper surgical technique for its use. This study aimed to report the follow-up data after XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery in patients with different types of glaucoma.
Methods
This was a retrospective, consecutive case series study. Patients who had an XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery between January 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in the study. Patients were included whose refractory glaucoma was resistant to previous surgical treatment. Patients were also included who had POAG, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma, with uncontrolled IOP and progressive visual field damage despite using the maximum tolerated dose of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Patients who had previous glaucoma surgery were included as well. The exclusion criteria included primary closed-angle glaucoma, a history of uveitis, and the presence of corneal disease. Patients who did not attend follow-up visits were also excluded. All patients were informed about the treatment and the potential complications. Informed patient consents were obtained preoperatively. The procedures of the study were approved by the institutional review board of the hospital and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (approval code: TUTF-BAEK 2016/213).
Before the XEN45 implantation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and gonioscopic examination were performed. Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (AT 900, Haag Strait, Bern, Germany). A detailed fundus examination was done using a 78-dioptre non-contact lens after pupil dilatation by 1% tropicamide gutt.
All of the surgical procedures were performed under sterile conditions by the same surgeon (OK). Irrigation of the eyelashes, eyelids, and periorbicular tissues was performed with antiseptic 10% povidone iodine. While using an eye speculum, 5% povidone iodine was flushed onto the conjunctiva and fornix for two minutes; conjunctival irrigation was then completed with saline. The surgery was performed under peribulbar anaesthesia with 5 mL prilocaine and 5 mL bupivacaine. After peribulbar anaesthesia, the superonasal quadrant of the conjunctiva was marked by blue surgical dye 3 mm posterior to the limbus. Clear corneal incisions (main and side-port) were created in the inferotemporal and superotemporal quadrants; a highly cohesive viscoelastic was used to stabilise the anterior chamber during surgery. A 27-gauge pre-loaded injector was placed into the eye through the main clear corneal incision at the inferotemporal quadrant. The needle was directed toward the superonasal quadrant (Figure 3). One hand was used to manipulate the injector, and the other hand was used to fix and rotate the eye. The needle was pushed into the sclera and carried forward into the subconjunctival space. The surgery was performed under gonioscopic control. A 6-mm-long implant was created to be positioned 2 mm into the subconjunctival space, 3 mm into the sclera, and 1 mm into the anterior chamber. Therefore, visualization of the tip of the needle exiting from the sclera indicated that an optimal 3-mm intrascleral tunnel had been formed. The XEN45 implant was deployed by rotating a dial on the inserter. Once bleb formation was seen, the needle was withdrawn. The viscoelastic material was aspirated, and then 0.1 ml of 1% cefuroxime was injected into the anterior chamber. Finally, the clear corneal incisions were hydrated with a balanced salt solution. Mitomycin C was not injected into the conjunctiva at any stage of the surgery. Topical steroid and antibiotic treatments were applied after the surgery. A topical steroid (prednisolone acetate 1%) was applied six or more times daily to control postoperative intraocular inflammation. The topical steroid treatment was stopped after the first month postoperative. Ocular massage for one minute four times daily was recommended during the postoperative period. Needling was not performed at any of the postoperative visits. Topical antiglaucomatous medications were added as needed according to the postoperative IOP levels. Follow-up visits were planned for 1 day, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Combined surgery (XEN45 + phacoemulsification + intraocular lens) was performed in the cases that had cataracts in addition to glaucoma. In combined surgery, the XEN45 implantation was performed after the phacoemulsification. After the intraocular lens implantation in the capsular sac, the anterior chamber was filled with a highly cohesive viscoelastic material. Then, the same procedures as were described previously were carried out.
All the data were compiled into a computer file for statistical analysis, and Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 17.0 was used to perform the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Glaucoma Eye
- Being tested
- XEN45 gel stent implantation in glaucoma surgery
- Keywords
- glaucoma, trabeculectomy, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, XEN45 gel stent
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
XEN45 gel stent implantation in glaucoma surgeryDevice
The XEN gel stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a recently developed, permanent, ab interno collagen implant that reduces IOP by draining aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraocular pressure
Mean intraocular pressure values
Measured: Postoperative 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Antiglaucomatous medications
Mean number of antiglaucomatous medications
Measured: Postoperative 12 months
Incidence of complications
Complications due to surgery
Measured: Postoperative 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2017
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Glaucoma EyeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Trakya University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sadık Altan Ozal, Trakya University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03138928
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14783785
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 8 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: This clinical trial is under review for publishing. If it is accepted for publishing,our results will be shared.
Publications
Sheybani A, Lenzhofer M, Hohensinn M, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Phacoemulsification combined with a new ab interno gel stent to treat open-angle glaucoma: Pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;41(9):1905-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
PubMed 26482822Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PubMed 24974815Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;120(10):1268-79. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268.
PubMed 12365904Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Outcomes of trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995 Dec;102(12):1760-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30796-8.
PubMed 9098275Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
PubMed 22196977Minckler D, Mosaed S, Dustin L, Ms BF; Trabectome Study Group. Trabectome (trabeculectomy-internal approach): additional experience and extended follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:149-59; discussion 159-60.
PubMed 19277230Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC; Trabectome Study Group. Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.043.
PubMed 22322166Bussel II, Kaplowitz K, Schuman JS, Loewen NA; Trabectome Study Group. Outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the trabectome by degree of angle opening. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;99(7):914-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305577. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
PubMed 25336577Lewis RA. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):1301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
PubMed 24943904Vera V, Horvath C. Xen Gel Stent: The solution designed by AqueSys. In: Samples, JR, Ahmed, IIK, editors. Surgical innovations in glaucoma. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2014, p. 189-198.
Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 28;10:189-206. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80490. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 26869753Kerr NM, Wang J, Barton K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery as primary stand-alone surgery for glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 May;45(4):393-400. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12888. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
PubMed 27928879Garcia-Feijoo J, Sampaolesi JR. A multicenter evaluation of ocular surface disease prevalence in patients with glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:441-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S29158. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
PubMed 22536034Valente C, Iester M, Corsi E, Rolando M. Symptoms and signs of tear film dysfunction in glaucomatous patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;27(3):281-5. doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0133. Epub 2011 May 10.
PubMed 21557633Dupont G, Collignon N. [NEW SURGICAL APPROACH IN PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA: XEN GEL STENT A MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE]. Rev Med Liege. 2016 Feb;71(2):90-3. French.
PubMed 27141652
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation in Glaucoma Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03138928
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14783785
- Conditions
- Glaucoma Eye
- Keywords
- glaucoma, trabeculectomy, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, XEN45 gel stent
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Trakya UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: To report the follow-up data for patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation, a new method of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).
Material and Methods: Fifteen eyes of fifteen patients who had XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery were investigated in the study. All the patients were examined preoperatively and at the following postoperative time points: 1 day; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Combined surgical procedures (XEN 45 + phacoemulsification + intraocular lens) were performed in the cases that had cataracts in addition to glaucoma.
Detailed description
Introduction
Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that results in damage to the optic nerve and permanent visual loss; more than 60 million people around the world are affected by glaucoma. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important risk factor for the development of optic nerve damage and changes in the visual field. Therefore, the most effective treatment modality is the reduction of IOP, in order to prevent glaucoma progression and optic nerve atrophy. Trabeculectomy and episcleral aqueous drainage implants are currently the most widely used surgical methods for reducing IOP and treating glaucoma. Unfortunately, these procedures have potentially destructive intraoperative and postoperative complications, such as hypotony, choroidal effusion, blebitis, and endophthalmitis. Therefore, there is a trend of developing new surgical procedures to avoid the complications arising from conventional surgical procedures. These new surgical methods, called "minimally invasive glaucoma surgery" (MIGS), have some advantages over the conventional glaucoma surgical procedures, such as ab interno applicability, the elimination of external intervention requirements, and the ease of performance alongside cataract surgery. These advantages allow MIGS methods to be safer and less invasive than other surgical methods.
The XEN gel stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a recently developed, permanent, ab interno collagen implant that reduces IOP by draining aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space. The stent is a hydrophilic tube that is 6 mm long and composed of porcine gelatin crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. There are three sizes of this stent: 45 μm, 63 μm, and 140 μm, all with different inner diameters. The XEN45 gel stent is CE-marked in the European Union, and it is indicated for the treatment of refractory glaucoma that has proven resistant to previous surgical treatment and for patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma that cannot be controlled with the maximum tolerated medical therapy. It is also licensed for use in Canada, Switzerland, and Turkey. The XEN45 gel stent was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Because it is a new device, there are still unknown aspects of its efficacy and safety and of the proper surgical technique for its use. This study aimed to report the follow-up data after XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery in patients with different types of glaucoma.
Methods
This was a retrospective, consecutive case series study. Patients who had an XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery between January 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in the study. Patients were included whose refractory glaucoma was resistant to previous surgical treatment. Patients were also included who had POAG, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma, with uncontrolled IOP and progressive visual field damage despite using the maximum tolerated dose of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Patients who had previous glaucoma surgery were included as well. The exclusion criteria included primary closed-angle glaucoma, a history of uveitis, and the presence of corneal disease. Patients who did not attend follow-up visits were also excluded. All patients were informed about the treatment and the potential complications. Informed patient consents were obtained preoperatively. The procedures of the study were approved by the institutional review board of the hospital and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (approval code: TUTF-BAEK 2016/213).
Before the XEN45 implantation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and gonioscopic examination were performed. Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (AT 900, Haag Strait, Bern, Germany). A detailed fundus examination was done using a 78-dioptre non-contact lens after pupil dilatation by 1% tropicamide gutt.
All of the surgical procedures were performed under sterile conditions by the same surgeon (OK). Irrigation of the eyelashes, eyelids, and periorbicular tissues was performed with antiseptic 10% povidone iodine. While using an eye speculum, 5% povidone iodine was flushed onto the conjunctiva and fornix for two minutes; conjunctival irrigation was then completed with saline. The surgery was performed under peribulbar anaesthesia with 5 mL prilocaine and 5 mL bupivacaine. After peribulbar anaesthesia, the superonasal quadrant of the conjunctiva was marked by blue surgical dye 3 mm posterior to the limbus. Clear corneal incisions (main and side-port) were created in the inferotemporal and superotemporal quadrants; a highly cohesive viscoelastic was used to stabilise the anterior chamber during surgery. A 27-gauge pre-loaded injector was placed into the eye through the main clear corneal incision at the inferotemporal quadrant. The needle was directed toward the superonasal quadrant (Figure 3). One hand was used to manipulate the injector, and the other hand was used to fix and rotate the eye. The needle was pushed into the sclera and carried forward into the subconjunctival space. The surgery was performed under gonioscopic control. A 6-mm-long implant was created to be positioned 2 mm into the subconjunctival space, 3 mm into the sclera, and 1 mm into the anterior chamber. Therefore, visualization of the tip of the needle exiting from the sclera indicated that an optimal 3-mm intrascleral tunnel had been formed. The XEN45 implant was deployed by rotating a dial on the inserter. Once bleb formation was seen, the needle was withdrawn. The viscoelastic material was aspirated, and then 0.1 ml of 1% cefuroxime was injected into the anterior chamber. Finally, the clear corneal incisions were hydrated with a balanced salt solution. Mitomycin C was not injected into the conjunctiva at any stage of the surgery. Topical steroid and antibiotic treatments were applied after the surgery. A topical steroid (prednisolone acetate 1%) was applied six or more times daily to control postoperative intraocular inflammation. The topical steroid treatment was stopped after the first month postoperative. Ocular massage for one minute four times daily was recommended during the postoperative period. Needling was not performed at any of the postoperative visits. Topical antiglaucomatous medications were added as needed according to the postoperative IOP levels. Follow-up visits were planned for 1 day, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Combined surgery (XEN45 + phacoemulsification + intraocular lens) was performed in the cases that had cataracts in addition to glaucoma. In combined surgery, the XEN45 implantation was performed after the phacoemulsification. After the intraocular lens implantation in the capsular sac, the anterior chamber was filled with a highly cohesive viscoelastic material. Then, the same procedures as were described previously were carried out.
All the data were compiled into a computer file for statistical analysis, and Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 17.0 was used to perform the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Fifteen patients who had an XEN45 gel stent implantation surgery between January 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma, with uncontrolled IOP and progressive visual field damage despite using the maximum tolerated dose of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Patients who had previous glaucoma surgery were included as well.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The exclusion criteria included primary closed-angle glaucoma, a history of uveitis, and the presence of corneal disease. Patients who did not attend follow-up visits were also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| XEN45 gel stent implantation in glaucoma surgeryThe XEN gel stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a recently developed, permanent, ab interno collagen implant that reduces IOP by draining aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Intraocular pressure
Time frame: Postoperative 12 months
Mean intraocular pressure values
2 secondary outcomes
Antiglaucomatous medications
Time frame: Postoperative 12 months
Incidence of complications
Time frame: Postoperative 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 26482822Sheybani A, Lenzhofer M, Hohensinn M, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Phacoemulsification combined with a new ab interno gel stent to treat open-angle glaucoma: Pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;41(9):1905-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 24974815Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 12365904Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;120(10):1268-79. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268.
- Results publication: PubMed 9098275Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Outcomes of trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995 Dec;102(12):1760-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30796-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 22196977Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 19277230Minckler D, Mosaed S, Dustin L, Ms BF; Trabectome Study Group. Trabectome (trabeculectomy-internal approach): additional experience and extended follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;106:149-59; discussion 159-60.
- Results publication: PubMed 22322166Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC; Trabectome Study Group. Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.043.
- Results publication: PubMed 25336577Bussel II, Kaplowitz K, Schuman JS, Loewen NA; Trabectome Study Group. Outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the trabectome by degree of angle opening. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;99(7):914-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305577. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 24943904Lewis RA. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):1301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
- Results publicationVera V, Horvath C. Xen Gel Stent: The solution designed by AqueSys. In: Samples, JR, Ahmed, IIK, editors. Surgical innovations in glaucoma. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2014, p. 189-198.
- Results publication: PubMed 26869753Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 28;10:189-206. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80490. eCollection 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 27928879Kerr NM, Wang J, Barton K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery as primary stand-alone surgery for glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 May;45(4):393-400. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12888. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. This clinical trial is under review for publishing. If it is accepted for publishing,our results will be shared.
Related trials for Glaucoma Eye
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
AI-Assisted vs Conventional Teleglaucoma Referral
Glaucoma
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
Recruiting
Automated Applanation Tonometry - Updated
Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Suspect
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pregabalin Eye Drops Comparing With Timolol Eye Drops in Adults With Glaucoma or High Eye Pressure.
Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glaucoma Eye, run by Trakya University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraocular pressure (time frame: Postoperative 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03138928, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2017.