Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaOPTIMISENCT03140176
Real-world Clinical Patterns Of Care And Outcomes Among AfME mRCC Patients Receiving Sunitinib as First Line Therapy.
An observational study of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Pfizer at 8 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
OPTIMISE is designed to provide knowledge regarding the use of Sunitinib as 1st line treatment and 2nd line treatment selected (Sunitinib-different sequence) with respect to efficacy outcomes, adverse events, and health related QoL in the real life setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Sunitinib
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2017to 22 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma being treated with Sunitinib as the first line therapy.
Who may be able to join
- Patients being treated with SU as 1st line treatment according to the approved therapeutic indication.
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC (clear cell RCC as well as nonclear cell RCC) with measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Who cannot join
- <!-- -->
- Patients being treated with cytokines or any other treatment other than SU in 1st line setting
- Patients presenting with a known hypersensitivity to SU or its metabolites will not be included in the study per the label.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 4 countries.
8 sites in 4 countries
Algeria3 sites
Pierre Et Marie Curie Center
Algers, 16005
CAC Annaba
Annaba
Hanene Djedi
Annaba
Egypt3 sites
Kasr Al Aini
Cairo, 11562
National Cancer Institute
Cairo, 11796
Demerdash Hospital
Cairo
About this study
Official title: REAL-WORLD CLINICAL PATTERNS OF CARE AND OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS IN AFRICA MIDDLE EAST (AFME) WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC) RECEIVING SUNITINIB AS FIRST LINE THERAPY (OPTIMISE).
OPTIMISE is designed to provide knowledge regarding the use of Sunitinib as 1st line treatment and 2nd line treatment selected (Sunitinib-different sequence) with respect to efficacy outcomes, adverse events, and health related QoL in the real life setting.
Read the detailed description
OPTIMISE study objectives are dual and aim primarily to increase the knowledge regarding the outcomes from Sunitinib use on one hand; and outcomes from the combined Sunitinib-2nd line sequence on the other hand in real life clinical practice.
This will be addressed in many countries across AfME and in individual country cohorts to understand specificities and differences in use and outcomes
- Conditions
- Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Sunitinib
- Keywords
- Sunitinib, Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Africa Middle East
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SunitinibDrug
Also called Sutent
Sunitinib is an FDA approved targeted therapy for use as first line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from when the participant received the first dose of sunitinib to the time of progression or death due to any cause, which occurred first. The time of progression was the date of the first tumor assessment where the progression was notified as response to therapy, over the sunitinib treatment. Participants who discontinued the study for any reason, including unacceptable toxicity during the treatment period, who remained alive and without disease progression, were censored at the last disease assessment that verified lack of disease progression. As per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters [mm]) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib to date of progression or death or censored date, whichever occurred first (up to maximum of 36 months)
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
TTF was defined as the time from when the participant received the first dose of sunitinib to the time of sunitinib discontinuation (date completed by the physician). In case of death when the participant was still treated with sunitinib, date of death was considered as date of discontinuation. If no sunitinib discontinuation was reported during the follow-up visits, participants were censored to the last follow-up visit.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib until the date of discontinuation or censored date (up to maximum of 36 months)
Secondary outcomes (30)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1. As per RECIST 1.1 criteria: CR = disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR = at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Number of Participants With Recommended Starting Dose of Sunitinib
The recommended starting dose of sunitinib was 50 milligrams (mg) per day, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off.
Measured: At initiation of sunitinib (Day 0)
Number of Participants With Other Starting Doses
Number of participants with other starting doses of sunitinib (50 mg per day, 2 weeks on, 1 week off; 37.5 mg per day for 2 weeks on and 1 week off; 25 mg per day for 2 weeks on and 1 week off; 37.5 mg per day 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: At initiation of sunitinib (Day 0)
Number of Participants With Moderate Chronic Liver Failure, With 2 Milligrams (mg) Twice Daily (BID) as Starting Dose
Measured: At initiation of sunitinib (Day 0)
Average Dose Received Over the Sunitinib Treatment Period
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Dose Intensity of Sunitinib
Dose intensity was defined as defined as the sum of sunitinib daily doses divided by the duration of sunitinib treatment in days (delay between the first sunitinib dose and the last dose, including temporary interruption).
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Number of Participants With Change in Dose or Schedule of Sunitinib
Number of participants with change in dose or schedule of sunitinib at the specified time points were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Number of Participants With Dose Increase
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Number of Participants With Temporary Interruption During the Sunitinib Treatment Period
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Time to First Interruption
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Time to All Interruptions
Measured: During treatment period (up to 12 months)
Number of Participants According to Reasons for Temporary Interruption
Number of participants according to reasons for temporary interruption (adverse events, logistical, personal and intolerant to sunitinib) at specified time points is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Number of Participants With Sunitinib Discontinuation
Number of participants with sunitinib discontinuation at specified time points is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Number of Participants According to Reasons for Sunitinib Discontinuation
Number of participants according to reasons for sunitinib discontinuation (death, intolerability, progression) at specified time points is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Median Duration of Sunitinib Treatment
Median duration of treatment was defined as the time between the sunitinib initiation and the sunitinib discontinuation date or the last follow-up date with sunitinib treatment.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib until discontinuation or last follow-up date with sunitinib treatment (up to maximum of 36 months)
Combined Progression Free Survival
Combined PFS was defined as the time from when the participants received the first dose of sunitinib as first line, until progression or death due to any cause while on the 2nd line treatment, whichever occurred first during the 2nd line sequence treatment. As per RECIST version 1.1, disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib until progression or death whichever occurred first during second line treatment (up to maximum of 36 months)
Combined TTF for the Sunitinib-2nd Line Sequence
Combined TTF was defined as the time from when the participant received the first dose with sunitinib as first line, to the time of 2nd line sequence discontinuation (date completed by the physician).
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib until discontinuation of second line treatment (up to maximum of 36 months)
Combined PFS According to Type of Second Line Treatment
Combined PFS was defined as the time from when the participants received the first dose of sunitinib as first line, until progression or death due to any cause while on the 2nd line treatment, whichever occurred first during the 2nd line sequence treatment. As per RECIST version 1.1, disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Combined PFS according to the type of second line treatment (best supportive care [BSC], tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKI] including pazopanib and mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors including everolimus) were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib until progression or death whichever occurred first during second line treatment (up to maximum of 36 months)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of first sunitinib dose to the date of death of any cause.
Measured: From date of first dose of sunitinib to the date of death of any cause (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing At Least One Adverse Event (AE) of Any Grade
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) as follows: Grade 1: mild AE, Grade 2: moderate AE, Grade 3: severe AE, Grade 4: life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5: death related to AE. In this outcome measure, number of participants with at least one AE of any grade is reported.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Most Common AEs of Any Grade by Preferred Term
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE as follows: Grade 1: mild AE, Grade 2: moderate AE, Grade 3: severe AE, Grade 4: life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5: death related to AE. In this outcome measure, number of most common AEs of any grade is presented. Only events captured as deaths (preferred term) are reported as deaths in the data table.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Events of Diarrhea, Hypertension, Fatigue, Asthenia, Palmar-plantar Erythrodysesthesia Syndrome, Nausea, Stomatitis, Neutropenia, Lymphopenia and Elevated Lipase
Number of events of diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue, asthenia, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, nausea, stomatitis, neutropenia, lymphopenia and elevated lipase were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Non-Serious AEs
A serious adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product (including pediatric formulas) at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. In this outcome measure, number of participants with serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Adverse Events According to Grade
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) as follows: Grade 1: mild AE, Grade 2: moderate AE, Grade 3: severe AE, Grade 4: life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5: death related to AE.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to AEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. In this outcome measure, number of participants who discontinued treatment due to AEs are reported.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Duration of Treatment Until Discontinuation for AEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage.
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Number of Participants According to the Cause of Death
Measured: From date of sunitinib first dose until end of follow-up (up to maximum of 36 months)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Total Scores
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that assessed symptoms of importance in renal cancer participants. It consisted of 4 subscales (FKSI-Disease Related Symptoms [DRS]-Physical [P]-12 items, FKSI-DRS-Emotional [E]-1 item, treatment side effects [TSE]-3 items, functional wellbeing [FWB]-3 items). Participants were required to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects and wellbeing on a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). The total FKSI scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses divided by the number of items completed multiplied by the total number of items in the scale and ranged from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 76 (asymptomatic), where higher scores indicated better health.
Measured: Day 0, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Sub-scale Scores
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that assessed symptoms of importance in renal cancer participants. It consisted of 4 subscales (FKSI-DRS-P: 12 items, FKSI-DRS-E: 1 item, TSE: 3 items, FWB: 3 items). Participants were required to respond to the items in each subscale on a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). The FKSI subscale scores were calculated as the sum of item responses divided by the number of items completed multiplied by the total number of items in the subscale and ranged from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 48 (asymptomatic) for FKSI-DRS-P, 0 (severely symptomatic) to 4 (asymptomatic) for FKSI-DRS-E and 0 (severely symptomatic) to 12 (asymptomatic) for TSE and FWB; higher scores indicated better health.
Measured: Day 0, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2017
- Study start15 Aug 2017
- Primary completion22 Jan 2022
- Study completion22 Jan 2022
Why it stopped: The study was terminated early due to the inability to recruit the planned number of patients
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03140176
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A6181223
- Acronym
- OPTIMISE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 2 May 2017
- Last updated
- 10 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.