AzTrials
AzTrials

Clinical or Oncologic Benefits of Robot-assisted IVOR-LEWIS in Esophageal CancerRAILENCT03140189

Robot-assisted IVOR-LEWIS Esophagectomy

An observational study of Clinical or Oncologic Benefits of Robot-assisted IVOR-LEWIS in Esophageal Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) have become increasingly popular in esophageal cancer. It is generally accepted that comparing to open resections, MIE results in decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery times, and shorter hospital stays with comparable oncologic outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
How many people
51 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
14 Jun 2017to 4 Apr 2024
How long will I take part?
3 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with histologically proven malignancy were candidates for surgical procedures. Operability criteria were defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III. In general, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with histologically proven esophageal malignancy
  • All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III
  • neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease

Who cannot join

  • Cancer located at the cervical esophageal Cancer located at the gastroesophageal junction history of surgery in the right thorax

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Yajie Zhang

    Shanghai, 200000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Robot- Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Short- Term and Long Term Outcomes of a Single-Arm Phase II Trial

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) have become increasingly popular in esophageal cancer. It is generally accepted that comparing to open resections, MIE results in decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery times, and shorter hospital stays with comparable oncologic outcomes. However, MIE poses an important challenge for established thoracic surgeons as it is a difficult technique to become skilled at with an protracted learning curve. Standard laparoscopic and thoracoscopic instruments are rigid and provide a finite freedom of movement with a two dimensional visualization of the operating field. Such a difficulty is increased even more when the Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis is needed.

Robot- assisted surgical system has opened a new era of minimally invasive surgery. Robot- assisted surgery offers some advantages including high- definition three- dimensional visualization and 7 degrees of freedom with the use of its surgical wrists, motion scaling, and tremor filtration, allowing the surgeon to perform complex operations comfortably in the domain of urinary tract, hepatobiliary and gynecological surgery. Although a robot-assisted thoraco- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was initiated from 2003, the published experience with RAMIE remains small, especially for Ivor- Lewis approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- term and long-term outcomes of RAILE to identify any clinical or oncologic benefits of RAILE in esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

This confirmatory, nonrandomized, single-arm trial (phase II) will be conducted to evaluate short-and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted thoraco- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Patients will registered preoperatively. The planned sample size was 51. Preoperative endoscopic biopsy was performed in all patients to confirm the histological diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Staging workup included thorough history and physical examination, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. Patients with histologically proven malignancy were candidates for surgical procedures. Operability criteria were defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III. In general, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease. The primary endpoint in the first stage is the short-term postoperative complications, and that in the second stage is overall survival; patients continue to be followed up for this endpoint.

Keywords
Esophageal cancer, Robotic, Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. rate of major postoperative complications

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. rate of overall postoperative complications

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  2. rate of 30-day mortality

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  3. operative time

    Measured: during the operation

  4. rate of conversion

    Measured: during the operation

  5. length of hospital stay

    Measured: within 30 days after surgery

  6. rate of R0 resection

    Measured: within 30 days after surgery

  7. number of harvested lymph nodes

    Measured: within 30 days after surgery

  8. overall survival

    Measured: 3 years after surgery

  9. disease-free survival

    Measured: 3 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 May 2017
  2. Study start14 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion10 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion4 Apr 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
51 participants (actual)
Target duration
3 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03140189
Sponsor's protocol ID
RTS-003
Acronym
RAILE
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
2 May 2017
Last updated
19 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Wee JO, Bravo-Iniguez CE, Jaklitsch MT. Early Experience of Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy With Circular End-to-End Stapled Anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 May 4.

    PubMed 27154153
  • Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, Park IK, Kim YT, Kang CH. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Oct;8(10):2853-2861. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.39.

    PubMed 27867561

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Clinical or Oncologic Benefits of Robot-assisted IVOR-LEWIS in Esophageal Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

rate of major postoperative complications (time frame: 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03140189, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in