AzTrials
AzTrials

Medical Device ComplicationNCT03140215

Comparative Study of Baska & I-gel for Ventilation of Female Patients During Minor Procedures

A study testing laryngeal mask insertion (Baska) and laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel ) in people with Medical Device Complication, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aimed to compare safety of the 3rd generation Supra-glottic airway device (SAD) "Baska" to the I-Gel , regarding seal pressure, fitting on the larynx (detected by Fiberoptic) \& complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Medical Device Complication
What is being tested?
laryngeal mask insertion (Baska) and laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel )
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2016to Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female ASA1,2
  • Age 18-55
  • BMI<35

Who cannot join

  • Anticipated upper airway problem
  • GIT disease
  • Pregnancy
  • High risk of aspiration

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of Baska & I-Gel for Spontaneously Ventilated Females During Minor Gynecological Procedures

The study aimed to compare safety of the 3rd generation Supra-glottic airway device (SAD) "Baska" to the I-Gel , regarding seal pressure, fitting on the larynx (detected by Fiberoptic) \& complications. The study will be done for females undergoing minor gynecological procedures under general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation.

Read the detailed description

Population of study \& disease condition : 2 equal groups (n=30), female patients enrolled for minor gynecological procedures (D\&C or hysteroscopy), All patients received general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation using Supra-glottic airway Device (SAD). Group A (Baska) \& group B ( I-gel).

Inclusion Criteria: Age: 18-55, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) 1 or 2, BMI<35 \& Low risk of aspiration.

Exclusion Criteria: Anticipated upper airway problem, Gastrointestinal tract (GIT, disease, pregnancy \& High risk of aspiration.

Methodology: All patients received fentanyl 1 micro gram/Kg, Propofol(2-4mg/Kg) was titrated to induce anesthesia, followed by manual ventilation with sevoflurane (2-4%) in Oxygen.All devices were inserted by one of 2 investigators.

Data collection: 1- Demographic Data: age,weight,height.2-duration of anesthesia.3- Data related to device insertion: Time of insertion,duration of anesthesia, seal pressure,peak airway pressure, Fiberoptic (FO)view of the larynx ,vomiting or regurgitation, postoperative laryngeal spasm or blood on the device after removal.

Primary outcome: To detect seal pressure and fitting against laryngeal aperture detected by FO. Secondary outcome:To determine Peak pressure, incidence of complications: vomiting or regurgitation, blood on the device after removal (indicating trauma to the airway) or postoperative laryngeal spasm..

Statistical analysis: For analysis of continuous variables independent sample t-test will be applied and for categorical variables chi-square test will be used.value of p<0.05 will be considered significant.

Sample size:

Sample size was calculated using EpiCalc program using the following data : mean seal pressure for Baska :29.98 , mean seal pressure for I-Gel: 25.62. SD: 4.9

, study power 80% confidence interval . P value<0.05. the calculated sample size was found to be 19 for each group (overall 38), so the investigators will allocate 30 patient in each group to avoid drop out.

Statistical analysis:

Source of funding This study will be attributed to Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of medicine, Cairo University. Support will be provided solely from departmental sources. Keywords: Baska, I-Gel, Supra-glottic airway devices, seal pressure

Being tested
laryngeal mask insertion (Baska), laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel )
Keywords
Baska, seal pressure, I-Gel, Supraglottic airway device

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laryngeal mask insertion (Baska)Device

    Also called Baska

  • laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel )Device

    Also called I-gel

Study groups in NCT03140215
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Baska Device ventilation groupActive comparatorDevice: laryngeal mask insertion (Baska)
Receives: Device: laryngeal mask insertion (Baska); Device: laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel )
I-Gel device ventilation groupActive comparatorDevice: laryngeal mask insertion ( I-gel )
Receives: Device: laryngeal mask insertion (Baska); Device: laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel )

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. seal pressure

    Airway Sealing Pressure in cmH2O at 5 mins postplacement.The airway sealing pressure was the pressure at which leak starts. This leak pressure was calculated as the plateau airway pressure reached with fresh gas flow 6 l/min, and pressure adjustment valve set at 70 cmH2O..

    Measured: seal pressure will be assessed 3minutes after induction of general anesthesia.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Fiberoptic view of the larynx.

    The fiberoptic device will be introduced through the device to visualize \& record the view

    Measured: Fiberoptic view will be assessed 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia.

  2. Peak airway pressure in CmH2O

    The peak airway pressure will be monitored during the operation time

    Measured: during the operation the operation

  3. incidence of vomiting and regurgitation

    patients will be monitored to detect vomiting \& regurgitation.

    Measured: from the start of operation till 10 minutes postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 May 2017
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03140215
Sponsor's protocol ID
UTF-8
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
8 Jan 2016
Last updated
4 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing laryngeal mask insertion (Baska) and laryngeal mask insertion (I-gel ) in people with Medical Device Complication, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

seal pressure (time frame: seal pressure will be assessed 3minutes after induction of general anesthesia.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in