AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain ManagementPhase 4NCT03142789

Adductor Canal Block After Total Knee Replacement - a Suture-method Catheter vs a Standard Catheter vs a Single Bolus

A Phase 4 study testing Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups), Initial bolus (Single bolus group) and Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups) in people with Pain Management, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study we wish to investigate the analgesic effect of the administration of 0.2% ropivacaine for an adductor canal block as repeated boluses (20 ml every 8 hours) through a new suture-method catheter or a standard perineural catheter compared with a single bolus (20 ml), in patients following primary total knee… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain Management
What is being tested?
Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups), Initial bolus (Single bolus group) and Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
153 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
9 May 2017to 12 Apr 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia
  • Patients who gave their written informed consent to participating in the study after having fully understood the contents of the protocol and restrictions
  • ASA 1-3
  • Ability to perform a TUG test preoperatively

Who cannot join

  • Patients who cannot cooperate
  • Patients who cannot understand or speak Danish.
  • Patients with allergy to the medicines used in the study
  • Patients with a daily intake of strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, ketobemidone, methadone, fentanyl) during the last 4 weeks
  • Patients suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse - based on the investigator's assessment
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
Show all 9Show fewer
  • BMI > 40
  • Neuromuscular pathology in the lower limbs
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Gentofte Hospital

    Copenhagen, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of an ACB (Adductor Canal Block) Using a New Suture-method Catheter vs a Standard Perineural Catheter vs a Single Bolus: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Study

In this study we wish to investigate the analgesic effect of the administration of 0.2% ropivacaine for an adductor canal block as repeated boluses (20 ml every 8 hours) through a new suture-method catheter or a standard perineural catheter compared with a single bolus (20 ml), in patients following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effects of three different administration forms for an ACB: repeated intermittent boluses through a Certa catheter (CC) versus repeated boluses through a standard catheter (through the needle) (SC) versus a single bolus (SB). Our dual hypothesis is that repeated boluses through a catheter (either Certa or standard catheter) reduces opioid consumption (primary outcome), as well as reduces pain scores, enhances ambulation and muscle strength compared with a single bolus, and that the Certa catheter is superior to a standard catheter.

Conditions
Pain Management
Being tested
Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups), Initial bolus (Single bolus group), Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups), Intermittent boluses (Single bolus group)
Keywords
Pain, Total knee arthroplasty, Regional anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Agnosia, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups)Drug

    10 ml of ropivacaine 0,75% will be used to ensure correct position of the needle and to expand the adductor canal, followed by injection of another 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% via the catheter during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter.

  • Initial bolus (Single bolus group)Drug

    20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75%

  • Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)Drug

    20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the catheter

  • Intermittent boluses (Single bolus group)Drug

    0.1ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the sham catheter

Study groups in NCT03142789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Certa CatheterActive comparatorA Certa-catheter (suture method) is inserted under ultrasound guidance at the midthigh level in the adductor canal, using an in plane technique, short/oblique axis view. A bolus of ropivacaine will be administered during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter (initial bolus). An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses every 8 hours until 12 pm on POD2. 2 dressings will be applied (medial and lateral) to obscure which catheter has been placed.
Receives: Drug: Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups); Drug: Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)
Standard CatheterActive comparatorA Standard-catheter is inserted under ultrasound guidance at the midthigh level in the adductor canal, using an in plane technique, short/oblique axis view. A bolus of ropivacaine will be administered during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter (initial bolus). An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses every 8 hours until 12 pm on POD2. 2 dressings will be applied (medial and lateral) to obscure which catheter has been placed.
Receives: Drug: Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups); Drug: Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)
Single BolusActive comparatorA bolus of ropivacaine will be injected into the adductor canal, at the midthigh level, using a 80 mm x 22G Pajunk needle during real time US imaging (initial bolus). A sham catheter (25 Certa and 25 standard catheters according to randomi-zation) will be fixed externally and covered by dressings as in the catheter groups groups (Certa and standard). Care will be taken to use approximately the same amount of time as used in the catheter groups (Certa and standard) An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses into the dressing every 8 hour until 12 PM on POD2.
Receives: Drug: Initial bolus (Single bolus group); Drug: Intermittent boluses (Single bolus group)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total opioid consumption

    • Total opioid consumption (PCA pump and any potential rescue administration) between groups (SB vs CC, SB vs SC and CC vs SC)

    Measured: from end of surgery until 12 (noon) on POD 2 (Postoperative Day)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. VAS (Visual analog scale) flexion

    VAS pain score (0-100mm) during 45 degrees active knee flexion

    Measured: o Pain is recorded preoperatively before administration of medication, and postoperatively at the PACU (Postoperative Care Unit), at 8 PM on the day of surgery, at 8 AM, 12 (noon) and 8 PM on POD 1 and finally at 8 AM and 12 (noon) on POD 2.

  2. VAS rest

    VAS pain score (0-100mm) during rest

    Measured: o Pain is recorded preoperatively before administration of medication, and postoperatively at the PACU, at 8 PM on the day of surgery, at 8 AM, 12 (noon) and 8 PM on POD 1 and finally at 8 AM and 12 (noon) on POD 2.

  3. VAS-TUG (Time-Up-and-Go-Test)

    Worst VAS pain score (0-100mm) during Timed-Up-and-Go test

    Measured: 12 (noon) on POD 1 and 2

  4. TUG-test

    Timed-Up-and-Go test

    Measured: 12 (noon) on POD 1 and 2

  5. 6 minutes walk test

    How many meters the patient can walk (using a high 4-wheel walker) in 6 minutes

    Measured: 12 (noon) on POD 1 and 2

  6. MVIC (Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction)

    Quadriceps strength assessed as maximum voluntary isometric contraction in percentage of preoperative baseline values.

    Measured: Preoperatively and at 12 (noon) on POD 1 and 2

  7. TUG test, patient number

    Number of patients able to perform the TUG test using a high 4-wheel walker

    Measured: 12 (noon) on POD 1 and 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 May 2017
  2. Study start9 May 2017
  3. Primary completion12 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion12 Apr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study is performed as a blinded, randomized, controlled study. Randomization will be based on a computer-generated block randomization list in a 1:1:1 ratio, block sizes of 9. A person, not otherwise involved in the study, will prepare the randomization list and keep it, locked away in a secure place. 2 sets of consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque, code envelopes will be prepared by the same person.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
153 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03142789
Sponsor's protocol ID
EudraCT number: 2016-005069-30
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
1 May 2017
Last updated
1 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: We have not yet decided whether IPD will be made available to other researchers

Publications

  • Lyngeraa TS, Jaeger P, Gottschau B, Graungaard B, Rossen-Jorgensen AM, Toftegaard I, Grevstad U. Comparison of the analgesic effect of an adductor canal block using a new suture-method catheter vs. standard perineural catheter vs. single-injection: a randomised, blinded, controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1397-1405. doi: 10.1111/anae.14814. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

    PubMed 31465115

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups), Initial bolus (Single bolus group) and Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups) in people with Pain Management, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total opioid consumption (time frame: from end of surgery until 12 (noon) on POD 2 (Postoperative Day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03142789, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in