Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 2/3DAMNCT03143192
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser
A Phase 2/3 study testing Micropulse Laser in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Keyvan Koushan at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of micropulse (MP) macular laser in combination with intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of centre-involved diabetic macular edema. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- What is being tested?
- Micropulse Laser
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 8 Mar 2017to 9 May 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus
- Presence of centre-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with the Central Macular Thickness (CMT) of ≥ 310µm on the spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
- Best corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) between, and including, 20/30 and 20/400 in the study eye.
- Patient's willingness and ability to attend the study visits
Who cannot join
- Any other potential causes of macular edema such as active uveitis, epiretinal membrane, post-operative CME, and vitromacular traction
- Any history of major intraocular surgery (such as cataract surgery or vitrectomy) in the study eye within prior six months, or anticipated need for intraocular surgery within the next six months from the enrollment
- Any major ocular pathology limiting potential vision such as large macular scars, vitreous hemorrhage, corneal opacities, visually significant cataracts, advanced glaucoma, or other types of optic neuropathy
- Any history of Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) in the study eye or anticipated need for PRP within the next 6 months from enrollment
- Any history of DME treatment (focal laser, anti-VEGF, or intraocular/periocular steroids) in the study eye in the past 4 months prior to the enrollment
- Significant renal disease requiring dialysis
Show all 10Show fewer
- Significant heart disease, stroke or transient ischemic attack requiring hospitalization in the past 4 months prior to the study
- Presence of active ocular or periocular infection
- Presence of active intraocular inflammation
- Known hypersensitivity to aflibercept or to any ingredient in the formulation or to any component of the container
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Mississauga Retina Institute
Mississauga, Ontario, L4X 2Z9
Toronto Retina Institute
Toronto, Ontario, M3C 0G9
About this study
The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of micropulse (MP) macular laser in combination with intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of centre-involved diabetic macular edema.
Read the detailed description
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the major causes of visual decline among diabetic patients. Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study has established focal/grid macular laser as the standard of treatment for clinically significant macular edema. More recently, intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, either as monotherapy or in combination with focal/grid laser, have proven to be superior for the treatment of DME compared to laser alone.
Micropulse (MP) macular laser involves applying the laser in a fraction of the time within very small pockets of energy. Unline traditional focal/grid macular laser, the micropulse method of delivery does not leave any visible burns on the retina.
A recent release by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network has shown that deferring focal/grid laser and treating diabetic macular edema with only anti-VEGF may lead to better visual outcomes. Since MP laser does not have the undesired side effect of leaving laser scars on the macula, the study is to show that prompt MP laser in addition to anti-vegf injections may lead to better visual outcomes and/or decreased treatment burden without the undesired side effect of macular scarring.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Being tested
- Micropulse Laser, Sham Laser
- Keywords
- DME, Micropulse Laser, Anti-VEGF
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Micropulse LaserCombination product
Aflibercept injection with Micropulse laser.
Sham LaserDevice
Aflibercept injection with Sham Laser
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aflibercept with Micropulse Laser | Experimental | Aflibercept 2mg (0.05mL) injected intravitreally every 4 weeks or as needed Micropulse Laser at initial visit and reassessed every 12 weeks. Receives: Combination Product: Micropulse Laser |
| Aflibercept with Sham Laser | Sham comparator | Aflibercept 2mg (0.05mL) injected intravitreally every 4 weeks or as needed Sham Laser at initial visit and reassessed every 12 weeks. Receives: Device: Sham Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of injections for each group
Number of intravitreal injections for each group
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Changes in visual acuity
Changes in visual acuity from baseline to 24 adjusted for baseline
Measured: 24 weeks
Changes in visual acuity
Changes in visual acuity from baseline to 48 weeks adjusted for baseline
Measured: 48 weeks
Changes in OCT Central Macular Thickness and Volume
Measurement changes in central macular thickness at 24 weeks
Measured: 24 weeks
Changes in OCT Central Macular Thickness and Volume
Measurement changes in central macular thickness at 48 weeks
Measured: 48 weeks
Number of injections half way
Number of intravitreal injections of each group at 24 weeks
Measured: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes with 2 or 3 lines of visual gain or loss
Improvement or deterioration of vision of 2 or 3 lines at 24 weeks
Measured: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes with 2 or 3 lines of visual gain or loss
Improvement or deterioration of vision of 2 or 3 lines at 48 weeks
Measured: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that achieve 20/20 vision
Eyes that are able to see 20/20 at 24 weeks regardless of baseline
Measured: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes that achieve 20/20 vision
Eyes that are able to see 20/20 at 48 weeks regardless of baseline
Measured: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that have PRP, vitreous hemorrhage, and vitrectomy.
Proportion of eyes in each study group that require panretinal photocoagulation, have a vitreous hemorrhage, or require a vitrectomy during the course of the study.
Measured: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that had vision or OCT improvement
In patients with HbA1c ≤ 8% or separately measured in patients with HbA1C > 8%
Measured: 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2017
- Study start8 Mar 2017
- Primary completion9 May 2019
- Study completion9 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This will be a parallel study comparing the results of patients who receive aflibercept and micropulse laser versus those who only receive aflibercept. The second group will receive sham laser to prevent placebo effects.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Keyvan Koushan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Keyvan Koushan, Toronto Retina Institute
- Investigators
- Keyvan Koushan, MD, FRCSC, Principal investigator, Toronto Retina Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03143192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19228
- Acronym
- DAM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 1 May 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The results of this study will be analyzed statistically which will be shared with other members of the scientific community but the individual participant data along with their identifiers will not be available to other researchers.
Publications
Koushan K, Eshtiaghi A, Fung P, Berger AR, Chow DR. Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser (DAM Study). Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 8;16:1109-1115. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S360869. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35422607
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03143192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAM / 19228
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Keywords
- DME, Micropulse Laser, Anti-VEGF
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Keyvan KoushanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of micropulse (MP) macular laser in combination with intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of centre-involved diabetic macular edema.
Detailed description
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the major causes of visual decline among diabetic patients. Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study has established focal/grid macular laser as the standard of treatment for clinically significant macular edema. More recently, intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, either as monotherapy or in combination with focal/grid laser, have proven to be superior for the treatment of DME compared to laser alone.
Micropulse (MP) macular laser involves applying the laser in a fraction of the time within very small pockets of energy. Unline traditional focal/grid macular laser, the micropulse method of delivery does not leave any visible burns on the retina.
A recent release by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network has shown that deferring focal/grid laser and treating diabetic macular edema with only anti-VEGF may lead to better visual outcomes. Since MP laser does not have the undesired side effect of leaving laser scars on the macula, the study is to show that prompt MP laser in addition to anti-vegf injections may lead to better visual outcomes and/or decreased treatment burden without the undesired side effect of macular scarring.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This will be a parallel study comparing the results of patients who receive aflibercept and micropulse laser versus those who only receive aflibercept. The second group will receive sham laser to prevent placebo effects.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aflibercept with Micropulse Laser | Experimental | Combination Product: Micropulse LaserAflibercept 2mg (0.05mL) injected intravitreally every 4 weeks or as needed Micropulse Laser at initial visit and reassessed every 12 weeks. |
| Aflibercept with Sham Laser | Sham comparator | Device: Sham LaserAflibercept 2mg (0.05mL) injected intravitreally every 4 weeks or as needed Sham Laser at initial visit and reassessed every 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus
- Presence of centre-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with the Central Macular Thickness (CMT) of ≥ 310µm on the spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
- Best corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) between, and including, 20/30 and 20/400 in the study eye.
- Patient's willingness and ability to attend the study visits
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Any other potential causes of macular edema such as active uveitis, epiretinal membrane, post-operative CME, and vitromacular traction
- Any history of major intraocular surgery (such as cataract surgery or vitrectomy) in the study eye within prior six months, or anticipated need for intraocular surgery within the next six months from the enrollment
- Any major ocular pathology limiting potential vision such as large macular scars, vitreous hemorrhage, corneal opacities, visually significant cataracts, advanced glaucoma, or other types of optic neuropathy
- Any history of Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) in the study eye or anticipated need for PRP within the next 6 months from enrollment
- Any history of DME treatment (focal laser, anti-VEGF, or intraocular/periocular steroids) in the study eye in the past 4 months prior to the enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Micropulse LaserAflibercept injection with Micropulse laser. | Combination product | Aflibercept with Micropulse Laser |
| Sham LaserAflibercept injection with Sham Laser | Device | Aflibercept with Sham Laser |
Primary outcome
Number of injections for each group
Time frame: 48 weeks
Number of intravitreal injections for each group
11 secondary outcomes
Changes in visual acuity
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in visual acuity
Time frame: 48 weeks
Changes in OCT Central Macular Thickness and Volume
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in OCT Central Macular Thickness and Volume
Time frame: 48 weeks
Number of injections half way
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes with 2 or 3 lines of visual gain or loss
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes with 2 or 3 lines of visual gain or loss
Time frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that achieve 20/20 vision
Time frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes that achieve 20/20 vision
Time frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that have PRP, vitreous hemorrhage, and vitrectomy.
Time frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of eyes that had vision or OCT improvement
Time frame: 48 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35422607Koushan K, Eshtiaghi A, Fung P, Berger AR, Chow DR. Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser (DAM Study). Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 8;16:1109-1115. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S360869. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The results of this study will be analyzed statistically which will be shared with other members of the scientific community but the individual participant data along with their identifiers will not be available to other researchers.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
CAPRI: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Keyvan Koushan, MD, FRCSC principal investigator
Toronto Retina Institute
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Micropulse Laser in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Keyvan Koushan at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of injections for each group (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03143192, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.