AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic RhinosinusitisRespireNCT03145051

Efficacy of Nasal Irrigation With Respimer® Netiflow® vs Saline Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

A study testing Saline solution and Respimer Netiflow in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Cystic Fibrosis, run by Laboratoire de la Mer at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of nasal irrigation with Respimer® mineral salts solution versus saline solution both administered with Respimer® Netiflow® medical device among patients aged ≥ 11 years and older with cystic fibrosis and suffering from… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
Saline solution and Respimer Netiflow
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Patient with Cystic Fibrosis with or without lung transplant;
  • Patients with allergic chronic rhino sinusitis or no allergic diagnosed by the clinical investigator on the basis of the following signs in variable combination: nasal congestion, headache, sneezing, itchy nose and eyes, runny nose, nosebleeds and nasal crusts, redness and eye discharge present more than 3 months per year.
  • Patient treated on an outpatient basis;
  • Patient agreeing not to take sea baths for the duration of the study;
  • Patient agreeing to respect the procedures for conducting the study, in particular the washout period and follow-up visits;
  • Patient capable of understanding and self-completing the questionnaires;
  • For juvenile patients, the holder (s) of parental authority have accepted the participation of the young person (by signing the informed consent after having taken note of the information note)
  • Member or beneficiary of a social security program

Who cannot join

  • Patients with significant obstruction of the nasal passages due to:
  • a mucocele,
  • polyposis causing nasal obstruction> 90% or
  • severe malformation of the septum causing a nasal obstruction> 90% in whom surgical treatment is recommended;
  • Patients with signs of severity that may require hospitalization, such as: severe impairment of general health, dyspnoea with cyanosis, high fever (> 40 ° C).
  • Patients requiring corticosteroid therapy during the study, with the exception of patients who received pulmonary transplant and were treated with oral corticosteroids at no more than 0.2 mg / kg / day.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with known systemic immunodeficiency status with the exception of patients receiving pulmonary transplantation and immunosuppressed.
  • Patient pregnant (urine test) or without effective contraception (birth control pill, contraceptive patch, contraceptive implant, vaginal ring, intrauterine device or intrauterine device, male condom).
  • Nursing patient.
  • Patient with a contraindication to nasal irrigations as defined in the product leaflet.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-faciale Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal (CHI) de Créteil

    Créteil, 94010

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Cross-over, Multicenter, Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Nasal Irrigation With Respimer® Netiflow® Mineral Salts Solution Versus Saline Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Suffering From Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Prospective, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of nasal irrigation with Respimer® mineral salts solution versus saline solution both administered with Respimer® Netiflow® medical device among patients aged ≥ 11 years and older with cystic fibrosis and suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis.

Being tested
Saline solution, Respimer Netiflow
Keywords
saline solution, minerals, cystic fibrosis, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal irrigation
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Saline solutionOther

    Also called nasal irrigation care

    a nasal irrigation care

  • Respimer NetiflowOther

    Also called nasal irrigation care

    a nasal irrigation care

Study groups in NCT03145051
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Respimer Netiflow mineral salts solutionExperimentalNasal irrigation with Respimer Netiflow mineral salts solution, 4 times/day during 8 weeks using Respimer Netiflow class I medical device
Receives: Other: Respimer Netiflow
Saline solutionActive comparatorNasal irrigation with saline solution , 4 times/day during 8 weeks using Respimer Netiflow class I medical device
Receives: Other: Saline solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in quality of life among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution compared to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.

    Quality of life to be assessed over an 8 weeks period of nasal wash using SNOT-20 questionnaire

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Clinical status evolution among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.

    Clinical status to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using Lund-Kennedy Symptomatic Score (LKSS)

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

  2. Endoscopic status evolution among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.

    Endoscopic status to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES)

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

  3. Mucociliary transport change among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.

    Mucociliary transport to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using saccharine test

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

  4. Evolution of nasal bacterial pathogens among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.

    Evolution of nasal bacterial pathogens to be assessed by bacteriologic swab within ethmoid nasal cavities after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

  5. Patient treatment acceptance of nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® medical device

    Patient treatment acceptance to be assessed by Morisky score after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

  6. Occurrence of adverse events : taste impairment, epistaxis, nasal irritations, nasal burning

    Adverse events to be assessed based on vigilance tracking during the whole study period

    Measured: over an 8 weeks period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2017
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionOct 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03145051
Sponsor's protocol ID
Laboratoiredelamer
Acronym
Respire
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
15 Nov 2016
Last updated
1 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Saline solution and Respimer Netiflow in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Cystic Fibrosis, run by Laboratoire de la Mer at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in quality of life among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution compared to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period. (time frame: over an 8 weeks period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in