AzTrials
AzTrials

Mitral Valve InsufficiencyNCT03145376

Clinical and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Before and After TAVI or MitraClip Positioning

An observational study of Mitral Valve Insufficiency and Aortic Stenosis Senile, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 2 sites in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since October of 2014, the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital has an "Heart Team", a group of selected specialists with the task of assessing and identifying eligible patients for valvular aortic transcatheter implantation (TAVI) or a placement of a MitraClip . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 90 years
What is being tested?
geriatric assessment
How many people
100 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 30 Oct 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVI or affected by mitral valve severe insufficiency treatable by MitraClip positioning.

Who may be able to join

  • Age higher than or equal to 65 aa;
  • the capacity to perform geriatric assessment tests;
  • sinus rhythm at the time of evaluation (for the evaluation of HRV only);
  • to sign appropriate informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • altered cognitive abilities such as to impair the evaluation;
  • hemodynamically unstable patient;
  • Inability or unwillingness to sign informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Gianfranco Piccirillo, MD, PhD contact

+393356759046

gianfranco.piccirillo@uniroma1.it

Federica Moscucci, MD contact

+393403304642

federica.moscucci@uniroma1.it

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Gianfranco Piccirillo

    Rome, 00186

    Federica Moscucci, MD, federica.moscucci@uniroma1.it

    FEDERICA MOSCUCCI, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Policlinico Umberto I

    Rome, 00186

    Federica Moscucci, MD, +393403304642, federica.moscucci@uniroma1.it

    GIANFRANCO PICCIRILLO, MD, PhD, +390649972349, gianfranco.piccirillo@uniroma1.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Before and After Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) or MitraClip Positioning

Since October of 2014, the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital has an "Heart Team", a group of selected specialists with the task of assessing and identifying eligible patients for valvular aortic transcatheter implantation (TAVI) or a placement of a MitraClip .

The specialists taking part to Heart Team are: a cardiologist, a heart surgeon, a vascular surgeon, an anesthesiologist and a geriatrician.

The Geriatrician is called to make a careful multidimensional assessment of the elderly patients who have been suggested for the interventions mentioned above. His role is to assess the degree of co-morbidity and polypathology, autonomy in the common activities of daily living, nutritional status, cognitive status and quality of life. Following this evaluation, together with the other components of Heart Team, it is expressed a collective judgment on the patient's eligibility to these interventions. So, the aim of the present study is to identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.

Read the detailed description

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive chronic valvular disease that progressively and rapidly leads to the development of heart failure. This pathology, which is typical of the elderly, is increasing together with the age of the population and it is a candidate for the development of less invasive and innovative therapies that enable the treatment of older patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity. According to the most recent guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease, the degenerative AS is the most common valve disease in Western countries especially in the group aged over 65 years. The degenerative AS, in its most severe form, is a highly debilitating chronic condition characterized by symptoms as such precordial pain suggestive of angina, transient altered state of consciousness, or syncope, dyspnea and other heart failure symptoms secondary to reduced stroke volume. A recent systematic review (2) estimated the prevalence of AS in the elderly population aged over 75 years amounted to 12.4% while the prevalence of severe AS amounted to 3.4%. The average survival after the onset of symptoms is about 2-3 years. The natural history of the disease is not modified by conservative treatment and, to date, the surgical aortic valve replacement is recommended by both the American and European guidelines for patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction (80 years obtain appreciable results with a less than 10% mortality and morbidity between 5 and 10%. Some conditions, such as the presence of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vasculopathy, chronic renal failure, dementia and other) and the advanced age of the patients, make the surgery too risky or impossible to achieve. Therefore, approximately one third of patients in advanced age is not currently subjected to surgery.

After the "first man" made in 2002, TAVI has been introduced in the clinic in 2007 and has quickly gained critical acclaim. Up to now, about 150,000 TAVI procedures were performed with a growing trend.

The methodical approach of the techniques involve various approaches: transfemoral, transapical, (the two most popular), transaxillary, transaortic.

The enormous diffusion of the method follows the growing demand. Conservative treatment of the SA guarantees any improvement; optimized drugs therapy is able nor to mitigate the symptomatology associated nor to resolve the underlying disease.

The surgery requires the use of extracorporeal circulation and, although conducted in the less invasive way possible, it remains an intervention in which elderly patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity are hardly addressed.

A clinical evaluation and multidimensional geriatric assessment are indispensable to ensure a correct diagnosis of the patient, estimating the risk of periprocedural mortality and morbidity and evaluate the actual possibility of intervention benefit on the patient's overall health.

MitraClip

The severe mitral regurgitation is a clear indication to intervention of mitral repair which has advantages compared to traditional surgery, preserving the contractile function of the left ventricle, reducing the incidence of adverse events related to the system of the prosthesis, by reducing the hospital mortality, morbidity and hospitalization, improving the long-term survival. The surgical risk of mitral plastic surgery presents a percentage lower than 2.5% in the centers that perform no less than 140 operations per year. However, an ejection fraction (FE) of the left ventricle lower than 55% is a negative prognostic index. In addition, the mitral plastic surgery has a long and difficult learning curves, but also the indisputable advantage of less invasiveness than traditional surgery, which allows its use even in patients deemed to be at higher operative risk. The placement of a MitraClip is the evolution of conventional surgery (Alfieri's speech): percutaneous, trans-septal puncture, placing clips on the mitral leaflets to create a dual orifice and therefore decrease or completely abolish the valve insufficiency . The EVEREST II study has shown that this procedure is less effective than surgery in reducing the degree of mitral regurgitation, but the percutaneous repair of mitral regurgitation is more secure and has shown improved clinical outcomes, comparable to cardiac surgery. At a post-hoc analysis, patients who benefit most from the MitraClip patients are elderly with low ejection fraction and functional mitral insufficiency. Considering that the prevalence of mitral insufficiency in the elderly is 30-50%, it is comprehensible how the MitraClip will have certain evolution in numerical terms.

The MitraClip is, therefore, a valid therapeutic option in case of functional mitral regurgitation, since the surgery in these patients is burdened with high mortality, by high recurrence of mitral regurgitation and a long hospital stay.

The MitraClip is to be used in a small number of properly selected patients. The procedural success depends on the ability to choose an individualized therapy for each patient depending on valvular anatomy, valve functionality, on comorbidities and on patient's life expectation, performing an estimation of the risk-benefit of the two percutaneous techniques and surgical intervention.

This estimate and evaluation of the patient must be operated in the geriatric multidisciplinary field, to ensure a comprehensive risk assessment of patients and their best selection.

Aim of the study

Identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.

Being tested
geriatric assessment
Keywords
TAVI, MitraClip, geriatric assessment, heart rate variability, elderly
Medical subject headings
Mitral Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • geriatric assessmentDiagnostic test

    Also called ECG, Heart Rate Variability, Echocardiogram

    1. Clinical evaluation and geriatric assessment with:
    2. CIRS: CIRS (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale)
    3. ADL (Activities of Daily Living);
    4. IADL (InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living);
    5. Mini Nutritional Assessment;
    6. Evaluation of quality of life (Short Form 36, SF-36).
    7. Making a traditional 12-lead ECG.
    8. A single lead electrocardiographic registration (DI, D II and D III) of 5 minutes baseline and 5 minutes with controlled breathing (15 breaths / min), using the Spectralink 2011 program, which allows us to identify and calculate the variables object of study;
    9. transthoracic echocardiogram.
Study groups in NCT03145376
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients before and after TAVI/MitraClipgeriatric assessment of patients before and after TAVI/Mitraclip
Receives: Diagnostic Test: geriatric assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in cognitive impairment evaluation using minimental state examination (MMSE)

    evaluation of the pre and post-operative cognitive impairment using the same test (mini mental state examination, MMSE: tot 28-30 points no cognitive impairment, 24-27 borderline, 19-23 mild cognitive impairment, 14-18 moderate cognitive impairment, <14 severe cognitive impairment)

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months to evaluate possible changes

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Quality of Life

    evaluation of the pre- and post-operative patient's quality of life with SF36 scale: 2 cumulative scores for physical and mental health

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months

  2. polypathology status evaluation with CIRS scale

    Cumulative Illness Rating Scale: ICS and ICC, cumulative final score can vary theoretically vary from 0 to 56

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months

  3. ADL: Activities of Daily Living

    Rating capability to attend 6 Activities of Daily Living (Have shower; Dressing; Going to the toilet; urinary incontinence; walking; having meal: tot score 0-6)

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months

  4. IADL:InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living

    rating capability to perform Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: using phone, shopping food, using means of transport, taking therapy, money management (for male and female) and doing laundry, doing housework and preparing meal evaluated just for female.

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months

  5. MNA:Mini Nutritional Assessment

    Evaluation of nutritional status with mini nutritional assessment score: max 30 points (optimal nutritional status)

    Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months

  6. mortality

    time death after procedure

    Measured: phone call after 6 months from baseline evaluation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion30 May 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03145376
Sponsor's protocol ID
TaMi01
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
27 Mar 2017
Last updated
30 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Mastropietri F, Di Iorio C, Mariani MV, Fabietti M, Stricchiola GM, Parrotta I, Sardella G, Mancone M, Magri D. Possible predictive role of electrical risk score on transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in older patients: preliminary data. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Sep 11;13:1657-1667. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S170226. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30237702

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mitral Valve Insufficiency and Aortic Stenosis Senile, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gianfranco Piccirillo, MD, PhD (+393356759046, gianfranco.piccirillo@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in cognitive impairment evaluation using minimental state examination (MMSE) (time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months to evaluate possible changes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03145376, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in