Mitral Valve InsufficiencyNCT03145376
Clinical and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Before and After TAVI or MitraClip Positioning
An observational study of Mitral Valve Insufficiency and Aortic Stenosis Senile, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Since October of 2014, the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital has an "Heart Team", a group of selected specialists with the task of assessing and identifying eligible patients for valvular aortic transcatheter implantation (TAVI) or a placement of a MitraClip . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis Senile
- What is being tested?
- geriatric assessment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Study population: elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVI or affected by mitral valve severe insufficiency treatable by MitraClip positioning.
Who may be able to join
- Age higher than or equal to 65 aa;
- the capacity to perform geriatric assessment tests;
- sinus rhythm at the time of evaluation (for the evaluation of HRV only);
- to sign appropriate informed consent.
Who cannot join
- altered cognitive abilities such as to impair the evaluation;
- hemodynamically unstable patient;
- Inability or unwillingness to sign informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Gianfranco Piccirillo
Rome, 00186
Federica Moscucci, MD, federica.moscucci@uniroma1.it
FEDERICA MOSCUCCI, MD
- Recruiting
Policlinico Umberto I
Rome, 00186
Federica Moscucci, MD, +393403304642, federica.moscucci@uniroma1.it
GIANFRANCO PICCIRILLO, MD, PhD, +390649972349, gianfranco.piccirillo@uniroma1.it
About this study
Official title: Clinical Evaluation and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Before and After Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) or MitraClip Positioning
Since October of 2014, the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital has an "Heart Team", a group of selected specialists with the task of assessing and identifying eligible patients for valvular aortic transcatheter implantation (TAVI) or a placement of a MitraClip .
The specialists taking part to Heart Team are: a cardiologist, a heart surgeon, a vascular surgeon, an anesthesiologist and a geriatrician.
The Geriatrician is called to make a careful multidimensional assessment of the elderly patients who have been suggested for the interventions mentioned above. His role is to assess the degree of co-morbidity and polypathology, autonomy in the common activities of daily living, nutritional status, cognitive status and quality of life. Following this evaluation, together with the other components of Heart Team, it is expressed a collective judgment on the patient's eligibility to these interventions. So, the aim of the present study is to identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.
Read the detailed description
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive chronic valvular disease that progressively and rapidly leads to the development of heart failure. This pathology, which is typical of the elderly, is increasing together with the age of the population and it is a candidate for the development of less invasive and innovative therapies that enable the treatment of older patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity. According to the most recent guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease, the degenerative AS is the most common valve disease in Western countries especially in the group aged over 65 years. The degenerative AS, in its most severe form, is a highly debilitating chronic condition characterized by symptoms as such precordial pain suggestive of angina, transient altered state of consciousness, or syncope, dyspnea and other heart failure symptoms secondary to reduced stroke volume. A recent systematic review (2) estimated the prevalence of AS in the elderly population aged over 75 years amounted to 12.4% while the prevalence of severe AS amounted to 3.4%. The average survival after the onset of symptoms is about 2-3 years. The natural history of the disease is not modified by conservative treatment and, to date, the surgical aortic valve replacement is recommended by both the American and European guidelines for patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction (80 years obtain appreciable results with a less than 10% mortality and morbidity between 5 and 10%. Some conditions, such as the presence of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vasculopathy, chronic renal failure, dementia and other) and the advanced age of the patients, make the surgery too risky or impossible to achieve. Therefore, approximately one third of patients in advanced age is not currently subjected to surgery.
After the "first man" made in 2002, TAVI has been introduced in the clinic in 2007 and has quickly gained critical acclaim. Up to now, about 150,000 TAVI procedures were performed with a growing trend.
The methodical approach of the techniques involve various approaches: transfemoral, transapical, (the two most popular), transaxillary, transaortic.
The enormous diffusion of the method follows the growing demand. Conservative treatment of the SA guarantees any improvement; optimized drugs therapy is able nor to mitigate the symptomatology associated nor to resolve the underlying disease.
The surgery requires the use of extracorporeal circulation and, although conducted in the less invasive way possible, it remains an intervention in which elderly patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity are hardly addressed.
A clinical evaluation and multidimensional geriatric assessment are indispensable to ensure a correct diagnosis of the patient, estimating the risk of periprocedural mortality and morbidity and evaluate the actual possibility of intervention benefit on the patient's overall health.
MitraClip
The severe mitral regurgitation is a clear indication to intervention of mitral repair which has advantages compared to traditional surgery, preserving the contractile function of the left ventricle, reducing the incidence of adverse events related to the system of the prosthesis, by reducing the hospital mortality, morbidity and hospitalization, improving the long-term survival. The surgical risk of mitral plastic surgery presents a percentage lower than 2.5% in the centers that perform no less than 140 operations per year. However, an ejection fraction (FE) of the left ventricle lower than 55% is a negative prognostic index. In addition, the mitral plastic surgery has a long and difficult learning curves, but also the indisputable advantage of less invasiveness than traditional surgery, which allows its use even in patients deemed to be at higher operative risk. The placement of a MitraClip is the evolution of conventional surgery (Alfieri's speech): percutaneous, trans-septal puncture, placing clips on the mitral leaflets to create a dual orifice and therefore decrease or completely abolish the valve insufficiency . The EVEREST II study has shown that this procedure is less effective than surgery in reducing the degree of mitral regurgitation, but the percutaneous repair of mitral regurgitation is more secure and has shown improved clinical outcomes, comparable to cardiac surgery. At a post-hoc analysis, patients who benefit most from the MitraClip patients are elderly with low ejection fraction and functional mitral insufficiency. Considering that the prevalence of mitral insufficiency in the elderly is 30-50%, it is comprehensible how the MitraClip will have certain evolution in numerical terms.
The MitraClip is, therefore, a valid therapeutic option in case of functional mitral regurgitation, since the surgery in these patients is burdened with high mortality, by high recurrence of mitral regurgitation and a long hospital stay.
The MitraClip is to be used in a small number of properly selected patients. The procedural success depends on the ability to choose an individualized therapy for each patient depending on valvular anatomy, valve functionality, on comorbidities and on patient's life expectation, performing an estimation of the risk-benefit of the two percutaneous techniques and surgical intervention.
This estimate and evaluation of the patient must be operated in the geriatric multidisciplinary field, to ensure a comprehensive risk assessment of patients and their best selection.
Aim of the study
Identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis Senile
- Being tested
- geriatric assessment
- Keywords
- TAVI, MitraClip, geriatric assessment, heart rate variability, elderly
- Medical subject headings
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
geriatric assessmentDiagnostic test
Also called ECG, Heart Rate Variability, Echocardiogram
- Clinical evaluation and geriatric assessment with:
- CIRS: CIRS (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale)
- ADL (Activities of Daily Living);
- IADL (InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living);
- Mini Nutritional Assessment;
- Evaluation of quality of life (Short Form 36, SF-36).
- Making a traditional 12-lead ECG.
- A single lead electrocardiographic registration (DI, D II and D III) of 5 minutes baseline and 5 minutes with controlled breathing (15 breaths / min), using the Spectralink 2011 program, which allows us to identify and calculate the variables object of study;
- transthoracic echocardiogram.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients before and after TAVI/MitraClip | geriatric assessment of patients before and after TAVI/Mitraclip Receives: Diagnostic Test: geriatric assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in cognitive impairment evaluation using minimental state examination (MMSE)
evaluation of the pre and post-operative cognitive impairment using the same test (mini mental state examination, MMSE: tot 28-30 points no cognitive impairment, 24-27 borderline, 19-23 mild cognitive impairment, 14-18 moderate cognitive impairment, <14 severe cognitive impairment)
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months to evaluate possible changes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Quality of Life
evaluation of the pre- and post-operative patient's quality of life with SF36 scale: 2 cumulative scores for physical and mental health
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
polypathology status evaluation with CIRS scale
Cumulative Illness Rating Scale: ICS and ICC, cumulative final score can vary theoretically vary from 0 to 56
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
ADL: Activities of Daily Living
Rating capability to attend 6 Activities of Daily Living (Have shower; Dressing; Going to the toilet; urinary incontinence; walking; having meal: tot score 0-6)
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
IADL:InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living
rating capability to perform Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: using phone, shopping food, using means of transport, taking therapy, money management (for male and female) and doing laundry, doing housework and preparing meal evaluated just for female.
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
MNA:Mini Nutritional Assessment
Evaluation of nutritional status with mini nutritional assessment score: max 30 points (optimal nutritional status)
Measured: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
mortality
time death after procedure
Measured: phone call after 6 months from baseline evaluation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion30 May 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mitral Valve InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Roma La SapienzaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gianfranco Piccirillo, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Investigators
- Gianfranco Piccirillo, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Sapienza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03145376
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TaMi01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Mastropietri F, Di Iorio C, Mariani MV, Fabietti M, Stricchiola GM, Parrotta I, Sardella G, Mancone M, Magri D. Possible predictive role of electrical risk score on transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in older patients: preliminary data. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Sep 11;13:1657-1667. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S170226. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30237702
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Before and After Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) or MitraClip Positioning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03145376
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TaMi01
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis Senile
- Keywords
- TAVI, MitraClip, geriatric assessment, heart rate variability, elderly
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La SapienzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since October of 2014, the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital has an "Heart Team", a group of selected specialists with the task of assessing and identifying eligible patients for valvular aortic transcatheter implantation (TAVI) or a placement of a MitraClip .
The specialists taking part to Heart Team are: a cardiologist, a heart surgeon, a vascular surgeon, an anesthesiologist and a geriatrician.
The Geriatrician is called to make a careful multidimensional assessment of the elderly patients who have been suggested for the interventions mentioned above. His role is to assess the degree of co-morbidity and polypathology, autonomy in the common activities of daily living, nutritional status, cognitive status and quality of life. Following this evaluation, together with the other components of Heart Team, it is expressed a collective judgment on the patient's eligibility to these interventions. So, the aim of the present study is to identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.
Detailed description
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive chronic valvular disease that progressively and rapidly leads to the development of heart failure. This pathology, which is typical of the elderly, is increasing together with the age of the population and it is a candidate for the development of less invasive and innovative therapies that enable the treatment of older patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity. According to the most recent guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease, the degenerative AS is the most common valve disease in Western countries especially in the group aged over 65 years. The degenerative AS, in its most severe form, is a highly debilitating chronic condition characterized by symptoms as such precordial pain suggestive of angina, transient altered state of consciousness, or syncope, dyspnea and other heart failure symptoms secondary to reduced stroke volume. A recent systematic review (2) estimated the prevalence of AS in the elderly population aged over 75 years amounted to 12.4% while the prevalence of severe AS amounted to 3.4%. The average survival after the onset of symptoms is about 2-3 years. The natural history of the disease is not modified by conservative treatment and, to date, the surgical aortic valve replacement is recommended by both the American and European guidelines for patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction (80 years obtain appreciable results with a less than 10% mortality and morbidity between 5 and 10%. Some conditions, such as the presence of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vasculopathy, chronic renal failure, dementia and other) and the advanced age of the patients, make the surgery too risky or impossible to achieve. Therefore, approximately one third of patients in advanced age is not currently subjected to surgery.
After the "first man" made in 2002, TAVI has been introduced in the clinic in 2007 and has quickly gained critical acclaim. Up to now, about 150,000 TAVI procedures were performed with a growing trend.
The methodical approach of the techniques involve various approaches: transfemoral, transapical, (the two most popular), transaxillary, transaortic.
The enormous diffusion of the method follows the growing demand. Conservative treatment of the SA guarantees any improvement; optimized drugs therapy is able nor to mitigate the symptomatology associated nor to resolve the underlying disease.
The surgery requires the use of extracorporeal circulation and, although conducted in the less invasive way possible, it remains an intervention in which elderly patients with polypathology and high degree of comorbidity are hardly addressed.
A clinical evaluation and multidimensional geriatric assessment are indispensable to ensure a correct diagnosis of the patient, estimating the risk of periprocedural mortality and morbidity and evaluate the actual possibility of intervention benefit on the patient's overall health.
MitraClip
The severe mitral regurgitation is a clear indication to intervention of mitral repair which has advantages compared to traditional surgery, preserving the contractile function of the left ventricle, reducing the incidence of adverse events related to the system of the prosthesis, by reducing the hospital mortality, morbidity and hospitalization, improving the long-term survival. The surgical risk of mitral plastic surgery presents a percentage lower than 2.5% in the centers that perform no less than 140 operations per year. However, an ejection fraction (FE) of the left ventricle lower than 55% is a negative prognostic index. In addition, the mitral plastic surgery has a long and difficult learning curves, but also the indisputable advantage of less invasiveness than traditional surgery, which allows its use even in patients deemed to be at higher operative risk. The placement of a MitraClip is the evolution of conventional surgery (Alfieri's speech): percutaneous, trans-septal puncture, placing clips on the mitral leaflets to create a dual orifice and therefore decrease or completely abolish the valve insufficiency . The EVEREST II study has shown that this procedure is less effective than surgery in reducing the degree of mitral regurgitation, but the percutaneous repair of mitral regurgitation is more secure and has shown improved clinical outcomes, comparable to cardiac surgery. At a post-hoc analysis, patients who benefit most from the MitraClip patients are elderly with low ejection fraction and functional mitral insufficiency. Considering that the prevalence of mitral insufficiency in the elderly is 30-50%, it is comprehensible how the MitraClip will have certain evolution in numerical terms.
The MitraClip is, therefore, a valid therapeutic option in case of functional mitral regurgitation, since the surgery in these patients is burdened with high mortality, by high recurrence of mitral regurgitation and a long hospital stay.
The MitraClip is to be used in a small number of properly selected patients. The procedural success depends on the ability to choose an individualized therapy for each patient depending on valvular anatomy, valve functionality, on comorbidities and on patient's life expectation, performing an estimation of the risk-benefit of the two percutaneous techniques and surgical intervention.
This estimate and evaluation of the patient must be operated in the geriatric multidisciplinary field, to ensure a comprehensive risk assessment of patients and their best selection.
Aim of the study
Identify changes in the degree of cognitive decline, of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living, quality of life, nutritional status, pre- and postoperatively (6 months after the procedure) polypathology degree in elderly patients to be undergone or undergoing TAVI or positioning MitraClip because suffering from aortic valvular stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency. The patients undergo to a battery of tests, to a 5 minutes electrocardiographic record to evaluate the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and to a complete echocardiographic evaluation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients before and after TAVI/MitraClip | – | Diagnostic Test: geriatric assessmentgeriatric assessment of patients before and after TAVI/Mitraclip |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVI or affected by mitral valve severe insufficiency treatable by MitraClip positioning.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age higher than or equal to 65 aa;
- the capacity to perform geriatric assessment tests;
- sinus rhythm at the time of evaluation (for the evaluation of HRV only);
- to sign appropriate informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- altered cognitive abilities such as to impair the evaluation;
- hemodynamically unstable patient;
- Inability or unwillingness to sign informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| geriatric assessmentAlso: ECG, Heart Rate Variability, Echocardiogram1. Clinical evaluation and geriatric assessment with: 1. CIRS: CIRS (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) 2. ADL (Activities of Daily Living); 3. IADL (InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living); 4. Mini Nutritional Assessment; 5. Evaluation of quality of life (Short Form 36, SF-36). 2. Making a traditional 12-lead ECG. 3. A single lead electrocardiographic registration (DI, D II and D III) of 5 minutes baseline and 5 minutes with controlled breathing (15 breaths / min), using the Spectralink 2011 program, which allows us to identify and calculate the variables object of study; 4. transthoracic echocardiogram. | Diagnostic test | patients before and after TAVI/MitraClip |
Primary outcome
Changes in cognitive impairment evaluation using minimental state examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months to evaluate possible changes
evaluation of the pre and post-operative cognitive impairment using the same test (mini mental state examination, MMSE: tot 28-30 points no cognitive impairment, 24-27 borderline, 19-23 mild cognitive impairment, 14-18 moderate cognitive impairment, <14 severe cognitive impairment)
6 secondary outcomes
Quality of Life
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
polypathology status evaluation with CIRS scale
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
ADL: Activities of Daily Living
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
IADL:InstrumentalActivities of Daily Living
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
MNA:Mini Nutritional Assessment
Time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months
mortality
Time frame: phone call after 6 months from baseline evaluation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30237702Piccirillo G, Moscucci F, Mastropietri F, Di Iorio C, Mariani MV, Fabietti M, Stricchiola GM, Parrotta I, Sardella G, Mancone M, Magri D. Possible predictive role of electrical risk score on transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in older patients: preliminary data. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Sep 11;13:1657-1667. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S170226. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mitral Valve Insufficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Recruiting
LEFT ATRIAL MONITORING IN PATIENTS BEFORE AND AFTER MITRAL SURGERY - LAMBDA STUDY
Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Multi-center Study of Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Recruiting
Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Exercise-Induced Severe Mitral Regurgitation
Heart Failure - NYHA II - IV, Mitral Regurgitation Functional
Not yet recruiting
Early Feasibility Study of the Capstan Medical TMVR System
Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gianfranco Piccirillo, MD, PhD principal investigator
Sapienza
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Mitral Valve Insufficiency and Aortic Stenosis Senile, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gianfranco Piccirillo, MD, PhD (+393356759046, gianfranco.piccirillo@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in cognitive impairment evaluation using minimental state examination (MMSE) (time frame: Baseline evaluation and a new one after 6 months to evaluate possible changes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03145376, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2017.